JEFF SESSIONS & PAT BUCHANAN: '16 A Choice Between Nationalism And Globalism

usatoday.com/story/opinion/2016/05/12/donald-trump-hillary-clinton-jeff-sessions-editorials-debates/84298310/

archive.is/ZjR4T


wnd.com/2016/04/what-trump-has-wrought/

archive.is/sP5RP


buchanan.org/blog/nationalism-and-populism-propel-trump-124860

archive.is/sVPNc

Session's op-ed is a Drudge headline tonight not sure if it was there throughout the day, the Buchanan one was also a headline a month ago. While you have people like Drudge showcasing the Right's grand shift toward Nationalism, the left, and by extension the whole MSM, is quiet. All I manage to find are pieces complaining about how racist people like Ann, Sessions and Buchanan are for harboring Nationalist sympathies.

The only legitimate article of fear I can find is this one, which I won't link to directly:


archive.is/is6Fj

Yes, this retarded britbong can't distinguish classic American patriotism and tradition from actual nationalism, which is an alien subject to most Americans. Let's push aside the fact she parses important distinctions around "flag-waving" and that she conflates America's identity politics, which is essentially "he dindu nuffin" and "wew wuz." The author does raise a question some on the non-cuckservative right have been asking: Why can't the left name the waking giant?

Other urls found in this thread:

steynonline.com/7432/the-world-they-made
archive.is/Mf2tS
archive.is/tMKNg
humanevents.com/2015/08/25/is-trumpism-the-new-nationalism/
archive.is/I60Oe
thealternativehypothesis.org/
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

bump

We really are at a crossroads

On the left you have Clinton and the globalist empire. If she wins we head towards a NWO and all the horrible shit that has to offer

On the right you have Trump and nationalism. A strong and prosperous future where we are smart with trade and immigration. We work for our own people before anyone else. America first.

There may be some other candidates that run independent to take advantage of the people who hate both Clinton and Trump, but they'll be irrelevant

The future of America and even the world will depend on the events of this magical year, 2016

To be a liberal or a subservient beta defies man's natural urges for greatness. Like domesticated animals who exhibit passivity, these betas were raise in a sheltered environment in which they were conditioned to embrace passivity and "tolerance."

Weakness is a cancer that breeds anxiety and stress. The only way to find peace with life and become content with yourself is to acknowledge the fact that in the end true peace results in engaging in the struggle of life and beating your peers. Sexual, social, and physical superiority are at the core of our desires and any attempts to suppress or cheapen those desires are disastrous to society and your own personal psyche.

TRUMP TAKE MY ENERGY

IT'S MALE CHAUVINISM YOU DUMB FUCKING CUNTS, CAN'T EVEN USE YOUR OWN TERMS CORRECTLY

GODDAMN I'M SO BLINDED WITH ANGER THAT I GOT IT WRONG MYSELF THIS TIME DISREGARD THAT, I SUCK COCKS

This reminds me: does anyone have that article where the writer mentions that the future of the Democrat and Republican parties is Clintonianism and Trumpism, respectively?

Fine with me.

WTF planet have they been on for the last sixty years?

It's interesting to see these mainstream talking heads I used to listen to and read years ago, standing at the crossroads between cuckservatism and nationalism, or at least acknowledging its existence.

Here's Mark Steyn quoting Rush saves me from archiving twice:

steynonline.com/7432/the-world-they-made

archive.is/Mf2tS

I could've sworn there was a similar one written by Buchanan article, no?

But I think you're talking about this one, right?

archive.is/tMKNg

We need a new Mount Rushmore. Who do we put? I'm thinking:

...

Yes, that one. Thanks user! That article was surprisingly not as biased as I thought it would be, and he is right.

>McKinley

In fairness patriotism is essentially a form of civic nationalism. While Holla Forums mostly holds civic nationalism in disdain its demonized in Europe as being racist despite having absolutely no racial element.

...

It's like a downplayed version of the Fascist vs. Communist struggle worldwide of the 30's.

Sure, but I've always seen it as tradition more than civic nationalism, in the American case; flag pole on a lawn; waving the flag; flag lapel pins; flag car stickers.

For example, take the flag raised over a lawn or on the front porch, the tradition is so infectious that foreigners who've recently become US citizens raise their native land's flag side-by-side with their adopted American one. Countless examples of this can be seen in places like South Florida and California, and then you have States like Texas where they proudly display their States flag.

You also have the USA USA chants and the "we're number one" slogan that up until very very recently was said by nearly every politician on both sides. Civic nationalism is really huge in the US when comparing to Europe.

Umm… Washington is already on Mount Rushmore 1, brosky.

Fair enough, user.

No doubt that American patriotism started as civic nationalism, but it all seems like a shadow cast down from times when the display of pride in ones country and people had meaning. In most cases, outside of Trump rallies, it feel hollow, with chanters just going through the motions of established tradition.

I know, I want to keep him on there.

