Which side would you live on?

Your community on Democrats is Detroit and Baltimore, the fuck is the organic fruit and community gardens there lel.

...

The trick is that it'll look just like the right, except they advertize the left.

The left, because that is where all the "caring liberals" went and established a segregated white community so the could virtue signal about supporting diversity by looking at the coloreds when they drive to their job on the right side.

Neither

In reality it's more like:
Shitholes like Baltimore.
Shitholes like Owsley county.

One flavor of demagogue-driven crapitalism or the other, and as always the few places in America where life is good are where the money flows.

Or it could be Seattle and Portland. It doesn't matter which of the two faces of Janus looks over the city. What matters is its economy.

The strawmanned side

The left side is still capitalism so neither. I'll be on a raft in the river.

What is a "Luxemburgist"? Luxemburg was essentially an orthodox Marxist who did not present any significant alterations or additions to Marxist theory.

Yes, but Luxemburg didn't just parrot Marx. She was a contemporary of Lenin and had some sharp criticisms of what he was doing, as well as some agreement. She took the events of her day and commented on them.

People who call themselves "Luxemburgists" are 9/10 times anarkiddies in recovery who've come to realize the very basic things Marx said were too true, while not reading more from Marx himself to find out that Luxemburg was just a faithful Marxist. So they find comfort in putting themselves as ideologues under bae like someone picks their favorite flavor of soda.

This is how most "radicals" today come to wearing their chosen banner: the most cursory glances at what their banner will signal and whether it suits their edge levels. Meanwhile, this means calling yourself a "Luxemburgist" is in fact the equivalent of simply being a consistent Marxist, but you won't hear that from anybody.

then why the need to give her her own ism

unless you mean by it a general tendency against centralist top-down Parties. I think her appeals to freeze peach in 1917-8 were pretty meh but she also died for her actions so I can't be too harsh, and she CERTAINLY does not deserve to be remembered as a "Menshevik" or however Stalin tarred her.

I think this user is right. she was also a very articulate defender against revisionism in the SPD, which is still a very relevant fact, in our fight against the current revisionism/opportunism.

Two people in this thread just did it back to back.

Peebles should switch to the 'Read a book' flair to remind themself to fucking do it every time they post more stupid shit

What actually matters is demographics. Detroit and Baltimore are populated by 80IQ Africans, Seattle and Portland are populated by 110IQ merchant caste Northwestern Europeans.

I'd set up a smuggling operation bringing weapons and pregnant teens into democrat-ville and bringing weed and porn into republican-ville.

Right. Race is why manufacturing tanked in Detroit and Baltimore while the Dot-Com Boom took off in Seattle and Portland. It didn't have anything to do with deindustrialization or the shift to a service-based economy. That's some in-depth analysis you have there.

little do we know that the left is actually a former ghetto, just got extremely gentrified

You're the same mongoloid namefaggot caught saying Luxemburgism is state socialism in other threads. Your "consistency" in Marxism is about as consistent as your invariant desire to become popular with your namefaggotry. Go back to reddit.

Manufacturing tanked across America because elites decided that an indigenous middle class was a threat and decided to outsource most manufacturing to the third world. De-industrialization does not explain why every African-majority city in America, and the world, is a horrific third-world hellscape, evolution does.
You say this as though it was unrelated to the demographics of those cities.

Take your demagogue pseudo-science out of here, Polly.

washingtonpost.com/opinions/marilyn-salenger-white-flight-and-detroits-decline/2013/07/21/7903e888-f24a-11e2-bdae-0d1f78989e8a_story.html?utm_term=.abdf7afadb91

NIGGERS ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR EVERYTHING BAD IN THE WORLD

This

...

Sure.

Happy?

heh

Murray is a completely non-biased social scientist. The fact that a scientist has uncovered information which puts non-Europeans in an unfavorable light doesn't give you the right to dismiss his work as demagoguery.

That's much better.

Just out of curiosity, how do you respond to feminist literature "proving" that men are predisposed to rape and abuse?

It's absolutely true. Male sexuality is innately dangerous and violent, as a tendency towards rape was evolutionarily adaptive until the recent advent of low-risk abortions.

With that said, not all male populations have the same tendency towards sexual violence. Populations which have been under prolonged rule by a powerful state apparatus have experienced selection against interpersonal violence. Rapists were generally executed by the state, therefore populations such as Western Europeans and East Asians have a lower prevalence of men who carry a genetic predisposition towards reproduction by force.

unz.com/pfrost/making-europeans-kinder-gentler/

it must be some kind of shitty flavour of communism if you still have to look for work at the job centre.

