Both Holla Forums & Holla Forums think globalization is a conspiracy imposed by the ruling class

Not OP but you delusional retards just got schooled hard on reality, but what do I know, keep reading your dusty 100-year old books on Marx/Lenin or 50 year old books by some other old ass communist who still thinks that factory workers being exploited by a factory owner is the biggest social problem we are facing this day and age.

OP here, also

Also

Both of these opinions are bad and wrong. Zizek is good and transgressive humor is good. Go fuck yourself moron.

...

Globalization isn't a "conspiracy", it is the inherent dynamic of capitalism to seek global expansion.

Immigrants aren't "brought in" by Soros, they're people fleeing poor conditions and trying to gain access to better life prospects — though obviously capitalists try to turn that situation to their advantage.

Only Leninists and flat-out tankies feel that way.

Identity politics were a factor in his popularity, yes — conservative idpol as a reaction against liberal idpol.

Concerns over unemployment also were a factor, that's true.

We hate smashies. We find them embarrassing at best — non-existent theory and shit praxis.

We… just aren't. This isn't /r9k/.

Ideology and economics are not discrete entities. Disagreements over political organization are often tied to disagreements over the mode of production and distribution.

There are only a few e-celebs associated with Holla Forums and most are loathed by many. The alt-right, on the other hand, is held together by obnoxious YouTube pundits who serve as their primary and often sole source of intellectual engagement.

We don't think debate is useless. We wouldn't be here otherwise.

We don't cry over a Fascist getting punched in the face, that's true.

It may depend on whom you ask, but many believe it is an error to deny the importance of clear-eyed reformist struggle.

We are everything but utopian. Our socialism is scientific.

… Are you a neo-liberal?

If the exploitation of the proletariat by the bourgeoisie and everything that entails isn't "the biggest social problem we are facing this day and age", then what is?

Historically, classical liberals were for suffrage restricted on the grounds of ownership, slavery and imperialism. Not to mention they sided with reactionaries every fucking time when faced with working class opposition. The left is the true heir to enlightenment thought. bet you can't name any of those 'enlightenment thinkers' who supposedly set the bases for neoliberalism

read this:
abahlali.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/Domenico-Losurdo-Gregory-Elliott-Liberalism_-A-Counter-History-Verso-2011.pdf

We don't reject the values of the Enlightenment, we are simply critical of its failures. In fact, most of us believe socialism must pick up where classical liberalism didn't live up to its expectations — that is, in guaranteeing liberty, equality and fraternity for all.

I'm not sure about what you're talking about here. Did you get upset because someone said "nigger" or "faggot"…?

Hello /r/neoliberal
drink petrol
I object to that. I'm a dystopian.
read a fucking pdf.

Most of us don't believe this and Holla Forums believes in a daddy fuhrer not democratic centralism. Very big difference.

literally no fucking arguement

t. OP

really makes me thunk

...

...

Socialism is the logical conclusion of enlightenment thought. Read Rousseau, Locke, Smith, or Mill, socialism is the logical conclusion of all of their principles. Neoliberalism is just barefaced elite vampirism painted in bright colours, and the 7,000,000 people who starve to death every year can attest to that.