Spoiler: It's the Jews again:
HOW DO THEY KEEP GETTING AWAY WITH IT!
...
who dat
Is it reasonable to be concerned if you notice the guy talking about how the evil bankers are taking over the world has a fucking teardrop tattoo, a sign that he's probably killed someone?
Are you suggesting we shouldn't trust the politics of people who kill people?
No, I'm just concerned for the safety of the people conducting the interview.
kek
kek wut
kek wut
Nice try, Rabbi Kikeberglestein, but your mind control won't work on me!
Dan Brown is a reliable source! I learned from him that Jesus is the 14 time great grandfather of a French cryptographer!
"Until its complete extermination or loss of national status, this racial trash always becomes the most fanatical bearer there is of counter-revolution, and it remains that. That is because its entire existence is nothing more than a protest against a great historical revolution… The next world war will cause not only reactionary classes and dynasties, but also entire reactionary peoples, to disappear from the earth. And that too is progress."
Holla Forums who said it?
scheme, you dumb whiggers
Commonism is a Jewish plot, man, don't you get it?
"The classes and the races too weak to master the new conditions of life must give way. They must perish in the revolutionary holocaust."
Holla Forums who said it?
What context is it in you faggot?
Meant to reply to you with
This truism really pisses me off. And that quote in particular adds a whole new layer of stupid to it.
Nice, killers and possible gang members are now educating the alt right on communism, OH the irony
the first one is talking about Slavs, the second one's context is apparent from who said it
some retard on stormfront 14 years ago atributed it to Marx without providing a source?
Kind of like Olavo claiming that pretty much the entire of the Labour party in britain was under direct control of stalin and they were doing a "scissors strategy" to indoctrinate the british people into communism, i wish it were true, the world be a lot more interesting if there were all powerful kabals for us to unmask, rather than people being dumb selfish monkeys and that having results in society. turns out there were no sources for his claims (he said it came from the official soviet archieves in 1991) and the narrative came from some random fiction writer.
Only the first sentence in that quote is real.
holocaust wasnt even a word back then, neither was genocide, makes u think.
I actually have to thank you for that, I wanted to see the comments.
You know, you keep telling us that the Jews created Marxism and Capitalism and control both, but I don't think that's how 20th century history unfolded
lepoltards use the report function for things they don't like
wew
Stopped watching after it attributed communism to moses hess.
Man, you gotta realize the Jews control everything, we gotta take the Bilderbergs and the Rothschilds down to make the white race free again.
IIRC Simon Schama said in his TV series on the history of Britain that the first recorded use of the word "holocaust" to describe the killing of Jews was about those massacred at York in 1190.
The first quote is Friedrich Engels in Neue Rheinische Zeitung, 1849
The second quote is Marx in Marx People's Paper, 1856
Here's a bonus one:
"Let us consider the actual, worldly Jew – not the Sabbath Jew, as Bauer does, but the everyday Jew. Let us not look for the secret of the Jew in his religion, but let us look for the secret of his religion in the real Jew. What is the secular basis of Judaism? Practical need, self-interest. What is the worldly religion of the Jew? Huckstering. What is his worldly God? Money. Very well then! Emancipation from huckstering and money, consequently from practical, real Jewry, would be the self-emancipation of our time…. We recognize in Jewry, therefore, a general present-time-oriented anti-social element, an element which through historical development – to which in this harmful respect the Jews have zealously contributed – has been brought to its present high level, at which it must necessarily dissolve itself. In the final analysis, the emancipation of the Jews is the emancipation of mankind from Jewry".
What's the book called?
see
Of course communism is about Jewish Control. Stop telling the Goyim and you will be rewarded!
So…. …..this is the power of never reading…….. ?
My guess for the book name is On the Jewish Question btw
Will I be given tax exempt status if I say I like Jews?
Lot's of MLs are unaware
The Jewish Question, haha, we detourned you're memes /leftypaul/!!!
Marx and Engels weren't well versed on intersectional muh privilege theory and might be even described as … politically incorrect! … triggered yet?!?!?!?!?!
no Goy. You must pay!
:(
and did you know? Lincoln wanted to get blacks out of the U.S! UNIONFAGS BTFO
So capitalism exists and it's made by Jews, and the Industrial Revolution brings to focus flaws within Capitalism and Mercantilism, but then now you're saying the Jews invented the criticism of Capitalism. But I thought they controlled Capitalism so why would they do that. So now you have Jews (all in on it together) inciting violence towards capitalism which results in not only widespread worker violence throughout the world (particularly Russia and the US), where they're both damaging each party. Ok that doesn't make sense for the colluding Jews to do but fine, let's keep going.