Manufacturing jobs were outsourced because labor costs are lower in poor countries and you don't need a fucking genius to assemble things in a factory. You would think that Holla Forums would understand that technological development is primarily driven by the right tail of the Autism Level distribution.

If anyone hasn't already, listen to this week's Chapo.
They talk about this exact fantasy that coastal liberals all have

The difference is that you actually get a job.

I mean it could be used to split unpleasant labor or allow people to switch up the work they do to keep from things getting repetitive.

Men are still massively more dangerous in every society. Shouldn't we segregate them for the benefit of "civilized people"?

Of fucking course it does, you retard. During the Migration of the early twentieth century, southern blacks moved en masse to industrial centers in the country to do labor that was slightly better than sharecropping. When industry in those cities collapsed it left everyone there poor and out of work.

Because it was. Seattle had been full of engineers after the Boeing and shipbuilding booms, so when natives Paul Allen and Bill Gates founded Microsoft they already had a labor pool to pull from.

How do "traditionalists" and feminists still not realize that they are the exact same thing?

Manufacturing costs were always lower in non-white countries, but in the past unions would have reacted violently to outsourcing. What has changed is that all of the organizations which represent the white worker have been subverted and have betrayed their constituents.

Lots of white cities also lost manufacturing, but their high I.Q. populations managed to maintain some semblance of European civilization.

So you basically concede that the economic success of Seattle is due to the high genetic capital of its inhabitants.

Where are you going with this? Personally I actually agree with the idea that different races have different (largely overlapping) Autism Level distributions. I don't understand what your end-game is though. You have a problem, but you don't have a solution. It just seems to be a weak excuse to justify tribalism and barbarism on your part.

Women and men were traditionally socially segregated in order to prevent many of the unfortunate tensions from which our society now suffers. Schools and workplaces should definitely be segregated by gender.

In the long run, this knowledge will inevitably lead to racial re-segregation, which will be overwhelmingly positive for Europeans. Knowledge of human biodiversity is fiercely suppressed by our elites, so I am content to just spread the knowledge around and watch the fireworks that ensue.

The white people in Detroit and Baltimore are broke too. Poverty doesn't discriminate.

How the fuck does that even follow? That makes absolutely no goddamn sense. There was a shipbuilding boom in Seattle, because it had a geographically protected, warm, deep-water port on the Pacific Ocean. Boeing was there, because the original aircraft that they made were made out of spruce wood that grows in the area.

Whatever you say, Mohammed.

Technological change made outsourcing economically favorable, and Asian countries in particular had both low labor costs and were sufficiently orderly for economic development to happen. No one outsources to the Middle East or Africa, for example. Why would you do that when your factory might get bombed by a radical Islamic group, or destroyed in the latest round of African tribal warfare?

Combine this with institutional capture by the capitalist class (buy your own politician!) and it's easy to see why outsourcing became a thing. You only have to purchase a few politicians and you can easily rewrite laws in order to increase the supply of labor. This is the whole point of third-world immigration.

but its two sides of the same capitalist city. it doesn't matter wether dems or republicans run the town you will still have affluent neighbourhoods with nice shit and slumtowns filled with poverty and misery.

Islam is the light.

Europeans have been segregating genders in order to preserve the social peace since before Islam existed. Every healthy society eventually converges on the same truth, men and women do not belong together in the public sphere, as tensions and competition between the genders tears apart the fabric of society.

And labor leaders, and academics, and the media. The radical American left unironically believes that the greatest threat facing the nation is the possibility that the flow of cheap labor may be obstructed.

Holla Forumsyps think that race is everything and that if whites didn't have to see browns everything would be better because god damn it jamal would stop taking my lunch money i wish lincoln lost

I accept the premise, but I strongly disagree with your conclusions.

To start with, you're proposing racial segregation, not segregation by IＱ, which is going to lead to a vast number of false positives and false negatives. If you genuinely wanted to get rid of all the untermensch, you'd give everyone an Autism Level test and kick the ones who score below, say, 110 out.

Secondly, I just don't think it would produce the effect you want. Most of the problems our species faces are caused by the malevolence and/or ignorance of world leaders. The ignorance of the electorate doesn't help, but ultimately very smart people have gone to great lengths to manipulate and subdue the common people in order to achieve their own ends. You must at least admit that, even if you disagree about the exact goals of the jews/bourgeoisie. Humans as a whole are too stupid and barbaric to solve most problems we face, and honestly variations of a few tens of Autism Level points make very little difference. We're still all a bunch of monkeys trying to control a machine with a million different unlabeled levers.

