BREXIT MOVIE RELEASE: GETS CENSORED

kek, looks like Wikifags are already on it

I don't know enough about it to say.

I just saw that it was removed almost instantly by youtube and I could tell kikery was afoot.

So I posted it here.

All comfy and ready to watch this. Thanks, user.

Try going down the GEX route? Rename the videos, but put the title in the description. Use annotations. And make it explode across hundreds of accounts. Google can't censor so many accounts at one go.

Pretty much what I'm suggesting.

What would be good is if we actually got GEX to upload the video.

Contact him?

The movie has been copyright claimed and will likely reappear when Brexit the Movie proves they have the rights to the music and footage.

Really they should have sorted this before it was released

sure goy it's just the copyright on the used music

...

They uploaded it themselves here
youtube.com/watch?list=PLxmmqnJBgiEBwrMoskhQaIOamCgM_aOvL&v=ltAtUTlm29w

shill is such a dirty word, but i'll spread it around.

vimeo.com/92357576

AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH

This is pretty good. Watching.

What the fuck. What the fuck.

German autism at its finest

Watched the whole thing. Definitely a lolbertarian slant to it in the middle which might turn some people off. If one were to condense the movie I would take that part out except the part about Switzerland.

Also the stuff about trade deals can be condensed.

Stay cucked, farageniggers.

The movie is mostly aimed at bluepilled normalfags, user.

Ultimately, the EU is devoted to suppressing feelings of nationalism by promoting a globalised, multicultural Europe as an alternative. The sooner it is destroyed, the better.

I'm not comfortable with GD either. It's not great they have to do this, it's an act of desperation for Greece at least and they look like thugs. I don't disagree with their politics but more their methods.

They avoided talking about hitler too, and used post war Germany as an example of how to do it right.

...

They're an irrelevant party.
Their support has actually shrunk substantially in Greece despite the refugee nonsense because they were revealed to be a front for the Mafia.

Could they have possibly picked a worse name? The word "sheeple" used unironically on it's own turns normies off faster than holohoax denial.

I didn't know that, but believe it. They need better shirts to look respectable, perhaps brown, or they just look like LARPers.

I know Holla Forums isn't gonna like this but just cause they're far right doesn't mean they're good.

Their support capped at about 12% back in 2012.
Since then it's shrunk down to about 7% and can't rise.

Even the KKE (stalinist LARPers) are now about as popular as Golden Dawn.

LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL BRITS ACTUALLY THINK THEY CAN CHANGE ANYTHING!!!! HAHAHAHALMFAOROFL!!!!!! YEAH RIGHT!

Two world wars.
One world cup.

Your move, Hans

American here. Good luck to you Brits on escaping the EU.

Fair use? They aren't making money off of it and it has dialogue over it.

Clapistan checking in:

Give em hell Blimeys

Britain here. Good luck to you on Trump becoming President.

Who knows, maybe he'll kick our politicians arses into gear and he'll make Britain, Great Britain again.
One can only hope.

This vid is Intro to Libertarianism 101.

...

how poetic

Most people here would agree that free markets and freedom is one of the better ways to go about having a nation.

In the event that free markets are controlled by corporate entities and special interests groups controlling the government and its regulations, nationalist socialism (or something along those lines) becomes the answer with right wing extremism.

They really need to Brexit and turn their island into a fortress. Collapse the tunnel in the channel, 50' walls on every coast facing the continental mainland. If Europe goes down, they can at least keep a foothold strong enough to serve as logistics for an eventual American military involvement.

Securing beachhead and infrastructure is always the worst.

It rhymes

How revisionist.

I-Is it happening?
Britain-American-Russian alliance when?

No need.

If you've ever wondered why the thousands of immigrants trapped in Calais don't just take a boat over to the UK it's because the English Channel is the single busiest shipping land in the world.

It'd be like crossing a duel carriageway in a pair of flip flops all the while 6 foot waves are crashing over you.

*shipping lane

that was some top-notch truthful propaganda.
they even created it in a way that gives the average ADD normies a solid 20 minutes of useful entertainment.

