Cruz and Kasich dropping out at the same time is part of a scam for a contested convention

Cruz and Kasich dropping out at the same time is part of a scam for a contested convention.

5 hits for "Clinton"
0 hits for "Trump"

Sadly Trump is taking the bait. He just said multiple times at his rally in WV that they don't need to go and vote in the primary to "save it" for the general.

Trump still NEEDS to get 1,237 for the first round of voting at the convention.

This has me incredibly suspicious of everyone.

Bump

what the fuck am i looking at, faggot?

I though that the simultaneous dropout might be a gambit.
Keep the pressure on, shout to the twitsphere that you can't stop until 1237

Tl:dr go out and vote idiets

Of course it is. The RNC gets to vote on the convention rules during the convention. This is by design. They could pass a rule "Nominees cannot have a last name starting with 'L'" if they want, and it's perfectly legal.

What's interesting is that prior to this election, they've always been able to obfuscate how they are selecting the nominee and pretend like its the voters. This year, despite all the media and all the propaganda and all the ballot stuff, the results did not turn out the way they were "supposed to."

Even if Trump gets 1,237 the RNC still can stop him from an uncontested ballot. I guarantee you that all the cards have not been played yet. But Trump is a very shrewd man, and I'm sure he knows this.

see;

Right. I understand that, but there's not point in handing them the contested convention.

bump

I'll be mailing my ballot tomorrow in Washington state. Our primary isn't for a couple weeks, but I got my ballot in the mail today.

We need people on Twitter to tell him people still need to vote, and we need these people yesterday.

oh look it's the resident pol schizophrenic

OUT OUT OUT

Cruz and Kasich gave up goysguys, no point in showing up to vote for Cruz or Kasich now that they gave up.

How do you do, fellow kids?

The RNC has picked Trump, they've made that very clear. It's a done deal.

k

YOU HAVE TO GO BACK

...

I know Trump has a plan and all but holy shit. His campaign managers must be on heart medications for some of the shit he says and does.

Look at these faggots here, mods are more than welcome to get a good laugh by comparing your bullshit to my posts.

Libertarian Nationalists > NatSoc fags

Hey, why didn't you reply to me? I told you to fuck off too :( Don't leave me out…

Oh. It's the lolbertarian faggot.

Lolbertarian and nationalism are very expressly mutually exclusive. The ideals of each are counter to the ideals of the other. Whatever. Filtered, reported.

Libertarianism focuses mostly on economics, Nationalism is politcally focused. The guy's a faggot, but there's no reason they are incompatible.

What the fuck is a "libertarian nationalist".

I used to be a libertarian Ron Paul supporter until I realized how cucked this ideology was on border control and race realism. Ron Paul (while I think he would make an outstanding sec of state/sec of treasury in Trump's administration) has a horrible record on border control and opposes deportations, and his son Randlet is such a joke that he honestly condemned Trump for wanting to make the GOP the "lily-white party".

As long as there are international kikes in this world we need a powerful government to stand up to them. Suicidal devotion to "small government" means our nation will get flooded with shitskins forever.

They are unable to exist together. Lolbertarian = the individual, nationalism = the group.

Tell me how that's compatible? Oh never mind; filtered, reported.

You NatSoc fags are delusional. Trump's basically a LN.

Libertarianism doesn't work in reality, it's foundationally fucked because it's essentially globalism, open borders, free trade, etc.

Libertarian Nationalism means all the benefits of Libertarian ideology WITHIN a country, but the country itself is NATIONALIST at the border/interaction with the global world.

LN solves the huge fucking holes in libertarianism.

k

Works just fine lrn2logic, the problem is you're just poorly educated and paranoid as fuck.

...

y?

It literally does. He's sliding the narrative out of the recent posts by spamming his shitlib ideals.

what is paleocon Alex.

For example;
This thread is now not talking about the context of the OP at all.

Nothing about WV or getting Trump to 1,237 delegates is being mentioned for more than half the thread until now.

That is by definition sliding.

He's a Paleocon or National Socialist, I've never heard LN used.

k

I freaked out too at first when Trump kept saying "Don't vote!" during the rally, then I realized that's the point. He just accomplished two important things:

1) His supporters who have been following Trump closely and understand he needs those 1237 delegates are pulling their hair out are in a panic, thinking that Trump made a mistake. This is GOOD. This means that anyTrump supporters whose energy was dying down and began thinking that Cruz and Kasich suspended meant that they could relax now are revved up and ready to support Trump, not out of just passion, but passion and earnestness. Furthermore, this is going to encourage Trump supporters to begin to speak out, that and the fear of Trump losing is scarier than getting nastiness from dems for voicing your opinion. Once more people speak up then fence sitters will see Trump supporters as more normal.