Mere stupidity cannot begin to account for that statement.

its another Holla Forums thinks we are liberals post

Your entire political ideology rests on the self idealized problem you are to weak to fight Muslims who are big bullies. At the end of the day your ideology is so incoherent it's worse than Islam if put into practice. But putting into practice neet bullshit is itself, a joke

No, I don't think that would appear in the top 1000 shortlist.
I'm not sure what would be at the top out of global warming, nuclear self-annihilation, civil war, the ongoing erosion of Americans' basic human rights, and the looming specter of entropic heat-death.

The truly crazy thing is that does not even fit the liberals, let alone communists whose entire philosophy is built around eliminating underpaid labor. It's a complete asspull with no basis in reality.

NEETs are a symptom, not a problem.

So, has that guy conceded on the whole Seattle vs. Detroit thing?

Don't engage the tripfag.

I dunno about it not fitting liberals. The current liberal center in both the GOP and the Dems really like undocumented laborers because they work cheaper than minimum wages and if they try to unionize they just get reported to ICE.

filter and move on famarade

I am not talking about the ways that NEETs are created at all, that's an entirely different discussion.

Fuck off lol

Maybe you are right. I was thinking that the liberals were more about moving factories to where the cheap labor already is.

I hate to break this to you, but the American Right also loves union busting - Democrats just co-opt them for votes.

Liberal economists basically argue that globalization is a net positive because the quality of life gains by people from poor countries are greater than quality of life losses in rich countries, and it results in lower commodity prices anyway, so it's not a big deal. While it's true that commodity prices have gone down, there is a lack of decent-paying jobs for people who aren't especially smart, and the costs of education, housing, and health care are exploding. This isn't really a conspiracy, they just don't think in terms of What's Best For The Great White Race, so the a relative decline in the economic status of dumb whites isn't considered a huge concern.

Radical leftists don't really argue in this way, they basically argue that borders are a spook and that the workers of the world have no country, so every worker should be allowed to migrate wherever they wish.

oh they do that too. after all the stuff they can't move out of america they bring in illegals and stuff that would be expensive/vunerable to unionization they ship overseas. in an age of transnational corporations capital isn't bound by nationality like the rest of us are.

*expensive to keep

Neoliberalism does a splendid job of illustrating why nationalism is cancer.

its not just neoliberalism but liberalism in general. the idea of a nation state as we know it was born in the french revolution. under feudalism the largest group your average serf cared about was his villiage or town.

I agree. This is the main reason why Rojava is an anarchic hellscape wrecked by gender warfare.

Oh wait.

Distantly related populations differ in more traits than just intelligence. A 110 I.Q. African will still be more impulsive, violent and anti-social than an 80 I.Q. Swede. High I.Q. Jews, Indians and East Asians (with the possible exception of Japanese) are corrupt and clannish sociopaths who consume the commons and destroy social trust. Europeans, particularly Northerwestern Europeans, are the only population on the planet capable of creating and sustaining a society which is tolerable to live in.

I would rather go and live beyond these there hills. Tho the road is tortuous and the distance enormous, there lies a realm where the human spirit is bathed in eternal sunshine.

You're talking about statistical trends as if they were universal laws. IＱ was just an example. Whatever factor you want to control, there will always be false positives and false negatives. It is always better to test for that trait directly and use that as your metric for deciding who to deport.

This shit is why people call you racist. Because you seem to just be looking for excuses to get rid of all the brown people. You don't give a shit about low-IＱ whites or violent whites. It's the most base form of tribalism. Ironically, tribalism is one of the maladaptive traits which I'd try to eliminate if I was running a eugenics program.

It's an intersectional kind of white supremacy.

Under capitalism, the left side can only exist because of the right side.

So neither.

Why do we need an excuse?

I confess that as a working class European, I have a powerful genetic predisposition to take the side of my own kind.

The individual is weak. Any society composed of atomized individuals is doomed to be conquered by a society of tribalists. Tribalism is highly adaptive.

As I thought. You're just another flawed animal responding to crude instincts. The veneer of rationality is exceedingly thin.
Tribalism is maladaptive for the human species as a whole. It's sad, but unsurprising, that you either can't see that or don't care. If humanity was anywhere near civilized we wouldn't have enough nukes pointed at ourselves to cause another mass extinction event.

You are presumably a rational machine, devoid of all loyalties and indifferent to life and death. Or maybe you are just a coward, too weak and docile to stand up for your own people.

The "human species" is an arbitrary social construct. There is no such thing and there never will be.

