Illiterate newfag here

I was being facetious more than anything but you have a point. There are no outright political prisoners but instead, dangerous ideas are either suppressed or pacified and then commodified.

Then I guess it would be fair to say that freedom of speech was non-existent for those that deviated from the line. I do not support such regimes.

What is a country that has a regime you support?

Don't see how that is relevant to the assessment of Soviet immorality and mass murder. What is your favourite type of graph to cite, bar graphs or pie graphs?

Yeah I'm wasting my time here, bring some material arguments next time.

tru.
Bars are nice but time to wrap this thread up up
No, It wasn't the best but it wasn't literal hell on earth.
Morals are spooks
As far as prisons are now. Beyond that, no.
Yes.

"Yeah I'm wasting my time here, bring some material arguments next time."
You are free to leave any time. Or am I exploiting you? You never know, with the loose definition of exploitation.
Also, an argument cannot be material, materialism is more than its relevance to Marxian philosophy.
Did you create the assembly line you are working with? Or did the people who rented out the space and paid people to do shit for them? Those 'people' are not you. You'd think people would learn with the war on drugs: even if you stifle or destroy free trade, people will always find a way to pay others to do shit for them or produce shit for them.

I hope you got my point.
If you agreed with their immorality, it was fine. It was one of the worst regimes in the twentieth century.
Then you ought to invite their imprisonment of the 'economic crimes'.