2) He's banking on the media jumping on his "gaffe" like flies on shit. You can almost hear them crowing "Trump doesn't even know he needs 1237 delegates! He thinks he's already won! What an idiot!" on every news station tomorrow morning (a FRIDAY morning, I might add) and all but advertising for Trump to go out and vote for him. This is good, especially since the media had already been talking a lot about Trump picking secretaries and the GOP coming out as supporting Trump then older people especially could honestly get confused and think that they don't have to vote.

Hopefully.


Likely but I can see it not happening as it would help thwart a contested convention.

And they're both literally the same if you change contexts.

So you want socialism within?

...

k

Who's topic diluting now? [happy faggot?]

Well good luck, if you think ethnic solidarity is even possible without draconian measures (which requires a massive socialist government). I'd settle for nationalist solidarity, because you're never going to get ethnic purity.

...

The Third Reich government was ardently socialist and very powerful, and yet was widely adored by the German people for keeping out jews and communists and revitalizing the economy from Weimar-era poverty.

There's nothing wrong with big government – it simply has to be the right sort of government, and the jewish progressives we have running things right now are illegitimate rulers. We need to place our country in the hands of a Hitler-esque leader (I've got faith in Trump) who can act unilaterally and decisively to deport shitskins and remove jews from banking positions without being obstructed by senseless beauracracy.

...

...

...

You're right, nothing wrong with big government in theory, the problem is people are corrupt, and the more people in government, the more corrupt it becomes. Big government will never work because human nature is corrupt.

By "big" I meant powerful/authoritative, not inefficient. My word choice could have been different but I meant a fascist-style government similar to what was practiced in Germany in the 30's.

No government is completely free of flaws, but we are watching literally every Western democracy implode before our eyes. Because of their idiotic, controlled bureaucrats, they are allowing mass-shitskin immigration to completely displace the native populations and voting every four years is doing nothing to fix things. Within decades whites will be a minority in every country that we inhabit thanks to the failings of democracy.

National Socialism is imperfect but I can guarantee that the German people wouldn't be under threat of extinction if Hitler was governing and there wasn't a world war.

Never going to happen. You should head over to >>>Holla Forums because they are closet fascists who want to control everything.

You leftist authoritarian fucks makes me sick.

Nationalism is different from socialism. If Germany was still nationalist and had strict immigration policies they wouldn't have the problem they have now. There isn't anyone on Earth who would say Germany isn't already some socialist fuck country.

Grow up.

yeah and Ron Paul Libertarianism was about cutting them off from the big government that lets niggers nig with welfare.

If you add a big Government it'll be controlled by the majority and in this case it's women, niggers, spics etc.

Trump is a genius. The media can't resist the urge to call him out on being wrong about something. So they'll jump on the story and every media outlet will end up shouting about how people still need to vote in primaries. Then the voters can't miss the message.

You're a joke and a faggot. The Third Reich should be our model for government.

Who the fuck is advocating for universal suffrage on here?

Quite the contrary, without a strong government jews will continue to flood us with shitskins. As shitskins outnumber the native population of whites they will carry more political clout so leaders like Ron Paul could never be elected and enforce small government reforms. The government would begin to resemble the shitskins it serves without a strong fascist leader to set things straight.

Holy shit it sure is NEWFAG in here. All you niggers taking the "lolbergtardian nationalist" bait need to an hero.

Need proof that shilling is afoot? Look how quickly the derail attempt was in this thread. Irresistible bait was laid lolberg's finest

You've seen ratto's plays before, he doesn't speak truthfully, ever.

So shouldn't we tell Trump?

Trump rides on populism, in a decade or so whites will be a minority in the US.

Whatever populist big government there is in the future will be for a largely Hispanic population.

Good luck faggot, it would take more than shitposting here to accomplish that goal, and I doubt your fat ass could even lift yourself out of your chair.

Fuck off D&C. The only thing that matters in this thread is reminding everybody that they need to vote Trump.

Why wouldn't everyone here vote for the only Nationalist running? I mean we all have nationalism in common, it just that the libertarian nationalists aren't leftists like natsoc.

See

They're quietly trying to cheat him out off votes.

It's already over. If they turned on Trump now the GOP would get completely obliterated.

Game is over.

It's not over until it's over. Letting your guard down is fucking stupid considering all the shit they pulled.

That is exactly what they'd say if their hope was for people not to go out and vote for him such as to bring about a contested convention.

I mean, Jesus Christ dude, you actually trust the fucking GOP?
Are you insane, retarded, or just that new?

a what?

