The bible predicted all of this, and basically you are a post modernist cultural marxist and WRONG

How do we prevent Jordan Bernt Peterson indoctrinating and radicalizing more and more normies?
He has been tremendously successful and is doing a great job of keeping people to the right, despite the clowning from Holla Forums and the alt-right.
Normally normies would abandon a movement that produces such filth, but professor Peterson is giving it credibility by making it sound educated and intellectual.

Other urls found in this thread:

kill him

It's a fad, it won't last. People can't handle this sort of motivated reasoning, where a hysterical crybaby invents his own perverse epistemology to justify his love for Jeebus, for too long without vomiting everything they've ever eaten.

Typical stalinist post-modernist neo-marxist soviet gulagian utopian 20th century anti-theist mankind hating tradition deconstructing thinking.

You just added $2 to his Patreon by posting that.

I think not throwing a bitch fit and not automatically assuming a contrarian position whenever right-wingers say something basically correct would be a pretty good start.

yo add another 2 bux for me dickfucker

you do know that you ca donate up to 9 dollars to a patreon without having a valid credit card, right? Probably like half of Peterson's patreon money is fake.

How is not being an deeply triggering and problematic traitor a bad thing, OP?

It's always fun to see Holla Forumsyps getting caught by wordfilters

1. Refute his claims without slander and an actual argument.
2. Clean our rooms and fix what is wrong with ourselves so we can have a good stable starting point to tackle problems outside of ourselves, instead of falling into the alluring trap of victimization and excused egos.
3. Search the underworld for our fathers, rescue them, even if they are in Winnipeg.

Why anyone is afraid of Peterson indoctrinating or radicalizing anyone is beyond me. He is harmless to anyone who is not intellectually dishonest. He is more likely, along with the biology professor in exile, to prevent far right radicalization.

He should be a non topic here because he has little to do with us. We are not idpol, the one force that will destroy us for good.

Leftypol still hasn't told me why I should hate my own race other than "it upsets my black supremacists masters"

Leftypol is supports idol when it suits you

But the EU is a genuinely economic oligarchy and bureaucratic nightmare that is virulently anti-leftist.

This reminds me of the mind loops leftists get caught up with like with example Merkel with the refugees or Trump with TTP, that because one side is bullshit then the reverse must be true and noble. See fallacy of the excluded middle.

My father is DEAD

How does the EU being anti-communist lead to the Bible being true?

which is why you have to rescue him from the underworld silly

EU is a WHIG organization. Basically the same thing. It's like calling mensheviks not real commies because they had a different game strategy for communism compared to the bolsheviks.

I wish the EU would actually support visionary projects like the image suggests.

the EU is striving for the exact opposite of communism tho

Black supremacist masters? What? Do you always talk about such spooky shit? No one here says you should hate whites my man.

I don't understand what got filtered I joined right before Autism Level got filtered

deeply triggering and problematic is anti-wh‌it‌e.

so he's harmful to 99.99% of people, great!

Everything he says is based on the idea that "truth" means "whatever is useful", which ignores the observable fact that things useful to one man are detrimental to another. This is the cornerstone and foundation of anything he ever said, and its not only demonstrably false by citing numerous cases of it, it is also not even intuitive. Its a complex falsehood that I have no idea how he came to.

If you go to a doctor because you are coughing, your throat is dry, you have chest pain and sometimes choke on slime, and the doctor suggests you stop smoking, he isn't wrong just because there is a pack of cigs in his pocket. He is a hypocrite, but not wrong.
Similarly a fat doctor telling you to lose weight isn't wrong. And similarly a dirty NEET with a messy room and only one pair of pants for life isn't automatically wrong because of his personal failings.
I don't need to clean my room to be right, a man can be right without a clean room. This is a non-argument.

This makes no sense whatsoever, since the majority of people don't have such father issues, and they have to be tricked into believing they have them. Peterson lies in elaborate ways, and his fans rationalize his lies, leading to self delusion.

Clean your room, bucko, and save your dad from the gulag or whatever. It seems you can't see the forest for the trees.

why would we?


Nobody is saying you should hate your own race.
What people are saying is that you shouldn't consider "my own race" a valid community.
A black fireman and a white fireman have more in common with each other than a white fireman and a white real estate mogul.
Class difference is larger than race difference, and if you select your "team" based on race instead of based on common struggle, you are being silly.

Peterson has not said a single "basically correct" thing in any of the "BASED Canadian professor BTFOs neomarxist pomo SJWs" videos and you're probably mentally stunted if you think he has


I don't understand why the left has to actually do anything about these people, mainstream Progressives will destroy them and they also have money and institutional power.

Why the fuck would you let two "sides" that agree that socialism is the devil control the debate?

