Fuck r/communism

Since becoming a tankie I have come to realise that ruthless stamping out of revisionism is indeed necessary. Perhaps /r/communism isn't so bad after all.

This is some next level irony.

Please go back.

It's reddit man. Be relative.

Well, I guess there are some "tankies" that are merely anti-revisionists, but you see a lot of them here that throw "anti-imperialism" into the mix. That's when things get a little silly imo; anyone who is anti-U.S. is good by definition, and one who is pro-U.S. (or receives U.S. aid) is bad by definition. Receiving aid from us may be an indication that something could be fishy, or maybe it's an indication of our profoundly muddled foreign policy. Maybe targets of the U.S. are targeted because they are Socialist or revolutionary, or maybe they are targeted for more real politik reasons, and their ideology doesn't matter,

Why do you give a shit about the Rohingya, though?

...

/r/bannedbycommies

...

in other words you got banned for for a 100% justified reason. gotcha

You're not serious, are you?

Tankies gonna tank, I don't know what you expected.

Join the club, lots of us have been banned from leftist subreddits, and it's almost always for the most asinine things.

It actually makes me wonder how the fuck a revolution would actually end up since if those fucktards were in charge they'd end up killing off anybody who so much as sneezed wrong.

Should we kick up a shitstorm about it?
Like a campaign?

Also whadya guise think about r/fullcommunism?

u serious m8y
/r/socialism with a different skin. It's shit, and I've had the displeasure of seeing a (ex?) mod of its post around the internet and embarrass socialists.

Please explain the things wrong with r/socialism, I haven't been there.

Identity politics is placed over class politics, most of its subscribed members are permabanned over perceived bigotry, which their definition constantly changes. They declared anime as bigoted right wing propaganda not so long ago. Posting there is like walking on a fucking minefield, because one of the special snowflakes will take offense to what you say and ban you. They are basically only concerned with creating a safe space and torture chamber, rather than any open discussion.

/r/fullcommunism used to have a ton of moderator overlap with that shithole, and both boards have had multiple meltdowns over our existence and the fact that they bleed members to us.

Oh, posting on Holla Forums used to be grounds to be permabanned on either board, if I'm remembering my shit right. I know /r/socialism still bans all mention of us.

Fuggin' identity politics.
I feel like "identity politics people" is just our word for "SJWs except we have a stricter definition, the rich profit off of it and it's not a Jewish conspiracy."

Not quite, but given that identity politics has latched onto socialism and destroyed all radicalism in multiple outlets and parties, it's definitely going to be discussed more here. It's also used to ridicule Holla Forums "muh white race" types.

Hi BO

Glass houses. Right now, we have our own spergy tankie problem to take care of. Hopefully we'll fix it before we reach Reddit levels of tyrannical torture chamber.

It's utter cancer, filled with eeplox and other sharpie sockpuppets, shilling for raddit and banning anyone who even look at the them funny. Frankly, given your opinion of that place, you should return there and never come to this board again plebbitor.

Can someone tell me why this thread still hasn't died?

Someone post the 'not a good fit'-'you're golden' picture.

Thanks, leftcomanon. Almost forgot to mention. They will ban socialists if they do not fit into their extremely narrow, white-knighting definitions of feminism, yet will allow liberals in with no problem.

Reminder that Marxism is nothing but justifying violence for the purpose of greed and jealousy.

Reminder that there are many more people in the world that would steal from or commit violence against a "rich" person" just for being rich than people in the world who would commit violence against a person of color just because they are a different race.

Reminder that most people are not racist and our schools detest this kind of attitude or behavior yet promote prejudice against rich people just because they have something that everyone else wants.

Reminder that rich people are who provide our economy with cheap loans and trickle down economics is very real because you can quite easily get a business loan to make your dreams come true. Furthermore the success of crowd funding platforms like kickstarter and patreon is partly due to people having so much excess wealth and disposable income.

Richism is real and a much bigger problem than racism yet people wrongly justify it through the teachings of Karl Marx and the media and academic institutions have brainwashed children into thinking that "all billionaires have done something bad to get that money."

A common logical fallacy is that people can have "too much wealth." This is false because if there was a wealth cap then that would eliminate the incentive for people to continue being creative when they have reached some arbitrary amount of wealth.

Reminder that the universe is inherently ownership based because passwords can be set by a programmer to infer ownership of an information system.

