youtube.com
I'm still sceptical about the IdPol stuff, but honestly, we don't have any Marxist YouTuber that works in academia related to political economy, and is relatable to the typical YouTube consumer. I think she's pretty valueable to us, despite her underlying liberal attitude.
I unironically like her a lot.
Mexie seems pretty cool dude, idk what you're talking about. She's very open to learning and rethinking things.
wew
Muke, stop posting this shit here and just buy Mexie dinner if you want her to peg you.
The thing is, who else do we have? A fat Maoist who is always angry, a Finnish guy who specializes in Stalin apologetics so much that he gives every liberal a heart attack or a twink autist who read one book but pretends he is a theory wiz?
It's not my position. I've just put on that disclaimer because I've seen people here hating her because of a IdPol. I think her IdPol isn't that bad, she did say she despises liberal IdPol.
Muke and Mexie broke up because Mexie is with FinnBol and everybody who thinks the USSR was socialist is a communist for Muke.
communist = red_fascist
Why does ML house both reactionary and liberal idpol more than other sects?
I'd point to FinnBol's video on idpol, based on her comment she takes up roughly his position, which I felt was pretty good
Black Red Guard is unironically the only good leftist on youtube
FinnBol's position on IdPol is pretty based.
Cry me a river. Anarchist YouTubers like Libertarian Socialist Rants and Anarchopac are borderline hilldawgs at this point.
I agree. Roo is a joke and should just delete his channel. I like FinnBol (I like listening to him talk about Soviet history, which he knows a lot about) but his videos are probably just scary to liberals (to some extent he even acknowledges this himself, he said once that there's absolutely no reason to talk to normies about Stalin or the USSR unless they ask). Muke might be somewhat effective at making liberals reconsider (I don't really know) but I personally can't stand him.
Good shit, you're right.
FinnBol's video on idpol was okay, but his conditional support for idpol groups was based on an implicit assumption of them reciprocating that support at other times. As far as I'm concerned history shows that does not happen and the idpollution just stabs us in the back.
lmao no I'm a ML myself I was correcting the word filter, please read before posting
If fact, I think he outright stated his expectation of reciprocity.
Ok sorry for misunderstanding
Every revolution in history that was succesful was hijacking some sort of anti-feudal, anti-imperialist sort of movement. I don't think there is any other way of creating revolutionary atmosphere than picking up the issues of the capitalist superstructure (the things that actually affect people in their lives). Capitalism creates racism, for example - so obviously Marxists should try to subvert anti-racist movements, right?
no problem
Was there any?
Not even Shaun?
Not this discussion please. I assume that by successful he means that communists, with popular support, took power in some area.
What happens when idpol subverts revolutionary movements then? We only need to look at various student groups, anarchist bookfairs, or reddit to see how that happens.
Shaun isn't a communist. He's good at debunking alt-right videos but honestly his extremly slow way of talking makes not sit through any of his videos. I think he specifically designed his videos to be listened to as a podcast to fall asleep with, etc.
I mean that communists ended up in power. It was always through the vehicles of some other movement.
That's obviously bad. But think about this: Fascism gains power through subverting conservative, center-right movements, always, and they apparently do it very succesfully, just look how Molyneux has become an actual fascist. Communists, on the other hand, try super-hard to distance themselves from left-liberal movements and revel in intellectual superiority. I think this needs to be changed.
It is important because if you propose that as a model to follow and it turns out incapable to actually achieve our aims as it always stops halfway as history demonstrated time and time again maybe you should think over what it means for a revolution to be "successful."
Do you deny that you need to end up in power to change something? I obviously disagree with you that every communist revolution was "unsuccessful" but that's really not the topic here.
I hold the view that society can only be restructured through the social revolution and not afterwards by policies of a state.
Both are in a reciprocal relationship. A state's policies are useless unless there is a social movement that somewhat supports them, the same way a social movement can be defeated when there is a repressive state. Secondly, do you believe that all the proletarian revolutions were a "coup" by a small elite and didn't have popular support? Because the masses were definitely involved in pretty much all revolution of the 20th century.
This is why we need to have a well defined anti-racist and anti-sexist position based on judging people as individuals regardless of their ethnicity, gender and sexuality so that idpol morons don't subvert it with their "diversity quotas" feminist poc garbage.
