Why pedophilia bad?

Because of the ease of grooming a person in that age bracket. You can more easily socialise them into thinking and acting a certain way. Their minds are palpable, and because of their lack of experience; most believe in some abstract version of what it means to have an emotional attachment with someone. their knowledge is theoretical, when it needs to be empirical to have a balanced relationship with someone more experienced - just trusting that no person would exploit this is a gullible way to think.

In reality, You'd have to have the same fundamental morals as someone who believes in slavery; to be aware of this, and still want to have a relationship with a very young person.

Can't the "grooming" go both ways?

That all depends on the adult. The fact is that most young people are less knowledgeable, but i suppose there can be older people who don't know as much as they should.

Most adults are dumb.

I'm still ephebo, but I'm not afraid of any competition from baby boomers.
I say 11, but for some groups, 6, other 14. Depends one the genes and nutrition really.

This, minus the suicide.

I'll try to keep it down.

I believe in slavery, mas'sa.
I never understood most relationships though, outside of marriage (even in it sometimes.)

As long as she studies, keeps house, and puts mas'sa first, everything should be, at least, tolerable.

Most older people don't know much, the old mas'sas knows best.

Because fully developed adults should not be attracted to someone who is not fully developed.

It's arguable that some people finish development sooner, but for the majority it's 16 or 17. The laws of the US are a little unreasonable in that regard. 1/3 of states set the age of consent ("AOC") at 16, another 1/3 at 17, and another 1/3 at 18.

Any state that has the AOC higher than 16 is just trying to be "safe". I don't really agree with it. Sexual maturity is reached at age 16.

Anyway, why don't people like "pedos"? Because children make bad decisions. After 17, they are expected to start making adult decisions. Adults in our society are expected to be some kind of mentor. In fact, people who become licensed to become mentors get even stricter alienation by society if they exploit someone. Maybe not as much alienation for preying on a minor, BUT the burden of proof on a licensed mentor is much lower.

When you have a young impressionable child (who is probably going through teen angst or something similar), burdening them with a complex relationship can have a serious negative effect on their psyche.

they're just insecure and want acceptance/social brownie points

Why is this view exclusively applied to pedophilia? It can - literally - be applied to absolutely any activity that involves any kind of adult/child relationship. The only reason I can come up with, is that most people view a sexual relationship as inherently damaging; otherwise, why would "grooming" even be bad to begin with?

Is it bad to give a little girl a back massage if she would like one? If no, why is it bad to give a little girl oral sex or teach her how to use a vibrator? What exactly makes one benign and the other severe enough to warrant imprisonment?

Also, the people who use the "children can be manipulated" argument have to address the fact that many adults can also be easily manipulated. A relationship between an adult with an IQ of 80 and an adult with an IQ of 140 has even more of a power imbalance than does the relationship between the average adult and the average 10 year old.

Should it be illegal to have sex with stupid adults?

That's just a lie. Maturity in general takes a varied amount of time for person to person. I've seen some people keep growing when they were 20. Also there have been accounts of people going through puberty at very age 16+. So staying "safe" as you call it, is in the best interest of everyone involved.

as long as you aren't hurting them/traumatizing them

ppl dont care about children they care about how people perceive them hence why they spout bullshit suggesting they do

i can see the moral conflict, i'd feel fucked up getting someone my own age to do what i want if they're really stupid and im totally playing em like a fiddle, i guess thats all personal judgment. those are sweeping generalizations tho, some kids are smarter more mature then 30 year olds and vice versa.

i was hanging with the guys, a respectable bunch: guy w/doctorate, guy testing for S.E.A.L. a machine shop worker, nurse etc in our mid 20's (23-28) we were drinking and smoking all night and i slipped up talking about how i nailed a 14 year old, and almost nailed her lil sis (11) surprisingly all gents agreed, super hot, they wish they did and want too, this got me thinking all guys think this way and just claim otherwise, the funny part was when the subject came up again later that week around women (story of some guy nailing young girl) they all chastised it were very vocal and off the handle bar nutty almost defensively, every time i hear ppl getting crazy like "castrate your self" "only cure for pedophilia is a bullet to the head" remind me of this, like they secretly wanna bed a fresh young babe

Because kids do dumb things. Adults should not be able to prey on the sexual naivety of children. Adults should know better and let kids be kids. Child to child sex antics is understandable but adult to child is just mental predatation. Grow up or off yourself cunt

12 is the sweet spot IMO

Or your a pedo trying to justify every little thing rather than admit your brain was formed wrong. Evidence children are damaged by you sexual predators is ignored, soley on the grounds of some cheap workaround to societies morals that suits you in your immature world's. Your deformed ! Your tiny penis and pedo brain have you seeing the world too simply chumps

There is no such evidence. In fact, the evidence proves the opposite: In cases where adults force themselves on children, yes, there is trauma. Rape is bad for everyone, adults and children alike. This has nothing to do with pedophilia in particular. In cases where what happened was consensual and mutually enjoyable, there is no trauma associated with the event itself. What does happen, however, is that the children, if what happened is discovered by authorities, become traumatized by the supposed treatment. What they perceived as an enjoyable and healthy experience, they are now told was wrong and horrible, and this quite understandably messes with their minds. If you're interested in this, you can easily find information about it online. You'll also find that the scientists who did this research were bullied and harassed to the point where no one has since dared do real research into pedophilia.

