How do you argue with someone when they say

How do you argue with someone when they say


?

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kulak
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Italian_Communist_Party
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_communist_parties
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

it wasn't real communism

The American "revolution" killed roughly 25% of all colonists.

ignore this falseflag

"actually-existing-socialism" was basically the capitalist industrial revolution mandated by the state for the most part

Good

They were all Kulaks, and kulaks aren't people

Why don't you own it?

Let's say that we're going to mix chemical components A and B. We don't exactly know how, but the correct mix should be something wonderful.

And everytime it leads to disaster. Destruction. Death. Stench.

Now, would it be smart to continue sticking to chemicals A and B, or would it be smarter to find another way to achieve your goals?

No it didn't. Read history.

this is still the only actual answer itt

I have a better example, faggot.;

you mix chemicals A and B and they make a perfection solution. But every time you're done, some jackass comes along and knocks over your chemistry set, destroying everything. Then says "see? science doesn't work. Now let's talk about jesus!"

Was the problem the chemistry or the 3rd party?

...

For fuck's sake user, stop, someone might not realize you're joking.

100 million people is claimed by the most popular book of this kind, "The Black Book of Communism". If you want to counter the argument about the loss of life under these regimes, just google it. Even on Wikipedia page you'll find the critique of the numbers, and if you search further, you can find evidence of miscalculations and the obsessive mania of authors, who purposely overstated the numbers. Of course, you shouldn't deny that nobody was killed under these regimes, such claims would be welcomed as warmly as the Holocaust deniers. Just say that the number of people killed under communist regimes is probably way lower, and don't forget to add that about 20 million people die each year due to capitalism

Collectivizing farms always leads to mass starvation because our world is addicted to efficient capitalist agriculture. Any deviation from this leads to famine, which accounts for the majority of your 100 million figure.

Explain to them that those numbers are very much inflated and the deaths where not voluntary it was a result of famines. Point them to the fact that capitalism kills more every 5 years to things like malnutrition/hunger, curable diseases and water pollution

Clearly, 100 million weren't enough.

Capitalist countries abandoned free market agriculture a long time ago.

...

"It didn't"

...

hOW aBoUT yOu ReAD WiKIpEdIa

...

...

Never forgetti the time stalin paid clouds to stop raining over Ukraine

These

>en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kulak
Huh wow i wonder if capitalists destroying literally millions of tons of food had something to do with this big nasty famine

...

It was more than 100 millie.

my sides

This is pure gold

the bugmen mentality on this board is astounding

Why argue with children?

There is no counter argument. Communism killed 100 million people and it was a horrific failure (that is if it's true goals where to bring about communism)

see

How many times does this need to be said.


The "communism killed 100 million meme" is a baseless claim whose bold source is the Black Book of Communism, a book that was so poorly done that even two of its authors, Nicolas Werth and Jean-Louis Margolin, later distanced themselves from the work.

The book's thesis, that communism killed 100 million people in the 20th century, completely falls apart when you consider the methodology they used to arrive at that figure. Essentially, they count virtually every single death, whether by natural causes, or famines (that in countries like China or Russia were common prior to the communists taking power, and eventually ended under the communists), or even a notion of people who "should've been born."

So here's how it works: If a person died of a heart attack, or slipped and fell down a flight of stairs, or died of a disease, or died from smoking, or from famine, or even of old age, etc under a communist regime, he was a "victim of communism" because it's the fault of the communists that he didn't have the right health care, or whatever. Basically, any death that happened, if it happened under a communist state (a state that called itself communist is the criteria the authors use), it was a result of "communism."

Now the funny thing is that if you use this methodology to calculate deaths under any other system, like capitalism, using the same criteria (a government that ''calls;' itself capitalist), you get a much, much higher death toll for capitalism. At least 100 million people died of smoking in capitalist countries in the 20th century. And how many people have died in capitalist countries of problems that could've been solved from inadequate health care? And how many people have died from obesity, etc? And that's not even getting into all of the overtly political deaths caused by funding death squads in other countries, starting wars of aggression, etc that capitalist countries (again, ones that have simply professed to be adherents to capitalism) have done.

So in conclusion, it's a load of crap. "Communism" didn't kill 100 million people, and if it did (if we accept this flawed methodology), then capitalism has killed at least ten times as many, and with the way the environment is heading, if we don't stop capitalism, it will surely end the human species.

Sorry, that should read, "whose sole source."

Has a communist government ever been voted into power?

Communists were voted into power in Czechoslovakia in 1946, with a 94% voter turn out and a full million more votes than the Liberal party.