Reminder that instead of complaining about how unfair the world is you should be striving to do something creative with you time.

Reminder that if you wanted to prove how good communism is you would try to start your own commune or coop and lead by example. Instead you search for excuses to validate your own failure and justify your destructive behaviors like smashing star bucks.

Reminder that in capitalism it is relatively easy to become financially independent and escape the 9-5 system yet that would be impossible in a marxist system legally.

Reminder that capitalism is really just another word for freedom and free trade and monkeys will trade coins for sex and food if you teach them what currency is.

Reminder that Marxism can exist in a capitalistic system but capitalists are hunted like dogs in a marxist society

Reminder that the free market really is just freedom and natural human behavior and even in marxist societies black markets always form and organized crime reaches its zenith in a marxist system (russian mob) and trying to prevent people from trading and acquiring capital is as futile as trying to stop people from altering their consciousness.

Reminder that you can tell you are on a liberal forum because any time an unpopular opinion is posted there will be calls for mods to ban the user.

Also forgot to add that the free market rewards intelligence and creativity. Something n33t smart kids should love.

Once you get a taste of independently making your own money from the internet you will resent fuckers that want to tear it all down just so they can work 9-5 for the government.

Even speculative markets like bitcoin are relatively easy to win at, like poker, and if you are reasonably smart can treat like a free credit card and just spend some time day trading whenever you need D0sh. Smart quiet nerds like anons should rejoice something like this exists in the world to reward them for being smart and creative.

It's really so easy to make money guys. If you wanted to sell origami on ebay you could and make a profit thanks to the internet and freedom. This is something to be celebrated. Not resent and try to destroy

Sounds like somebody's in high school.

...

I like your bait style, but on the off chance you're here for more, how do you explain the free market being human nature when for for over a millennia, markets were centralized through outright palace economies, some of which like the Incan empire utilized total economic planning, or oligarchies as in Rome, which were decidedly unfree and uncompetitive economies? And what of Feudalism, in which the merchants and markets were secondary or lower to serf taxation and other outright non market forces? Or, going back before, what of before even the concept of wealth or currency?

All of leftist Reddit was infiltrated by Goon-orchestrated armies of Tumblrinas lead from SRS during the height of OWS. For more info on them, read the sidebar links in /r/SubredditCancer. This came to a particular head years later when Catgirl Drawfag (a minor celebrity of broadly warm popularity on both Holla Forums and most leftist Reddit subs) was attacked by the moderation, resulting in an aggressive purge of anyone and anything associated with Holla Forums or weebs on Reddit (jokingly called "the purrge" or "anime farm").

From the start of GG, "IdPol/identitarianism" was universally used to describe a core aspect of SJWs (there is more to SJWs than just idpol, like virtue-signaling, outrage-mongering, postmodernism, and social parasitism, which is part of why "SJW" is still a necessary term, even though the sarcastic nature of the term makes it troublesome to use on normalfags, throughout GG none of us were able to agree on a less sarcastic replacement for the term).

Speaking of the fact that SJWs aren't the only group afflicted with IdPol, the moment I could tell something was wrong with Holla Forumsacks in GG was when some of them started getting triggered by the (until then de rigueur) use of "IdPol" in even the most offhand fashion. I would later learn that probably lined up with when 8/pol/ moderation turned the board into a rulecucked neonazi torture chamber.

It's a giant honeytrap that corrupts or turns away normalfags with a budding interest in radical leftism. We have to destroy it, decrease its prominance, or otherwise save them somehow.

tippy top wew m8

Also read the fucking first hand account of Bolshevikism titled socialism redpill. Literally violence and theft. You are the mother fucking bourgeois that will be vandalized and raped for the masses.

Those are REGULATED. Without the corruption the peasants could have been their own boss and that wasnt real freedom. They were manipulated and trapped in their situations. Today we have the power to be our own masters and the free market is the ultimate MEAL TICKET.

Or you could draw furry porn. The point is that it's relatively easy to get paid for being creative. Try that under Marxism. The only way to easily get paid in Marxism is to be a "criminal." Otherwise you are trapped literally "working for the man." The good thing is that crypto currencies allow you to participate in the free market under Marxism and there is no way to shut it down.