Is there room on Mt Rushmore for another person?
I'm thinking if Trump really does make America great again and his administration sets the foundation for nationalism and the destruction of kike globalism then he deserves a spot

that's a man, baby

We've gone full circle, Holla Forums.

It is no longer (((left vs right))), as we've been conditioned to believe all our lives. But rather the reality of Nationalism vs (((gl0balism))). Its funny to realize that only one man was the root responsibility for this, Trump.


TAKE MY ENERGY, TRUMP

Outside of Ann retweeting nationalists, my searches yield nothing. Any anons have anything?

Using the words of these more mainstream talking heads, and showing their nationalist sympathies, is a good way of redpilling normies.

Found the Pat article I mentioned in my first reply:

Whatever becomes of Trump the candidate, Trumpism, i.e., economic and foreign policy nationalism, appears ascendant.

humanevents.com/2015/08/25/is-trumpism-the-new-nationalism/

archive.is/I60Oe

We're also approaching another economic collapse in 2017.

We should remove Lincoln and put Trump instead.

I like how our 'No longer left vs. right, now the choices are Nationalism vs. Globalism' meme is taking root in the mainstream now.

Accidental quote.

we seem to be leaking into the mainstream at an ever-increasing rate.

We should learn more about non-Jewish globalist elements as well. All psychopaths for example have no loyalty to their nation or even families, only themselves.

I'm bummed that Oswald never took power in Britain. They weren't worthy.

He was pretty jew-blind, though.

Use the following to confuse the shit out of libtards:

It was dumb to portray himself as a fascist fifth column in a parliamentary country distrusting of fascism. The German diplomats even said they outright avoided communicating with him at all because they didn't want the British government to think they were colluding.

So? He did everything else right.


Yeah, so it was a steep uphill battle from the beginning, but I still love him as an orator and as a politician.

I'm disappointed

It's not necessarily a non-issue, but it's nowhere near a big enough issue to dispel the fact that he was one of the smartest fascists to ever live. Besides, he did want Jews out of Britain on nationalist principles, he just didn't target them as a problem specifically.

Have you not seen the post-war interview where he cucks hard for the jews and basically goes full "not an anti-semite!!!"? It really tainted my views on Mosley

Buchanan for VP please

Someone posted the transcript in a thread previously, and my opinion on him was pretty untainted. He's not a God like Hitler, but he's a great guy in the end, in my books.

Trump has denigrated him before but maybe in the past decade Trump has changed his mind about Pat. He's pretty old at 77 too but his mind still seems sharp.

During the later half of the last century the left vs right gave way to liberalism vs conservatism. The left vs right fight didn't go anywhere, it was still there in the background, but now the new fight had the center stage. Right now we are witnessing another shift. The liberalism vs conservatism fight is taking a step back to give way to globalism vs nationalism. Both, liberalism vs conservatism and left vs right will still exist in the background, but the new fight will be the important one.

what a good way to put it

MAGA

guy shouldve been more sharp to say:

"Well go ahead and take it back, see how long it lasts."

yup it's a man

When all appeared to be lost and the people had almost given up hope, suddenly Trump appeared. It was as if God had sent him to vanquish the enemies of righteousness. He had it made and could have died wealthy and content knowing that he had made something of his life, but that was not enough. Trump was driven by an undying will to Make America Great Again, and by extension Make Europe Great Again and Make the World Great Again.

Do not waste this gift.

Never knew the Shah was so based

I think Trump was just but hurt that he lost the reform party nom to Pat. He's had a lot of good things to say about pat lately. Honestly I wonder if trump looked around and thought "wow, what the hell is happening to this country?" and read Pats books. He read Adios America, I wouldn't doubt he also read Death of the West and Hitler, Churchill, and the Unecessary war as well.

I don't think he's our hero but he's very helpful and there's a small chance that he really is hiding his power level; just the slim possibility of that is tremendous if you think about it. This really is a once in a lifetime opportunity like Goebbels 2.0 says at the rallies.

Someone should mail him a hardback copy of The Culture of Critique.

I love these little clips of doomed men. It's like a glimmer of their fate can be seen in their eyes. They yet live in these fragments, becoming warnings for all will listen.
When the world is against you, then you will know what it is to have lived a righteous life.

The world was certainly against Rhodesia. Ian Smith was attacked by both the liberal west and communist east because both promoted false premises about racial equality, bolstered by Marxist neo-anthropology. Those premises once held leave only vile oppression and cruelty as the explanation for the lower standards of black Africans.

Rest easy, Rhodesia.
You were too good for this world.
One day, we're gonna make this right.
We're gonna make them give back our past.

Also notice how he denies being a "racialist" because even he views it as immoral (races are inherently unequal) although it's the only position that could save his nation. It could be that he secretly is a racialist but his fear of revealing that to the press also means he can't refute their criticisms.

It's extremely important that the truth of human racial biology is uncovered again. Rhodesia was doomed because even its leaders accepted the premises tearing them apart and would not refute them; similar to Cuckservatives who have been the standard "right-wing" post-WWII.

Speaking of which here's a great new data-oriented website on just that subject: thealternativehypothesis.org/