Leftists are literally siding with porky now because they're so afraid of nationalism

Explain yourselves

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=QQcrSPiNnNg
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

Nice strawman you got there

...

The WaPo is owned by Jeff Bezos (founder of Amazon), so its more like porky siding with porky

shit thread btw

...

See pic. Global Capitalism > National Capitalism

Where do you think you are?

I'm starting to believe you guys just call us liberals to rustle our jimmies more than anything

wdhmbt?

Porky is in controll, I rather "side"(ie. hate less) with the antinationalist porky than the nationalist porky. How do you even manage to delude yourselve into thinking that nationalists arent porky?

Belongs in the "Most liberal image" contest, could be a winner.

YOUR TIME HAS COME GLOBALISTS

Aren't liberals nationalists
They just disagree with the hard right on what benefits the nation

...

True but Global socialism < Nat Socialism

No they are the 'open borders' type morons.

Lol
What if open borders benefit the nation tho
Still nationalist, just disagree on what benefits the nation

They still are mostly fixated on nationalist thinking and its inherent statism. They just think the nation benifits the most from open borders. They are just as ruthless in their foreign politics to achive their nations superiority and thus higher profits for their companies. Thinking that "open borders"(which almost noone really wants) actually means that they abandon their chauvinism is retarded af.

youtube.com/watch?v=QQcrSPiNnNg

It benefits big business by driving working class wages down. Which you could argue will increase productive efficiency.

But they dont exactly come out and say that in the media when they are pushing open borders. Its always tugging on your heart strings instead.

That would make them 'nationhoodists' rather than 'nationalists'.

Yeah but If you don't want lower wages get a real job lmao -right wingers any time immigration isn't being discussed
Higher profits means more growth and a boom = better for the nation, who cares if the lazy workers lose out, become a CEO, equality don't exist lmao

Retarded

Trying to nuke capitalism on local scale while leaving it abroad means you can't connect the dots and probably suffer from some kind of retardation.

The extra supply drags down the wages of every working job.
Unless of course you are the CEO or manager who can give himself a pay rise due to the wages saved on the real workers.

I understand you are parroting the basic normie logic here to make a point. But the obvious counter point is that if you increase the economy by 1% and increase the population by 2% then everyone's share of the wealth in the economy goes down.

But trying to nuke it on a global scale is completely impossible.

Maybe, but this is the only option which isn't a Sisyphean task.

They are both Sisyphean tasks IMO.

does it tho?

no

yes

yes