IGN Review

7/10

"Ghostbusters Scares Up Some Laughs!

No webm for you, so here are some highlights:


Seems like the party line is bury Feig for this.

Other urls found in this thread:

lesmocon.com/2013/11/the-worst-review-ever-written-god-hand.html
chicago.suntimes.com/entertainment/ghostbusters-reboot-a-horrifying-mess/
archive.is/KtVrM
metacritic.com/movie/ghostbusters-2016
archive.is/etm6z
archive.is/vYrJV
archive.is/Fmc3g
facebook.com/groups/midnightsedge/permalink/1265845026773418/>>395440
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

...

So I was right. Hacks decided to give the movie good reviews in fear to be labeled as misogynists, they state that the dykes who do the acting and writing dindunuffin and the only bad thing in the movie are the penises.

...

OPs like you should be shot on sight.

The usual "it was shit, but this is as low as we can go without pissing off our sponsors" score.

faggots like you should be shot while they are still in the womb

webms aren't that hard to make retard

Should pose as pissed off feminists demanding that 7/10 get changed to a 10/10 because the reviewer is obviously sexist.

You already gave them a view, why do you feel the need to link directly to them, just so that they would receive even more views?
The reason I saged was because I contributed nothing to the thread, I just posted something that should have been in the OP in the first place. My post shouldn't have counted as a separate post and thus bum the 6 goijilion Ghostbuster thread
Sage for off topic meta.