I love it when Social justice puritans in comics write themselves into a corner.
we have enough threads showing the general stupidity of SJW comics, so lets be a little more specific, can you post comic pages where the author contradicts themselves or unintentionally disproves their own moral?
It happens a lot more than you think, since the people they're up against are, you know, morally sound in their beliefs and convictions.
I dunno, Sam is definitely on the short list to replace Steve.
Doesn't hurt that on his first adventure he got turned into a werewolf. Capwolf was the first comic I owned as a child.
If they had to replace him, yeah, it does kind of make sense. But the essence of what that character says is true, at least in a meta sense. He wasn't made Captain America because it made the most sense, he was made Captain America to score liberal points.
>starts another thread
Come now.
We can't get too cozy, user.
We need to be reminded of the sickness that is progressive thinking, lest we forget how widespread it is.
Definitely true in the meta. If this had happened back at the end of Civil War when cap got a bullet then I don't think anyone would have looked twice.
In universe this is the most logical path for things to go, but looking at the company pretty much everything they are doing is pure pandering.
Because god help us, you can't make NEW heroes and move the plot forward, you can only race/gender/orientation/favorite food-swap an existing 'popular' character.
I'd love to see them try to put forward a new character or group, just once.
Why is Mugi so cute?
We wouldnt be on Holla Forums to begin with if we didnt know of SJWs
Yes, the whole idea of Cap losing powers was so that he would take his place at least temporarily, and yet it's not very jarring because there were plenty of cases of supers being substituted by other characters, and Sam being the Captain's partner for a long while was a perfect candidate for this anyways. It's really stupid to be mad at this, unlike Whor.