Why did she consider non-participation in elections to be childish?
Why did she consider non-participation in elections to be childish?
Michael Price
Other urls found in this thread:
en.wikipedia.org
left-dis.nl
insurgentnotes.com
youtube.com
marxists.de
marxists.org
marxists.org
marxists.org
twitter.com
Benjamin Adams
Because it is
Kevin Sullivan
That was before they betrayed her
James Rivera
No it wasn't, and stop assuming things.
Owen Jones
...
Jacob Hill
Because she actually read Marx, unlike most edgy teenage rebels here.
Grayson Green
because she was an opportunist that hadn't read bordiga
Thomas King
Because it is. Impossibilism was something Marx himself also hated, and he rebutted the anarchists on it in particular. Some form of participation is always going to be useful.
Ian Harris
Because as long as the political arena is parliamentary electoral participation is a great way to shill your party to workers, to demonstrate the numerical strength of the workers movement to workers who may not yet be on board and to provide a sharp contrast to the bourgeois parties encouraging a further class polarisation/overt class struggle in society. Parliamentary representation also gives you another podium from which to agitate the masses.
Jason Campbell
This