Socialism is a mode of production

...

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/aCiYmCVikjo
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

...

Never in the history of the world has an entire class of people done something. "The bourgeois" didn't create Capitalism, that was individuals, often associated with the bourgeoisie but also from the aristocracy, the clergy, the peasantry, and other orders. It will be the same thing with Communism. Predicates (such as "doesn't own private property") are incapable of social action; only individuals are, though individuals are driven by predicates.

What are you even imblying?

...

Brainwash the proles until the superstructure is aptly resonant with the underlying base.

why are leftcoms clinically retarded

shit thread, kill yourself

That abolishes the present state of things: production for exchange.

S P O O K Y

wot

If capitalism is a mode of production and not just the real movement which abolished the previous state of things, than socialism will also be more than the real movement to abolish the present state of things or at least close enough to be considered such by all but pedantic autists.
No, but ideology influences the aftermath of a revolution along with material circumstance. We can see this with the liberal revolutions and the Russian revolution.

Ideology can fucking MOTIVATE and CATALYZE revolutions! If you disagree with this you are a moron.

That was my point, but ideology can't win revolutions. Adopting Anarcho-Syndicalism or Marxism-Leninism doesn't grant resistance to superior fire power or tactics.

We agree, comrade.

This but unironically.

Your boss might be a wage-laborer as well. Your boss isn't the one who controls the means of production, the shareholders are.

The boss is the one who is controlling me, without him the shareholders won't get their dividends. They are powerless without those who actually enforce their order. Wage-workers can be class-traitors, you know, just look at any cop or manager.

youtu.be/aCiYmCVikjo

I always thought movement here was used in the dialectical sense, and not the social. Which is it?

If you kill your boss you'll just go to jail. If you organize for revolution, we'll all live in relative paradise.

I'll kill the police too and burn down the prisons.

No you won't.

Capital is controlling you, your boss and the shareholders, you fucking idiot. Read Marx.

That was a good quote until the last part, WTF?

Capital is not a physical entity, I cannot force me to act in a way that reproduces it.

You are free to starve, of course, but most people don't want to, and so the system wheels on.

...

Socialism is love, socialism is life.

Socialism: just do whatever the fuck you want.

What kind of leftist are you?

socialism is just the workers owning the means of production.

communism is the common ownership of the means of production and abolition of state, law, class and money, etc.

Marx didn't came up with the concepts, they're way older. Read a book.

AKA LeftComs.

He's talking in the context of capitalism.

This

You are all fools, TRUE socialism is raising the minimum wage by one cent.

The hell of capitalism isn't that the firm has a boss

you're made of the same stuff Holla Forumsacks are made of.

Where most of the people was farmers.

you fucking retards, the form of production isn't the fucking problem, production under capitalism IS socialized, the problem is exactly property and organizing production.