The Swedish flag is a constant reminder of our dark and oppressive past. Refugees and migrants are forced to live under its Christian Cross; a symbol of the Crusades and the slaughter of millions of innocent Islamic lives in Sweden's past that makes them feel unwelcome and unsafe. Sweden should be a safe space for everyone.
The rise of Extremist Far‐Right movements, emboldened by the flag of Christianity and 'whiteness', only further necessitates this change.
As our outdated national symbol gradually becomes the banner of Xenophobic and racist extremist groups, we must think into the future. A future of peace, understanding and tolerance.
Our proposition is, to show our unity with the religion of peace and to make our home a home and a safe environment for all, that we replace our symbol of an oppressive past with the Holy symbol of Islam. No longer would far‐right extremists feel that their country caters to their extreme and genocidal ideologies.
The cross is only representative of Christians while the moon not only represents our solidarity with Islam but is also a part of nature. The moon and stars represent a universal culture of beauty and resistance to fascism and intolerance.
It is time for Sweden to become an international country, a beacon of tolerance and understanding.(USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST)
There are no liberals to bait here, mate. They get the bullet, too. Enjoy your ban.
LOL That was quick.
Bra bete mv. Pröva igen snart.
Holla Forums falseflaggot aside, there are idpolers out there who would support this.
Why does this board make pretend that this is not then ultimate end game?
Dear Leader's justice is so swift!
Because it isn't.
Das ist gut
Communist revolution will never come but Sweden will be under formal muslim rule before 2030
What has that got to do with us?
by 2030? Shit they're going to need to increase their immigration quotas tenfold to hit that milestone.
Far left movements enable muslim invaders every step of the way
Yet it is not the left who is responsible for this mass movement of individuals, who incidentally tend to be young, working age men. Perhaps it is worth asking yourself, when confronted with this issue, "who benefits?".
The answer can be found in socialist writings from Marx to the modern day; the development of an even larger reserve army of labour.
The far left actively combats any nativist sentiments and all of the European MPs who are too cowardly to put the borders under armed guard with orders to kill were Marxists in their youth hoping for an international Communist revolution that will never come as muslim subhumans intrude into Europe forming parallel communities.
The muslim invaders are not useful EVEN from a neoliberal perspective they do not work they only come here to consume resources and sell drugs all those who facilitated their invasion either through neoliberal apologia or marxist apologia will pay dearly for it one day.
Because they're reactionary and against socialist thought. Many leftists are against mass immigration, however, precisely for the reasons Marx outlined. Are you suggesting the EU is a leftist institution? I keep hearing this, yet am only provided with a handful of examples. Anybody who actually listens to EU rhetoric hears nothing of Marx there. Why would they hope when they are allegedly in control of the entire supranational apparatus? Why would they instead introduce large numbers of reactionary foreigners into their societies, putting strains upon their systems and fuelling the reactionary right? If they truly had power over these institutions, why would they insist on following neoliberal economic policies? Even if that were true (and I have yet to see any statistical proof that this is the case), it wouldn't matter. Their mere presence increases job insecurity and adds to the reserve industrial army.
Keep up the apologia you will regret it one day I'm certain of it. But it will be too late.
What apologia? Where? No one here defends the EU, it's a tool for the Germans and the French to drink the blood of Greeks and Slavs