I see on one side people recommending dozens of books and authors, "read bordiga", "read lenin", "read cockshott" etc. and on the other complete brainlets without even the tiniest grasp of theory who will probably relapse into red liberals in a few years. This board is getting dumber by the day.
is capital volume 1 enough to get a reasonable undestanding of marx.
Thomas Phillips
I'm proud of you fam
Cameron Roberts
capital vol. 1 is gonna take an eternity, just read wage labour and capital
Robert Adams
yeah uh dont click this link reported :)
Liam Thompson
allready half done.
Jason Cooper
...
Asher Thomas
No, it's barely enough for a particular aspect of Marx's thought. Marx's thought, as with all thinkers, developed, changed., interacted with different influences and events. There is the early Marx, Marx of the Grundrisse (which is for some reason never mentioned here despite being extremely significant for contemporary Marxist thought), the Marx who wrote Capital, and in these divisions there are yet more divisions.
Aiden James
hi Holla Forums some of marx is outdated, I'll give you that, but this definitely isn't