Check out how fucking easy it is to make 5 bucks. Do that 20 times and you get 100:
fiverr.com/

forum.fiverr.com/t/marketing-yourself-just-do-it-heres-how-upyour/133753

Holy shit, this is amazing. This is legendary shitposting

Holy fuck, you're either 16 or genuinely retarded. This is amazing, somebody please screencap this guy's posts.

...

Except in absence of a lord and regulatory bodies, peasants have historically collaborated and cooperated. Other than the fact that there is little to no historical data that peasants suddenly rose up and competed with one another to their detriment once a lord was absent, numerous tribal societies and the more modern Obshchina showed a slant towards peasant cooperation. I hate to break it to you, man, but the early capitalists were not voluntary or free, they were revolutionary terrorists who beheaded thousands in the French Revolution and forced their ideas into the world, which were later adopted by kingdoms as a more efficient means of oppression than feudalism and a show of the increasingly powerful merchant classes. Neither was early capitalism free, as it was spearheaded by oligarchies and even outright state control, like proposed in the French Revolution but never quite fully implemented.

I'm sorry, but I do not think you have a very good grasp on history or politics, and not even economics.

...

Trying to artificially create an EQUAL OUTCOME society is flawed, inorganic, and will always lead to catastrophe because humans are imperfect and absolute power corrupts absolutely. This also applies to democracy and without proper game theory will devolve into violent mob rule.

Creating a system that allows EQUAL OPPORTUNITY is extremely beneficial and something that we can all profit from.

K wage slave. And you can make a lot of money if youre good. Most people dont actually want a lot of money but they just want freedom and marxism means that you always have a "boss" and always have to show up someplace and good luck getting flexible hours and working from home or having dissenting opinions.

Making a few thousand every month doing what you love and having no one tell you what to do is maximum comfy.

And the best part is you can invest your money into bitcoin or other crypto currencies and learn2invest so you get exponentially paid. Good luck doing that in marxism.

Alternatively you can learn2daytrade and bypass the part where you freelance. It is a game that rewards intelligence. I bet youre so stupid you think that poker is just luck? I bet youre so stupid you think that blackjack cant be beat.

And you think freelancing pays shitting? What kind of shitty wages would you earn under Marxism? Have you EVER worked for a government in the public sector? I have and the amount of corruption and bullshit bureaucratically fuck assery is mind blowing. Its impossible to get anything done and you are not appreciated for doing a good job because it makes other people look bad. In government work you are paid to just stand around all day or sit around all day and you are only rewarded for not shaking things up or ruining other people's scheme to leach off taxpayer money.

Ad hominen. You are scared to even address the contents of the image so you come up with an irrational argument to dismiss it.

Before kids memed it the red pill was a legit metaphor and featured an empowered black man as the one imparting the knowledge of the universe to you.

This much delusion. You cant refute any of the points with logic so you did the only thing you could do which is come up with some kind of character assassination in a vain effort to avoid coming up with anything of substance.

I've never seen so much unearned smugness in one post

It would help if you made actual logical points to respond to :^)

Yes, I Carl Margs shall redistribute all the wealth that we socialists want to abolish in the first place to the lazy poor people

that's not how profit works. we can't ALL profit from something, as profit is based on realisation of surplus value in the first place, value which has to be extracted from SOMEWHERE.

Marxism is specifically and diametrically opposed to wage labour in the first place. You would earn as much "wages" as was the value of the work you performed from the outset.

So you're using not only personal experience as some sort benign attempt at refutation, but personal experience in a system that is completely opposite to the system you're supposedly refuting. How is your experience valuable for sake of argument if it isn't understanding of how that experience would be in a socialist society, since you do not live in a socialist society? At best this is mere anarchist whining about big bad state.

Oh, that's why my Holla Forums post was taken down from fullgommubism

Of course he's gonna make that argument, you're arguing against a dude who unironically believes that everybody here is a tankie.

It's like

You'd think he'd at least look up the wiki article for socialism, but I guess PJW told him that the wiki entries were all secretly written by George Soros

Why does any of what you said require a class of parasites exploiting the value creators?

I have a zillion tabs open on a Core 2 system, copying and pasting back and forth from xed because Firefox is crawling so slow. Things are a bit stuttery.

Use Firemin to restrict the CPU and RAM usage, if you are not using a fork..