Molymeme went fashie for the money and most conservatives were sympathetic to nationalism or fascism anyways. On top of this fascists don't lose much by making some concessions to conservatives or lolberts as fascists are mecruical forces of reaction to defend capitalism once anh aesthetics are stripped away. Conversely we communists have much to lose with the support of idpol, in fact in would not be out of the realm of possibility for a rainbow diverse fascism that was positive towards ethnic diversity or lgbt issues led by (neo)liberals. I don't think we should dismiss the struggles of niggers or cunts as irrelevant, but rather recognise the danger of working with liberals.
They don't, the state is always against the masses by its very essence.
Just because the masses participate does not make it a proletarian revolution. (The Bolshevik "Revolution" was a textbook example of a coup though without participation from the masses.)
I like finnbol cuz he isn't an overly smug asshole, expect when it comes to his anarchism videos, he comes across and very patronizing
I disagree, but you seem to be an anarchist so this came down to an ideological question now.
They are when the proletarian faction is victorious. The Kuomintang obviously were not a proletarian movement, but they were defeated by a proletarian movement. Just because you don't like how a movement degenerated doesn't make it anti-proletarian.
That's just not true. The Bolsheviks could have never taken power without popular support, they had majorities or at least massive influences in all the Soviets, they stoppe Russia from becoming fascist with worker self-organization in Petrograd. Even Leftcoms usually admit that it was an actual dictatorship of the proletariat until 1921 or something.
I'm not advocating for working with liberals. I advocate for entering movements that are opposed to an effect of the capitalist superstructure, and driving the liberals out of it.
Fuck off "left"con shill. Social changes were always made by small groups of persons and always will be.
first response was directed at
Fair enough, but you realize that anarchists have been viciously attacking him and everything ML. I don't think he would display an attitude like that if it wasn't anarchists who always start it. There are anarchist orgas which practically advertize to be against "Stalinism". In another video he said one of his band members is an anarchist and he is no problem with him politically whatsoever.
It’s not wrong to work with non-communist groups on certain issues. However, that would extend to conseratives as well as liberals, Lenin even told Bolsheviks to go into Tsarist and Black Hundreds dominated unions.
But I think the thing is communists look to infiltrate and go wherever the working class is not just infiltrated left-liberals as they are being perceived as being “closer” to communism.
This is true, really I have no actual problems with him. I enjoy how sober and clear his videos are, no fluff or anything.
And what makes you think the liberals will not drive you out instead? I mean we've seen this happen plenty of times now and I don't think it's something that can be avoided when entering a group where liberals are already established and in positions of leadership.
I've been here long enough to see plenty of lol anarkiddies bait fam, acting like all problems between A and ML is because of only one side starting fights is disingenuous.
I think while idpol is (rightly) heavily criticized here we shouldn't be pathologically afraid of it to the point that it inhibits our agitation and education efforts. We live in an age of idpol and how we deal with it will vary on a case by case basis.
If that happens, we have at least tried. I mean when neoliberal hilldawgs can drive out socialists that tells you something about the material conditions that quite not facilitate revolution as yet, I'd assume.
In America, for sure.
I'm actually quite honest about this. I have nothing against the Holla Forums anarchists, they are mostly based. But I do get the impression that it is always anarchists who start it, this is also based on my practical IRL experience as member of a ML party. Sometimes I think whatever we do we get smeared - when we are sectarian, we are blamed to be a "historical oddity" and when we try to facilitate left unity we are blamed for "opportunism".
I think anarchists are just stuck in a position where if they don't mount those kind of attacks publicly they get caught up in arguments about the USSR or State run economies more often than they already do. They desperately want their theory to speak for them not another tendencies so they overcompemsate sometimes.
I also really like the anarchos here tbh
And after how many failures do we decide that it is no longer a good tactic?
It's being exported fam, look at the limeys.
I've seen anarchists here start shit, but I've also seen MLs do the same here. I don't really have anything in particular against MLs, but I don't want to waste time conversing with a fuckwit who hasn't bothered to read one page of anarchist lit and whose argument is various bits of "utopian", "idealist", and "anarkiddie" cobbled together. I understand you likely feel similar about certain anarchists and I understand we do have some dumbfucks, but don't act like those sort of guys don't exist within ML as well.
came into thread hoping for amazing lefty tits
damn it, Holla Forums
Do NOT sexualize Mexie
Not mexie tits but here you go.
I refuse to believe any leftist can be that hot.