Libertarian Nationalist.

tl;dr: An oxymoron used by shills recently because it is extremely good bait.

If you want their definition, then they say it's what America had been before the modern era. ie: Protectionist foreign policy with internal free markets, and borders.

This is of course not useful for our situation, as it has no fix for the jew question, the degenerates, and the nonwhites that are already here, other than "the free market will fix it."

Here, a starter kit on what to do if you spot one, other than filtering of course.

I wondered if that's what he meant; I've heard people bantying that about. Libertarian Nationalism isn't a thing. It's fucking stupid.

It is a 'thing' and I am one. I'm not going anywhere, so you can spend your time crying like bitches or just accept that it's superior to natsoc.

You're on the right track my friend.

It's certainly what he meant. They are constantly trying to claim that America pre-modern era was LibNat, or that Trump is one, or that they are the sole defenders of American principles left on this board of Nazis.

You'll see that have a predictable pattern too.

See what I mean? I had hidden while writing that post. He goes right to the bait, doesn't even wait. In all honesty, if you see any libertarian, whether or not they're "nationalistic," you're best off pre-emptively filtering them.

...

Check this NatSoc faggot out, can't handle LibNats so he has to filter because he needs a safe place just like a SJW bitch to avoid being triggered.

Here, even though you're filtered, I'll still give you a (you), and one more shekel in your account. I'm feeling generous, after all Trump is winning, and it's one step closer to a National Socialist America.

...

NatSoc national anthem

Welp, Kek just confirmed it, Libertarian Nationalism is complete shit

...

how does socialism combat degeneracy when it is the only thing that enables it?
What is socialism but government enforced dysgenics?
"nationalism" doesn't fix broken, you should know, being a Holla Forumsak, that Hitler didn't care about economic systems, he cared about winning a war that he intended to start. Socialism works great for a generation but slowly breeds corruption and inefficiency. If you need an example you need only examine Donald Trump, Politicians can't even do politics better than the free market.

They're basically special snowflake paleocons

Recall;
Socialism
National socialism

Are not equivalent.

It doesn't, but NatSoc on the other hand does it by having both the people and the gov't police the racial purity, as that is the main purpose of the gov't under Natsoc.

He cared about the German people and the white race. He tried to avoid the war, extend the olive branch to Britain and America multiple times.

Not with that attitude user!
Cleanse yourself.

k

I'm already white. You'll have to try to purge me yourself, but it won't go well for you.

What does national socialism do that is socialism? why is it called national socialism if it is not the fusion of those two ideologies?

Hitlers first dictates to his economic managers was to get the country ready for war and to do whatever measures necessary, he didn't care how it was done.

This is some serious autistic obsessive compulsion right here.

...

...

This is and has been explained thousands of times just this year on Holla Forums.

It's not that there aren't similarities. But it's like the similarities between a bushnigger in sub-Saharan Africa and an upper class white student in the US.

The big ones people try and make out to be equals or compatible which are in no way compatible are Nationalism and Libertarianism.

Libertarianism believes in forced equality through outcome, and "inopportunity?" pushed on those who do just about everything anyway.

Libertarianism believes in open borders.

Libertarianism believes in anarchy (total and pure "freedom") because of da big bad gubmint. All while suckling on the teet of said big government.

Libertarianism believes in subjectivity over objectivity.

If the distinction is so obvious why are you failing to explain them?
By what justification to you believe libertarianism advocates forced anything?
By what justification do you believe libertarianism advocates the redistribution of wealth to transport, inoculate, inspect and resettle people from other countries?
By what evidence do you suggest that Libertarianism 'sucks the teet' of big government?
How can you assert that libertarianism values subjectivity over objectivity, as it is the political belief in the objective results of survival of the fittest?

I can make baseless assertions too but I'd rather you explain why your ideology is named socialism if it is not socialism. I also want you you to know that as a libertarian myself I personally help in my community because I feel the obligation to, I don't need a gun to enforce morality upon me.

REMEMBER YOU NIGGERS "PRESUMPTIVE NOMINEE" MEANS JACKSHIT!!!

UNTIL WE GET CONFIRMATION FROM THE RNC THAT TRUMP IS THE NOMINEE WE CANNOT REST!!!

WE HAVE TO REMAIN IN FULL WARMODE, THE GOP IS GOING TO ATTEMPT TO HAVE DELEGATES THROWN OUT OR CONTESTED!!!

WE CAN'T SETTLE WITH 1237, WE NEED TO AIM FOR 1488 (AT MINIMUM) TO APPEASE THE MEME GODS!!!

