Why are leftist YouTube channels so fucking garbage?

They're all the same "chop up the video of some other Z-list internet nobody who I disagree with and selectively use and misinterpret what they said so I can make 'witty' jokes and get free internet attention haha aren't I so clever you guys I'm such a good debater by the way subscribe to my Patreon" Shit. It's Sargon or TheAmazingAtheist, but for the left. Fucking garbage.
They perpetuate the whole myth about modern society being a massively racist and patriarchal monster and that's why we need liberal identity politics, they make leftists look like smug liberals, most of them sound like they read marx once a month ago and then became a socialist, it's all fucking shit. These smug neckbeard pieces of shit are the faces of socialism on YouTube.

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/channel/UCyoQK-mZXr2ws4C0nXGCH1w
8ch.net/leftypol/res/1511405.html
youtube.com/watch?v=cqZy-NZGf8A
youtube.com/watch?v=HX2z2u3Uar8
wsws.org/en/articles/2015/07/30/pers-j30.html
tumblr.com/
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_from_authority
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murder_of_Marion_Parker
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Objectivism_(Ayn_Rand)
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Population_density
youtube.com/watch?v=oGmGT_AUCAk
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

Greetings, Holla Forums.

Bad Mouse and HBomberguy both put out solid content with high production value, Especially BM's recent vid on the Paris Commune.

choose one

I don't like Sargon or TAA either (although I'm embarrassed to say that I once did)
They do literally the same shit, that's my point. The best we can come up with is copying the intellectually lazy edgy teenager fodder that Sargon does, but instead of starting bullshit drama with z-list nobodies, bitching about 'cultural marxism' and islam and intentionally misinterpreting what other people say, we start bullshit drama with z-list nobodies, bitch about 'patriarchy' and 'queerphobia' and intentionally misinterpret what other people say


I'll have to check that out, the only times I've run into them are when they're making "look at this stupid thing this YouTuber said" videos and the massive aura of smug they let off kind of put me off from checking out their other work.

YouTube might be shit but it's also the biggest political platform there is online, so coming off like smug shitheads who just learned about Marxism from a gender studies class is a dumb idea.

Kyle Kulinski is great. Also there are the fun leftist channels like Bat'ko that are also great.

...

Yes, he's not as left-wing as us, but he's one of the only good american YouTube political commentators.

youtube.com/channel/UCyoQK-mZXr2ws4C0nXGCH1w

Give him a check. Thought provoking stuff.

this tbqh. all these fags suck

Don't worry about youtube sell newspapers instead.

You forgot everyone's favorite pre-mirror stage guerrilla leader.

YouTube is entertainment, not some sort of intellectual forum.

Anarchopac is good, but that's because he is just reading essays he wrote in front of a stagnant image, and doesn't participate in internet drama. Also, I doubt most of you will like his recent stuff as he has been focusing on identity politics.

I like Bat'ko, Pierre, and the other lads, but they are obviously too high brow and dialectical for the masses.

You've got to be joking…

Take it over here please
8ch.net/leftypol/res/1511405.html

he's very meh to me.
That and he openly bashes communism using the "muh human nature" argument, while also blatantly admitting he has never read Marx or anything like that

are you retarded?

LSR is a high-quality channel.

His video about the US backing authoritarian regimes was top-fucking-notch revolutionary propaganda.

It's what brings in the money. Leftism is a business too.

He's a disgusting socdem but he's a genuinely disgusting socdem. i.e. he's consistent. That's something I respect even if I think his views are shit.

h bomber is not bad. the other two I do not like. Sometimes xerox and contra are good too. lefty podcasts are generally better tho.

He also isn't active anymore.

in b4 "co-ops aren't real socialism"

Literally why

MAXIMUM OVERKEK

they aren't you pseudo socialist fool.

In during "co-ops aren't real socialism"

People that don't fit into the categories glorified by the ruling ideology are attracted to radical politics. The chads and stacies of the world rarely ever question the established order.

BadMouseProductions is entertaining to watch. Especially when he takes the piss out of status quo edgelords like Carl From Swindon and That Uncle T. I watch his videos purely for the lolz.

Nice try, Porky.

...

Everything on YouTube has been shit since Google bought it.

Nice try

Jason is god-tier though.

everytime you think something in youtube is garbage, think how it will be in spanish
this is a regular fitness channel
youtube.com/watch?v=cqZy-NZGf8A

don't forget H.Bomberguy is a rape apologist too. Hopefully we can get some good leftist content on youtube now that r/socialism has demanded he open his platform to women and POC.

