Indiana Results Monitoring Thread

So the last time I had one of these, half of you stupid boyim shat all over it while the other half ignored it, despite producing conclusive evidence that the vote was rigged in Florida and North Carolina.

In Indiana, delegates are given in a WTA (Winner-Take-All) fashion to the winner of each Congressional district, with each district receiving 3 delegates. Delegates are selected by each Congressional district's GOP - meaning no, stormderps, you don't get a say in who is chosen, and since only members of the pre-existing Congressional District Committee (one for each Congressional district) may even attend the meeting, you don't get the watch the process or hear their deliberations, either (Rule 10-1). Delegates are bound to vote for the highest vote-getter for their Congressional district on the first ballot only, after which they become unbound (Rule 10-2).

Source: indiana.gop/sites/default/files/Republican State Party Rules .pdf

The strategy for district-based WTA is to nickel and dime Trump out of delegates, meaning that we are most likely to see Trump narrowly lose a few key counties that will cause him to lose districts, and thus lose delegates. This is most likely to be accomplished via a lone state employee altering elections returns either as they come in or after they've been published in hopes that no one is watching - indeed, in past elections, no one has been. Luckily for us, the Indiana Elections Divisions conveniently provides us a website to monitor county election returns as well as the statewide aggregate, with update times and total ballot counts for each candidate.

Action Steps
1. Visit in.gov/apps/sos/primary/sos_primary16 and select two counties from the dropdown list, each in separate tabs, to monitor. Post "#CountyName" ITT when you select a county to monitor.

2. Also keep a tab open for this in.gov/apps/sos/primary/sos_primary16?page=office&countyID=-1&partyID=-1&officeID=36&districtID=-1&districtshortviewID=-1&candidate=# page, which is the statewide presidential vote count totals for all candidates of both parties.

3. Take screenshots every time the data is updated. If ANYTHING changes, screenshot, save, and upload. If you do not wish to include your desktop and browser, use a page saver such as Pearl Crescent to capture only the data on the page you're viewing.

Other urls found in this thread:

er.ncsbe.gov/?election_dt=03/15/2016&county_id=0&office=FED&contest=0
in.gov/sos/elections/files/Voting_Systems_Used_in_Indiana_2015.pdf
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

Wait Rach why are you trying to help Holla Forums achieve something it wants?

>>implying that is not always the case
smh tbh lad
We need to have mandatory reading comprehension tests here.

FMS (Frequently Made Shitposts)
1. HURRR UR DUM! WE WON' FIND NUFFINS!
I was personally able to observe multiple instances of elections fraud using the tactics I listed above. If we had a team of people on this, we could likely catch more. Given the growing importance of each and every state contest, it is more and more likely that elections will have their results altered.

2. wel hw u no dey's fuxin w/ da results
As stated in the OP, my last thread resulted in proof that tens of thousands of votes in NC were altered (likely Trump-to-Cruz conversions) before publication of various updates, and that votes were taken away from nearly every candidate in Florida in the middle of returns coming in. The fact that results are being altered in the middle of election night returns suggests that it is merely one employee per state involved in the adjustment of a few numbers. Perhaps they do it because they support a candidate other than the winner, or because they are being bribed, blackmailed, threatened - the possibilities go on. Regardless, the available evidence suggests a small footprint for the elections rigging, meaning that this isn't an overarching statewide conspiracy but rather a surgically-targeted alteration of the data being done in secret, with the fewer people involved, the better for whoever is organizing it.

3. B-b-but Rach, if they really are just rigging the election in this way, why would ZOG do it so openly and not in total secrecy?
Perhaps because they don't have to. How many news articles did the last thread generate? How many journalists looked into it? How many people outside of Holla Forums were even paying attention? Zero. There is no need for a more convoluted plan that the one I posit.

I'll take #Dearborn and #Wabash . Now you stupid boyim take two counties each as well or get mown down by the
LEFT WING DEATH SQUADS
at work here.

Hey Rach how many of your Reddit buddies are gonna commit suicide when the "fascist" Trump wins?

Why do you keep coming here?

So I was poking around the site's code and found this on the statewide presidential results page.

Statewide   (D&R) Democratic Hillary Clinton 0  
Every other candidate's section is identical. It looks to me like this means that statewide vote totals will have to be manually inserted, and possibly even manually added up as well. Whereas other states - including ones that had their results altered, like North Carolina - have automatic update systems such as that you don't even have the option to manually enter in data like this, it appears that Indiana has yet another gaping vulnerability in its election reporting systems at the state level.

Can any HTML-script-Java-coding-guru-white-privileged-nerd give insight on this?

Looking at it, it is as you say, they are manually entering it. It means easily that they could manually enter in whatever they want, but then I didn't pay close enough attention to how other states were doing with electronic machines. States like AZ also did paper ballots, but I don't remember where else.

That male chauvinist pig will never win. #ReadyForHillary #DealWithIt