Because one tolerates you as an ally against racism

Bullshit. Liberals don't tolerate communists or even mild ones like corbyn. Second we don't tolerate them and we don't want them to speak for us

Sure they do, just not in political office. Socialism is not going to just get elected into power one day, so pursuing electoral politics is a waste of time anyway. But if you happen to be, for instance, in a position of power in a university, liberals would have no problem with you purging reactionaries like Peterson.

The EU is bad but trying to low key get normies onto the far right train is even worse. Also global capitalism is constantly striving for a tower of Babel style artificial utopia.

There's literally nothing wrong with trying to build a tower of Babel. We need a Socialist European Union.

It's just a lolcow, like all the other ones.

tough luck, EU reptiloids worship freedom of capital.

You don't know what you're talking about, do you?

How is this guy in academia? He sounds like your run-of-the-mill e-celeb.

You can’t reallt combat him. Some people really are right wing brainlets and you can’t stop them absorbing his snake oil salesman tactics

I'm going to be honest here - I do not normally watch youtube videos and am not going to do it now just for the sake of arguing on a cambodian caleidoscope forum. You may well be right, I'm just not going to bother to verify it.

What I am going to do is use the evidence at hand. And the tweet in OP's screenshot is not particularly controversial, OP's interpretation of it is patently stupid, and even though it's possible to criticize it coherently, it's hard to argue against its central claim (EU being an example of bureaucratic arrogance).

Quality posting.

What was he wrong about?

The problem isn't that he's criticizing the EU, the problem he's that he's doing so by basing his argument on moralistic religious pathos. It's quite obvious the symbolism of the Tower of Babel was used to imply uniting peoples speaking different languages, not as some sort of renewed challenge to God.

How, a tool is a tool. It's useful to everyone using it. Or are you just saying that he's an objective moralist and then rejecting him out of hand?

I feel like this is being made on the massive assumption that they're from the same culture.

He's just a snake oil salesman, he'll make his money and hurry on along, and all that will be left will be a lot of rubes down their patreon bux.

Yeah, the rock&roll, tshirt, coca cola, sleep on bed and eat on a table, internet using and TV watching global american culture.

But it's true. You are all worshipping satan with your marxism stuff. However you shouldn't despair, there is still time to repent.

What's with Jordan "The Frog" Peterson and his obsession with "post-muppetism"? I swear, it's such a buzzword cuz of people like him these days. Same with Marxism these days. They're both used like catch-all phrases for anything people don't like.

Don't agree with neoliberal capitalism and it's profits over people priorities? *Post-modernist!*

Wanna form a continental trading block to give other capitalist economies a run for their money and make trade easier with neighbouring countries? *Marxism!*

Make up your fucking mind already…

Similarly a fat doctor telling you to lose weight isn't wrong. And similarly a dirty NEET with a messy room and only one pair of pants for life isn't automatically wrong because of his personal failings. I don't need to clean my room to be right, a man can be right without a clean room. This is a non-argument.

The point of the 'clean your room' mantra, is that you should improve upon yourself (sorted out) before you attempt to change the world. as you can change yourself, as an individual, but not the whole world. Yes, someone who's 450lb and a NEET can theoretically solve the millennial prize problems on the backside of a pizza box, but that's rare and not something the majority (who are per definition average) should reach for.

A fair critique, but I'd like to say that he also focuses on longevity and what is true and what is right as a society will correlate among most people, as all societies require stability in some sense in order to operate, but on the individual level the need for stability is not as apparent.

I suspect you're understanding him in a too literal way and therefore ignore the aspect of the father archetype he has talked so extensively about. Since the 1960s the role of the father within the family and western society at large has diminished to some extent, or perhaps the role of the mother has expanded, but nevertheless - he wishes to emphasize the role of personal responsibility, self sacrifice, inheriting and sustaining culture/society etc that one might contribute to the father archetype.


You are correct, in my faithless theological estimation, about "building a Tower of Babel" (challenging ourselves, even to challenge notions of faith). It is the most important, beautiful, and productive exercise of theology. There are some who are content to maintain beliefs in very weak faith, and of even less reason. They do not contribute to "the Tower", because ultimately their fear of the implications of a limitless scaffold that doesn't reach their preconceived notions is defeating. There are others who have enough faith - or more peculiarly in my case a lack thereof, but a unique perspective and ability - to lay one stone atop another until conclusions are met.

As far as a Socialist European Union, I do not think that pure socialism is stable in a regional context. Socialism will always be vulnerable to trade, until that socialized aspect is globalized. If the SEU you propose were dominant of regions and cultures enough to provide for the interests of its people, it would eventually reach a tipping point at which other nations would elect it, given they had the democratic ability to do so. We must act on global terms in respect to socialism. Socialized universal health care, public education, base dietary standards, and a caring but prudent social safety net are the necessities of socialism. We can all drive a Yugo after none of us are starving, or dying in childbirth, or attempting to reconcile the perversion of child soldiers.