K so I never advocated for violence. Furthermore I advocate for people being able to start their own commune or coop if they want and if they are self sufficient there is no need to even compete on the free market but if they produce something there no reason they shouldnt be able to sell it.

The tribes and peasants could have had their own mini capitalist system that worked for them or remained a commune. The part that fucked it up was when other people came in violently and forced them to work for them. The lords or whoever wrongly took their land. There is no reason that a small group of people cant cooperate with eachother but still have agreements on who owns what and even use currency for their small transactions and trade with other groups

You are wrongly assuming capitalists mean that a person will go around conquering anyone less powerful than them. In my view capitalism just means freedom basically because most people in the world would choose to own what they produce. When 3D printers become more advanced there will be less nee to have a "boss" or someone that owns the factory and production of even aircraft or cars can be done with decentralized contracts between many independent producers.

I'm actually shilling for independent production. If you can make something that adds value and sell it to the market without someone owning your means of production then I think even Marx should have been proud. Although he had other deluded ideas and theories.

It's means to transfer value AND a speculative game. If you were smart at all you would have realized the potential to make money and bought bitcoin ages ago and exit the market before it crashes. If you ARE smart at all now you would learn how to day trade. Daytrading is very similar to the online poker boom 10 years ago and as long as you know what youre getting into and arent delusional you can minimize the risks you take.

Is comfortable knowing that it rewards intelligence and creativity. Something you should have more of than normies. And there is no reason to violently enforce egalitarianism. Its much more ethical to rely on voluntary charity to take care of those who cannot take care of themselves. Rich people dont pay taxes anyways because its easier than ever to hide wealth and bitcoin only makes it easier. It would take a cultural shift but we could live in a world where people voluntarily pay to help those less fortunate. But it still should be comforting to know that if you have any creativity in you whatsoever it is possible to make money independently.

People should get paid for the initiative they take investing in new startups for example. And many people do add billions of dollars worth of real value to the market without leaching. Overnight success in tech companies is a thing and not uncommon and their succes can be in the hundreds of millions or even billions over night without any kind of unethical business practices. Furthermore investing is a legitimate way to make money and their investments help other people make their dreams come true. Then those that have been invested in and are successful can become investors in the future and contribute to low interest rates that allow for more people to make their dreams come true.

Here is a video titled "how to get the fucking money" which illustrates the relative ease in acquiring start up capital:
youtube.com/watch?v=YjcIRQuCXr0

So? They are micro investing in their employees then.

Omg one aspect of the system is FUBAR. Too bad there arent ways of getting your money out of it and into something that hedges against shitty banks? Oh wait there is this shiny metal that does exactly that..

Ofc there are assholes in the market but that doesnt mean freedom in general is bad or that free trade and free markets should be entirely eliminated. That is an extremist view and the product of your delusion and disenfranchisement. Its very insulting to those of us who enjoy making money independently to advocate the destruction of the system which allows us to be free.

So make your own commune or psuedo-marxist production firm and then split the profits of your creativity with your comrades. You can still participate in the free market and live the kind of lifestyle you wish. No one is stopping you and many people would be very supportive and you could easily acquire the start up investment risk free through crowd funding.

So if everyone owned 3d printers and a farm then they couldnt all be self sufficient and independently create value? The value of currency might change but this is not collectivism so you can generate your own value. AND I am saying that because you are not a normie you are probably somewhat intelligent and creative (if not delusional) and you should take comfort in the relative ease in which you can turn your own creative efforts into dosh and live comfortably and confidently.

Then stop advocating for the destruction of our economic system which provides a comfortable living standard for n33ts across the planet.
Socialism is synonymous with violently redistributing wealth. You want to kill people or throw them in cages if they do not contribute to what you think is the best way to redistribute wealth. Richism is a far greater problem in the world as opposed to racism. No one cares what someone looks like or very few people do however there are millions of people that advocate for stealing from rich people and wrongly assume they all did something unethical to acquire their wealth.
Then stop advocating for interfering with free trade.
ZOMG poker isnt economically productive we must BAN IT ALL!!!! Not everything you dont like should be banned and not everything you do like should be subsidized. That is incredibly greedy and selfish and authoritarian. You are free to educate others why they shouldnt play poker but its unethical to ban it as freedom should allow for people to make bad choices as well. And the speculative markets of bitcoin and other cryptos allows for decentralized wealth transfer across the world anonymously which hedges against tyrannical authoritarians interfering with anons' business. As an user you should support this.