It's also helpful to look at this in a historical perspective. Adult/child relationships have been part of countless cultures, and in those cultures, where this was seen as normal and healthy, the children were not traumatized by it.

Just think about it:

Why would consensual, enjoyable sex be traumatizing for… Anyone? The idea, when you think about it honestly, is blatantly absurd.

fantastic work with those citations… you totally aren't just a pedo trying to justify pedophilia with nothing but rhetoric arguments.

It does go both ways

As a bystander I really would like to see that study

Even if the child enjoyed it at the time, they will grow up in a world that doesn't accept pedophilia. When they grow up and are conditioned by society, their memoires will be negative and it will cause lasting damage.

mainweb-v.musc.edu/vawprevention/research/sa.shtml
here something to fuel your thought… a good study that isn't subjective

projection

true

This is a good starting point:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rind_et_al._controversy

You also want to find "The Trauma Myth" by Richard Green. Unfortunately it's pretty difficult to find. The only link I have is to a darknet site that also hosts cp…

As you should quickly be able to discern from the wikipedia article, this whole debacle is a fucking mess of hysteria and mudslinging and fanaticism. If you're serious about educating yourself on this, it will take some time as you'll have to dig through mountains of idiocy, and you'll have to do your best to remain objective. A lot of scientists are incapable of keeping cool when it comes to this topic, as you'll see.

I'm sleep deprived so I didn't think of this when making my post… I just uploaded The Trauma Myth. It's here if you want it:

anonfiles.com/file/b717ec970231f264c31c7285c86c2fdb

Ah fuck… I'm too sleep deprived for this shit… Wrong file; it's a review… Don't bother downloading it.

All it really says in that wiki is that rape is a bit exaggerated… nothing stands out that says he's pro pedophilia.

I found the correct file. Currently uploading. It'll take a while because it's an entire e-book.

It must be a pretty objective article then +1

...

It's not an article. It's a book by a Harvard psychologist. The cp site is just the only place on the internet apparently that has a pirated copy.

Okay, done!

The Trauma Myth by Susan A. Clancy (Two links in case one doesn't work):
anonfiles.com/file/8b1738358499ecfcf9bb4ade302cd06d

www20.zippyshare.com/v/eZNnNusZ/file.html

Also;

Is Pedophilia a Mental Disorder? by Richard Green:
anonfiles.com/file/d7c15b2c972e3e388e927ad2ff4ae0c0

You fags will hold anything close to heart that appears to be (or is) on your side, like a bible and bash anyone who doesn't fit your narrative. If that isn't fanaticism, I don't know what is.

cool story bro.

Oh, and those who ask… this is from the first book posted by Hanna, by Susan A Clancy if anyone was wondering. She's likely a pedo, and thus making the book subjective.

Although I do agree that the fetish is not a mental disorder… I do however think It's all about power. It's very easy to overpower and manipulate children.

What are you talking about?

I'm talking about people (in your community) slinging the term "sjw" and other stupid buzzwords your side of the table loves to sling. Also I'm talking about people like you coming from circle jerking fests thinking somehow you're accepted by everyone just because you spend a lot of time in those threads/boards.

...

...

Lemme guess… Bernie?

Nah he has no chance…. I'm not voting this year or any year. As a matter of fact I'm probably going to end up getting the fuck out of this country and move to what ever place has that isn't ruled by a power hungry government

damn user you nailed it. personally i enjoy fapping to loli but i wouldnt try to start any kind of sexual relationship with a child for the very reasons you just explained.

well pretty much anyone with a concious knows its wrong to have sex with kids m8. if that doesnt apply to you then my advice is seek god, seek buddha, seek counseling. but you're heading on a one way trip to prison with that mindset

Define kids

Kid: a human being that hasnt reached full sexual maturity

kids being the plural form

OK, and at what age would you say a human being of the female variety reaches full sexual maturity?

read this mate

i couldn't but in general i would say 14-15. it can vary a lot depending on genetics and nutrition though. some kids mature at 12 others at 19. i didnt hit puberty until i was 18 so i know its not the same for everyone. and really you can look at a girl and know she isnt sexually mature. it isnt rocket science.

So we should raise the age of concent to twenty - just to be on the safe side?

no… I'm just saying keep the law as is. We don't need to change something that already works and functions as it should.

...

but user-kun i want to fuck 14 year old girls legally -__-

...

Is it though? How many cases haven't we seen where teens have been charged for CP when it was pictures they had taken by themselves, relationships where one party was under the legal age?