Just recently Nepal elected a ML party to head its government but I don't know if they're in power atm.

I don't disagree

India routinely votes ML parties into govt at the state level

Google Chile

kill them

Chile, the National Front in Iran was partly communist (Leninist and Titoist elements), the PCI and PCF won plently of legislative elections (and in some cases would have won outright if not for US electoral manipulation), both Nicaragua and Venezuela have had leftist (although debatable if they are communist in ideological terms) governments elected. There is the state of Kerala which has an ideologically marxist government, several countries in Europe have had governments with communist parties in them (Portugal springs to mind), And then finally there is the clusterfuck of Nepal. Look at the wiki page for their legislature, it will be a good funny 10-15 mins.

"Well, let's make it a 100 million and one."

Yeah we're going to have to work a lot harder to even approach capitalism's numbers

you dont argue with it. For all their huffing and puffing it was still national socialism. Stalin had to keep absorbing states to keep his population even. So the whole idea of gloabl communism was really just an expanding national socialism. bc meh philosophy

Tell them that it didn’t.

...

Then why did they die? There's obviously enough food going around, so what's preventing them access to their needs?

they died because of neoliberalism

Did you even read my post you fucking brainlet? I am using the same exact standard for evaluating the communist "death toll" for evaluating the capitalist one.

They deserved it

Fucking lol

Stop

i read that as a prompt to continue but i don't have anything else remotely similar to dump

Tell them Capitalism killed 100 million Communist.

When did socdems become the best posters?

Commies are not even efficient at killing themselves lmfao.

Communists are every bit as efficient as Capitalists.

kill them

What has worked best for me as autistic as it sounds is going through statistics of how many people starve because of capitalism which is around 21 000 die every day because of starvation alone.
And then explain how the statistics of how many people died in the soviet union and china are simply all natural deaths total not direct causes of socialism and people were starving before socialism.

by my estimates, July.

Brought to your by Bordigist Gang

laughed

it didn't, it wasn't real communism even if it did, and capitalism killed and will kill more

By linking them this.

I dont know what youre talking about science isnt real and is a patriarchal construct so what ever i feel is true lalalalala

The beatings will continue until morale improves.

...

...

for a sense of scale

this triggers me to no end

Doshite

and they weren't real people

So who was it? Ebil Amerikkka? CIA? CIA plants who created gulags and great leap forwards and all the totalitarian genocidal shitholes of the 20th century communism? Answer me.

...

...

...

...

In addition to the other posters, Communists were regularly elected to regional and city governments in Italy.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Italian_Communist_Party

For nowadays:

Communists take part in/are in charge of several governing coalitions where they have a varying degree of power. See here:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_communist_parties

Told Status
[x] TOLD
[x] SUPER TOLD
[x] MEGA TOLD
[x] OCTOLDBER REVOLUTION
[x] MARXISM-LENINISM-TOLDISM
[x] TOLD WITH CHINESE CHARACTERISTICS
[x] COMINTOLD
[x] TSOLD BOMBA
[x] THE HUNT FOR RED OCTOLDBER

Or was it local quantum variations in gravity, horses or planetary alignment?

The Soviet Union was obviously a Fascist state, not real communism

So was Cuba, not real communism

And so was China or North Korea, not real Communism.

Venezuela however…… Socialism =/= Communism. Socialism will never work, but communism will.

The Soviet Union was a state capitalist state whose creators tried to implement Communism through. Cuba is just a Socdem state with a lot of nationalization whose creators tried to implement Communism through. China is just capitalist with some gidsmedats whose creators tried to implement Communism through. North Korea is just a quasi-monarchy, I don't even know what the creators intended. Venezuela is just a socdem state and has always been Capitalist.

wut


"Tsold bomba" is pushing it, but otherwise it's quite the kek.

you failed and casted the shadow of shame upon your family.

Broke: Communism killed 100 million people
Woke: Capitalism killed hundreds of millions of people
Common sense: Only people who don't know how to research demographics and compare statistics believe that shit.

ignoe them, realize that debate is worthless anyway, and tell them to face the wall

Haha. Kys.

No it's these BASTE infographics and memes that these helpful posters.

Serious: It would have helped if they didn't keep adding their own names revision after revision

How about you fuck off, newfag.

...

Might as well roll

die bitch

Source me on that pic, fam.

Is this a challenge?

what's this from?

ask them how many capitalism has killed
this forces them to think about where the number they cite has come from and what methodologies it uses to attribute deaths to 'ideology' or political system

b-bbut communism killed 100 million people!!!!!

also related, a post I capped a few days ago