Look up vinterflamma
Can we get some lefty dick too
Are you retarded? How do you think the Bolsheviks were able to overthrow an entire state which actively tried to subdue them?
Not can they, but one of them occasionally posts here.
don't forget he's too much of a bitch to show his face and loves whining about "muh degenewacy"
Why is this an issue
Who cares?
When has he done that?
This argument is dumb and I wish this post wasn't old. The failure of implementing an idea has no actual bearing on an idea. You would have to prove that the failure was connected to the idea being implemented and not the surrounding period/the implementing.
Tell me Holla Forums, how do we solve the pseud problem under socialism?
So?
What are you even talking about
This should probably be its own thread.
Literally what? A person made a quote and a guy disagreed with it. Do we have to back up everything we say, are we not entitled to hold opinions without constantly proving them to everyone? I do not understand the pseud going on here. "LOL equal rights is good".
"DO YOU HAVE A SNIGNLE FAKING ARUGEMENT TO BAK THIS UP"
He looks like a typical Finnish metalhead with long straight dirty blond hair I believe, I don't have any pics but thats what I sort of remember when I used to see him around facebook which I have since stopped using
Why would you not? She isn't really the bad kind of idpol.
How can you not? That girl has sex appeal for days
Why does this board hate Anal Water?
Not to sound woman-hating, but the left would be so much bigger if our biggest youtubers were pretty girls who know shitloads of theory, like Mexie. Imagine if we had five Mexies, one ML, one AnSyn, one Trot, one Maoist-Third Worldist, and one LeftComm.
To be fair, you have to have a very high Autism Level to understand Anal Water posts. The dialectics are extremely subtle, and without a solid grasp of Hegel's work most of his arguments will go over a typical reader’s head.
Why does anyone need to learn Hegel or any metaphysics for that matter? Marx literally BTFO'd all philosophy.
Example please.
is mexie fat?
...
Nice orientalism there.
I took it not to mean that there was an expectation of reciprocity, but rather that communist organisations gain grassroots support by actually helping people with issues under capitalism, such as racism etc, rather than a bunch of rhetoric about class warfare. That’s not to say organising by class shouldn’t be the primary priority, but limiting yourself to these issues is also limiting your clout as an organisation.
...
Good post
I'm not very well read in philosophy but I get this sense too. Dialectics and historical materialism are literally perfect.
...
No. Watch the Badmouse video where him and her talk.
Too bad I'm never showing my face, eh?
He said pretty girls fam.
To be honest, I'm at that weird halfway point where I'm not traditionally beautiful, but not ugly enough to be interesting.
Do you have nice tits or ass or did you somehow manage to be comoletely average?
I don't show off my body. I'm long and skinny if that's what you're asking.
If all else fails you can always post feet.
...
I was asking if you had nice tits or ass, not to see your jewbs. Mexie's main draw to thirsty fucks is her milkbags, not her face.
Speak for yourself fam, she cute :3
She uses some kind of filter and it makes her eyes look weird.
Can you not comprehend why somebody who defends Stalin on the internet might not want to show his face? In any case, in some of his videos he dropped his name, so you can easily look him up so it isn't a big deal for him. And yes, he looks like your average Scandinavian metal kid.
Absolutely not, she has a meal plan and lifts afaik. Check out her Insta. Although she broke up with her boyfriend recently, that maybe caused her to eat more.
Fucking dropped
She looks as wide as badmouse
She had a video on her channel (can't find it anymore) where she talks about how she used to be way more into fitness and intense dieting but stopped because it was causing her health problems. She's not fat now by any means but she isn't as fit as she used to be
Do you get irritated by horny young men asking you personal questions about your anatomy?
...
שלום לך
Are you the same schizophrenic Jewess from youtube that hangs out with Anal Water and shits on Unroo?
You're pretty dumb, thats for sure.
That fucking idealistic retarded slut XDDD
...
Yes, and it's one reason why women can be reluctant to participate in politics: leftist circles aren't a refuge from horny dudes lusting after your body over your mind.
Yes. Have a pic with a time stamp.
Are you a "girl" or a girl?
Are you a trap?
That is inherent to all radical politics. If you aren't alienated by society in some way, you wouldn't be drawn to it in the first place. This alienation often includes sexual frustration.
By the way, are you actually a primitivist? Jason said so in a response video to you.
FAAB, born-female, whatever you'd like to call it.
