Guy with hammer and sickle as twitter name LOLs at the suggestion that class in marxist analysis is not defined by...

The (temporarily or otherwise) unemployed have generally been the most revolutionary (because they're the most disenchanted), alongside people like Marx who were proletarian but lived largely off of bourgeois sugar daddy dough from Engels.

Doctor.

But these are (for the most part) the minorities, and you can't have a revolution with a minority

Revolutions have almost always started off with small groups of revolutionary workers, which later on assimilated larger masses.

Also real rich for Mao to talk about which workers are revolutionary when he's responsible for almost all of the early revolutionary Chinese proletariat being culled, leading to his "discovery" of the peasants' revolutionary subjectivity: insurgentnotes.com/2012/10/notes-towards-a-critique-of-maoism/.

my point is that for example in china, the peasants were the majority, going with the workers didn't work because they were the minority
I just don't see how can a revolution happen in a first world country that invest so much in the welfare state like denmark since this is the entire purpose of the welfare state

Classless, provided he can support himself.

No.

I remember red liberal being used as an insult by leftists long Holla Forums was invented.

Several STEM professions, a majority of medicine-related fields, gay computer shit