...

teens cant be charged with cp for taking pics of themselves. only an adult possessing said pics can

keep on dreamin

reason.com/blog/2015/09/02/teen-boy-will-be-charged-as-adult-for-ha
techdirt.com/articles/20090117/0557263447.shtml

if the two parties was not of legal age then the party that took the photo should be fined. Also if the second party decides to leak it over the internet (or whatever else) should also be fined and the content should be taken down. If party b is not of legal age then he/she should go to prison for knowingly possessing such content.

and i agree it is unfortunate for all those poor chads getting that sweet teen cooch and going to jail for it. BUT if they were mature adults then they wouldnt be having these issues. if something like that does happen its either becasue the parents found out (dumbass) or the kids broke up and the girl told her parents or an adult that she fucked the guy. these kids shouldnt be fucking in the first place, since they obviously lack the mental facilities to have or maintain a healthy relationship

hey man you never know… no one ever expected the USSR to be taken down by it's own people so…

See

...

its not even a state its a commonwealth and that means that bible-belt backwoods law enforcement can call the sky red if they want and it will have to reach a higher court before its thrown out. i bet none of those kids could be found guilty in a jury trial.

careful your proving your insecurities user

What about this then?
- abcnews.go.com/TheLaw/story?id=5995084&page=1

no thx

another ignorant cop makes an arrest that won't hold weight in court.

notice none of these say convicted?????

yeah it's pedos trying to pull needle out of haystacks with shitty jewgle searches

- edition.cnn.com/2009/CRIME/04/07/sexting.busts/index.html?_s=PM:CRIME

>Canadian girl, 17, convicted of child porn for sending nude pics of boyfriend’s ex
- nydailynews.com/news/national/canadian-girl-17-convicted-child-porn-sending-nude-pics-boyfriend-article-1.1578009

You were saying?

morons. they should have never plead no contest. literally their own damn fault. what jury is/ gonna convict a kid of sex crimes for something like that!?
NONE

Keep telling yourself that.

because 6-17 year olds dont make informed decisions and cannot give proper consent.

either way i could care less. when you act like a retard you face consequences, as these passionate kids found out the hard way.

it's a normie signalling thing - people are terrified of not fitting in and have been conditioned since birth to consider pedophila worse than murder. I'm not advocating it, but people have no perspective

Absolutely! That ability magically hits you the second you turn 18 :^)

well played user

probably not. but how does that justify enticing innocent little princesses into sexual acts?

I don't remember saying that… You somehow seemed to assume that from my post.

i assumed it from your tone. given the fact that there are like 10-15 users on this board in the first place i also assume you are the user who has been trying to argue "le pedo cause" this whole thread

not necessarily, but its much more likely that they've reached a level of maturity where they can make a more informed decision regarding sexual intercourse.

ok dr. phil i will file this in my mental recycle bin and hopefully it wont get emptied when i meet that qt 14 year old loli that wants the D

get https or no fucking pedo is gonna come to that site nigga

when you bag her make a post on 8ch so i can go buy a lottery ticket, coz its gonna be the day when the extremely unlikely is occurring.

obviously its a fantasy m8. which is something apart from reality that relies on your imagination to conceive. i wouldnt hook up with a qt 14 year old. why? because its fucking illegal here.

To all the pedos/non pedos itt… life is unfair stop projecting your bullshit and get on with you life. It's immature and rather sad. Neither of you two parties will make a huge break through. You're all just blowing hot air… resulting in a cyclic continuum that will never end. Honestly mods need to start banning people who post x thread in y thread and x amount of y threads. It's becoming ridiculous.

In another thread you said it was morally wrong, so even if it was made legal, you still wouldn't date/fuck a 14 year-old, right?

More like pedos are trying desperately to fit in with society

i said it was morally wrong to fuck kids and then explained kids to mean someone who wasnt sexually mature. if the 14 year old in question was sexually mature and it wasn't illegal then fuck yea i would hit dat.

dont like the topic then fuck the fuck off to another castle m8 your princess is in another castle i too had issues with mods but that was before i realized the levels of advanced faggotry that take place here. ban yourself from pedo threads and you won't have this issue my friend

and allow you to just have a perfect little hivemind with no opposition nah…. you'd be no different then lgbt fags

k

i dont associate with pedo's. all opinions are my own. just like any pedo can make threads here so can any murder or rapist.

yeah and I'm sure you think it's ok to spam the board until all other worthwhile threads are gone… tl;dr literal autism user

...

its a random board. ofc its ok m8. how new are you here??????

I've only been here for 1 minute user :D

if you want uniformed discussion on a certain topic you should try/go back to reddit friend

we are all influenced by people. but we still have our own conciousness to make our own decisions. honestly 90% of the pedos i've had contact with (here on Holla Forums) fucking scare me. i mean i could literally see these dudes abusing kids.
oh so thats what this is about? some twitter shit you got mixed up in or something? twitter is fucking cancer m8, drop it like a sledge hammer.

XD i'm so new here my god.. holy fuk. This is like year old shit. Not to mention other shit I can't seem to find

newfag

post u autist

?

Why would anyone want to fit in society? I mean, most are not places I would like to associate with.

I welcome these guys.

Bad taste.

imo they are pedos themselves and are just unwilling to accept the fact.
embrace it

Its normal to be attracted to girls who are 13 and up, but if you fuck them you're basically fucking a retard. Don't fuck children. Below 13 if you're attracted to them seek help.

