Can we just ban nationalism please?

You leftists are so weak and cowardly that you would be slaughtered easily. And you know it. All you will do is hide in your gun "free" safe spaces and cry.

Dubs confirm
Leftist are weak cucks

They are collectivist cucks. If you look at those anti-Trump protestors, most of them a scrawny little faggots. If any one of those people were on their own, they would be shy and passive if and avoid any sort of confrontation. Yet when they are in a group they get a sudden rise in self esteem and think they can do anything. The leftist mob mentality is fucking cancer. All of these faggots need to be beaten until cured.

Beta vote left
Alpha vote TRUMP

Wrong. Don't cherrypick.

Read this paper: papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1798773

It isn't their thesis but they showed that strong men support their own interests when it comes to wealth distribution. So, poor strong men support welfare, but rich strong men oppose it, and the opposite is true for weak men.

What this means is that leftists should be the more muscly group because they are comprised of a coalition of weak rich men and strong poor men, whereas rightists are comprised of the strong rich men and weak poor men group. Since there are more poor men than rich men, leftists will have more strong guys.

The right wing media reported that paper as saying that right wing men are stronger, but that's not what it says.

But in reality,they look like this

You realize that these studies are usually completely biased and they often disregard certain factors while conducting polls? Social science is a fucking joke.

A few cherry picked examples do. Compare a million leftists and a million rightists and the leftists will be the big guys overall.

Have you any specific objections with the methodology or do you just assume something is wrong and never update your beliefs?

Yes, I'll give you an example with the "wage gap" conspiracy theory.

Here are some of the factors that Social science left out of the collectivist poll they conducted while trying to determine the "true" wage gap between men and women:

>women decide to choose certain jobs that pay less

These three factors alone would destroy the wage gap theory. If you look at specific job titles and compare the wages between men and women you'll notice that there is no gap and in some cases, women make even more than men.

Like I said, social science is a joke. It's not scientific in any way and should be seen as a pseudo-science.

Poor strong men support capitalism, so that they can work hard and not be poor. The American working class supports Trump. Trump is taking the unions away from the democrats. That's why the scum bag leftists fear him so much.

That's what your problem is. You are engaging in wishful thinking, high up in your ivory tower. Tell your professor Shekelberg from Goodgoy University, that real life does not match his unsupported theories.

No, I mean with that particular study.

It could be because you live in a world composed of nations.

Wrong. Read the paper. This is not what was found therefore what you are saying is just a myth unless you can disprove the study.

It most likely left out certain factors like I showed you with my example. All of their studies are based on collective information, they don't adjust it based on certain factors. Get it? It's not scientific, their data is flawed because they can't into actual science.

Social Science != Science

No. If you have something important to say, then say it here and now. Impress us.

'If a college professor's theories doesn't match reality, then it is reality that is wrong.'

That is what brainwashed millennials actually believe.

I can disprove it with one word.

Trump.

I love how Trump is completely destroying your entire worldview. No wonder you throw temper tantrums.

free speech means you have the right to logically and emotionally demolish skinheads and atheists and creationists all with rational debate and excellent oratory and rhetoric

It's already banned retard.

All my keks

Are you delusional? This is like half-assed free speech. It vaguely resembles free speech, It actually resembles socialism more than free speech.

n o

eat shit and die in a fire commie scum

heh

kill yourself

5/10 made me reply

People who dislike racists would use a term to legitimize their hatred like "nationalism". Try patriotism next time, sounds more normal.

Can we just ban you! Problem solved.

hHHAHAH

good luck with that ya idiot.

...

I propose building a big wall to keep all the nationalists out!

And what's more, how about the rest of us all live together in the same area and declare our "zone" just for us?

And the rule is no nationalist outsiders can even come around, with their toxic ideology.

We will make sure our kids stick with their own kind, namely non-nationalists.

We can pass laws forbidding nationalists from trespassing and trying to invade us. We must protect ourselves from their nationalist terrorism!

If anyone expresses nationalist or fascist ideas, let's round them up and deport them! In the name of love and tolerance!

...