Now the Soviet Union exists and Capitalist nations fucking hate its existence and want it gone. Then the Cold War happens and Asia's communist now, but is that Jews too? After so many lives lost and so much terrible shit done and the near nuclear war between opposing sides, what was the point
I'm so confused. Maybe that's what the Jews want, for me to be confused as to where the fuck the planning in this massive century spanning conspiracy. It just seems fucking counter productive
It's 84-Interdimensional Dreidel my dude
yes silly goyim, Capitalism, Liberalism, Communism are all tools for the Zionist agenda.
In case anyone missed this
hooktube.com
But if their goal is simple slavery why does all the extra shit happen and if they protect their capital then why the fuck did they invent communism which did plenty of harm to it
Are you saying socialism is slavery or communism is slavery
Is it both slavery
Then what the fuck why are they self mutilating their bottom line and nearly going to nuclear war
I
Don't
Get
It
Dude
Engels and Marx feuded with National Zionism though.
Didn't the guy who made this also do this:
The Jews are the Reapers in Mass Effect. Don't question the plot holes they're just powerful, if you question it you're disrespecting Holla Forums's artistic integrity
Literally webm related
No the goal is world domination. Sectarian violence is a tool for regime change and the USSR was no longer exclusively under Jewish Control by the time of the cold war. Power though conflict, thesis -> antithesis -> synthesis. CIA finances communist revolution in south America then American Military uses that as an excuse to restore "democracy" and a new Banana republic is established. Class conflict and Racial Conflict are just ways to stir up revolution to subvert existing established powers.
The Jews are basically the Aldmeri Dominion: powerful magic users, have pointy noses, live a long time and are exceptional craftsman.
Ok that's where I was going with it but then if it's world domination what system do they use afterwards, communism or capitalism. And if it involves either why did they invent the other? For shits and giggles? How do they handle a conspiracy that long, why did they destroy so much of their own capital, why did they erect strict borders
It just doesn't make sense. In the context of history your conspiracy does not make sense.
I mean it all just seems so fucking counter intuitive
The simple answer is that Jews are bad, just accept it and help in the pogrom.
they feuded over the methodology not over the end goal. Both Nationalist Zionist and Interventionist Zionist (like Marx) are Zionist.
The system afterward for the goyim is not important, you are merely cattle. The ends justify the means.
I've never read this before. This is shocking to me. This blows everything open in history.
I meant themselves. What do they do, themselves.
Wasn’t Hess a proto-nazi or some shit?
Relavent
hooktube.com
who?
...
So is Occam's razor a Jewish Conspiracy by any chance??
I can’t believe of all people to tie to Marx they pick Hess.
yes, all abrahamic religions are jewish.
(and Occam was a christian Monk)
under rated webm
wewt
If this guy thinks it's self evident that this is bad holy fuck I'm laughing. Way too far gone.
There is literally nothing wrong with being a Jewish communist.
Be'ezrat Hashem, revolution is coming soon.
...
Did you all know the Communist logo was a Tel-Aviv Football Club Logo.
Why couldn't they get a guy without a speech impediment to narrate this shit?
...
" Marx wrote to Engels about the “Proudhonist clique” in Paris which “declares nationalities to be an absurdity, attacks Bismarck and Garibaldi. As polemics against chauvinism their doings are useful and explicable. But as believers in Proudhon (Lafargue and Longuet, two very good friends of mine here, also belong to them), who think all Europe must and will sit quietly on their hind quarters until the gentlemen in France abolish poverty and ignorance—they are grotesque.” (Letter of June 7, 1866.)
“Yesterday,” Marx wrote on June 20, 1866, “there Was a discussion in the International Council on the present war…. The discussion wound up, as was to be foreseen, with ‘the question of nationality’ in general and the attitude we take towards it…. The representatives of ‘Young France’ (non workers) came out with the announcement that all nationalities and even nations were ‘antiquated prejudices’. Proudhonised Stirnerism…. The whole world waits until the French are ripe for a social revolution…. The English laughed very much when I began my speech by saying that our friend Lafargue and others, who had done away with nationalities, had spoken ‘French’ to us, i. e., a language which nine-tenths of the audience did not understand. I also suggested that by the negation of nationalities he appeared, quite unconsciously, to understand their absorption by the model French nation.” "
So that's where the Russians stole it from!