[CITATION NEEDED]

And if you're so intellectualize, contest me with you're knowledge of how you think it's acceptable to make coitus with young.

unintelligble/10
seems like a reddit post their friend. sure you posted in the right browser tab?

moar Sharlotta pl0x

there is no right or wrong. its just a house of cards kid.
make sure you play the right ones
-gotta know when to hold em' gotta know when to fold em'-

why of course my anonymous friend ;^)
any set in particular? or do you want me to just throw some at ya?

forgot to turn spoilers off lel
also fyi i posted like 50 of her pics here a few hours ago m8. 8ch.net/b/res/5673026.html

more of these sets would be nice:

thanks m8, also if you have any webms, please post them. **I tried 10 times to post the only webm I have of her but I keep getting errors, i'll keep trying…*

i have dont have webms. just the wmv's. will look into trying to convert a few here in a bit.

fuck it, I give up. I'll come back later and try to post the webm. It's the one of her in that blue one piece bathing suit btw.

no sweat. i'm sure i already have it m8

you leaving?

i assume you fucked off. so im gonna stop posting. got shit to do today anyway lol

this has become my favorite pasta

It's not fucked up to do anything with a minor.
We only THINK it is because we have been grown up to think so. It has been engraved in our mind by the textbooks of our schools.

There certainly is some natural age for having sexual intercourse because having sex with a too young person can really cause damage in the lower half of a minor, but around the age of 8-13 is it already biologically possible to have sex without damage, completely dependent on the growth of the individual.

If you grow up a child and never talk them about pedophilia and OH how horrible it is and as an adult perform something sexual with them, they will most likely enjoy it, because it's only natural for us. Tell me, where's the harm in that?

no, just challenging the status quo, not hard with the poorly thought out mainstream argument, and my brain turned out just fine, some would argue better then most do to above average intelligence compared to general pop at least.

this

its what you call imprinting or shocking, a paranoid parent looses there shit cause the kid picked up a fork the kid is traumatized and imprinted that the fork is evil. shitty parents and adults are probobly doing more harm to kids than any of these "pedo's" itt.

idk if thats even it, what makes more sense is its just an easier sexual release, not everyone wants to dominate others but this tense high pressure society has everyone running for comfort food, comfort sex (if you're not getting it why not lower the bar until you do) i have the same argument for gays: its easier or more convenient.

puberty? most animals start having kids at puberty (be it late or early), the biological switch is flipped, you gain a new ability (reproduction) use it.

i keep getting this suspicion

holy hell

so funny seeing normies fear what they dont understand

Why do some people put so much effort to fill boards with certain inane topics beyond possibility of sincere interest on their part?

Example from 4chan: atheism threads.
Example from /n/: crab news.

And they aren’t simple copypasta bots.

Has anyone already solved this mystery yet?

Bitches aren't good for anything in modern society so you better get that jing/loosh while it's a prime hormonal output levels. YA FEEL ME?

If you were a real bro you would unleash a female's innate sexuality and turn her into a fertility goddess or something.

Much better than a bunch of wimps and miserable cunts running amok.

Not to mention there are plenty of worse (imo) grooming that it is legal to put your kids through, and in that case, they don't usually have a choose in the matter.

Word.

Thank you.

well pedos usually do have a hard time fitting in ( ° ʖ °)

Okay, so how much does it cost to hire her for a photo session,
or at least order specific photo shoots?
Obviously nothing pornographic.

This explains mental damage only in those already born in fascism. But how does it explain minds of those who had been born in liberalism (when paedophilia was still acceptable) and then grew up to become paedophobic anyway?

that was supposed to be a lenny face but Holla Forums fucked it up

who the fuck grew up thinking pedophilia was ok? I've never heard a liberal diving that deep

trolling at its finest

lol xd

...

In Brazeel it's legal.

...

Yellow piss is a sign of not drinking enough water.

1. Have you never heard, for example, of Catholic priests?
2. Most everyone who lived before the Internet. Haven’t you lived before the Internet?
3. Explain how you have missed the fact that people weren’t prosecuted for child sex for decades and now suddenly are. Are you stupid on purpose?

huffingtonpost.co.uk/2016/02/25/jimmy-saville-bbc-dame-janet-smith-report_n_9314084.html

That’s how the world was before Bush and 9/11.

Picture source: archive.is/rFIca = books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=pedophilia,paedophilia,child sex,underage&year_start=1800&year_end=2008&corpus=15&smoothing=3

Gays don’t want to see that gay pogroms are next in line. Maybe we should start suing old gays for their gay acts before homosexuality became legal. (Before even we make them illegal again.)

vice.com/read/inside-miracle-village-379

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miracle_Village_(community)

news.vice.com/article/an-alleged-pedophiles-perfect-scam

vice.com/read/realizing-youre-a-pedophile-can-make-you-want-to-kill-yourself

...

Gay ghettos when?

True, Alan Turing did it!
It proves that homosexuality is wrong, doesn’t it?

Imagine similar header in Vice.

Why do you post pedo pictures? You clearly only pretend being disgusted by paedophilia to justify your violent mania. Yesterday Jews, today paedophiles, tomorrow whomever. And the society is so stupid that you can always do it with total impunity.

*headline

...

...

6-10 is much different than 11-13 and completely of another type than 14-17 (legal in most of the WESTERN world)

Those of us who thought nothing of it. It just was a marriage or date between a minor and adult.
It wasn't Liberal either!

6-10 is sometimes different from the later two, but 11-13 is usually the same as 14-17, even 18-21.

I don't like that continent, or the Caribbean sea. Especially the weather, I don't know how they can stand it. I don't know how people can speak so fondly of it, though the sea does has less of drug problem from what I have heard (more GRIDs though).

No they're not. That falls under assault then battery.

...

I think 11 and up should be legal

Try framing your thread in the positive for once, defeatist cuck.

