Wow… Really Makes You Think

Not true. There's a higher percentage of black serial killers as compared to their population than there is white serial killers. Not only that, but also of the top 10 mass shooters in American history only one of them is white. But reality doesn't fit the Leftist narrative.

Because white male heterosexual Christians are the personification of evil (the devil) in the secular religion of Leftism.

Go back to your goat-fucking, Ahmed.

The two serial killers with the highest number of victims are both South American Latinos. Obviously her tweet if unfunny anti-white nonsense, but still, it annoys me.

SMH

Why are latinos so good at killin?

How can someone pack so much shit into one post?

Because it is proper bait, that's how.

Conquistador spirit.

I mean its not like they actively promote killing gays and jews, or stone women for adultery, or are for raping young boys and throwing acid in the faces of girls who are trying to get a basic education. If there was a religion that promoted that then what should we do then?

wow racist AND a repressed bestiality complex, were your parents this retarded or are you the product of a bad upbringing?

it's not the religion though. there's a problem within the religion that's exacerbated by circumstance. there are plenty of muslims around who don't believe in any of this shit, and there would be plenty more of them within supposedly extremist countries like afghanistan if those countries hadn't been decimated by war.
there are passages in leviticus about stoning for certain offenses. there are even extremely unusual cases of ultraorthodox jewish sects carrying these punishments out. but this belief isn't in the mainstream, in large part because jews and christians occupy civilized, stable, intellectual societies. but if that ever changed, if they were thrust into a similar environment, all those niceties would go out the window. religion is just a (particularly good) way to draw lines in the violent tribalism that occurs when societies collapse.

Even in Europe ex-Muslims get threatened, attacked or even killed because they leave the faith. Why? Because once upon a time it was decided that leaving the Islamic religion is akin to treason, as you are leaving the ummah behind, therefore you should be put to death.

Does your ad-nausuem apologetics account for that? Have you ever studied Islamic traditional thought, or even read the Quran or hadith? Everyone is suddenly an expert on Islam when it comes to denouncing IS as not Islamic or Afhanistan society as not Islamic.

Here's your (You)

What are they classing as serial killing?

honor killings are extremely historically common among many of the ethnic groups that make up the US. particularly Italians. there are plenty of progressive muslims in the world who would laugh at the idea of killing apostates. most muslims in afghanistan would have laughed at the idea 40 years ago.
this state cheerleading quasi-academicism is ridiculous. I'll steal your words: everyone is suddenly an expert on Islam (but somehow everything they say is completely lacking context). you could come to really horrifying conclusions about lots of religions by reading their fundamental texts. the old testament is a violent, racist document. and from the bhagavad gita:
furthermore, judaism, catholicism, hinduism, buddhism have actual known histories of horrific violence! does this mean that they are all "religions of hate"? does that mean that a violent society founded upon their tenets is more legitimate than a nonviolent one?

and you know this violence isn't just a historical, long-forgotten part of christianity. the irish troubles only ended in 1998! but somehow there was never a media narrative of christianity being a fundamentally violent religion or Irish culture being inherently sectarian like that old colonialist yarn about the sunni and shia. they weren't always at each other's throats! they used to be peaceful neighbors!

That's such a fucking stupid thing to say.

That jewess is LYING, and her gentile followers just can't help but clicking "like" on every post derogatory of white men.

Am I mad? Yes.

stopped reading here.

Fuck off you goddamn apologist scum.
I bet you're gonna start talking out our ass about the crusades next.

You took the bait.

stopped reading there.

Typo aside I still caught you fucking piece of shit.

ALMOST FIVE HUNDRED FUCKING YEARS OF PREDATION ON THE EUROPEAN PEOPLE AND WE CAME AND FUCKED YOUR SHIT UP.
Stop trying to pretend christianity is anywhere near as barbaric, backwards or fucking stupid in this age or any.

children

that's a political war tbh

Why do you insist on taking this bait? More obvious a bait there cannot be.

They're called muslims who didn't actually want to be muslims and freedom of religion laws don't exist in their countries.

So I should let people spout their stupidity unopposed?
How weak you are.