If they pull some shit now, after declaring him the nominee for weeks, there will be riots. I don't think they will go that far. Nonetheless, everybody needs to go vote regardless. No reason to not make his win as airtight as possible.

This tbh fam.

And we need to be watching like fucking hawks - they're up to something.

(single check)
(trips check)

Finally on topic replies ignoring the shills.


Sadly 1,498 is the max it seems Trump can get. Or around there. With the way states do ballots you can bet the remaining state's ballots will have as many non-Trump names still present. People who dropped / suspended can still win delegates.


Hopefully. It's still not worth just going by and allowing that option to come. The best path is to supersede that event and prevent it.

honestly, if Paul Manafort is not concerned, I'm not terribly concerned either. If he has no one else on the ballot, how are not ALL of the delegates in those states going to him?

Maybe I (OP) am Paul Manafort.

Carly Fiorina is the worst possible person Rato could have picked, it's like he wanted his campaign to die. He should have picked Jeb as his running mate. At least that would have been hilarious.

IF TRUMP TELLS YOU NOT TO VOTE, STILL DO IT FAGGOT

kek to the moon

Well technically they are still on the ballot.

Time for a Jeb surge?

It would have been a better world for YEB! to be back in our lives. Even though it would have only been for 3 days, it would have bane much better.

wouldn't that be hilarious if they tried to give the nomination to Jeb and Trump ran up on stage and said,
"Hold it you dummies! Jeb is a mess!"

If only Jeb gave out his damn guacamole recipe with that expensive piece of shit bowl.

Men of honor putting the needs of their country and countrymen before petty pride and greed. Men who understand that it is Order that separates us from the beasts.

I'm still going to vote for Mr. Trump.

Gotta stay on the right side of history.

Not him but I'll give it a go.


That's the big concern the NatSocs and others go on about. Libertarians' place the highest value upon the individual and the individuals rights, while the NatSocs place the highest value upon the community and the Duties inherent in being part of one.

See the Libertarians push for individual rights and "Treat other as you wish to be treated." eschews duty and responsibility, cause why clean up the trash on the side walk when the TrashCo truck comes by once a day as per contract? the NatSoc on the other hand, knows that the TrashCo truck comes by once a day, but sees it as a responsibility of his As a Godd Person, the same as the Libertarian see himself. to pick up the trash so his community is cleaner.

You just told them at the Charleston rally to not vote until October. What the fuck are you doing, Donald?

Okay, but how can he not get the delegates? So long as a small number of people vote in every primary, he should have it. He is unopposed.

This is completely separate from weird rule changes.

I think you're generalizing a bit and also confusing national socialism with fascism.

Fascist motto would be "the state is people and people are state, ergo people should do everything they can to better the state". Much like a corporation.

National Socialist motto would be "people make the state and the state should represent the people, as it is the people who make it".

You can see parallels between both, but ultimately fascism promotes doing everything an individual can for the betterment of state. National Socialism is more along the lines of the state which represents the individual and his interests so much, that individual's interests will be tied to the interests of state.

Subtle differences, but there are still some, especially regarding philosophy of "making the state better".

Hmm. yeah I see your point. I still hold by my summary.

>National Socialists place highest value upon the Community Which is not the same as The State, but is a part of The State.

If only like a hundred people go out and vote for Trump, and Soros buses in 200, then we see a Yeb! surge, contested convention, and the RNC screwing Trump out of the nomination.

I was going to say the same thing to you… since I actually have higher education in this subject matter :^)

It's called Civic Republicanism, or Democratic Republicanism. Pic related is probably the most authoritative source. (I can provide you with more if you like) Its a version of liberalism, but it is very different from classical liberalism/libertarianism.

Also, classical liberalism was always "national" in a lot of ways. Jesus, those guys are stupid.


oh yeah, I know

you're fucking retarded. the LN isn't a thing

Get the word out on SM lads. They all still need to vote.

was getting caught a part of your plan?

meant to say social media once

What? Do you understand anything? He IS opposed. He won't be the only name on the ballot.

Even if a candidate drops out suspends his campaign, they can still win delegates.

I still don't get it

Just make sure you and your friends continue to go out and vote. The last thing we need is for the gop to try and worm their way out when the finish line is so close. We can then relax for a bit once we hit the magic number before destroying Hillary in the general or Bernie if dems split.

Trump's just the 'anti-establishment wildcard' character played by the establishment to make the election look real, but obongo will just declare marshmallow law for '4 moar yeerz!!' after 9/11 part 2: electric boogaloo.
Then he'll give his tranny wife a suckjob while trump's peaceful-protest supporters claw at the (nigger)house door

Those sneaky rats are up to something for sure.

I agree with this fellow pol member, you guys are paranoid :^)