GTFO ANCAP SHILL

You are boring people with shit meems.

When community cohesion is disrupted its called George Orwell.

*Justice democrat
;)

t. pollack who became a leftist last year

sage

What exactly do you want except that? Those are super popular youtubers that spread their ideology far and wide

How would you make a good one? I have a youtube channel and the time I'd be willing to donate for the people.

BadMouse is an irl qt tho

youtube.com/watch?v=HX2z2u3Uar8

Ex Worker is pretty good. a bit monotone but he uploads a lot

I watched you're stupid u_tube. I didnt really i just saw the stupid pig meeme ate begining.

I wonder if that came from pink floyd, more notably horse face Waters. Fucking horse face he 's got lots of money. Please kill him+he is v. gay.
Thanks
user.

...

THIS

...

He's a typical retarded liberal. He's slightly more against establishment dems than other democrats, that's where it ends, he's just a standard liberal in every single other way.


The number of actual leftists in general is ridiculously small. Most people are simple reactionaries on both sides. I don't think true leftism or true any sort of philosophy will ever have a chance due to how reactionary most people actually are.

Leftube has been greatly surpassing my expectations honestly.

Shaun and Jen is a hero.

Muke is fucking trash and people here only pretend to like his shit because he posts here.

Lol not by themselves but an economy based entirely around cooperatives is socialism

The only thing I use him for is linking to his Socialism Has Never Worked video but I haven't actually watched any videos including that one so I don't know if he's good or not.

lol

I want them to not make socialism look worse than it already does.

...

Jason was too irrelevant to make it into a post about bad leftist YouTubers. Kek.

Because Leftists are anti-social, inexperienced, jobless bums who never mature beyond high school and are eternally stuck in a state of teenage angst.

oddly enough, some of his more click baity videos have millions of views

...

Lee Marx pendejo.

What kind of idpol nonsense did you watch? This is leftypol not tumblr.

What kind of idpol nonsense did you come accross. This is leftypol not tumblr.

A: Take a minute to get to know what makes us different from SJW's. wsws.org/en/articles/2015/07/30/pers-j30.html

B: Go flame some SJW's: tumblr.com/

Because leftism is garbage.
It's standard r/K selection stuff; the weak and insecure spread their delusional and deceitful set of ideas so they can have greater success at surviving.

...

It's probably the worst meme by right-winger so far.

Nice meme

No shit. Read it again.

Sad.

Is there a single pursuit of leftists that is not focused on giving unfairly advantage to the mediocre mass?

No, in fact, this is well understood in the evolutionary incentives of animals. Mediocre people will mentally be more attracted to a regime that attacks stronger people to favor the mediocre. Even things like putting a 50% inheritance tax on the average family fulfills leftists with pleasure. It's all about the favoring of the weak, the unwilling, the unsorted.

Why you should the mediocre mass not choose an advantage?

nice Strawman fag. I bet your PHD is shining now

...

right wing youtuber are just aesthetic with no arguments, while left-wing are less aesthetic but with more arguments.

Guess yourself who is better.

That's not an argument.

HBomberguy is Fitzthistlewits right?

Is there for everyone to see

newfag

Because that's not how modern society works. Because the mediocre masses attacking anyone who's exceptional is a death sentence to modern standards of living.

Look around you, look at all the technology, and gadgets, and electric work; look at the immense amounts of systems that need to be planned and managed by geniuses. Look at how amazingly designed something simple like a fucking regular shoe is.

We don't live in the wild anymore, we are not in a zero-sum game anymore, and those shitty instincts will betray them it will make them destroy their own countries. The best thing for the weak is letting exceptional people create as much wealth as possible. I'm sure you've noticed how every legit left leaning country is a complete shithole, and how all those revolutionary movements are located in the worst places in India, Mexico, Venezuela, Colombia; it was the weak people pursuing their impulses that turned those places into a living hell.

And of couse, there's the fact that being a weak fuck is pathetic and you should inspire to be better. Stop lying to yourself, stop letting hedonistic ideas that come outside of your head govern the way you think, try to define truth by yourself, objectively define right from wrong, objectively understand your surroundings and how to improve your live without trying to sabotage others.

How do you "objectively" determine morals?

presented without comment.