When they're trying to get you riled for the lulz, yes. You should.

you could argue islamic fundamentalism is political at its root

like I've pointed out, there's much more recent violence, and different violence, to choose from. how about the spanish conquest of the americas, you think the mayas started that one?

thats a slippery slope, and I'd rather state someone is wrong and take that chance then let idiots bleet unopposed.

But I've said all I need to. Poes law is a harsh reality.

vs

nah, i ain't gonna go for it.

yeah somehow there's always room for the examination of nuances and exigencies when we're talking about OUR people

i'm not irish but ok

IRA want independence from England

ISIS want everyone to worship their religion

listen to some old IRA songs, then compare them to muslim nasheeds

look I'm not trying to defend ISIS, they're awful
but surely you can see that both of your statements are gross simplifications. There was plenty of corruption and crime in the irish independence movement, and one of the primary motivations of modern islamic fundamentalism is kicking out western despots and running their own country.

Not anymore. Not all bankers are jews but all back stabbers are jews.

i agree, and since millions of them now live in western countries, they want to kick us out

I found something wrong with your post.

wow. thats… thats some insightful stuff.

i dunno

pedophilia is okay in islam, isn't it?

i think i'm going to convert.

The Mexican character from Overwatch is a psychopathic mass murder who literally worship death
How the fuck did reaper got past let's censor Tracer Ass because one single mother complained blizzard? I'm shocked there not a shitstorm over blizzard promoting Mexican stereotypes yet or some shit like that.

turnabout is fair play tbh

...

MMMM!

Faggot. I'm Irish, and that conflict had nothing to do with religion, it was about race and land. If the Troubles showed anything, it's that multiculturalism doesn't work.

Just attention whoring.
It's actually disrespectful for the victims to use them for this if you ask me.

I'm perfectly happy to let ISIS burn down the Middle East, but we're being forced to take them into our countries. At least the IRA never wanted to take over England.

If faggots like you didn't insist on letting Muslims in, the west wouldn't have to worry about Islamic terrorism.

WAKE UP SHEEPLE

This. Are you guys consciously larping along with the tv or do you honestly keep falling for the same bullshit over and over?

Part of it yes but the fact of fighting christain and Protestant was also a huge part of it

turbobit.net/brwhexfd261j.html
turbobit.net/b18vf1yh53yz.html
turbobit.net/22r11700sj7x.html
turbobit.net/ijyv9oqu7ghd.html
turbobit.net/ipkjwu0c5nvw.html
turbobit.net/1j0sahbr92kv.html
turbobit.net/5awk5xrt2t4r.html
turbobit.net/sb7xpe1b7gh8.html
turbobit.net/xoudde6myrwr.html
turbobit.net/qwoat8buo95a.html
turbobit.net/02aapr7gz5fi.html
turbobit.net/qvt2frkn2qmc.html
turbobit.net/sogfj63pdwk6.html
turbobit.net/kcctpluy8tro.html
turbobit.net/srweqzzpdbip.html
turbobit.net/ljvkbeu28sxm.html
turbobit.net/qap4x640p4hw.html
turbobit.net/brwhexfd261j.html
turbobit.net/b18vf1yh53yz.html
turbobit.net/22r11700sj7x.html
turbobit.net/ijyv9oqu7ghd.html
turbobit.net/ipkjwu0c5nvw.html
turbobit.net/1j0sahbr92kv.html
turbobit.net/5awk5xrt2t4r.html
turbobit.net/sb7xpe1b7gh8.html
turbobit.net/xoudde6myrwr.html
turbobit.net/qwoat8buo95a.html
turbobit.net/02aapr7gz5fi.html
turbobit.net/qvt2frkn2qmc.html
turbobit.net/sogfj63pdwk6.html
turbobit.net/kcctpluy8tro.html
turbobit.net/srweqzzpdbip.html
turbobit.net/ljvkbeu28sxm.html
turbobit.net/qap4x640p4hw.html

...

...

The joke is ripe for the picking, it's not something special that no one else would think up you dumbass.

stop being reasonable, the MSM taught us to hate and vote trump!

Be a little less obvious, samefag

>All

I hate this kike cunt so goddamn much.