This is the kind of shit that needs a signalboosting Operation behind it, if only brit/pol/ wasn't so demoralized and compromised.

There's the streisand affect just sitting there, waiting to be exploited.

bump.

...

...

BITCOIN
coindesk.com/assange-bitcoin-wikileaks-helped-keep-alive/

it's newspeak for:
we are afraid what you will say, because our empire can fall if you don't support us.

What do you think?

post it on Pornhub, I promise it won't be taken down

(((PURE COINCIDENCE)))

another bump. the sliding today is ovr the top

Worth a sticky imo

God, I'm actually feeling rage.

Portugal suffered the exact same way. Sure our fishing industry wasn't as big as Britain's, but we've been utterly fucked the same way. Fish prices rise to ridiculous levels about middle of the year as we reach our quotas and have to start buying from the Nordics not just cod but everything else.

Fuck the EU. Fucking invoke Windsor and take us with you you damn Albion cunts.

We're so utterly fucked it's our commies advocating leaving.

God I hate lolbergs.

HELL YEAH

FUCK THE EU

Well, if the corrupt EU leaders can't be voted out, the only other option is to behead them like in the olden days. Those who don't learn from the mistakes of history are doomed to repeat them.

Stopped watching at the umbrella segment. They said protectionism/tariffs only bolsters companies that can't compete with more innovative foreign companies while raising prices for consumers. In reality, removing tariffs only enriches the oligarchies of foreign countries that support slave labor. They don't innovate. They steal innovation. That's why they had to use a fictional example with buttons on umbrellas instead of a real world example.

Not to mention that it's not in line with what's happened.

European companies that go back hundreds of years have been taken over by literal shitskins.

Arcelor steel could bought over by the fucking curryniggers for Christ sake.

Tariffs didn't kill the local economic. What killed the local economy were the quotas that only favor the Germany, Belgian and Dutch industries and economies. France's agriculture was absolutely shafted, Spain's manufacturing was destroyed. Britain's fishing was destroyed.

Portugal's milk and fishing was absolutely wrecked. Our swine farmers have fucked staged protests in the form of barbeques at a popular Lisbon square because of the damages that have been done

It's a fucking travesty that shitty 2007 treaty has my capital's name on it.

I think using the steel example was a bad idea. China has been dumping steel below the cost of production in the EU recently which has put a lot of people out of work. They should have got Trump's help with this.

Hue

You wanna know why those comments are blocked? It's not that they're afraid of the lefties. They're afraid of their own altright (or right, or nationalists or whatever you wanna call it) supporters who'll immediately call them out for the lolberg retards they are.

If all Britain's gonna do once they leave is open their markets and let the EU walk all over them with sanctions, they'll be back before you know it begging for the Merkel dick.

Heck this just makes the NO camp come off as controlled opposition

HOLY SHIT

How fucking stupid are you?

I hope you are not correct. I guess nationalism is a very touchy subject there.

They should just leave out all the lolberg stuff and stick to democracy and self determination. They're trying to insert the lolberg agenda into it and it makes a lot of boring and useless parts.

Only a million times smarter than your mom unfortunately.

do we know why?
Is it some copyright bullshit?

Ther sounds suspiciously like bread lines, and like the eu is a convoluted form of communism.

Stupid and cringe-worthy? Did you come straight from Reddit?

Spanish scum fishermen used to fish the whole British quota then dump the fish dead in the port.

Europeans are scum.

Nationalism isn't popular in the UK.

UKIP is a libertarian party.
There is no nationalist/protectionist anti EU party that exists here other than the BNP and they're a dead party with 0% of the vote.

That's the whole reason British people will probably end up leaving. We don't want nationalist parties to start gaining traction so we want to leave now and start making money again rather than succumb to brownshirt thuggery and misery.

Reducing the size of the state, encouraging free trade with the whole world and cutting off useless government industries/red tape are key UKIP policies.
They're why the party is so popular in Conservative constituencies.
Nigel Farage always associated himself closely with figures like Ron Paul and Margaret Thatcher.