There are always going to be parasites whether in communism or capitalism but I am advocating for freedom and decentralization so we remain free and have relatively good control over our own destinys. Not all rich people siphoned their wealth off an exploited group of employees though and those employees got something in their arrangement with their employer. Imagine when 3D printers get better. There can be millions of independent producers then without bosses. Marxism would break down when 3D printers git good enough.

Furthermore the creator or programmer of a computer gets to set the password so they intrinsically own it.

wow with all that technical knowledge you might even be able to get a job.. :^)

I'm for self-employment, too, but that's not what you shilled, t's like the difference between being an independent whore, versus being one of a pimp's hoes. Look into the history of "piecework" and current problems with "precarity". Cyberserf farms like Fiverr offer the ripoffs of a temp agency with none benefits.

Two things: First, do you know why Ponzi schemes and gambling have usually been criminalized in most civilized countries? Because unlike other economic activities, which multiply money that goes into them (as goods, services, liquidity, or just personal amusement), such cons simply redistribute money from a large number of losers to a small number of winners, much like (other) petty fraud and theft. The only purpose of such activities is to give people a perverse incentive to cultivate gullible and predatory behavior in others, and "crowd out" investment in productive activities.

Second, I am in favor of blockchain technology, anonymous/pseudonymous systems, and cryptocurrencies. I am not, however, in favor of currency speculation (for the above reasons), or deflationary currency. Are you familiar with the "bimetallic" "Free Silver" struggle against the "Cross of Gold" which was ravaging the economy in the 1800s? Deflationary currency is bad, because it disincentivizses investment, and incentivizes hoarding. Inflationary currency is good, because it incentivizes investment, and punishes hoarding.

Survivorship bias applies to things where, even if everyone involved is equally smart and talented, the limited number of "slots" for success mean something other than merit (possibly random chance, often more insidious forces) will cause there to be winners and losers. Gambling, pro sports, pop stars, acting, day traders, management jobs, elite STEM jobs, etc. Even entrepreneurs are subject to such limits, like the widely derided success of Microsoft and Intel over dozens of technically superior competitors, soon spun into powerful monopolies that unjustly crushed all later challengers.

Allowing the arbitrary winners of such contests to accumulate undue power is a recipe for corruption and ruin.

I don't think you understand how capitalism has worked during the last century. The rich rarely make direct investments, mostly they deposit their money in the same pool as proles. This money is then managed by professionals hired by the banks and investment funds, who lend it out to return interest on these deposits at varying rates depending on risk. This split between a small amount of deposited money, and the larger amount of money lent to debtors, is the fractional reserve system. Without it, capitalism wouldn't have been efficient enough to turn a profit for a hundred years.

It is also the reason nearly all rich people are completely irrelevant to any productivity that occurs under capitalism.

True, but can we change the system to reduce their number and influence? History says yes, as the transition from each successive system to the next (even capitalism) has shown.

This is the crux of the problem. What if an "manufacturer" decides to shut down a factory their employees depend on, to take advantage of 3rd-world sweatshop labor? What if a "programmer" decides to discontinue a piece of software or website and fire the devteam/admins that maintain it, because they merged with a competitor and wish to eliminate "redundancy"? What if "landlord" evicts all their tenants from a housing development and turns it into an "investment property" traded between absentee "owners", reducing the amount of precious limited land used for habitation? If you personally use what you own, that's fine, but arbitrarily claiming "ownership" over property also used by others? These perverted rentiers make up the majority of "capitalists", and the problem has been getting worse as capitalism breaks down, pics related.

Property absent use is violence, simple as.

Also this. Capitalism isn't "hoomun naytur", it's a recent system emerging from the same liberal enlightenment rational humanist ideals that eventually produced socialism. It was imposed by violent revolution against the feudal system that preceded it, revolution that usually failed and lapsed back into monarchy for centuries (French 1st Republic, Commonwealth England, Revolutionary Waves of 1820/1830/1848, etc.), and even when successful resulted in tremendous destruction of life and property, (American Revolution, German Revolution of 1918). Each new system has been forced by the violence of the old, to itself use violence during its birth.

Furthermore, Marxist theory directly posits that capitalism is a necessary stage in the development of civilization. From barbarism, through tribalism, slave empire, feudalism, then capitalism, into socialism, communism, and beyond.