Holla Forums - Normalfag Social Signalling

Because those who oppose Christ are evil and band together.

The entirety of Europe roots for Ireland to eventually shake off their occupiers in the north. It's just natural for the irish to own their island fully.

You'd have a point if it said "person" instead of "warrior" and it dropped the "righteous", but it doesn't. If you're already a warrior, you might as well fight righteous wars instead of non-righteous wars, right? It's not saying that the average person should fight in a war, but that warriors (people already in the army) should fight righteous wars.
It's miles removed from the Islamic idea that there is no greater reward in heaven for a man than when he gives his life in the fight for Allah's cause.

Honestly, this is proper bait.
It's borderline retarded, which makes it attractive to reply to, but not retarded enough to discard as trolling.
Your posts read like average centre-left simpleton. Pepper on fancy words like "neo-colonialism", "orientalism", "military industrial complex" and "Western imperialism", and you've become average left-wing student simpleton.

Really impressive, my friend.

Its not like we created those societies from scratch or anything

go ahead and name one who lives like Christ, I'll wait.

Normally when you try to tear something down, you know a little bit about it first.

rofl you stupid Xtians know nothing about Jeebus.
Here lemme tell you this: Jesus was a socialist. That's right

Not just that, he would have approved of gay marriage because he said to love your neighbour.

Btw don't eat shellfish or wear mixed clothing ;)

"What's good is what's good for the Jews"

This is standard procedure…
Muslims when they're killing Jews = bad guys, go kill them you fucking goyim
Muslims when they're killing non-Jews = it's not their fault it's you, you fucking goyim

Fellow mick, here, the fucking brits can keep the nordie hell hole.

European Catholics root for Irish Catholics, and those who don't care about the religious difference simply want Britain/England to lose because everyone is butthurt about Anglos in general dominating world affairs for centuries

don't mistake that for continentals giving a fuck about either Brits or Irish for their own sake

Muslims killing G-d's chosen is also good because then the gentiles can be manipulated into supporting us them.

Tricked again, goy of mine.

yeah and the fact that people lined up catholic vs protestant was puuuuure coincidence. I don't buy it, Protestantism is a religion of hatred and war and we ought to expel all of its practitioners and completely embargo Northern Ireland. It's wrong to incentivize religious terrorism.

if faggots like you didn't insist on destabilizing Muslim countries and trying to be king shit of the entire world, in the west we wouldn't have to worry about Islamic terorism.

You truly are the gayest cunt.

no, it's saying that there's no greater good for a warrior to fight in a righteous war
vs there's no greater (reward in heaven) for a man than when he gives his life in the fight for allah's cause
islam is actually better because it encourages selflessness and sacrifice!
don't you realize that you're doing exactly the thing you're accusing me of? peppering your argument with meaningless ad-hominems in an effort to declare yourself the clear and obvious winner? don't you realize that this kind of horseshit stands in the way of honest discourse?

yeah and muslims might have too if we hadn't fucked everything up. Afghanistan used to be a great place. our CIA destabilizes regimes that pose a threat to our economy as a matter of course, it's absurd to claim that muslims are just inherently unable to form stable unified societies

They didn't

I never insisted on that. Muslims destabilise

Did you know Islam discourages gay cunts? It's true, they don't like gay cunts, but I do.

you may not have explicitly insisted on it but time and again we all vote to raise the defense budget in the name of "keeping America safe" while preserving total secrecy of the defense department to protect "national security". we demand constant economic growth from our leaders, which necessitates an international philosophy of relentless self-advocacy and subterfuge.

oh, and [citation needed]. no country in the middle east has been without strong American influence for the past century.

Islam needs a fucking reformation if it wants to continue to exist.
Any religion that requires forced conversion and is afraid of people leaving the religion to the point of honor killing offenders, isn't a religion, its a cult. A truly all powerful god would punish those that it sees fit, it wouldn't need its followers to do it.
Only the insecure try to censor or squash dissent.

...

Not a lot of interpretation is required to make that conclusion… forget about the story where he flipped over the tables of the money changers in the temple, what about the loaves and fishes? What if rather than miraculously multiplying them for all, he just cut them into pieces small enough that everyone got the same amount?