Yeah I'm a green anarchist. But all Jews technically are since we believe the messianic era will be a return to prelarpsian utopia.
Which shows a serious failure on the part of revolutionaries to set an ethical example for the masses. If you're going to be leading the revolution, you should feel committed to mentally transcend all the bullshit capitalism has conditioned into you. Even Mao made this point in On Contradiction, about battles being won due to the conduct of the people fighting them.
Also, I thought theoretical antihumanists didn't adhere to the concept of alienation.
Not every green anarchist is a primitivist though. From what I was getting was that you sympathize with Third Worldism but reject Jason's Marxist-Leninist economistic approach.
I sympathize with it somewhat.
Jason's Third Worldism is – paradoxical, to say the least. Statements like: "only the most backwards nations are capable of socialist revolution" strike me as pretty bold and metaphysical. It's idealist, because no one can predict when and where a revolution will occur; all you can do is take action and hope your actions enable you to win (idealism and materialism aren't even opposed anyway). "B-b-but it's *empirically true*!" - so what? We're talking about a world which is heavily chaotic, not some cogito ergo sum bullshit. I don't know. Maybe I just strongly dislike anything heavily formalistic.
In other words, it's obnoxious to say you're against "metaphysics" - or that "metaphysics" and "dialectics" are entirely opposed as are idealism and materialism - and then proceed to base your theory on metaphysical claims.
Also, it is possible to use deduction when you're talking about how to meet the final goal (i.e. communism will require a massive societal overhaul), but you always have to take existing conditions into account, and it looks foolish to use such means and then claim you're basing everything on empirical claims only.
Jason truly is way too formalistic, which I think is caused by his desire to use an ideology as an identity. He grew up poor, through some weird coincidences he ended up with communism instead of alt-rightism but he needs his ideology to provide him axioms to make sense of the world. I don't hate him though. What I find interesting that Kim Il-sung, one of his idols, was heavily rejecting formalism:
marxists.org
I agree.
A lot of philosophical faux pas made by Marxists come from Marx's early polemics against the German idealists. A.W. and Hyperion told me in one of our chats that Marx during that time had a schoolboy-tier understanding of Hegel.
A lot of that formalism could be shaken off by making a case for Third Worldism using more than just economics. Econ never interested me even though I used to debate with "an"-caps. Read Marcuse, read Althusser like a good Maoist, read Baudrillard, read Fanon, use Lévinas' moral concept of the Other, return to theology and ancient philosophy, etc. and find whatever you need to show why black and brown people make better socialists than whites.
For example: you could claim Ibn Khaldun's theory of history meshes well with TWism as he talks about the non-corrupted poor and downtrodden overthrowing the corrupted people in power in a cyclical fashion, particularly interesting since many western Maoists seem to have a jihadi fetish (granted, Ibn Khaldun wasn't Shia or Palestinian but Tunisian).
Is Mexie our answer to Lauren Southern
...
Well I'm sure that plenty of anons here have wanked to her a few times, but I doubt she's dumb enough to do Lauren's publicity stunts.
The beginning of a great post for sure!
You could not reach a decent formal argument for the MTW position and conclude from this that formalist reasoning about the issue should be dropped?
"Therefore, the Negro nation are, as a rule, submissive to slavery, because (Negroes) have little (that is essentially) human and have attributes that are quite similar to those of dumb animals, as we have stated." - Ibn Khaldun
...
What do you want me to say? Jason's MTWism is rooted entirely in economism. "Look at these charts" is not a theory.
Sunni Arabs are the white people of the Middle East, yes.
The word prelarpsian is a portmanteau of preteen, LARPing, and rectal prolapse IIRC. That should clear things up.
she's beautiful woman
Doing things for others in the expectation of them doing things for you is to expect reciprocity for your goodwill.
No, it is a description of reality.
This kind of reductionism will get you nowhere.
What are your views on Israel/Zionism as a jew?
What are your views on Gnosticism as an antinominian?
What are your views on veganism and transhumanism as an ecologist?
Depends on what you mean by "Zionism". I don't support the Israeli government, checkpoints, apartheid walls, Jewish-only roads, etc. but I do want to see Jews return to Eretz Yisrael. That's already happening anyway (and it's not like someone who's half Ashkenazi half Yemenite feels attached to either Germany or Yemen), so my views on it are a moot point. But I'm strongly against borders so I have no issue with the Palestinians who were forced out in 1948 and their descendants coming back. Also, I find secular Israeli society to be deplorable, basically neoliberal as fuck, but then again so is Ramallah. I don't see Palestinian culture as something leftists should fetishize.
