Those things are the literal definition of Capitalism.
Your asinine rejection of the definition of words you happen to dislike does not alter reality to suit you, it merely makes you yet another censorious leftist idiot who wants to evangelically proselytize their own personal special snowflake dictionary instead of actually debating and discussing the merits and drawbacks of systems.
I would ask you if you follow the Austrian Theorist school of economic thought, but I have a sneaking suspicion you wouldn't even understand the question.
Colonial Scrip, Lincoln's Greenbacks, England's Tally Stick system, and National Socialist Germany's labor-backed fiat currency are the best systems, both actual and, in the case of Greenbacks, proposed, that we have ever had, specifically because they directly combat the gambit of the banking and donor class which funnels money upwards. The 90% give their money to the 10%, then 10% to the 1%, and the 1% to the 0.1%. All of these systems are, in other words, usury proof, or at the very least, powerfully resistant to it.
Only a system of money which prohibits the artificial introduction of scarcity (which is the ultimate Globalist plot for controlling the masses, by convincing them that there isn't enough food, water, or electricity to go around when there is) and encourages the constant circulation of money instead of the aggregation of wealth is suitable for long-term economic stability and health.
This is something even the Libertarians, and especially Ron Paul, fail to grasp, because tying a currency to gold still allows for the enforcement of artificial scarcity, to the tune of flooding or starving the market of bullion. Spoiler alert: out of all of the gold that has been mined in the 20th century onwards, only about 20ish percent of it is in circulation as backed currency or jewelry. Over 80% of it is unaccounted for, which means it is being held by private hands in off-the-books stashes. Switching to gold is the fake revolution meant to co-opt the true economic and financial redpill. You're just trading one petrodollar for another, only instead of the bankers indirectly controlling the value of our wealth by manipulating the Arabs, they can directly control it since they have all the gold.
Usury is not Capitalism. Bribery is not Capitalism. Capitalism does not "inevitably lead" to either of these two things.
Go watch Princes of the Yen, The Money Masters, and Damon Vrabel, and start browsing realcurrencies.wordpress. Give yourself a fucking education, instead of the blatant faux-revolutionary progressive brainwashing you've obviously been receiving.
Benjamin Franklin had no formal schooling whatsoever in the field of economics, just a large amount of common sense, an English lawyers education, and relatively clean fingernails that smelled oddly of fish, and yet he'd shit all over you, your Marxist professors, and every single one of the stuffed Austrian turkeys the Jewish elite bribed into extolling the virtues of usury.
It's like you don't even understand why Hitler actually had war forced onto him in the first place, or something.