It is all about power. I only care about power. "The hand that rocks the cradle is the hand that rules the world."

That and the science of Taoist sex with premenarchal girls for health/longevity.

Laymen need not apply.

Yet to see a counterargument to this. Well, antipedos? Where is it?

What?

, ,

News

>>>/n/385689

I guess that he means that anti-paedos only care about power. Paedophiles deprive them of the power over the cradle. That’s why paedophilia is “bad”.

I also guess that he’s a Taoist monk.

alpha as fuck

And surprisingly liberal too.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_consent#Traditional_attitudes

Children can't consent to sex, only to having their gender changed via chemical or surgical castration.

Ah, but you see, that's beautiful and progressive.
See the difference?

in my own opinion, it is bad because children seem to be especially susceptible to grooming and being manipulated. is it possible that a child can genuinely want to have sex with an adult without mental fuckery beforehand and have there be no mental trauma? sure, i guess it is possible, but how do you tell the difference between that, and a real abusive situation? its not worth the risk. it will never be worth the risk to allow that shit to become acceptable.

This

Because kids aren't ready for that shit you imbecile. Physically a girl's vagina is not ready to accept a man's penis, let alone get pregnant. A boy is certainly in no position to be a father either, if he impregnates a woman. And of course sodomy is a million times worse than "straight" pedophilia or "normal" homosex. Mentally a child is not ready either, nor is a horny monkey that cannot control its urges in any way somebody that should be influencing children.
It's like having a torture fetish: The only way you can get off is by doing bad things, which therefore makes it a bad thing.

The reason virgins won't lose their virginity to non-virgins (despite being desperate, and ignoring that they couldn't even get a slut to fuck them anyway) is because they are insecure about their lack of sexual knowledge and prowess, and are intimidated by the idea of a girl knowing what is supposed to happen in the bedroom better than they do. Their only hope is to lose their virginity with a girl who has never watched porn or by some other miracle knows less about sex than they do.
They also have enough to worry about when it comes to measuring up in a womans eyes when that woman DOESN'T have other males to compare them to.

...

Oh my god literally kill yourselves.

Every woman likes a certain size, so your statement is retarded. Plus, I don't think a virgin is gonna want a large cock for their very first time

vporn.com/fetish/catalina-and-kelly-wells-are-two-teen-cheerleaders-that-max-gave-a-ride/1214160/

max-hardcore.com did it for me :) ive only slept with one 15 yr old while 21. But these days only 18+ hurrr durr daily express and muhh pedo witch hunt is too much in England.

it was normal in 1800s to have a 11 year old wifey, under that is too physically messed up to have sex, if they are attending school then 15-16+ is not wrong, yes they are immature ones but there is women who are 27 who don't know shit about anything. feminists think its ok for caitlyn jenner to lecture presidents etc, but talk about normal healthy relationships between a 22 year old guy and 16 year old and murrr pedo gets quoted…

?

Fuck somebody your own age.

ageofconsent.com/comments/numberten.htm

iam , i have slept with women my age and a few years younger since about 23, im just saying its a witch hunt.

telegraph.co.uk/sport/football/teams/england/11445146/England-player-arrested-for-sex-with-14-year-old-according-to-report.html

It's parental rights to control who their child gets to fuck

they are modern day witches. not every 50 year old guy in a coat is a pedo. the media stirs it up look at the daily mail/sun/ national enquirer. i don't approve of it and yes parents should educate their kids, but the uk/usa attitude to sex education is backward. and thats not because holland is muh liberal…

Gee. I wonder why the pedos never fight for children's right to fuck each other. /s

yeah it's totally not you guys all along

thats why the father should be involved to vet the guy.

Women/girls should essentially be slaves, anyway. They don't deserve rights, and they're happier without them.

That is one sexy picture op

...

...

...

You.
Pic is a proof.
You secretly fucked as a child
but you want to deny sex to other children.

This is why anti-paedophilia is objectively much worse than paedophilia. Anti-paedophilia is violent, stupid, built on pure hatred (instead of love) and supported by an endless web of lies. Anti-paedophilia is literally terrorism.

P.S. I wonder what the respective child sex percentages are among vicious paedo haters. I’m sure they are even higher because psychopaths demand obedience from everyone except themselves. Benign paedos are most likely adult virgins, intimidated into sexual abstinence for life.

Normies confirmed for Nazis.
Nazis confirmed for scum.

But paedophiles are the pervert ones.

Anti-paedos confirmed for scum.

I support gender freedom but I hate pseudo-liberal logic.

This pseudo-liberalism is a disguised false-flag eugenic Nazi project to eliminate transgender children from the genetic pool. It has nothing to do with gender freedom.

Proof? Show me even one boy allowed to amplify his masculinity with the help of hormones. You can’t – because pseudo-liberal gender “freedom” extends only in one direction: the sexually devastating one.

Not only they won’t allow gender amplification (“because unnatural”, implying transgender therapy is natural), in fact they apply aggressive medical measures (“for health”) to inhibit it in boys in which such amplification happens naturally. That doublethink! Pic related: a boy with somewhat big dick injected with hormones to make his dick normal (little) again.

With health care like this, how can white men ever have bigger dicks than African men?

Please, stop calling fascism liberalism.