What if rather than implying the eucharist sacrament at the last supper, he was simply talking with the same "this is my blood sweat and tears" allegory we use today to describe the product of hard work?

You forgot Afghanistan. America didn't give a shit about Afghanistan until after 9/11, well under 100 years ago

afghanistan was the center of a proxy war between russia and the US in the 70s
our support for the mujahideen under Reagan was a big cause for their bloody civil war in the 80s-90s
british colonialists also fucked around there 130 years prior
but please, tell me more about how the ignorant mudslimes are just fundamentally incapable of self-organization

you sound like the inattentive mother who calls the cops on the deli clerk for selling her kid a pack of cigarettes

afghanistan wanted arms and training during the reagan administration to fight the soviets, it wasnt a proxy war it was a business deal in the best interest of the us

dont pretend that was the us involving itself in foreign affairs, it was not the same as iran contra

what the fuck are you saying, that they weren't? we picked a side, that's getting involved.
where did I say it was?

you sound like the angry redneck who tells the cops his battered housewife was asking for it

irregardless, no matter how you slice the earliest involvement of the us in afghanistan was late 70's early 80's - not close to 100 years

yeah and Afghanistan was starting to become a pretty great country in the 70s with a strong intellectual class and progressive, modern values

You've been defending Islam all over this site recently.
I'd congratulate you on getting shitloads of replies every time if retards on this site didn't constantly fall for the most obvious b8.

nice constructive, intelligent counterpoint there

...

tripdubs confirm

Read chapter Al-Baqarah verse 191-193 you dumb nigger.

Don't even get me started on the child sex slave shit either.

You have to read it in context, bigot. That context being that Muhammad is supposedly a perfect human being and an example for humanity for all eternity.

The guy was a warlord (true), killed pagans and jews that didn't approve of him (true), and married a 6 year old and had sex with her at 9 (according to Al Bukhari, most trusted hadith).

Perfect human being and an example universally and eternally.

read 1 Samuel 15:3 or Deuteronomy 20:16-18 you dumb hypocrite
the bible has plenty of that historic war cheerleading too

...

Christians are supposed to emulate Jesus Christ, a peaceful man that didn't like greed or violence.

Muslims are supposed to emulate Muhammad, a murderous warlord that married children.

...

yeah I guess I'm in the wrong place if I expect anybody to find the idea of expelling all the Jews in the US ridiculous
all the new testament stuff is more implicit, but it's there. look at acts 3:23 or romans 1:32

what about Jews? anyway jesus says he isn't taking back the old testament, see Matthew 5:17 and Timothy 3:16. And that's not even to mention Jesus in Revelations, who's much scarier than Muhammad ever was

go home filner you're a serial rapist and nobody likes you anymore

Are you going to conveniently shove aside the fact that Muhammad ordered the death of people that didn't approve of him, and that he married a 6 year old and had sex with her when she was 9?

By definition, this person cannot be an example for humanity.

Nothing of the sort, I'm pointing out that that's exactly what most modern muslims do, and I'm pointing out that it's just the sort of thing that modern Christians, Jews, and Hindus do. No religion in the world really follows these historical documents to the letter, just as any modern Christian would be completely appalled at the idea of launching a new series of Crusades.

...

Except the crusades are not founded within the foundations of Christianity; the New Testament and Jesus Christ.
There are historical atrocities associated with all religions, sure, but comitting atrocities is what Muhammad and his followers did from the very start.

You simply cannot compare Jesus to Muhammad. Jesus, putting aside the religious aspects of him, namely that He is God, was a peaceful man. You cannot dispute this. He was pretty much a disgruntled jewish man that had a bone to pick with the establishment.

What was Muhammad? A power grabbing warmonger whose "revelation" changed quite a bit throughout the course of his life, adapting to his new circumstances, which was very convenient of course.
Just like L Ron Hubbard, who made up stuff as he went to cover his ass. Jesus did none of the sort. They are not comparable.

Everything Muhammad did was moral, according to Islam. When you explain "oh well marrying children was an accepted practice at the time" it doesn't meany anything, given how muslims view Muhammad.
A Christian can indeed be appaled by the crusades, but how can a muslim be appaled by anything their prophet did?

