Hey goys and gals, Holla Forums here...

...

It's an absolute necessity for Socialism to happen. The bourgeoisie is international, therefor the proletariat must be also.
That's not something we advocate, nor is it something that's possible. The first world is wealthier than the third partially through imperialism, but mainly because its more developed and you can't redistribute that.
No one cares about "their" nation's wealth, they only care about their own standard of living and livelihood. Many countries are very wealthy, yet the majority of its people aren't.
Because one is necessary and the other is impossible.

"Fuck the government."

That's the appeal of internationalism

There is no such thing as the term is usually used, existing on the left. Remember that, in real life, little pieces of paper are actually meaningless.

The types of "wealth redistribution" that DO exist on the Left involve things like workers taking over their workplace, or just camping your way across the world without regard to imaginary property.

While current capitalism often DOES sell a factory for scrap and build a new one overseas, no one is going to dig, say, North America down to the seafloor and dump the dirt off the shore of Africa. That's just silly.

No. Ending Imperialism would fuck over the western world.
That's why they'll never revolt.

The only thing imperialism does to help the 1st world proletariat is it allows them to sometimes buy cheaper shit. The bourgeoisie does not share their imperialist profits.

socialism in one country sucks, international capitalism sucks

Dog that’s the very end goal, like the very end. We want a world in which there is not 3rd world era being fucked over by special interests. That does not mean we are coming to your doorstep with guns to take your wealth. It’s juet that eventually we think that it’s worth making th entire planet a more equitable place, not just one section of it

...

...

What is this? Basic economics class in college?