What went wrong ?

What the actual fuck?

I think this is part of the problem, how do Communist parties accept burgeoise elections, and pass the power to non-socialistr parties??
Are they that revisionist?

youtube.com/watch?v=a0BpfwazhUA

I'm no expert on the subject, but considering the communists (more or less) succeeded in overthrowing the monarchy, perhaps they do not consider these elections bourgeoisie? But then again, considering the fact that a People's Republic has not yet been established, that can't be certain.

It's not like they accept them on principle, they constantly threaten to take the Red Army back to the hills and renew the fight when they can't get their way. They just have a strong enough popularity that they can hope to take power democratically and the international community has nothing to whine about. They might be wary of giving India or whoever any pretext to invade.
It's also worth noting that their only credible non-Marxist opponents are the socdem NC, the left wing of which is still quite socialist, so it's not like they're facing some existential threat.

For their present mega revisionist situation I suspect demoralization after the fall of the Soviet Union had a role, they were the official party aligned with the Soviets in the US after all. So once Gus Hall died they gave up entirely even on running candidates for office, let alone for revolution.

Most of these don't exist anymore to be fair lad

That's a good point. If the communist parties openly declared a people's republic right away it'd draw too much international attention.

REVISIONISM

Feminism

4u

So you got caught. What's the next step in your master plan?

Because to the Nepalese communist, their revolution happened a few years back and they are now in the dictatorship of the proletariat.

top kek

...

As far as I know, the main splits happened between the factions who want to throw out Indian capital (which is quite extractive in Nepal) and those who want to keep it as Nepal is quite dependent on India economically (and India might even react with military considering they are still spooked about the Natalie's and often see Nepal as a lost province).

For western opportunists, this would make no difference. If the former is victorious, they would be blamed for "isolationism" and "Socialism in One Country", and if the latter is, they would froth their mouth about "revisionism" or "capitalism with red flags". We can only hope that once the provisional government is replaced with a socialist constitution, that they get a chance for a peaceful socialist construction that might take 20 years at least. Nepal is a very backwards country and it's topography isn't ideal either. Maybe the DPRK might help them, as they have a history of supporting communist struggles on the Indian subcontinent. Even if it turns out to be a lukewarm compromise in the end, it is good to see that communist revolutions still happen, and can hijack states on their own.