When Britain leaves the EU we basically want to be like another Venice with tonnes of trade coming in and out, rich buyers buying up vast amounts of land and a huge services economy. That's what economists like Patrick Minford want to see.
It's what hopefully will happen as the stupid Europeans desperately try and protect their failed industries whilst the rest of the world out-competes them into destruction.

Hitler warned us about the Pan European Movement/Coudenhove-Kalergi in his Second Book. Too bad it was never published.

archive.org/details/ZweitesBuch-AdolfHitlersSecretBook

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_von_Coudenhove-Kalergi#Pan-European_political_activist
In 1922, he co-founded[citation needed] the Pan-European Union (PEU) with Archduke Otto von Habsburg, as "the only way of guarding against an eventual world hegemony by Russia."[13] In 1923, he published a manifesto entitled Pan-Europa, each copy containing a membership form which invited the reader to become a member of the Pan-Europa movement. He favored social democracy as an improvement on "the feudal aristocracy of the sword" but his ambition was to create a conservative society that superseded democracy with "the social aristocracy of the spirit."[14] European freemason lodges supported his movement, including the lodge Humanitas.[15] Pan-Europa was translated into the languages of European countries (not total; Italian edition was not published at that time[16]), Japanese, Chinese and so on (not even into Russian[16]).

According to his autobiography, at the beginning of 1924 his friend Baron Louis de Rothschild introduced him to Max Warburg who offered to finance his movement for the next 3 years by giving him 60,000 gold marks. Warburg remained sincerely interested in the movement for the remainder of his life and served as an intermediate for Coudenhove-Kalergi with influential Americans such as banker Paul Warburg and financier Bernard Baruch.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paneuropean_Union

I'm 20 minutes in, I dont' have all night to watch this right now, but:

YOU HAVE TO KNOW WHO THE FUCKING ENEMY IS IN ORDER TO FIGHT THEM

The reason freedom's (real freedom, not lolberg "freedom", which is privatizing everything so the jews control it) been spinning its wheels and not going anywhere for the last 70 years is because no one wants to name the enemy.

TELL PEOPLE WHO CAME UP WITH THE IDEA FOR THE EU, TELL THEM WHO FINANCED IT

It's on wikipedia, for Kek/Odin/Thor/Pepe/Jeebus' sake!

It might be an America vs Britain thing. You need less trade regulation, America needs more. EU sounds even more cancerous than the U.S. federal govt.

It's a piece of shit.

My grandfather used to pay 90% of his income in the 70s during the madness that protectionism and regulation brought the UK.
He was a fisherman.

What's even madder is how they control every aspect of our fucking lives.
You can't smoke anywhere, you can't do this, you can't do that. All these stupid little European rules we have to follow to the letter from Germany.
The older people who actually remember living through the war years and the destruction they brought are like "hang on, we fought two world wars against Germany and now they control us?".
It's shocking.

They've even started imposing fucking regulations on e-cigarettes.
Why?
Because the big tobacco companies have lobbied those corrupt Euro pricks to drive out the better,safer, healthier competition and strangle UK consumers even more.
When we leave the EU I'm going to be so happy man.

It's a good video against EU's bullshit, but for fuck's sake.

I'm curious about the whole strategy of the British elite. Is Brexit deep down really about jump-starting the North Atlantic Union and therefore just a new way to continue towards ever increasing Global Governance? Wasn't the plan to create a European Union, and a North American Union and then join the two together in a North Atlantic Union? The European Union has been progressing too slowly for the Globalists. The North American Union has faced too much opposition from ordinary people although the Mexican border has been opened up to hurry it along. Are the British elite just going to get out of the EU in order to jump straight to the Atlantic Union instead?

no…

unilad.co.uk/nsfw/do-you-know-porn-better-than-politics-take-the-test/
dude porn lmao

Unfortunately I don't think we'll leave. We may come within 3 or 4 percent of pulling it off but that'll be it, we're then locked into the unelected United States of Europe for life.

