Can anyone try and explain the purpose of actions like those following the U.S election and the G20 summit?
Genuinely interested in how people think it furthers the radical left.
Are smashies good?
Benjamin Sullivan
Other urls found in this thread:
skytorrents.in
skytorrents.in
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
twitter.com
Jeremiah Howard
Justified anger expressed in an eruption of violence.
Brandon Gray
Those poor windows
Angel Flores
...
Joshua Kelly
it is easy to ignore someone with a sign on a 2x4. Its a bit harder to ignore someone coming to fuck your shit up with a 2x4.
Aiden Ramirez
It worked for the blacks in the 60s in the US.
They just started setting everything on fire until the government gave them free money.
David Thompson
Actions speak louder than words. And they get you free shit.
Gabriel Nelson
It hinges on the possibility (which exists in itself in degrees) of action that believes that blocking to the point of distinction and lasting breakdown is both possible and desirable, and implements tactics and strategies toward those ends, and additionally have much less (or no) allegiance to the existent/would be happy to see as total of a break down/break off as possible. These actions derive their power exactly through their illegibility, by ditching the "civil" in civil disobedience and becoming as unintelligible to power (yet emotionally intelligible to those with whom they resonate) as possible. These situations are often inherently resistent to representation (from which it's opponents derive their critique).
Lucas Bennett
when the get held back with no effort
hell yes they're good at showing how retarded you lot are
Hunter Thomas
This is a good point. Property damage is not "violence" though. I also believe property damage should be primarily directed towards the obviously exploitative, such as banks etc. That way you're a lot harder to disregard.
Webm related is more about rioting in general but still interesting.