Then let the mediocre masses and geniuses be united in the fact that geniality blossoms in the absence of hierarchy and inequality.


Cold showers and youtube tutorials on how to be a real men. Not exactly the spark of genius.

Start off by inspiring to get rid of all hypocrisy. Don't violate the individuality of others in ways you wouldn't want it to be done to you.

Bad mouse is ok

...

half of his shit videos are about shit video games, the other half are about shit e-celebrities.

Except that's not what leftism is about. See: ; all leftists pursuits seek to harm the exceptional.

But only my individuality matters

falseflagging at its best.
When the Holla Forumstards will ever understand that leftism is not against talented people or against meritocracy?

Yes, and so does your individuality to you, and everyone's individuality to themselves. Only difference being, whether you are hedonistic worm that violates the individuality of others or whether you are someone who rejects hypocrisy, deceitfulness, and parasitism.

Quite the opposite, leftists choose the exceptional over the mediocre. A mediocre billionaire's heir would be less entitled to material means than a scientific genius, while in capitalism, it is the other way around. We will locate resources to the means required by a genius, instead of the status-signalling ferrari desired by a princeling.

this man:

He was aware that talented people may spark in a socialist society. For you is hard to understand it because spooks of capitalistic society.

inb4 echoes

All wrong.
You are also doing the oldest trick in the book of ignoring literally everything else that was already mentioned. Why leftists want forced health care payments again? Why leftists claim property is theft again? Why leftists love welfare? Why leftists want the collectivization of everything? Why leftists want workers to steal the capital they never invested and planned?

In order to believe what you just said we would have to ignore literally everything leftists want.

who's "leftists" dude.
I think property is theft and am for the collectivisation of everything. Healthcare shouldn't be bought and sold in the first place, it isn't in Cuba.

You never explained why I should respect other people's individuality unless it is to my own gain though.

Why shouldn't the geniuses of this world, and those who benefit from them, not choose to serve their own interests instead of those of the few that hamper both the geniuses and the masses?

Why should they choose a mega-yacht for an oligarch when they have the power to direct their resources to their combined will?

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_from_authority

With the exception of the neckbeard manlet(?) and the young George RR Martin faggot behind him most of the people there look pretty normal.

But your argument was an argument from authority (lack of it specifically)

You claimed socialism only appeals to subhuman parasites.
, user proved you wrong.

Maybe it was just an EXAMPLE of an exceptional who was into socialism?
Why are you so immune to brain usage?

No, you made a fallacy and I pointed that out. Pointing out an appeal to authority is not a appeal to lack of authority, you idiot. I made arguments which you decided to address with a fallacy.

"Nothing matters" is just as strong of a claim as "everything matters". If you think your consistency matters or not, whether your life has meaning or not, it's up to you.

...

Listen, man. "Individualism" as interpreted by Ayn Rand & Friends: The Animated Series 1996 is literally parasitism. The idea that you should take what you want for your own benefit? That's social parasitism. Stirner is guilty of the same thing. Many psychiatrists have characterized psychopathy as a form of social parasitism, because it is.
So let's leave alone why you need us. We are more than you and stronger than you, so our perspective is infinitely more valuable. But I will say that you do need us to steal from, to manipulate, to abuse, to step on, to betray.
Why do WE need YOU?
We don't.
Social Darwinism is an abortive, useless ideology. It is the ideology of the lichen, and it can not sustain itself because there must always be someone who does not follow it to step on.
So let's dial it backwards and start from scratch again. That means you have to erase the conclusions that Social Darwinism led to. That means you have to erase the notion that some people are more "worthy" or inherently "better" than others and "deserve" the benefits of their parasitism because they have the balls and skill to do it, because it's false.
Now never say "exceptional people" ever again, shitbag.

I'm pretty sure capitalists wouldn't like to be capitalized

Nobody is fucking "weak" you stupid hack. There are people who have and haven't had the proper training. The drive to improve exists in almost all of humanity; you can't say it doesn't just because Jamal is too busy working three jobs to learn Algebra. IF ANYTHING, JAMAL IS SO MUCH MORE "STRONG" THAN PORKY MCLARDIKINS. Neck yourself.


Lol Marx would agree with me you cocksuckers. It's socialism, but not communism.