There are just too many cucks, migrants and brainwashed sheeple buying into the scaremongering. R.I.P Britannia.

It really is just a modified and stealthed revival of the Soviet Union, right down to its political structure.

How is that democracy exactly? The hell is going on in europe.

The lolberg pearl-clutching about right wing nationalism on the rise is a good way to subvert the masses to feel the need to move their sovereignty from a bureaucratic circlejerk to an industrial circlejerk.

Globalist horseshoes don't realize Swiss wealth only exists because the global Jew store their shekels there in case of shoah.

Everyone stores their money there from Russians to Nazis during WW2.

It's not just a Jewish thing.

Why do you think Hitler pussied out of invading Switzerland when it was right next to him throughout the entirety of the war and part German speaking?

Without trade protectionism, your local economy becomes just a small segment of the global economy. This means your shit gets outsourced and your turn into a consumerist service economy, incapable of self-sufficiency and reliant upon the global economy for basic goods and manufacturing. This makes you and your people reliant on the global elite.

That is to say, it's globalist thinking that opposes protectionist trading.

Trade means nothing.
It's actually small potatoes if you're talking about economies like Britain.

What matters is hot money transfers and FDI.
To keep either of those steady you need an open, clear market with as little tax/regulatory burden as possible.
Don't know what it is now but it used to be that 4 out of every 10 Euros entering the EU went to Britain.We're an extremely attractive economy to invest in at the moment.
Once we leave the EU it'll be even more attractive for investors to come to the UK and buy up assets/splash money everywhere.

Germany is extremely envious of Britain's financial prosperity in recent years.
It's why they and France have been trying their damnedest to impose financial regulations and taxes on transfers and the like, strangling London and making the UK poorer so we aren't as confident about leaving.

Because its nothing but Mountains and passes. Its basically a fortress.

Brexit is bad anyway. The alt-right supports the EU and will turn it into a Euro imperium by publishing dank right wing movie reviews.

Except you wont be able to compete at all and you'll just be at the mercy of China, India and the US.

Which is completely unnecessary. You have enough resources to run your own shit. Tariffs would also help pay for the government, obviously reducing taxes down to the bare minimum.

You don't even need to protect all the industries. Just some key ones like energy, fishing and farming, maybe shit manufacturing for the sake of cultural significance.

Who are the investors?
Arabs from UAE, currniggers from Indian? Chinese?

And they bring with them demands and cultural pressure to shit away from local culture.

Free market is the death of national identity.

You meant cuckswellniggers.

The lack of immigration and culture discussion, the libertarian overtones, definitely not what Farage would produce. (Although even he would, of course, be cautious.)

Actually, they're Russians, Frenchmen, Germans.
Pretty much anyone you can imagine really.

The number of Russian billionaires that keep their money in the UK is staggering.
Chelsea football club is famously owned by one of Putin's buddies.

The free market makes us rich. You'd have us return to the squalor and soul crushing poverty of the 1970s when the trains were an hour late and stank of piss because the government paid workers were too lazy to even move a finger.

And there's several clubs sponsored by Arabs

Manchester City's own by an oil shitter.

Also I'm not saying you can't do what you want, it's your country and your resources. But the free market wont save you any more than the EU.

The point is, what does it matter?

Why does it matter if a football club owner is Russian of American?
How does it have any effect on the performance of the players?
How does it effect the branding?

The needless fear of the free market is what made Britain so unbearably poor during the 70s.
Back then the strikes were so bad rubbish heaps were piled on the streets.
The whole country was like one big Detroit.
Union leaders were screaming about a socialist revolution, the army was planning a coup, there were riots, crime was rampant, nothing worked.

Why is that ridiculous nationalised state governed and regulated economy something we should ever return to?
What remnants of that stupid era we have left in this country are some of the most cancerous aspects of our society.

The BBC, the NHS, network rail.

Why is any of that good for us?
You sound like a Russian yearning for the "good old days" of communism.

Again, do what you will lolberg.