I don't think Jesus and Muhammad are the same, I prefer Jesus to be sure. Do you really believe that even a *majority* of US Christians actually follow his philosophy though? The point is: the essence of a religion is different from its foundational text, and different from its history. No more are all Muslims anxious to rally and murder the infidels than all Christians are to transform the United States into a socialist paradise.

lmao. that there are exceptions, though i cannont think of any, does not disprove the rule.

I can't say I don't admire your autism

not only are there exceptions, your rule is nonsense. if you were to paint a picture of the world Christian population assuming that they followed the strict teachings of Christ you wouldn't get anything that remotely resembled reality.

10/10

serial killer and mass murderer are different tho

At least we left something good in that forsaken continent.

...

Take note of how you responded to that post NINE FUCKING HOURS LATER

Slowest moving website might be a better way of moving it, not necessarily talking about the actual website

This is why shitpost.

It's not a religion, it's a political organization.

A series of killings.

It's not my fault you use the exact same arguments word for word and make it obvious you're the only one doing it.

Reminder that in the Syrian Civil War alone there are over 350,000 deaths. And 4,000,000 refugees.

Fuck Islam and Fuck Mohammed

pretty sure its three or more instances with three or more victims in three or more seperate incidents.

like, if you kill two people two days apart and then a third a week later you are officially a serial killer

In other words, a series of killings.

by jove i think you're right

It's elementary my dear Watson.

Seriously, how do people still get mass shooting and serial killing mixed up in the legal sense (as far as the US goes)?
The FBI itself defines a "mass" shooting incident as four or more people injured or killed in one event (average day in the ghetto in other words), while "serial" killing is defined as multiple incidents of death separated by a period of time.

If someone were to shoot four people in the space of an hour or two that would count as a mass shooting.
While if someone were to kill one person one day, then another person a week later, and then two more people a month after that it's considered serial killing.

It's not hard to figure this out yourself.

You dumb niggers realize you are all playing into this washed-up 90s comedian/whore plans right? she's a fucking hasbeen, she's so fucking desperate she goes to literally the shittiest events because any exposure is good exposure

any exposure is good exposure you retards

You think she's that dumb? that she didn't see how complete nobodies like anita became famous with this opreshun bullshit? that she isn't using this to get some fame back?

This is why those countries are such hellholes, you simply can't let people like that alive, let alone not rotting in prison for the rest of their lives

The only muslims I know who don't follow this shit tend to be agnostics/atheists which is really hard to do when apostasy gets you the death penalty

Ironically most muslims born in the first world are completely oblivious to what a shithole most muslim countries are and why their fathers decided to escape so they become the same fundamentalist assholes that almost killed their parents

On the other hand I haven't seen a religious muslim who was openly against isis even though like 99.99% of isis victims are other muslims

I didn't realize complaining about her on an imageboard that almost nobody visits was giving her any sort of actual attention.
Also, yes, she probably is that dumb. You don't have to be smart to partake in the opreshin olympics.

Case in point your precious ANITA
Anita is not smart.
She lucked out by complaining to the right group of obnoxious beta males on cuck/v/.
If she had have shit her pants in front of literally anyone else they would have laughed at her and continued not giving a fuck.
Any retard female can get pity bucks if they complain to the right betas.

i heard it on good authority from another washed up 90's comedienne that sarah silverman's stand up routine was entirely written and refined by her then boyfriend jimmy kimmel - so yeah i find it hard to believe she "meant to do that" unless she has a staff writer writing her tweets

it is your fault that you reply with empty-headed putdowns rather than substantive arguments

It's not my fault that you don't know how to adapt your logic when people blow your shitty Islamophile logic out of the water.

not all muslim countries are fundamentalist shitholes, and islam doesn't make a country a fundamentalist shithole. Baghdad was at one point one of the key intellectual centers of the world!

jordan is pretty cool but even there they have the fucking religious police who arent agents of the state and have no authority but everyone looks the other way when they beat you up

fuck islam it's a shit

Yeah, centuries ago.
Or were you being sarcastic and that was your point all along?

Jews, please leave.

