ITT Holla Forums in the 1950s

...

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=7VbHUI1R3IA
youtube.com/watch?v=8RM1oTw6fPg
youtube.com/watch?v=umoYewIsn_I
youtube.com/watch?v=RPTwDO0sh-E
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_civil_wars
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

yes, actually.

The Civil Rights movement was actually very class conscious. Remember that on the day MLK was shot he was working to support a strike in the area. The 70s was when the liberal elites forced class to take a back seat to idpol.

Well it's true, if black people would have fought for revolution instead of amendments they would have ended up the least exploited in the end.

Makes you think

Remember kids, scratch a redditor and a polyp bleeds

Civil rights movement was based. The black panther party was anti-idpol.

notice how they're not all fat retarded liberals that took "racial studies" classes at overpaid universities

...

no and fuck off with your false equivalences

Hmm, it's almost like the civil rights movement of the 60s had a more universalist undercurrent to it compared to the divisive intersectional bullshit you see these days. But don't let that get in the way of your shitposting, OP.

stfu op

Haha this

Fucking liberal

But we like the civil rights movement? Especially the BPP
Fred Hampton would be spinning in his grave if he saw the idpol nonsense that goes on these days

But there was also an undeniable, explicitly racial strain of justice they were seeking. The point we should take away that class/racial/sexual struggle are all crippled on their own. The mainstream trend has been to emphasize the latter at the expense of the former, but that doesn't diminish their objective importance. Rejecting anti-racism/anti-sexism on class-essentialist grounds is ceding territory to liberals. All three should be the domain of socialists.

So how do you propose we become involved in the Mens Rights movement?

I agree completely. The question is how to go about this properly, and ignore the stupider shit that has come out of those movements. For example, I was listening to an interview of Democratic Cops of America's chief organizer. He was talking about healthcare and goes

To include ftm trannies that might get pregnant. I mean it's crazy, I don't want to get roped into the tone policing and witch hunting of the liberal anti racist and anti sexist movements.

Well I'm a "TERF" so I would consider transgender identity to be a manifestation of sexism, so maybe you're asking the wrong person.

As far as racism goes though it's a no-brainer. I can't remember any other time when anti-cop sentiment was so mainstream in the US. That's huge. Only an idiot would dismiss something like BLM outright. Yeah it's true that Democratic politicians and the media seek to subvert it at every turn, but the core message fits snugly within larger leftist praxis.


Fuck off.

Fuck off, this is a Fred Hampton board

Can you explain? My response to the transgender question is that we instead work towards having people accept feminine males and masculine females. Maybe if a dude in a dress was to become socially acceptable he wouldn't feel the need to take estrogen pills and cut his dick off

Also I agree about the racism. Anti-racism also carries it's own baggage, but it's not hard to find examples of real racism today

mlk was a house nigga and the reason civil rights movement took off is because it had major funding from porky "handlers"

cut this shit out unless you gonna provide a source for your bold claims

The postwar Civil Rights movement was great. The end began in the 1960s with Vietnam, when the anti-war movement exploded as liberal college students joined en masse to avoid getting drafted. Their single-issue focus made them weak and vulnerable to cooption, so once the war was over most abandoned the movement or began to focus on identity over class struggle.

This is your brain on reddit.

kys

That idea is considered "TERFy".

Persuasive. Not everyone has a five minute attention span, you know.

What happened with "not ceding territory"? Or was that only about idpol you personally benefit from? :^)

Ahahahahahahahaha

...

Fucking brocialist exclusionary black power movement, why didn't you say WE are PEOPLE. Wow can not believe how fucking chauvinist these assholes are, may as well be FUCKING NAZIS!

The CIA was investigating him for associating with communist. Read the JFK files.

no because Holla Forums is all brown people LARPing as white nationalist

Dude FUCK the Black Panthers! Look at these liberals LITERALLY TOLERATING L I T E R A L White Supremacy in the name of some stupid fucking shit called "class unity"! Racetraitors! None of those "Young Patriot" yts have ever experienced REAL opression and they are not "allies" because they have excluded the history of my people through REHBABILITATING the fucking CONFEDERATE FLAG! Fuck actually recruiting working class people, symbols and ideas are FAR MORE INFLUENTIAL THAN MATERIAL CONDITONS! #FckYt

It's really not the same thing. Those white guys in the picture would probably be asked to march in the back because of their white privilege.

So you're telling me this:
youtube.com/watch?v=7VbHUI1R3IA
and this
youtube.com/watch?v=8RM1oTw6fPg

Are actually more revolutionary than this
youtube.com/watch?v=umoYewIsn_I
and this
youtube.com/watch?v=RPTwDO0sh-E

FUCK IdPol

The FBI literally told him to commit suicide or they'd release information they had on him.

But we have children on Holla Forums, so it is what it is.

Yes but struggling against racist policies like Jim Crow isn’t idpol because racism is idpol.

Just as a general tip for the future, never actually say "a group of people" and "question" like that. If you can type and read, you should probably know better.

it's true, though. fighting for concessions like that just makes it more difficult to overthrow the capitalist system, because now that black Americans have the right to vote, they no longer feel as much alienation as they otherwise would have. ideally, if you're trying to foment revolution, you want the capitalist system to be maximally shitty and unsatisfactory for all parties involved. the Civil Rights movement accomplished the opposite. it further embedded the oppressed underclass into the machinery and theater of its political system, and assuaged symptoms that are ultimately irrelevant compared to an actual revolution, in the eye of a revolutionary.

You're right OP, look at all these wonderful white allies truly making strides in overthrowing the capitalist system

I hate to play the privilege meme. But it really is a lot easier to say this when you're not in a position that would get affected. Like when Oscar Wilde wrote how the worst slave owners were the less abusive ones because they kept the system afloat, it was easy for him to say that because he wasn't getting whipped and lynched. So concessions might not be as revolutionary as you want, but it makes a lot of people's lives easier.

Just like plebbitors are flagellating whites larping as darkies

Yes, when the revolution happens, we will simultaneously give rights to women, non-whites, gays, etc… while we also overthrow the bourgeoisie. Lmao do you even into basic development of society? It is obviously to the benefits of socialists for better worker rights, socialists can't just fix everything at once.

Keep on fighting on your molehills, liberal.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_civil_wars

well done! we did it!

fucking hell the citation links to /r/The_Donald

...

Wdhmbt

That is literally what shitlibs think, not joking.

Why was this person banned?