Why do people like this movie? It's just about an autistic cuck who's pretty good a driving and decides to help a family of race traitors.
Is it just the aesthetic and the pleasure of watching Ryan Gosling fuck up some kikes?
Drive
Logan Morris
Jayden Green
it's an antisemitic piece of shit, the edgy teens here like it only for that.
Jeremiah Watson
whew.
although, tbh fam, it was bad.
Jason Barnes
...
Bentley Rogers
Pop """""art""""" aesthetics is not art film in the slightest. It's nothing more than a popcorn flick.
Even if it was antisemitic, the antisemitism is symbolic af, which means that it means no shit. The director just wants it to fly over your head. Zero artistic value.
Liam Morris
The neon 80's aesthetic appeals to dying whites as it was the decadent height of a white-centric civilization. The human beans' autism reflects the autism of the disenfranchised white male. His journey being the journey out of cuckdom and glowing idealization of the female, he drives toward an uncertain future, knowing the past must be left behind, can he create a future for himself, or will he forever live off the fumes of the 80's he never lived through as a millennial? Not knowing where to go, where to take the "vehicle" that is his life, the only place he can feel comfortable is on the road, in the slipstream of illusory progress, forever driving but not going anywhere. He knows he must finally turn off the 80's new-wave electro-synth soundtrack and finally park his vehicle in front of a home. But where is this home for the disenfranchised white male in a society which demonizes and rejects him?
DRIVE™
Julian King
...
Samuel Long
Because the main character is L I T E R A L L Y literally me
Jeremiah Kelly
...
Anthony Sullivan
THIS IS NOW AN AUTISTIC NIGHTDRIVE THREAD
Anthony Gonzalez
...
Wyatt Baker
*another man's kid
Luke Hughes
nice copypasta, upboited
Isaiah Phillips
nope, OC
Nathan Rogers
It's Holla Forums's perfect film for those very reasons.
Grayson Hill
Yep, sounds about right.
Jacob Cooper
His motivation is never explicitly explained.
I like to think he just likes hurting people, and aligned himself to the family in trouble in order to express that in good conscience.
Also the movie is
A E S T H E T I C
Justin Taylor
its a decent modern noir flick
Chase Adams
The original is better.
Justin Kelly
Sounds alright to me what's he problem here. That description alone sounds like the greatest movies of all time.
William Peterson
REEEEEAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH I THOUGHT
THIS MOVIE WAS KINO AND SHOWED MY PARENTS
THEY LAUGHTED AT ME BECAUSE THE MAIN CHARACTER IS A CUCK AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA THEY
LAUGHED
AT ME F DHGBJFKHJL
Ian Sanchez
I want to raise your son and support you. If anything happens in that 5 minutes window I will be yours no matter what.
I drive you forever, even if you turned out to have a husband or somehow my hands became a little dirty… idk why that would even happen.
So what will it be, Holla Forums?
Lincoln Hernandez
You read the novel? How good was it?
Easton Adams
the antisemitism is symbolic af, which means that it means no shit.
So a film about the Jews would say it's the Jews directly?
Michael Martin
What is and is not "pop art"?
Easton Miller
There is some artistic value too this film. For example at 1:25-1:31 in this video his steps are timed too the music creating a kind of audio-visual poetry.
One of the commenters of the video noticed this as well: "There's something about that OTS shot with the scorpion that's kind of cool".
Thomas Clark
This guy did a interesting analysis of the cinematography as well.
John Young
The Drive is anti-semitic meme isn't even a meme.
2011 article from huffpo about jews kvetching over Drive.
huffingtonpost.com
archive.is
The normalfag who made that video made me appreciate it even more.
Alexander Kelly
lol tarkfag remains retarded
Andrew Clark
Of courshe.
Art that is created to entertain.
Art that is created to deliver a spiritual experience.
"I reject the principles of 'montage cinema' because they do not allow the film to continue beyond the edges of the screen: they do not allow the audience to bring personal experience to bear on what is in front of them on film."
This split screen shit is the most retarded way ever to analyze a cinematography.
What an extremely pretentious name.
It's a meme and the jewish lawyers fell for the meme.
Nicholas Cruz
No, this original.
Jaxson Jones
Simple. It gives all the socially awkward autists in here the false hope that they can also look cool and get a girl without having to talk to them.
Brandon Davis
Andei Tarkovsky is not the full arbitrator of taste in art. Eisenstein was not the influence on me liking the 6 seconds when the music and imagery collected into a aesthetic hole. You are simply a sheep fellating the philosophy of a man, not a God or false idol as your comment indicates. I refuse to let a man allow his flawed thoughts and flawed perception cloud what is clearly beautiful to me.
Look and see, foolish man. See how Andrei's comment implies he fully understands how others perceive a film. When he says "the audience" it indicates his arrogant belief of him being the judge of all that is aesthetic. It is all his taste, fully actualized and realized, but he assumes all others think feel and see as he does. The fool. He also does not elaborate or define these so called "principles of 'montage cinema'", Andrei is arrogantly pissing in the wind, and nothing more.
Justin Garcia
meant to connect too
Logan Rogers
He remains completely fucking retarded. He doesn't like good stories, he doesn't like aesthetic in film, he doesn't like symbolism, and it seems like he doesn't enjoy anything besides smelling his own rotten asshole.
Kevin Murphy
It's not about the taste in art, it's about serving your audience. An artist deserves artistic freedom and so do the consumers. Let them form their own experience and meanings from things. Tark's perception isn't really flawed because he doesn't even force his perception, rather pushed for freedom of perception.
When in fact he was criticizing directors who forced their own taste of aesthetics? He didn't assume that everyone thought the same as him, and therefore he wanted directors to allow audience bring their own personal experience.
It's the soviet montage theory. Go check it by yourself.
Logan Gutierrez
Are you still here?
Carson Walker
Because it's a superhero movie that's not capeshit, with great A E S T H E T I C.
Or did you miss the scene where he stomps the head in of the faggot who was going to murder his waifu?
Hudson Parker
Or all the super human driving he's able to do, for that matter.
Eli Miller
bump