Singular Muslim spammer, please leave.

oh the middle east is definitely a shithole NOW, all I'm saying is it's not islam's fault

did you read what you replied to?

there are literally gangs of men you are forced to go to church with who will beat you up for things that are not illegal, and everyone else looks the other way because they are forced to go to church with these men too.

and how is this not islams fault?

not all muslims do that, just some
you are generalising so many people you think that's okay??

what about the KKK, they wre christians? are all christians KKK?? smh

Holy shit.
At first I thought you were just mining for salt, but you actually believe the #notallmuslims shit.
There are actual #notallmuslims posters on Holla Forums.
Globalists really do shit on even the most insignificant of sites that disagree with their disruptive ways.
I need to digest this.

lol this meme, coming from a jewess

what do you mean "you actually believe this shit"?? its not shit thats why i believe it

do you really think all muslims want to blow themselves up?? there are a billion muslims if they blew themselves up their would be no planet earth for you to spew your bigotry on anymore

what about anders breivik he was a pious beliving christian (the man in norway that killed 90 children) its what i heard on the news. whats your response to that??

think carefully about the fact that your first assumption when you encounter someone who disagrees with you is that they're trolling, and your second is that they don't belong here. if you want some echo chamber where you get congratulated on your amazing opinions all the time, go back to reddit. if you want to pretend to be some kind of free-thinker, try taking a statement you disagree with seriously once in awhile, and analyzing it critically.

DUDE JEWS LMAO

...

...

the difference, achmed, is that brievik is in jail for his crimes, as are kkk members who get caught assassinating black leaders and fundamentalist christians who blow up abortion clinics

in islam, the PEOPLE protect the TERRORISTS and in islam, the INFIDELS are prosecuted

This, it doesn't matter if there are muslims that don't agree with ISIS, because they still, willfully in most cases, provide a blanket for the ISIS type muslims to hide behind, and do nothing to purge those people from their ranks, unlike most Christians who actively discourage other Christians from blowing up abortion clinics. This means that they're still dangerous to non-muslim people, even if they're not aware of that fact.

Unlike a lot of the people on this site, I don't think all muslims should be gassed, but I do think you faggots should stay out of western civilization and remain in your containment desert.

all terrorists are Muslim but not all Muslims are terrorists

fixed that for you, Jew

that is not real islam because islam means peace
why does it matter anyway its not as if terrorist that claim to be muslim arent arrested??

do you want every muslim to be arrested because only 1% are violent?
why dont we just kill every jew because 90% are international banker gangsters that steal our money?? smh

western civilisation only exist because muslims preserved greek philosophy while europe were in the dark ages
know your history idiot

...

No, you fucking faggot, you go back to whatever Islam apologist shithole you came from.
No human being on this planet that is able to rub two brain cells together actually believes Islam is beneficial to humanity in any way.
Even Jews don't require the death of all nonbelievers, and they're part of one of the most cancerous ideologies on the fucking planet.

...

are you fucking kidding me? we've invaded entire countries over this shit

its not a meme its history
i do know what the byzatine empire is it is eastern roman empire that later got conquered by muslims because muslims had a more advanced way of thinking resulting in the ottoman empire which was the most prospreous in europe for centuries

not to mention the ottoman empire was extremely tolerant of everyone meanwhile the europeans were killing jews because they had "poisoned the well"

you should learn real history not racist history is what im saying :)

you don't think americans protect their own? you don't think a white american jury has ever acquitted someone for a lynching?

No, it's a meme. The only thing that happened during that period was a lot of people moved from Roman cities to the countryside. No knowledge was lost, aside from documents written about non-Christian gods because the Christian writers didn't think that was worth preserving, so they wrote over them to save money on parchment, but that had nothing to do with what brought western civilization to the heights it achieved anyway. Come to think of it, Greek philosophy didn't really do any of that either. Unless you're talking about things like math and science, but that's not really philosophy.

No, the Turks conquered Constantinople because the children of a deposed Byzantine emperor co-opted the military forces that had been assembled for the 4th Crusade and attacked the city in an attempt to put their family back on the throne. This resulted in the Byzantine Empire being severely weakened, which finally made it possible for the Turks to defeat them.