I'm comparing protectionism with protectionism.

In the 70s Britain was a fully protected economy.
The state owned vast amounts of industry.
Suspected soviet spy and prime minister Harold Wilson periodically appeared on TV smoking a pipe eerily like Joseph Stalin.
That decade is known in this country as one of the most miserable and economically destitute decades in all of our history.
So miserable that we were known as the sick man of Europe.

Why would it be preferable for us to return to that stupid state of existence?

What benefit would it bring us?

You've yet to give an answer.

Well if you weren't utter retards and learned to manage where needed and let the market otherwise, you'd get a situation like Imperial Germany that rose to become the greatest industrial power of the 19t century using Bismarck's protectionist policies.

Here's how this goes. You and all your lolberg economists are not smarter than Otto von fucking Bismarck.

What do you do, Otto von Bismarck?

I'd like to hear your response.

Go back to coal?

Wanna know why coal's cheaper than dirt and not used? Because shitty EU (and on a larger scale UN) random environmental restrictions making it completely unprofitable to use coal

Ignore the restrictions, tell the UN to piss off just like the EU, go back to using coal.

...

Oh, and another thing. That's a really shitty example because Bismarck dealt with commies and unions with an iron fist that'd make Thatcher jealous.

If he knew there was a way to make Germany energy independent that didn't rely on coal, he'd make the switch, so long as Germany remained completely independent for it's energy needs.

As a freemason I find this deplorable.

Are you anti-Anglo, user.?

nah im anti protestant muslim atheist

Must be pretty accurate then, eh?

Yeah, It was good up until that point, would have been better without it honestly.

...

Posting one more and then making 4 MB versions for those that may want to shill it on halfchan

...

That was a stupid fucking test honestly

Half of it was pure guessing which is never good, and the other half was simply picking the most logical sounding name (out of Rocky Siffredi, Steve Rocco, or Rocco Siffredi obviously the third one is going to be his actual name)

And everyone's heard of Sarah Palin and Sasha Grey so those two are a given

...

...

I watched it on there but video is slow as shit. Might be due to my country ( /aus/ ) being literally Jewed (see our current PM) out of decent internet.

I'd love to share on my Jewtube channel but I've been put on (((bad standing))) after exposing a feminist pedophile advocate for fraud.

I disagree with most of this, regulation can be pretty good. Especially when it comes to comparing yourself to china, so what if they have high growth rates. Do you even know their cancer rates because of pm2.5 pollution? Have you seen their cities lately? This movie also doesnt show the other side of the regulations, the desire to protect industry so that the jobs remain, by opening up markets, jobs will still most likely be lost to overseas.

At the economic level, if you remove the jew influence and narrow down to somewhat good will. I believe that europe is not doing entirely bad. Some regulation is good, or else you wind up as a polluting china, out of control, water on fire america.

Its a shame that the narrative is being set up as either being bad, or being good. When the reality is that there are many good things in the EU. Fucking roaming was recently abolished as well, universal usb standards…

God, there are so many good things. Though of course many of us look at it through the immigration lens, and on that you are right, if you were to focus on that, and on the jews forcing it down on europe. No other option but the exit is reccomendable. Though if we didnt have the joo influence, no immigration, staying in the EU for economic reasons would be different.

Post it anyway

Are they being dishonest with the use of the word "law"? I can't imagine they're confusing it with British or ISO standards.

What do each of these "laws" mean and how far reaching are they?

A company makes a pillowcase but they use a very flammable material - against all BS/ISO standards relating to pillowcases/furniture/upholstery/whatever. Are they breaking some separate special EU law?

What's going on here?

hse.gov.uk/work-equipment-machinery/standard.htm

gov.uk/guidance/product-safety-for-manufacturers

Although the image they are conveying is dishonest, they didn't state it was British law but rather EU law.

The issue of the EU is the complete lack of respect for the cultures of Europe and it's attempt to centralize.

I would very much like to see a united Europe on a foreign politics level. Something similar to the HRE that would allow for maximum decentralization on an internal level.