Why is it that anarchists are so childish? Most of the time they fail to see beyond western made lies...

Except I know for a fact that you constantly shill for a revisionist state.

Ancoms who think this way are mostly fine. However, we are still going to clash about how to start things. Fact is, MLs think that their system is the best way to get revolution. Part of the process of proving that is always criticizing anarchists. However, I'd be perfectly happy to support an anarchist revolution that didn't depend on imperialist puppetry like S.D.F. and wasn't engaged in opportunism or wrecking. I guess EZLN qualifies unless there's something bad I don't know about it.

Why don't you read our texts? Anarchists aren't very interested in socialism per se, because many tenants of socialist dogma are very liberal in nature. 'Liberality' / mainly democracy isn't huge for anarchists, especially Stirner, Robert Anton Wilson, the TAZ guy et al. because democracy is placing what's called Rationality at the highest pinnacle, and they believe that ordering society around a perfectly rational logic is doomed to failure. It's a matter of experience: most of us use our intuition rather than our mind.
Smoke weed or do breathing exercises and you'll start to tap into this.

What about the Greek Anarchists? If killing fascists and helping refugees is opportunist, that's pretty shitty my dude.

I agree fuck revisionism, Cuba is on the edge of pulling a China and North Korea is a grey zone for me

Well Marcos started off as a maoist who read gramsci and later adapted his views for the native communities

No those dudes are cool and would beat the shit out of any of us here

To be fair, even as an anarchist, I think if there was genuine ML who got it right it'd be Thomas Sankara. I may disagree with his supression of anarchists and his use of show trials, but economically he was able to institute ML praxis pretty well. tbh I'm a bit shocked that that some MLs hold Stalin and the Kim Jeongs as shining examples of ML.

Literally the worst poster on this board.

So why haven't you addressed your concerns in the DPRK general? So we can actually talk about them instead of derailing this thread?
Private property of means of production? Or one-man businesses that allocate their produce locally?
ffs it's common knowledge that a black market arose during the Arduous March as the state's distribution system collapsed (mostly caused by the lack of fuel to run chemical factories to produce enough artifical fertilizer and pesticides), should they just let the people starve out of ideological dogmatism? They are in the process of regaining control over meticulous economic planning, as the food situation improves, sure there might still be black markets but they are cracked down upon if possible, in the last year alone ten huge farm cooperatives and food factories have been built. This isn't the 90s anymore. Literally the only thing that happened was the reduction of the quota for agricultural cooperatives to 70% from 100%.

You are implicitly supporting imperialism as you blame eventual shortcomings and problems on the DPRK itself, questions their ideological conviction or call them revisionists, instead of being a materialist and analyze the disastrous effect world-wide sanctions have on a small country that is forced to produce everything itself with less than 20% arable land.

Some things they do seem legit, but they also seem to spend a lot of time attacking and smearing KKE.