No, silly buns, Ayn Rand was opposed to any type of parasitism and moral inconsistency; it's the main characteristic of objectivism; selfishness is only right when it doesn't interfere with the pursuit of others. In fact, rejecting parasitism for the sake of consistency is the only thing that differentiates Rand form Stirner.

No, your perspective is not infinitely more valuable, might doesn't make right.
And, you will say that, except you are wrong.

So, basically, Ayn Rand is wrong because people will do exactly what Ayn Rand said people shouldn't do.

lol. The black population has the biggest rates of highschool and college dropping out, they have the most unemployment, the least entrepreneurship, and most on welfare. What made you get to the conclusion that "JAMAL IS SO MUCH MORE "STRONG" THAN PORKY MCLARDIKINS."? BLACKED.com porn?

Well, Ayn Rand oscillates. She says that and then her idealized characters go off and step on people, and even rape people. That's just my point, actually, that her attempt to be consistent is built on a flawed foundation and so ends up inconsistent in its own way. Because in the real world expecting people to not harm each-other is asking entirely too much. The only realistic way to ensure this is to have everyone live in our own little bubbles and OH SHIT, it turns out we can't reproduce like that so that can't be what we're supposed to do either. Additionally, selfishness inherently interferes with other selfishnesses because there is a limited amount of resources to go around. This is pretty basic stuff.
Might doesn't make right but it might as well make right if everyone thinks it does. Besides you're misinterpreting me, my point isn't that we should kill all the parasites, it's that if these two groups are going to follow their own interests the compliant majority will inevitably prevail.

LOL nice job making it about race, I was just talking about inner city NORPs. Working three jobs is infinitely harder than sitting at a desk, counting money, sending e-mails and making decisions twice a day. You already knew this you fucking NEET.

Wasn't one of her protagonists a rapist? And wasn't he inspired by a real life kidnapper/serial killer? en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murder_of_Marion_Parker
Not to mention Rand was on the US government's paycheck for a big portion of her life.

I think you're idealising your philosophical similars a little bit.

I call becoming rich at the expense of other people parasitism. No matter how mind gymnastics you have to do to save Ayn Rand, but the 1/4 of the population who is making the other 3/4 starving is definitely parasitism.

Is this a point or just brain farting?

That was the point I made, is that she's a hypocrite for that very reason.

You made it about race you idiot.
Who wrote this?

I did bitch, why can't Porky McLardikins be Black? Why can't Jamal be White? I have literally met a white Jamal and there are plenty of Black Porkies.

1- silly argument
2- not rape
3- Taking as much money from the government as possible is just trying to get your taxes back.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Objectivism_(Ayn_Rand)

Egoism with a golden rule is the very essence of her philosophy, you are saying it isn't; you are saying that it's hedonistic egoism like Stirner; you are demonstrably wrong.

LOL initiating sex without consent is rape even if the other person doesn't have a problem with it.
"Nor ask another man to live for mine"- this is inherently anticapitalist and yet Rand was a capitalist. Plus it doesn't even have a clause that sounds anything like "I will never take more than I need". Rand was the philosophical equivalent of shitposting.

literally who

If the person doesn't have a problem with it is not rape for fucks sake. Women love rough sex, the person who wrote that scene was a heterosexual woman. If you look at erotic novels written by women you'll see that there's far rougher shit written by women.

Yes is yes, dude, this is very simple. If someone starts off opposed to sex and decides they don't have a problem with it later that's still rape.
Wew nice generalization, most of the chicks I talk to say getting jackhammered isn't stimulating enough and is uncomfortable. SOME women love rough sex and some women like Rand have rape fantasies.

No it's not you idiot. Capitalism is about voluntary deals.

That's because "need" is a retarded vague concept, that's because people create wealth, they don't "take" from a zero sum game, that's because the whole phrase you wrote comes from the altruistic cuck textbook.

It's not a generalization.
Aggressivity can be passionate and not like a raging baboon.
All those feminists cunts will at least once buy a erotic novel with an aggressive alpha male that physically force her to fuck.

No it fuckin' isn't my guy,there's no difference in between someone holding a gun to your head and saying you have to do something and the threat of dying of starvation if you don't go and work for someone.
Sure it isn't, you "need" whatever you're likely to use. The rich sit on billions and spend not even one billion in their life, most of the time. And when they do spend that one billion it's on shit they'll never make full use of, like Antilia. (Money transfers like buying stocks to make even more money exempt)
Wew somebody teach this guy about "finite resources". You don't create wealth from thin air.
The real cuckoldry is sacrificing honest communion with peers so you can have material goods you don't need that you'll eventually lose, it's a self-cuckoldry committed to a materialistic ideal that disguises itself as the self. I touch on this in my fiction book.