I'll check it out, been thinking about a switch to Palememe or a Konqueror fork, what with Mozilla's recent antics.

Boardowner plz.

I dont have time to answer in depth right now but I just want to say you should take that damn anarchist flag off.

You know its possible to support economic activities one way or the other without relying on violence? Why cant people choose for themselves how they want to trade and manage their wealth? You can make a case one way or the other and try to persuade people with words or education.

If people want to play the seashell game native style are you really going to stop them as an anarchist? People have been using currency for ages and trading things and playing games with them for 10s of thousands of years or more.

If i have time ill come back later but u should know what i mean.

ALso with regards to software, a lot people only use free software because they refuse to support authors being dickheads. You can persuade people to make choices in "capitalism" but still allow people to make bad ones.

And you could have contracts set up protecting tenants.

You must be American

Private property and wage labour are literally upheld by the threat of violence and negate the anti-authoritarianism that forms an intrinsic part of anarchism by their very existence.

Take that damn "anarchist" flag off.

The very existence of a Market require an enforcement backed by violence.
The primitive barter meme is a joke.

I'll wait for a response on the rest, but this demands a very brief rejoinder.

Obviously, we need some kind of deliberate system to mediate between groups of people, since something "self-regulating" like the market can (and cyclically does) fail catastrophically. In the arc of history, that has usually been a decrease in autocracy, and an increase in democracy.

Business right now is the only major sphere of life in which autocracy survives. The goal of socialism is to bring democracy to business, and stamp out this final bastion of the autocrats.

Also, to clarify:
Because absentee property requires violence (or the thread thereof) every single day, I think that is an inherent problem, with a plausible solution.
True. Socialist revolution will not necessarily be violent, there is an entire school of socialism ("dual power" mutualism) based on this parallel reformist approach. But if capitalists (as they often have) react to consumer/worker/business unions with violence, the situation will escalate.
I never argued against money. That said, I do think some things could probably be done better without money ("natural monopolies" like infrastructure, insurance, real estate), but other things seem to be done best with money and markets (innovation).
True in theory, but what happens if perverse incentives pile up, causing auguring civilization into a nosedive? Stupid opportunities can be tolerated in small amounts, but if they become too popular, accepting them can be suicidal.

...

...

DO NOT
Palemoon's dev is a total retard who often refuses to modernize the browser. It took YEARS for HTML5 to be satisfactorily supported, and he has recently attempted to tamper with adblocking software, though in a way that is easily changeable.

That pic is funny but doesn't really dispel the myth. Marx worked multiple jobs at numerous points in time, and when he was not working he was organizing individuals or writing.

Isn't Palemoon's poor standards support because Moonchild is backporting modern features into an ancient pre-Chromestralis version of Gecko all by his lonesome, instead of autobuild slurping the poz fresh from Mozilla's cock with each nightly release like every other Firefox "fork" except TenFourFox, and maybe Cyberfox? Maybe when more people start fleeing Firefox, some core ex-devs will assist in resuscitating a more genuine Gecko browser, perhaps even bring back engine embedding for the likes of Galeon/K-Meleon/Camino?

As for the adblocking thing, I think that's more of a political statement than anything, and it's done in a manner that he explains how to bypass, so no harm no foul.

So what.

Is the verdict in? Should we update our memes, or is Engels' portrait just too classic?

I have my doubts.

4/10 b8 "it was bretty good :DDDD"

The system you advocate is violence unrestricted, in addition to not having anything to do with actual anarchism. How does it feel knowing you ride off our actual ancom coattails, peasant?

If the revolution was up to them the same mistakes the soviet union had would happen again

His name is nearly German caricature it's so common.

Being a tankie is objectively good though. The Hungarian fascists deserved it.

If you dont let people trade freely or use money if they want then that is infact no anarchism at all.

FALSE, No one is stopping you from not paticipating. I agree its weird that homeless people dont have anywhere to go but that does not mean the entire system is flawed. In some places charitable organizations could take care of this and in the mi-devil ages monasteries offered refuge to vagrants.

You have this delusion people are forcing you to engage in our system yet you are free to make your own commune or coop.

