Why should i as a middle class person give a single fuck about the worker?

why should i as a middle class person give a single fuck about the worker?

retarded

Are you an employer?

You are a worker.

you shouldn't, and they shouldn't give a shit about you. This is the basic premise of socialism

thats literally not an argument.

technically we're all workers, employers work for their clients.

Read Marx

Impolite sage for being retarded

thats probably why you guys fail to gain traction, at least Holla Forumstards have some spook to back their shit, you guys dont even have that.

why should a normie become communist?

I guess if you mean if you mean managers, but when we say employer we generally mean those who actually own the property.

You are not a temporarily-embarrassed millionaire.

Your parents do not own a business. The chances of you becoming comfortably rich are slim. The odds of amassing great wealth are essentially nothing.

You have had to make compromises in your life because of your socioeconomic status. Other people you know have gotten ahead and done things you can only dream of, simply by way of being born rich.

Do you want to keep getting cheated in life?

You ARE the worker, comrade.

Do you have a job and a boss? If so you are a worker, dumbass.

because those odds will get better under communism?.


people aren't born equal, some are taller, some are fatter, some are smarter….etc.
money just like everything else, is just another variable.
taking away their wealthy won't make my life more enjoyable.

i'm a trader, i used to work at an oil company now i work from home.
my job is to be a capitalist parasite, i'm well aware of that, i produce nothing.

It totally will, though.

No, you'll just have no need to. Under Socialism you work to attain luxuries, under Communism you have anything you want already.

...

You literally own the means of your production then

I suppose it's the equivalent of "why should I be nice to people I don't know" etc.
I suppose one person doesn't make a difference either way but what would not giving a fuck about workers get you?

except i produce nothing, im a byproduct of capitalism.

explain pls

i can have my own aircraft and boat under communism?

thats still not an argument

Depends on what you mean when you say "communism." The actual Marxist definition tends to differ from what normies mean.

social cohesion and peace.
thats really not the same thing. you're not losing anything by being polite

i don't hate workers, i have as much consideration for them as i do for anyone else.

Read Marx, class is different from income

we both know thats bullshit, i was just playing along.

you're pretty stupid aren't you?

True


Not true. The distribution of resources is determined by human agency, unlike physical traits. We can decide how to distribute our resources however we want.


It will if that wealth and the means of production are systematically used to improve the lives of society as a whole, instead of to enrich a tiny segment of society.

Um, no actually. You could have a boat or personal aircraft "under communism" since, generally speaking, communism is used to refer to a stateless, classless, and moneyless society. It's generally understood that such a society would have achieved post-scarcity, and as such your personal desires could be sated.

Under socialism, you could work for a boat, however I'm dubious about the practicality of personal aircraft since that's pretty bourgeois.

However, may I ask you, can you afford your own boat and personal aircraft right now? For the majority of the working class, owning the two is still an impossibility to begin with anyhow. At least with socialism when workers receive the full value of their labor and aren't restricted with wage labor and the cost of living more would have the opportunity to actually have boats universally.

Imagine thinking to yourself "I'm going to visit this board and use their own logic to own them" and then coming up with this.