cummies :^)
Cummies :^)
HOLY SHIT LOL
==Holla Forums BTFO
Holla Forums ON SUICIDE WATCH
wat
...
Well done.
Still salty form 1945, fascists?
You mean when Germany cut through Russia like nothing because of their shitty commandants who were saved by the weather ?
...
...
Germany had lost 1/3 of it armies by the start of 1943. Struggle was already over then, and overwhelming forces of production cleared the rest out.
I don't get it
Terrible vid friend.
Fascism is only on feels you idiot, are you really that retarded ?
fgh
That is pure ideology form your part. You can not create intellectually honest position by building an straw-man form assumed psychological narratives. It is actually worse, because you ignore the actual arguments and merely attack person whoever is making them.
Okay let me get this straight
Your first post
My response
and now
wew lad, you are a whole different level of retarded
Only actual fascists can be fascists, this discloses any possibility of any communist or socialist form being fascist(due to fascism being anti-thesis for socialism).
You are aware that destroying a "upper class" by authority is inherently fascists, Socialism and Communism isn't possible without fascism
You don`t seem to understand difference between authoritarianism,totalitarianism and fascism.
Nor do you understand socialism and communism, since you think that they are top-down systems.
He's a communist. What do you expect?
Next you'll be surprised when a downie pees himself.
It didn't call it totalitarian because it isn't inherently, also Fascism is authoritarian but not always the other way around.
Socialism is the workers controlling the means of production and Communism is the larger community controlling it. So back to the point it's still fascist because it puts some people over others "The middle class" over the "1%" instead of trying to uplift the individual. You commies are all the same
Right-wing is by default anti-intellectual.
Right wing is inherently realistic left wing is taking things that sound good.
It is democratic to let the majority dictate the rules of society instead of allowing 1% to hold advantage over others. Equality of opportunity is the goal.
Democracy isn't moral nor good. Because it infringes on the rights of the minority. Don't think that the word democracy gives me fuzzy good feelings like it does with you. Also no equality of outcome is the goal because equality of opportunity will always lead to some people being better then others
Ultimate goal is not numeral equality(ergo total equality).
"Form each according to their ability to each according to their needs" Sums up the basis of socialist policy.
Left wing is politicisezed jealousy and misanthropy. It is the opposite of optimism.
t. dirt-poor gender studies major
I know, and it's retarded. People should be able to fail if they are bad and succeed if they are good, as they do now. If you feel bad that you seem to fail or see people fail get better. I seen people with downs work hard and have a good Job so please.
I`m theology major not some identity politics scrublord.
It is mathematically impossible to have full employment in market economy, thus there will always be the unemployed. I don`t think it is moral to let them starve or lack opportunities to improve their conditions in society.
Not a dot better
I learn economics and computer science, yet I am still better with philosophy then the others in that course and theology then the people in the theology course. Nice intellectual wankery you get your degree in
School is free, they they'd have been better there they would not be unemployed besides there are tones of jobs people just don't want to do
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Everybody starving > some people starving?
Got it!
*if they'd have been better there
Our current models of production when it comes to food would allow our planet`s total population to rise up to 12 billion, but the meat and fish consumption rates should be cut to achieve this. There has been no major starvation within any nation that has good farming subsidies.
I`m just looking to get secure government job with good salary.
Education does not crate more jobs in market economy, thus there would still be always unemployment. Also the fluctuation within the markets would always guarantee that there would be some unemployment.
Yeah and it will guaranty that the best people will get a job so that a society can advance
also
I do economics and computer science to further our worlds understanding of it, I'd be fine if I just got food to survive for it
Growth for the sake of growth is the philosophy of a tumor. This world doesn't need 12 billion people.
...
Let me A German bring some American pride in here
How would full employment somehow eat away the meritocratic structures form society?
Larger population would also lead into increase in amount of scientists and productive forces thus aiding the humanity more than harming it.
Because you would force people into jobs which they are shit at and wouldn't want to do. most people who are jobless are that only for a short time and if not they usually don't want a Job. Who really wants to work can work.
If people only worked out of their free will there would be no workplace suicides,strikes or even unions. It is the materialistic conditions that need to change if you want to turn job into thing of merit and increase labors effectiveness.
Too bad, people never will we are selfish lazy slobs. Left politics are always contrary to human nature.
This whole fucking Thread is pasta from pol.
"Human nature" is conditional and mostly tied to culture, thus it can be changed. Masses could we turned away form self-interest towards collective interests quite easily with proper educational and cultural policies.
And that is where you are wrong. It is not, it's biological. In every situation people tried it it showed. We are controlled by biology and not only or even mostly by socialization.
They are misanthropes. Of course their ideals would be against human nature.
And here the communist admits that the only way he can acchieve his ideal is through mass-brainwashing.
Professor Gad Saad wants to disagree
Bump against your sage
Child who is never spoken to will never learn to speak. Thus culture and society > biological narrative in this context.
Because they don't know how to speak ? They still have the instance to communicate !
So still
Biology>Culture
*instinct
Look at my OC
Too many artifacts and no dragon dildo in her hand.
1/10
...
Be the change you want to see, it's open source.
literally tyranny of majority
direct democracy would be the worst kind of government
leftypol getting BTFO in this bread
Tip Top Kek.
kek. Great Thread OP