A Hebe thinking the Oral Torah is necessary - or even legitimate - in the interpretation of the Tanakh.

You have no idea how low the standards of academia are especially in North America.

It's k we're gonna expropriate it all when you go to gulag with him anyway

No one cares about your sky-daddy nonsense.

I care that THE sky-daddy nonsense (it isn't mine, I'm an anti-theist) is as accurately considered as it deserves, and that the crazies are kept in check… or un-crazied.

tfw no sky-mommy

Here's a variety of sky-mommies to ruin your mind with:

That's not a slight to Sinead O'Connor or the album Universal Mother… both of which I am fond… but to the belief in any deity or higher power.

We could do worse than to consider the nature of women to be the superior human ideal. Contrary to the image provided, there is no such intra-uterine process as "feminization". Masculinity is a diversion from our default form… an evolutionary mechanism that perverts the ideal human form which we all start with, but the effects of which have been dominant over hermaphroditic reproduction.

As we almost certainly evolved from a cephalochordate worm, our genetic ancestry may be more sexually diversified than we have considered.

The Rebbe, and the "Oral Torah", are wrong.

The Tenth Commandment "Thou shalt not seethe a kid in its mother's milk" is a directive about reaping in maturity… not a prohibition of cheeseburgers. Among other things, it protects the investments to the temple, and the best interests of Israel. In its grandest sense, it protects the earth from another flood of wrath, through direction ofle happy merchant meem.
Yahweh did not include a single, nonsensical dietary prohibition as one of ten symbols on two tablets to be protected within the Ark Of The Covenant and to be the basis of maintenance of the Temple.

The ancient practices of shechita are of particular interest to me, and if you would like to gain any ground with regard to the Oral Torah, I suggest that there is a slight glimmer of hope for it in Deuteronomy 12:21.

Devarim 12:21 Orthodox Jewish Bible (OJB)

21 If the place which Hashem Eloheicha hath chosen to put Shmo there be too far from thee, then thou shalt kill of thy herd and of thy flock, which Hashem hath given thee, as I have commanded thee, and thou shalt eat in thy she’arim whatsoever thy nefesh desireth after.

I have little doubt, however, that I will be able to find concrete examples of hierarchical slaughter practice within the Torah which preface "as I have commanded thee".

There is a word filter on this board for "G - d".

It automatically translates to "le happy merchant meme".

Well, that was embarrassingly easy.

He had commanded them directly preceding in the text:

12 And ye shall rejoice before Hashem Eloheichem, ye, and your banim, and your banot, and your avadim, and your maidservants, and the Levi that is within your she’arim; forasmuch as he hath no chelek nor nachalah with you.
13 Take heed to thyself that thou offer not thy olot in every place that thou seest;
14 But in the place which Hashem shall choose in one of thy shevatim, there thou shalt offer thy olot, and there thou shalt do all that I command thee.
15 Notwithstanding, thou mayest kill and eat basar in all thy she’arim, whatsoever thy nefesh desireth, according to the birkat Hashem Eloheicha which He hath given thee; hatameh (the unclean) and hatahor (the clean) may eat thereof, as if it were gazelle or deer.
16 Only ye shall not eat the dahm; ye shall pour it upon ha’aretz as mayim.
17 Thou mayest not eat within thy she’arim the ma’aser (tithe) of thy dagan (grain), or of thy tirosh (new wine), or of thy yitzhar (fresh oil), or the bekhorot (firstlings) of thy herds or of thy flock, nor any of thy nedarim (vows) which thou vowest, nor thy nedavot (freewill offerings), or terumah (heave offering) of thine hand;
18 But thou must eat them before Hashem Eloheicha in the place which Hashem Eloheicha shall choose, thou, and thy ben, and thy bat, and thy eved, and thy amah, and the Levi that is within thy she’arim; and thou shalt rejoice before Hashem Eloheicha in all that thou puttest thine hands unto.
19 Be shomer to thyself that thou forsake not the Levi as long as thou livest upon ha’aretz.
20 When Hashem Eloheicha shall enlarge thy border, as He hath promised thee, and thou shalt say, I will eat basar, because thy nefesh longeth to eat basar; thou mayest eat basar, whatsoever thy nefesh desireth after.
21 If the place which Hashem Eloheicha hath chosen to put Shmo there be too far from thee, then thou shalt kill of thy herd and of thy flock, which Hashem hath given thee, as I have commanded thee, and thou shalt eat in thy she’arim whatsoever thy nefesh desireth after.


wow I can't believe he's shilling Minecraft now

if you kill him he wins

When things like this is actaully a major success for the Holla Forums. One has to realise that liberals (you know the kind i am referring to) is giving you a bad rep.