For mod’s notice: picture is from a medical journal, so it’s not child porn. In addition, to make it DOST-compliant, I made a legally redundant step to obliterate his dick from view. Child haters and dick haters should be pleased.

(posting attempt #2)
I support gender freedom but I hate pseudo-liberal logic.

This pseudo-liberalism is a disguised false-flag eugenic Nazi project to eliminate transgender children from the genetic pool. It has nothing to do with gender freedom.

Proof? Show me even one boy allowed to amplify his masculinity with the help of hormones. You can’t – because pseudo-liberal gender “freedom” extends only in one direction: the sexually devastating one.

Not only they won’t allow gender amplification (“because unnatural”, implying transgender therapy is natural), in fact they apply aggressive medical measures (“for health”) to inhibit it in boys in which such amplification happens naturally. That doublethink! Pic related: a boy with somewhat big dick injected with hormones to make his dick normal (little) again.

With health care like this, how can white men ever have bigger dicks than African men?

Please, stop calling fascism liberalism.

For mod’s notice: picture is from a medical journal, so it’s not child porn. In addition, to make it DOST-compliant, I made a legally redundant step to obliterate his dick from view. Child haters and dick haters should be pleased.

This fucking proxy won’t let me upload picture.
And Holla Forums won’t let me post via the other proxy at all.

/thread

Where were you when OP posted his stupid question?

It never was good idiot it always was cancer. That's exactly the reason why it's been getting 5 bumps a day no one fucking cares. Having a stupid argument over the internet is not going to sign something into law. Fuck off.

However it can fool a few people, including you, into thinking that paedophilia is wrong.

I'd sooner die than conform to anyone's beliefs. Also fuck off with your gender amplification shit… it just shows you don't give a fuck about the children and the side effects (possibly death) of such hormones. You don't give a fuck about children.

I believe that 1 + 1 = 2.
What will you do now?

That's not a belief idiot that's just logic.
arithmetic =/= beliefs Wow you're fucking retarded.

If it is possible to believe in lies,
it surely must be possible to believe in truth too.

...

...

...

So what? You're beliefs are the only correct ones? Fuck everyone elses amirite?
literally jew the post

If IQ was a contest who calls others “stupid” the greatest number of times, your IQ would be at least 300.

damage control

And who (other than you) is promoting beliefs instead of logic in this thread?

Your “logic” in a nutshell.

“No, my beliefs are the only wrong ones.”
Is that the answer you want to hear?

damage control

Never said I put it ahead of logic… proving your autism.

Nope… but it's your belief to have pedophilia legalized. There is no such thing as a right or wrong answer when questioning someones beliefs/morals.

meant for

Sorry about late answer.
I was in the toilet.
Your toilet.

pedo_marriages are the only healthy pedophile relationship both ethically and sexually

we need a map of the countries that allow it

[citations needed]

Have you missed this whole thread?

I think the legal age for sex in Germany is 14. While I wouldn't have sex with a 14 year old I think it is good this way. When I was 14 years old back then I would totally be okay with all kind of dirty sex if one of the older females around me would be okay with it too.

citations needed

True. I was in Germany a couple of weeks ago
and schoolgirls from the same hostel tried to get to my room at night.

Of course I didn’t let them in.
I didn’t want them to hurt me.

The age of consent in Germany is 14, as long as a person over the age of 21 does not exploit a 14- to 15-year-old person's lack of capacity for sexual self-determination, in which case a conviction of an individual over the age of 21 requires a complaint from the younger individual; being over 21 and engaging in sexual relations with a minor of that age does not constitute an offense by itself. Otherwise the age of consent is 16, although provisions protecting minors against abuse apply until the age of 18 (under Section 182(1), it is illegal to engage in sexual activity with a person under 18 "by taking advantage of an exploitative situation"[33]).

Is this why you summarily dismissed everything that was said in this thread
without one rational argument?

Your IQ is getting bigger.

Pic unrelated.

Pedo = attraction to children
children = 3 - 8

6 - 17 is only 16.666% pedo. [6, 7] vs [8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17] = 2/12.

9 - 17 is like 3 different terms. Hobophile or something.

...

LOL.

It’s hebephile.
As in >>>/hebe/ .

In actuality a child becomes a teen at 13 years old (thirteen) let that sink in for a moment.

Oh.

Nope. Adolescence is between childhood and teenage years.

because it fucks with them mentally you retard. you sound like a sand nigger

Reflections from my short trip to Germany: German people are beautiful on the outside and beautiful on the inside.

Errors of WW2 made them much wiser, ahead of many other nations. They learned their lessons instead of trying to evade them. It seems that their liberalism is still vigorous and not derailed by Nazi parodies of liberalism as it happened elsewhere. In Germany, it feels like it’s still 1990s.

You had no child sex.
You were an adult virgin until the age of 30.
And look how it fucked you up.

Who’s going to judge their psychological welfare?
Anti-paedos?

LOL. That’s not how logic works.
¬(A ⇔ ¬ A).

No, wait… it’s even better:

Your priorities are showing.

Why do pseudo-liberal priorities align so neatly with anti-liberal ones?

The insanity of paedophobic dogma

If adult paedophilia is a dangerous perversion,
what does it make childhood teleiophilia?

If children are expected to be paedophiles,
how can adults expected to be teleiophiles?

