I can't decide which exactly is my favorite part. This post is a smörgåsbord of fucking ridiculous nonsense.
lol, nice. You assert that racial loyalty is an actual thing, then just dismiss the nearly three thousand years of evidence to the contrary.
Putting aside that these kingdoms were each others' common enemies, it sure took them long enough to "band together." Spain had been in the hands of the Muslims for nearly 300 years by this point. Nor did they "band together" over some mythical common "Christian identity." Are you high? The pope issued his call for a crusade and it went almost totally ignored. And this was after years of Byzantium losing ground to their Muslim competitors. Where was this racial loyalty, this Christian solidarity then? Especially when you had groups like the Venetians that were only too happy to capitalize on Constantinople's misfortunes.
And all that's aside from the various crusades specifically aimed at other European Christians. The crusade against the Cathars in Southern France for example, or the Saxons and Pommeranians in Northern Germany (oh but they weren't Christians so I guess that's okay), or the pagan and Christian peoples of the Baltic. And if you aren't just looking at religious squabbles then you see that Europe is in an almost constant state of internecine warfare that sometimes depopulated entire regions and wiped out entire cultures. Maybe they weren't white enough? Or Christian enough? Oh well, recurring themes like that are a common occurrence e everywhere in the world :,)
This is another facet of what makes trying to talk with racists so ridiculous. What the fuck are you even talking about "the same ethnic group?" White? Because WW2 certainly didn't fucking change that.
I'm not familiar with all the genetic variations of, say, Germany, but if it's anything like Britain, which is (or was I guess) crammed full of people culturally and ethnically distinct then I would imagine that a country like Germany or France would have significantly different "ethnic groups" too. Italy is another good example. It's patently ridiculous to say that a Sicilian and a Tuscan are "the same ethnic group." Historically, culturally, genetically, linguistically, how much would you say that they had in common? Anything? By the time "Italy" becomes a thing again, your average Sicialian and Tuscan would have been politically and geographically separated by 1400 years or more. And Germany was even less politically coherent than Italy.
Blah blah blah, already addressed this.
Because your whole ridiculous ideology is completely nonsensical. What the fuck is "white?" Do Spaniards count as white? They were occupied by the Muslims for 700 years, so help me out here, my dude. What about the Greeks? They were vassals of the Ottomans, so I'm willing to bet they're contaminated with icky Asian genes. The Hungarians definitely can't be white or the Finns :,), can they? There's historical proof that they aren't native to Europe–hell, they don't even speak a PIE language! Or is that okay because they are pleasingly pale?
yes, you said you were an ancap, you don't have to keep repeating yourself.
Do you? Because it sounds like you don't know thing fucking one about Europe or Europeans. It sounds more like you just don't want the scary browns to bother you.
lol wew my lad. Even if this weren't completely idiotic, then you'd better start caring about economics, because it's economics that is creating this problem in the first place, just like it has all the way back, before the Romans, before the Greeks even. It's why Europeans slaughtered one another century upon century. It's why Christians murdered other Christians. It's why there even are "Germans" and "French" and even "Europeans."
Because you're a fucking fool and don't have the slightest fucking clue of how the world works or why.