I consider myself antinomian. Scholem showed a lot of similarity between kabbalah and Gnosticism and it's highly possible Xtian Gnosticism originated from a Jewish Gnosticism.
No opinion on veganism. If it radicalizes the mind then I'm all for it, since leftists need to be more like us Jews and set a strong moral example for others to follow (which means living your principles). I have negative feelings on transhumanism.
Shabbat shalom!
I see two interpretations of this. Please be more specific as to your meaning.
Wish she'd lose the nose stud, but otherwise she's very cute and charismatic. We should promote the shit out of her.
kek, this totally isn't a Holla Forums false flag intended to divide and conquer and keep us impotent.
What happened to her? Twitter account is gone.
Is this your first day on a chan?
Some user said he had her instagram but wouldn't share it.
What exactly made these things revolutionary movements that were eventually subverted by idpol?
There's nothing radical about "student groups" and fucking bookfairs.
Next you'll say that Che Guevarra t-shirts were revolutionary because capitalist exploitation of the figure of a famous leftoid is a good thing.
They're nominally socialist organizations/groups.
By themselves no, if I have to explain the difference between a student communist group or anarchist educational event from a non-communist student group or bookfair then you should consider killing yourself.
No that's a rather bizarre prediction.
college is where the kids of petty bourgeois and bourgeois go study so they can handle their porky parents businesses. Maybe you kill yourself you fucking bourgeois filth.
...
I love megane anime girls :3
Not really, many proletarians go because they've been indoctrinated to believing it's their way out of poverty. You'd know this if you left your basement.
I honestly can't tell if you're a redditor or Holla Forums
If you can't tell what componet (should) make a communist student group or anarchist bookfair radical than no amount of education is going to help you.
not really the case at the state school I go to.
I don't like mexie
These are all Democratic Cops of America/Chapo type people. In one of the intermittent cycles of controversy about Nick Mullen and Chapo a bunch of girls in Democratic Cops of America/the left-twitterverse started posting naked picture of themselves for some reason.
The hottest of those girls (imo the last one) is at @vinterflamma on twitter.
I feel like its impossible to actually discuss this in real life because it comes off as very misogynistic, but harnessing sex appeal would be a great recruitment tool in general. I do remember when getting involved with leftist organizing irl one of my motivations (not the biggest but it was on my mind) was to actually be able to meet politically minded and intellectual women because meeting people like that is quite rare. I remember seeing picture of Democratic Cops of America meetings and thinking that I would like to meet some of the people at them, despite the stereotype there are some quite attractive leftist women particularly in the less militant/edgy groups.
No, it's vinterflamma and one of the anfems who posts here.
Charts and graphs depicting rates of exploitation on their own are not a theory. Theory isn't just data but interpretation of data.
Forgot to remove my shitposting flag.
My experience is that most theory proponents like to defenestrate data as it tends to get in the way of their ideas.
Data is just one part of the equation. Sure, it's obligatory to provide real-world analysis to back up your theory, but everything depends on how the data is analyzed and put into a theoretical framework.
Jason, for instance, only appeals to economic data without giving thought to other factors which would make or break revolutionary potential. The growth of jihadi groups in the MENA over communist parties should debunk his economism.
See, where you see a refutation, I see at least a partial confirmation. "Behind every fascism, there is a failed revolution"
Sure, but you could also say that support for Le Pen in France was also the product of failed leftist revolt. Or Modi support in India (which is technically Second World, not Third World, given that India is both highly developed and soft imperialist towards its neighbors and religious minorities like the Kashmiris and Sikhs).
The fact is, economic conditions aren't nearly enough to determine when and where a socialist revolution will occur. You also have to factor in things like hegemony, culture, ideology, family structure, cultural psychology (i.e. Asians are heavily group and duty-oriented and aren't going to revolt for communism out of "self interest" unless they get the right signal to do so), etc. And I reaffirm what I said before: shit like "only the most backwards of the backwards are capable of successfully implementing communism because they are backwards" are grand metaphysical statements. Do you believe nations collectively lose desire for communism as they progress further and further away from their primitive communist roots?