And you think that everyone hates their job and hates owning property? FALSE. Many people are quite happy with their circumstances and faggots like yourself are trying to ruin it for everyone. I want everyone to have their own cake and eat it to so you faggots need to organize and create your own communist community so you fags dont feel like ruining our system because of your delusions.

SO WHY DO BLACK MARKETS EXIST IN COUNTRIES THAT ENFORCE MARXISM?!?!?! IS SOMEONE FORCING THEM TO CREATE A BLACK MARKET?!

SO ITS NOT FUCKING ANARCHISM THEN ITS FUCKING AUTHORITARIANISM IN ITS MOST AUTHORITARIAN FORM. YOU ARE A MISNOMER FAGGOT.

SORRY THAT PEOPLE FEEL LIKE THEY SHOULD HAVE THE RIGHT TO DEFEND THEIR HOME AND THE LAND THEY CONTROL. YOU WANT TO STEAL PEOPLES PROPERTY. OWNING AND CONTROLLING LAND IS AN ORGANIC BEHAVIOR THAT EVEN GODDAMN NATIVE AMERICANS PARTICIPATED IN.

REE THEN FUCK OFF AND LET PEOPLE LIVE THEIR OWN LIVES INSTEAD OF TRYING TO UNDERMINE THE ENTIRE GODDAMN SYSTEM WHICH MANY PEOPLE VOLUNTARILY PARTICIPATE IN AND ARE THANKFUL FOR.

CAN BE DONE BETTER WITH PRIVATE DECENTRALIZED SOLUTIONS. DEMOCRACY AND BUREAUCRACY HAS MAJOR FLAWS AND LETTING PEOPLE CONTROL THEIR OWN ENVIRONMENT AND COMMUNITY IS MUCH MORE ETHICAL.

SO FUCK OFF THEN YOU HAVE NOTHING TO COMPLAIN ABOUT. GO SET UP YOUR OWN FUCKING COMMUNE SOMEWHERE THEN WE CAN ALL HAVE OUR CAKES AND EAT THEM TO.

IMPLYING THERE ISNT WAYS OF USING BITCOIN AND HIDING YOUR TRACES. IMPLYING I WASNT REFERRING TO CRYPTO IN GENERAL BY SAYING BITCOIN. IMPLYING THERE ISNT MONERO.

YOU ARE UNETHICAL. YOU ARE ADVOCATING FOR VIOLENCE WHICH WILL ONLY SERVE TO EMPOWER THE POLICE STATE.

CONTROLLING YOUR OWN LAND AND ALLOWING FREE TRADE IS THE GODDAMN OPPOSITE OF FUCKING VIOLENCE YOU FAGGOT. IF YOU BUILD A FUCKING FARM AND THEN A BUNCH OF SOCIALIST FAGS SAY THAT THEY HAVE A RIGHT TO YOUR PRODUCTION THAT IS INFACT FUCKING VIOLENCE.

FREEDOM IS ANARCHISM YOU FUCKING INSUFFERABLE FAGGOT. YOU ARE ADVOCATING FOR CHAOS.

HOW DOES IT FEEL KNOWING YOUR GOALS ARE UNREALISTIC AND NEVER GOING TO BE ACHIEVED AND YOUR ONLY REALISTIC OPTION IS TO FOLLOW MY ADVICE AND MAKE YOUR OWN PRIVATE COMMUNE OR COOP.

the existence of brainlets empowers the police state, so you should kill yourself

So much for the rational right :^)

...

FREEDOM AND ANARCHISM ARE WHAT I SAY THEY ARE BECAUSE I SAY SO STFU LEFTCUCKS REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

Every fucking time. What's it like being the laughing stock of the right and left of all stripes?

didn't 'tankie' - as a specific term and not one that just means anyone who believes in muh already existing socialism - originally refer to people who supported the Soviet invasions of Hungary and Czechoslovakia, i.e. the pro-Soviet communists whom Hoxhaists and Maoists would call revisionists?

Well, pack it up lads. Looks like it's all over, hating rich people is mean

t.retard who genuinely thinks he will continue to make a living off a zero-sum game, and moreso that this is a viable career path for everyone

Is it any wonder lolberts are attracted to the economic equivalent of a circlejerk, especially one that transcends the typical wastefulness of currency speculation by requiring the construction of a massive distributed supercomputer?

I sometimes wonder how would aliens react if they came to Earth and saw bitcoin.