LOL you fucking know it is you fucking redpiller
Aggressive/=/rough
wow stopped reading any time
Believe it or not erotic novels have a fairly small market that buys dozens so you're already wrong.

Proofs?

i guess what may happen to me if I don't agree to have any kind of deals

Value is defined by what fulfills us, and the physical world can be molded in many many ways. Houses in Japan are not made with the same resources as houses in USA, because their available materials are different, however, houses are still built and still function all the same. Furthermore, physical resources are potentially infinite; they never vanquish, they are always around us. The biggest scarcity of resources is in ideas.

You would starve to death because you, yourself, can't think of a better way to get food than to get hired by that specific enterprise. That enterprise is giving you a way of an easy life, and you chose that job voluntarily because you perceive to be the best option for you. That is voluntary. Just because they are giving you the best option you can take, it doesn't mean you are being forced. Just because planting food in a subsistence style with no capital investments it not something you want, it doesn't mean capitalism is not voluntary. Just because you enjoy the capital investments of someone else, it doesn't mean it's not voluntary.

No, I think trying to keep your what you righteously made is not the real meaning of cuckoldry.

You can go homestead in your own subsistence farm trying your best to survive in this world. Guess what happens to you if you don't pay for your Bernie Sander's Free Government Healthcare™? You go to jail; society goes out of its way to destroy you.

Basically, you want the capital that others invested in; so you will take those deals. The fact that you want to live near their capital investments and productivity, doesn't mean that free enterprises are forcing you to.

The default scenario is poverty and misery; without those free people investing in their surroundings a human being would be in extremely harsh conditions; it's the default, not something capitalism invented.

No one cares about your Austrian definitions of concepts.

...

nobody here gives about captalism with gibmedats

I prefer free healthcare instead of being forced to give money to porky insurances who are making me pay more because of a pre-existing gastroesophageal reflux.
Also you assumption is spooked as fuck.

so again I'm forced or i die.

Too bad that's exactly what's happening with capitalism.


No, the default is people mutually helping each other and attempting to master their environnment in order to satiate themselves.
Poverty and misery is the result of restricting access to the means of subsistances, the first of it being land.
People doing nothing and staying all day long in their mudd hutts is a fantasy.

You dumb.

Except being forced to give money to porky insurances is what "free" health care is, you idiot. Good luck paying for insurance companies you might not even want for 50 years because leftists want homeless people to get free shit.

No, you are not forced to die, you can survive on your own, you can find your best methods of living. That's not being forced to die, get real.

Should have worded it better.
People taking away what other people righteously made is what happen with capitalism.

No, it's not. The cost of production theory of value is wrong. The labor theory of value is wrong. Entrepreneurs create wealth and labor.

Let's also not ignore the retarded commie hypocrisy of claiming to care about theft while simultaneously trying to validate all theft.

Poverty and misery for the past 30 000 years.
If mankind was on a clock, being able to acquire enough calories for a week with 3 hours of minimum wage work like today would be the last second of the last minute of the day.

It took a long time to people figure out how to invest in capital and how to make production explode in productivity; it didn't just magically happen. And it also took a little bit of natural selection as well, with the feel industrialist societies colonizing and teaching the entire planet how to do it.

How com there was poverty and misery for as long as mankind existed even when people have plenty of land, you fucking retard? Why the fuck aren't poor people just moving to the middle of US where anyone can acquire a football field in land to end with their misery?

Seems like your claim is veritably wrong. Seems like capital investments eradicated poverty and that's why people are trying to live as close to big capital investments as possible.

Badmouse started to become tolerable after Sargon called him out on being a cringy larper. Best thing Sargon has ever done.

Muke is one of the most sexually attractive people I have ever seen.
Hbomberguy is pure cancer, makes me embarrassed to be a leftist.

Yes you are, this is not the XIXth anymore, there is no more land where you can just fuck off and do you own thing. Every valuable assets have been turned into private property and youhave no choice but sucking the dick of gatekeepers owners are.