Simply put: I think people who're exposed to imminent risk from the economic system are by far more likely to take up arms and demand change by force. We're digressing from the topic we were discussing, however.
Nothing indicates they will fight for communism though. Many "Islamic socialist" parties, for instance, use Marxist-themed rhetoric all while promoting a doctrine of class-collaborationism.
If I'm a Lebanese prole, on what basis would I join the communist party over Hizballah? Why does the PFLP only have support in Bethlehem and a few other Christian villages whereas Hamas still has plenty more?
The fact is, economism is bullshit. Being exploited doesn't mean you immediately desire egalitarianism. In fact, from a Leninist perspective a major role of the vanguard party is steering the exploited in the right ideological direction. Funny how Unruhists claim to hate LeftComms yet seem to believe spontaneous communist revolutions will occur in the Global South.
Kind of disgusting how this cave becky uses an anti Lantinx slur as her name.
As I said earlier, it is a partial confirmation. I don't disagree that outreach and education are needed to nudge those inclined to resist in the desired direction. Do you think it is credible to expect any significant insurrection in, say, Spain or Poland at this point? Greece experienced a large uptick in resistance to capitalism after the application of EU austerity collapsed the economy. Economism seems partially consistent with real world events.
I was in Paris on May Day. I saw a potential insurrection before my very eyes. Got teargassed by the pigs, twice. Saw a "non-provoking" protester get beaten right beside me and I still feel ashamed not having been able to save his ass. Now, France isn't nearly as bad as, say, Moldova, and yet a mini-revolt happened. Why? Because the radical left in France has a strong history of left-wing uprising.
I follow Blanqui: regardless of conditions, it is your job to make revolution, even when everything is stacked against you. We Jews say, the best time for Moshiach to have come was 1000 years ago, the second best time is tomorrow.
Pics of May Day for confirmation so you know I'm not lying.
The real hardcore commies, Bolsheviks, Maoists, even Gonzalo, really made it a point for its members to follow a code of conduct of sex equality. Sendero had a disproportionately high number of female members, and the Cheka gave women equal opportunities from the start. I never saw any numbers on this, but I would bet that the proportion of women in Cheka was higher than the proportion of women in the party-State. Anyway, a site about MUH MISANDRY whining about women secret police being secret poliece: unknownmisandry.blogspot.com.br
Unsurprisingly, the site isn't particularly well sourced. I found out this Jacobleva as Varvara Iakovleva, this lovely bit from an Australian newspaper. The second news shows how reliable it is. In the same page they also reported that the tzar was still alive in 1919 kek
too obvious, polyp
So do the vast majority of self-proclaimed socialist parties. Well, the ones with a minimum of relevance, at least.
not sure if bait
Did the insurrection occur? Did you grasp a weapon and assault that police officer? No.
Didn't Anarchists do this as well even if they didn't have much of a code of conduct? Like where they didn't discriminate against women in their ranks and a prominent figure being Emma fucking Goldman
Be sure to donate to her patreon
always with the "liberal" label.
I suppose so, yeah, but I can't say for sure because my reading on the history of anarchism is minuscule. Anarchism is more of a paradigm shift than socialism I suppose, so it makes sense they would have a more "organic" tendency towards sex equality. Especially since codes of conduct are kind of antithetical to them.
We were militant enough to warrant the cops attacking us constantly.
Meanwhile, why hasn't an intifada overthrown the Israeli government yet?
I actually don't understand why Mexie and the finnish stalinist are friends.
Mexie is sympathetic to Marxism-Leninism and Mexie's first experience on YouTube was to recieve the Stalin pill by FinnBol. FinnBol designes his videos very academically, so as someone who is working in leftist academia she probably appreciated that too.
I wouldn't say they are friends though, their personalities are vastly different. Mexie is your average social studies Canadian chick with nosering and FinnBol is your average Finnish Black Metal autist.
Now Chaya, do you not think it is a bit unreasonable to ask why an insurrectionary force composed primarily of stone throwing teenagers has failed to defeat an army that has repeatedly won devastating victories when attacked en-masse by its neighbours?
There will never be a life debate where roid-rage Mexie shouts NO! YOU ARE NEGATED at A.W. and rips off his legs to clobber him to death with :/
I agree 100%
I honestly don't see how your snarky remark is an argument for Third Worldism. You know Palestinians with stones and antique rockets which don't do shit can't defeat the IDF too, right?