A true sexual orientation is for life.

*what does it make of

Yeah and enjoy the rest of your life being persecuted and *still* being attracted to them.

Fuck that for a lark.

Exactly, it's the parent's not the government

This is what the whole anti-paedophilia boils down to.
The society considers child’s dick and child’s pussy family property.
Where are those hordes of angry wymyn
protesting about anti-paedophile objectification of children?
They don’t mind it.

The final frontier…

I want to suck artist’s dick.
Are you the artist?

I actually love dominant little girls in the literal sense…

you learn from history, it is Germany's bad past that makes us want to make a better Germany. And this is also why refugees are foreigners are bad. They don't have our history and they don't understand our culture. They come here and shit in our country.

A case in point. Anti-liberal immigrants should go to anti-liberal countries such as Poland and USA, while Germany should accept only liberal immigrants such as me.

Jedem das Seine: repressions to fascists, liberty to liberals.

>Jedem das Seine

Kek.

A thread is what anons make it,
not what OP wants it to be.

Disregard OPs – make every thread a good thread.

This woman doesn’t need parents.

She needs a man.

I wouldn't fuck a child, but if the child had a brain, some experience, a slutty dress, and some lube, I probably wouldn't pass up the opportunity on account of having a cock.

...

Because in its affair of protecting the children humanity forgot paedophilia is what built western civilization.

In ancient Greece for example, it was common and expected for a teacher to fuck his students in the ass before, after, and during philosophical arguments for the sake of education.
Not going so far on the degenerate road, Roman philosopher Juvenil once stated that the only true and sincere form of mutual love was that from a grown adult to a little boy.

And even if I don't say we should all go and fuck little kids I also believe demonizing pedos as if they were ISIS is demonizing our own history, even if it's for the greater good.

as in, a man to cuddle, caress and occasionally sex with?

the satanist want worlwide pedophilia
and no AOC and despite the attempts
of moralists and mortal souls they will
still win unless you end the CIA FBI
ect they are alll in cahoots apparentlly the 70s was legal they might as well do it all over again
if they arent rounding up all the satanists and cult members and demonic witch sister/brotherhoods
seems they cant even do this either its purposely or its impossible if they cant do this then they would be deemed worthless for these energetic emissions of evil are the sole source of a majority of destruction of innocence

shit it feels like its the 60s

I meant you fuckers making it as if the pedos are always the victims in all this. A very narrow viewpoint. Of course you're to dumb to understand this.

...

I meant *past I fucked it up

2. Most everyone who lived before the Internet. Haven’t you lived before the Internet?

3. Explain how you have missed the fact that people weren’t prosecuted for child sex for decades and now suddenly are. Are you stupid on purpose?
Fantastic use of the Authority fallacy

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Honor_killing

As in “a dick”.

She needs a throbbing dick in her throat.

Cuddling can wait.

Fun fact: sex with her is legal in her home country.

Its called indulgence in roman Catholicism
Just tip your priest like 50 bucks

its not looked down upon in the natural world, as long as you arn't hurting her or raping her

(pic related) mitochondrial eve was 15 when she died and already had an abundance of children… meaning she was being porked way before "western values" … in an uncontrolled environment… meaning it was a natural phenomenon….

Nope.

Your opinion doesn't best empirical fact dubsy.

Dude you barely need to go back 100 years, hell you don't need to back at all, there's plenty of young sluts out there who've gotten knocked up early

only if she agrees. just because its legal doesnt mean she wants it

Interesting. I believe you but I don’t see how your image demonstrates her age at death.

Of existing strains of humanity, Khoikhoi and Bushmen (San) reach adulthood in their early teens. They are remarkably archaic (genetically conservative) too.

It's amazing that parents or adults think they can monitor/control/proscribe when/if their kid has sex.

Just like smoking and drinking a marginally intelligent kid will do what the fuck they want because they are as able to adapt around the bullshit controls placed upon them as we were, as usual moreso with tech.

To imagine it's any other way is delusional and while you lawfags are polishing your picket fences in imaginary Innocentland legions of underage tramp trim is being slayed upon the altar of cocks.

its common fact, just could find any good mitochondrial eve pics…

ya when i was 5 i'd play doctor with my neighbor girl, i ended up slapping/tapping her pussy, she liked it for some reason wonder why… and she would rub her belly up on down on my willy…

optimal child bearing age is ~18, based on child mortality rates

Sadly, they can. A proof (and a result): a generation of adult male virgins scared of sex for life. “Good” families literally practice beta upbringing.

The winners in this sex control game are psychopathic children and children from dysfunctional families. That’s why psychopaths are such vicious anti-paedos: they fuck when they want since young age and they want to deny the same to others. Sexual repression of children breeds psychopathy by giving reproductive advantage to malicious children over benign children. Fascism is a result of sexual repression of children.

Don’t confuse psychopathy with intelligence.

(me)
And the technology is moving forward. Soon Intellisense cameras will alert parents whenever a boy touches himself inappropriately (in bed or in toilet) without the need for visual surveillance. This will unlock the long-desired possibility of curbing underage masturbation.

