Why didn't Iron Manlet use the Hulkbuster again Cap and Bucky?

Why didn't Iron Manlet use the Hulkbuster again Cap and Bucky?

...

Because they were inside a Bunker.

1. Because he wanted to capture both of them alive, not fucking destroy them with extreme prejudice.
2. This thing spends too much energy to be used against normal foes.
3. Its only used as last resort against foes like the Hulk.

Aka, capeshit plot.

Why doesn't he just use it all the time?

He has unlimited energy though.

The comics establish his Hulkbuster armor spends too much energy as a way to excuse why he doesn't use it as his default armor. I don't remember that part being addressed in the movie specifically.

The movie didn't explain much about it, its just sort of like LOL here's ironman mother fuckers.

no, he doesn't. the chestplate gets charged. they don't touch on it much in the films but it's there. you're so fucking stupid and constantly shitposting MUH CAPESHIT AMIRITE U REDDITFAGS that you don't even pay attention to basic bitch details.

If the original arc reactor Tony made INACAVEWITHABOXOFSCRAPS! could power the armor for 15 minutes, we can assume that with his superior tech and resources he could figure out a way to make his armor last non-stop for at least several hours up to a day.

Then there's the whole nonsensical "new element" subplot from IM2. Jarvis I think said it was more efficient than palladium.

Probably the Hulkbuster consumes too much energy to be used as a standard suit, given its slower top speed he'd consume an entire reactor before he can reach destination.

And also it needs a satellite to be operated, which isn't always practical.

that's exactly it

So basically it was used as a deus ex machina for one plotline, and they then wrote it out cause "(mumble mumble) power issues". In other words, it's the exact same as JK Rowling giving characters a time-travel necklace but then using excuses writing them in and out of the plot as it suits because she's a hack writer.

JK having the turners get destroyed was a smart thing to do. Bringing them back was fucking dumb.

On topic though, he didn't use it because he didn't want to kill them (yet). Ignore the energy argument, think about how unwieldy the armour really is, he only uses it against Hulk because it's intended to be able to take a hit from him and knock him out/distract him. Using it anywhere else and he'd be outmanoeuvred and end up destroying the place if he tried fighting in it. I don't think it really needs to be spelled out in the film to convey that, even now, we're really overthinking it, he didn't use it because it wasn't convenient.

The problem is with movie Ironman. It shows he can build suits in good numbers, in incredible speeds, with vastly different varations. Ironman 3 just shit the bed with them all. I know they were in the comics too but I'll keep it to just movie Ironman for sake of argument.
The problem with introducing all those suits and them destroying them in Ironman 3, then having all those new suits including the hulk buster in the avengers movies is…it doesn't matter what suit he uses or if one gets destroyed or someone else captures one (like rhode in ironman 2) because he'll just build 5 more, no big whoop.
I feel no investment if his suit gets torn to shit, like the hulkbuster was, because I know there'll just be more parts, or another suit.

No consequences, no tension, no drama…no excitement.

Why didn't Dr. Manhattan turn all the world's nukes into cotton candy?

He was too busy thinking about his gf cuckolding him in the near future.

tbh he cucked his girlfriend with silk spectre. What comes around, goes around.

Because he thought it was the only way humanity wouldn't finish each other off.

Didn't you pay attention in the comics/media? He's a deconstruction of the Ubermensch; he's actually very emotive/irrational.

It's called the Hulkbuster, not the Cap and Buckybuster.

to be honest, I fell asleep several times during the movie

It's called the big black cock for white women, it isn't called the white cock for white women for a reason.

This right here is why Holla Forums users fetishize cuckolding so much despite claiming to loathe it.

why do you think those who write the Louis CK copypastas are such experts in terminology and describe with such passionate details what happens when Louis walks on stage?

they're cucks, they're all cucks
some may be just in denial, other may be just pretending to be racists for shit and giggles

but in the end, if you don't like cuck porn you simply don't care about it

these people are obsessed with BBCs, interracial breeding grounds, statistics about the penis size in sub-saharan Africa, etc.

No lucifer, i ain't having that shit today.

I thought the whole point IM3 was he would stop using the suits

He had mental problems and used suit building as an excuse. As he overcame his mental issues he decided to destroy his suits because he no longer needed a distraction. Plus they were all inferior since he wasn't of right mind.

Why didn't he give himself a bigger dick?

Cause he knows it's not the size that counts but how many you have

Watchmen is overrated trash and always has been.

*tips fedora*

Because writers are fucking idiots that can't explain why a anger filled behemoth is a different type of threat than two trained supersoldiers. The smart thing would have been to have the hulkbuster make an appearance but have it fail due to how different of a fight it would have been. Showing Tony's hubris in his suits and the difference between experience with training and just experience. But that would require talented writers.

Why don't the Power Rangers just call the Megazord staight away for every villain?

That's a legit question and sometimes they actually do.

AIDS really slows the poor fella down.

Stop tripfagging, faggot


The book is better.

He's a small guy.

Why didnt ironman have his drone robots gang up on them like how he did in the iron man 3 movie.

for you.

Why are his balls so much bigger than his cock?

...

he has a severe case of blue balls

Every. Single. Fucking. Episode.

...

I'm fairly sure it's a written or printed work consisting of pages glued or sewn together along one side and bound in covers, user.