They were only tolerant because they had a law which forced non-Muslims to pay a tax that about 1 fifth of their total income. Their tolerance didn't even matter in the end, because many people under their rule converted to Islam anyway just to have to get out having to pay that tax.

Also, the Jews were far from innocent. The European people attack them for a reason, and that reason wasn't their religion.

The stuff you're spouting is History Channel tier.

All of this talk of history is irrelevant to what I was originally trying to say, which is that western civilization, regardless of how it came about, needs to get rid of Muslims because they are a danger to it.

...

im not going to read this racist history just get a life virgin

...

hes saying muslims are intolerant
thats racist so how can saying muslims were intolerant in history not be racist and unacceptable??

just because its history does not mean it should be accepted or condoned

...

your mum is hot

...

im just not a filthy bigot like you or the other racists on this forum

[citation needed]
see en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lost_work#Classical_world for example
[citation needed intensifies]

this isn't true, classical scholars fled the fall of byzantium and the ottoman empire and brought the renaissance to western europe. the ottomans were kind of assholes, although they did collect a lot

the real golden age of islam was 8th-13th centuries, the muslims really did save a lot of classical works then and significantly furthered their work.

thats right

Ah, a troll, then. Shame.

And burned those that were haram.

Then had one guy, basically by himself, cuck them into stupidity and inbreeding, and now they are nigger tier.

Not that they weren't subhuman before, since the "golden age" of Islam was a byproduct of their conquests. Once they ran out of smart guys from the cultures they conquered so went away their "golden age".

Those weren't lost because of Christians. They are just works we know to have existed but have no copy of.

they sound like the Romans tbh

many more works would be lost if muslims hadn't saved and translated them

Why are we falling for this bait?

the romans were actually incredibly religously tolerant. they didnt care who you worshipped so long as you let veryone else worship who they pleased. the christians were intolerant, and in turn the romans did not tolerate them.

i have no idea why the jews were given a special exemption, though.

nice selective memory there, you ever heard of the Holy Roman Empire before?

Sauce?

lmao kid, the holy roman empire wasn't roman, nor was it holy or an empire.

fair enough, nice double post
you may find this article educational
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religious_persecution_in_the_Roman_Empire

Not him, but if the only thing you can say in defense of the muslims is "well, there were also other bad people!" then you don't have a strong argument.

I said plenty of other things in defense of the muslims
nice strawman though

That's not a strawman, idiot.

yes, pretending that my argument is weaker than it actually is in order to argue against it is a straw man argument. try again.

...

your video sucks, the crusades were not restricted to the middle east. it's also a matter of semantics that we don't classify post-medieval Christian brutality like the conquest of the americas as crusades, and we classify every single war of a Muslim kingdom as a jihad. by exclusively focusing on the crusades, you're also ignoring major wars of Christian motivation, like the 30 Years War and French Wars of Religion, all fought over which specific type of Christian you ought to call yourself! These Christians, they're just so violent they can't help themselves! In the context of all this contemporary brutality, yes, I maintain it's completely absurd to point to Islamic jihad from 1000 years ago and say that modern muslims are the same. Would you go to war today if the pope told you to?

nice try achmed

yourlogicalfallacyis.com/personal-incredulity

No, faggot, a strawman is where he refutes an argument you never actually made and then pretends he destroyed your shit.
All he did was call you out for defending shitslam by saying other ideologies are shitty too, which you have been doing this entire time.
Sorry your arguments are terrible and unconvincing.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proof_by_assertion

I wonder if you actually think Muslims aren't some of the worst people on the planet or if you're just being contrarian for the easy salt.

Have you ever met and interacted with Muslims before? Did you go to school with any? They're human beings, just like the rest of us. Try going to service at a mosque sometime, you'll be welcome most places. You won't see any angry imams calling their followers to war and blasting the white heathens, you'll see people praying to God.

How old are you, twelve?

>>>Holla Forums

Wow…So…This Is…
The Power Of Wit…

Google the file name.

Worshipping DEATH? what an evil satanic race, who are otherwise catholic/christian. Time to go to Holla Forums and honor lucifer i mean kek.

>>>Holla Forums

bump