Fail. NO one own the planet, that's the point. You own what you create. You didn't create land.


lol.
They only get to decide what's being done because of pieces of papers saying they're the only ones who have a say in how ressources are to be used and the state ready to beat the fuck of anyone who disagree.
Let's see an entrepreneur building a house.
Did he invent it? No it's the architect's idea.
Did he build it? Nope the brickbuilders, carpenters, plumbers and electircians did.
Did he bring the materials to the site? Nope, the drivers did.

Well, people have to sell their labour power on the market not to starve and moreover, when those people selling their labour power(ie. working somewhere) create something, they do not own what they've created, because somebody else's claim on their creation is somehow better thanks to le private property.

Shut up Muke .

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Population_density
In most areas of the world the population density is bellow 10 people per kilometer square. So, you are wrong. Very wrong. And I already said it to you, you could absolutely buy a football field in land if you wanted to live doing you own thing.

Except you don't. You don't want to. You don't want to give up internet access, large food variety, various sorts of gadgets and modern tools, to live isolated doing you own thing. You want the services from the capitalistic enterprises, so you live where they offer service.
lol. Women only get to decide to not be raped because of a piece of paper that says they own their own bodies.

Who made the enterprise? Who is making the investments? Who is risking his wealth? The architect? No. The carpenters? No. The drivers? Nope.
Also, you are an idiot if you think real state entrepreneurs are not experts in all those minor occupations. They care about every material they use, they care about the design of the architecture more than the architect, typically they oversee construction along with the main architect.

It's not about how many people are inhabiting the land, it's about who owns it and what can be done on it.
I like the service but their is absolutely no reason their organization should be capitalistic for it hinders a lot the efficiency of ressources managment.

Technically the piece of paper says you can't have sex with someone against their will. It's no matter of self ownership. And it would be pretty meaningless without a might to back it up.

They're risking their jobs. You know, their source of income? Their livelyhood?
What a big boss is risking? 50% of 100 years of a worker's wage?
When a factory close, someone is starving, protip, it's usually not the owner.

They get to decide what's done. Exactly what i said. They can make good or bad decisions, just like the architect can makes good or bad decisions. How his role not redundant?

kek, the only good looking dude also fails the paper bag test

Anyone care to explain how Hbomberguy is anything more than a smug liberal? He doesn't come off as someone with any real interest in leftism and is only in it for the hip and cool socjus money.

It's true, he's a comedian, go watch anarchopac or somthing.

his being a dumb "video gamer" who actually devotes time and energy to discussing the subject is reason enough to disregard him. it's just embarrassing to him and other leftists when rightists can point to him as an example of an "internet leftist." it's ready-made defamation

if youtube commentators are to have any value (itself unlikely), they should be serious, mature and educational, not littered with obnoxious and infantile "popular culture" like fucking video games

Jason has without a doubt the highest production value of all leftist youtubers. Just check his new video:

youtube.com/watch?v=oGmGT_AUCAk

This exceeds infowar production value. He needs our support.

I find him obnoxious. The content may be good from time to time, but his presentation just destroys everything. A pity tho.

i cri

Reminder that you were one of the anons who pretty much broke the board morale wise and created a huge wave of defeatism and put many people off leftism and even politics during the global warming thread, lowering our user count from 900+ to 800ish, and leaving people too apathetic to convert the polyps that came over when we hit 1300.

god I can't believe he still has that fucking Mohawk

I disagree in every way except the fact that every pop-culture video he makes is completely and utterly banal.

I like some of hbomberguy's videos but I don't even hold him in as high esteem as contrapoints (who never talks about economics period). Seriously… I don't want left wing commentators to be as annoying as the right wing ones.
Unless that name

I saw Bad Mouse, is incredibly cancerous, it looks like material done for little kids with random noises every two seconds.

Fuck, it's depressing, but it makes me understand why so many rebelious teens take Sargon as a reference, when rattle play is the leftist content

i'll say it again and again, feminism is a cancer we have to get rid off

He's right, that's not an argument and it's a biased opinion based in nothing but salt. I'm not in the youbute world but leftist channels look like they're made by kids for kids. They only exist to provide Sargon's shithole with more content to mock

Does anyone actually like this asinine moron?

One of the least articulate pricks I've ever heard.

nigga…

I wouldn't call him asinine, but he's pretty fucking stupid. His stupidity is comforting to listen to in a way though. He's just barely ethical enough to be honest with how much he doesn't understand anything, which means he only makes me cringe due to his incompetence.

wat?

I was saying dont be mean to videogame politics tubers