1. “Normal” puberty ages are irrelevant because they are artificially delayed by the society, by laws against child sex and even by health care.
2. Age of puberty tells us about capacity for reproduction. I know that idiots equate sex with raping a vagina with a penis but what idiots think is irrelevant to reality. If capacity for reproduction determined capacity for sex, sex should be harmful to infertile adults… such as, for example, MILFs. It obviously isn’t. Every healthy life form is capable of orgasm. Denial of this vital biological function in childhood cripples sexuality for life and only serves to spawn a generation after generation of ignorant anti-paedophiles such as OP.

Pardon. Wrong thread. OP in the other thread was anti-paedophile.

web.archive.org/web/20160429222125/https://8ch.net/b/res/5676733.html

pedo is stupid, but hebe is fine

but you should be married first

if you want to just get ur rocks off, then consider suicide

If by “marriage” you mean a loli harem, then I agree.

Oh boy, this is the kind of thread that always gets max replies. We went over this a thousand times, I don't even have to read the thread to know what's going on: pedos argue that it's cool if it's consensual, antis say kids can't consent and that pedos should be killed or castrated. Every single time. When will either party stop falling for the bait? I dunno.

gr8 shitbumps m8s

Not true. Example: .
And many other such threads that have died prematurely.
I think this thread is an exception.

1. Seriously? And this makes a debate wrong?
2. Do you think that the public understanding of paedophilia is so high that further debates are unnecessary?
3. The only thing that makes any debate wrong is when participants don’t listen to opponent’s arguments. Which might actually be the case with paedophilia as a topic.

No but it makes it redundant as the same exact arguments are used over and over again and nobody ever reaches a conclusion, both parties remain convinced that their side is the good one and no concessions are made.

I think that the current view of pedophilia prevents constructive debates from being made. Most people will be blinded by their feels when talking about it and even when logical arguments are made, most of them will be throughly rejected because of said feels.

Absolutely. That was my point. Nobody ever listens to the other side in this kind of threads (especially in the anti side, although I might be a little biased saying that). No concessions are made and nothing changes. It's just a bunch of drama for nothing. I think the pedo side has to realize that before making such debates, mentalities have to change.

i don't have to listen their arguments since they're wrong and i am right

§1, §2, §3: at least the two of us have reached a consensus here.
However, let me add §4.

4. This is Holla Forums. This is the place where we can exercise our debating skills as a matter of sport, for no other purpose.

LOL.

I guess this is still better than the trap threads so I shouldn't complain.

are traps gay user?

...

thats some low quality shit there if i've ever seen it.
people like this are the reason that everyone is so afraid of pedos, they actually want to fuck underage underdeveloped children, and will take any means necessary to legitimize it and to accomplish their agenda.

...

Pedos don't like children they like fucking children. This is why no one takes them seriously.

Why are little girls so wonderful, cute, admirable, fantastic, remarkable, awe-inspiring, amazing, sensational, divine, astonishing, incredible, awesome, magnificent, superb, perfect, brilliant, marvellous, outstanding, terrific, tremendous, fabulous and astounding?

as opposed too

I don't find little kids attractive, but assuming you do… The above statement would be your argument.

shit video

…they are flexible though

...

The best thing about kids is that they say CRAZY stuff that's so insane that hilarious. Why do they have to grow out of that phase? Can't they all be Sarah Palin?

My Body…
My Daddy…
My Choice…

I'm a virgin dough.

Pretty good.

What?

Little girls are so perfect they are like angels, I would go as far as to call them divine I worship them.

How dare you say paedosexuals don't like children we love children and lolies more than anything we just want what's best for them.

As far as i'm aware, its because people get paedophilia confused with wanting to rape children. I had a conversation with my father about this, and he refused to accept that a paedophile doesn't necessarily want to hurt children, or in some cases even have sex with them.

I thought maybe pedophilia was wrong and all sexual contact with a minor is bad, but I had a similar experience with normalfags, and saw how ignorant they really are.
Similar to how sjw's close their mind to any reason when something conflicts their worldview.

If you are wealthy and attractive and can afford it, yes, men should be allowed to take multiple wives.

Because they need someone to love, cherish and protect them. Nature's solution.

Great shitbump, nigger.

What a shitbump.

sage

300

Yes, I have question /pedo/

Is pedophilia something naturally occuring like being gay or is it formed through sexual repression/ abuse?

I always thought it was natural like any sexual fetish or preference, but now I dunno. There isn't any animals who do this.

Sorry for making this a thread earlier. I did post this same question in the other pedo thread as well, but it fits better here.

Pedophilia is completely natural like homosexuality. telegraph.co.uk/comment/10948796/Paedophilia-is-natural-and-normal-for-males.html

How are you sure it doesn't occur with other animals? Bonobos mate with all members of its group, regardless of age. It widely occurs in nature, even my own cat is a pedo.

I think Bonobos just jack off their kids, but never penetrate them. Also, I think there is only a few studies out now that connect genetics to pedophilia, but you can't honestly know for certain.

The nature vs nurture thing is hard to separate in studies.

The thing that seems like the most revealing aspect is that you can't really change a pedo behavior. if they are attracted no amount of psychiatry is going to change that. It's as crazy as praying away the "gay" in people.

But since it's so sketchy right now I don't really have a strong argument for either one.

294

Explain female pedos because there's a lot of them out there. It's just the tabooest idea within the taboo idea of pedoness.

At least to the public.

Checkmate anarchists.