Mass extinction is perfectly natural part of the evolutionary process.

I need an exorcist!

That is indeed one extraordinary example of cognative dissonance. That is if he isn't just taking the piss. Inb4 lolitrollu

lets not forget this also

washingtonpost.com/local/freddie-grays-life-a-study-in-the-sad-effects-of-lead-paint-on-poor-blacks/2015/04/29/0be898e6-eea8-11e4-8abc-d6aa3bad79dd_story.html?utm_term=.78fcccffcf87

how long until you are just pretending to be retarded?

lead causes brain damage that leads to violence and poor impulse control. inner city america has tons of lead in paint and plumbing. poor people live in the inner city. blacks and latinos are more likely to be urban poor. hmmm there is somthing here but i can't put my finger on it.

Aggregating several closely related populations into a tribal coalition under the banner of white-nationalism is a perfectly valid ideological position. Pretending that a common human nature exists between populations which have been subjected to 200,000 years of divergent evolution, and that any insufficiency among the more primitive equatorial populations is the result of a conspiracy by northern peoples is absurd.

Populations which evolved in warm climates are generally stupid and lazy. Brown people are globally stupid, not just in America.

I honestly can't get over just how completely wrong you are.

Humans are closely related to other humans. That's why we're all able to produce viable offspring with one another and understand each other's emotions and language. This is the kind of basic fucking biology you get taught in elementary school. The differences between the most brain-damaged human and the greatest genius are tiny compared to the differences between the average human and our closest relatives in the animal kingdom.

I actually gave you the benefit of the doubt and tried to have an intellectually honest discussion with you. Evidently I wasted my time.

I. Q. is a measurement of education. The countries with the highest I.Q.s on your gay little chart have massive state education programs. also argentina isn't white kiddo

im beginning to think he ate the lead paint

Not only 200,000 years is short, but it's not even a correct figure. A common ancestor existed for the whole of humanity (apart maybe from some pygmees and khoi-san people) about 70,000 years ago.
Right, and so is the idea that the decadence of white countries is the result of a Semite conspiracy.
If you really want brown people out, and if you really want to end decadence, fight for the end of Capitalism.

More like 🍀🍀🍀elementary school🍀🍀🍀 amirite

explain the aussies

test

Humans are closely related to bananas, what's your point? Europeans have been blessed by evolution with the highest level of genetic capital of any population on earth. If we are to avoid being dragged into stone-age entropy, we must expel outsiders and build walls. Non-Europeans have nothing of value to offer us.

Not it isn't. It is a non-biased method for measuring pattern recognition and general cognitive fitness.

Allowing Semites disproportionate influence over our academia, media and financial institutions definitely isn't helping the situation.

Market valuation of goods and services is not something that can be fought, it is just a fact of nature. Fighting takes place between tribes.

Are stormfags really this retarded?
Have you ever been to Seattle? I lived there for 10 years. It's mostly the Asians and Indian immigrants who have the high paying tech jobs.

Race is the spookiest spook of them all.

This isn't race realism. This is race I-don't-even-know-what-a-species-is.
The only advice I can give is to read the most basic biology textbook you can find. In fact, you might want to start with a basic math textbook and work up from there.

The foreign helots were only imported in the last few years. Seattle was always a beautiful Anglo-Germanic city.

How about I live on the sun? It's my property anyway.

Man, there are conservative Jews, too. Do you think the orthodox rabbis who preach for strict interpretatin of the Torah are happy to see fun occuring around them? Do you think there are no non-Jews pushing for decadent lifestyles?
How can you hate the Jew so much and then proceed to defend as a sacred god the very thing that made them have any kind of power whatsoever?
Let's have a quick lesson of history, shall we?
When did Jews start having a desproportionate amount of power in relation to their demographic weight?

Just make sure to go there at night otherwise it's too hot :^)

"Conservatism" is not a universalist ideology, a conservative foreigner isn't interested in conserving the same things as yourself. Even most "progressive" Jews in the West are fanatical nationalists "conservatives" when it comes to their own country.

What you are suggesting seems to be that we should concentrate on fighting the vague human tendency to sell things to each other instead of fighting our open tribal enemies. That hardly seems helpful.

Probably from the moment that the Ashkenazi and Sephardi merchant clans formed about 1300 years ago.

Of course not, but let's check:
Check.
Check.
Check.
Check.
Check.
Check.

All in all, you have much more in common with rabbid Israeli rabbies than you'd think.

But Capitalism goes way beyond that, user.
But you do fight them by fighting Capitalism.

Wrong. The Rotschilds and related started to be influential around the 17th century, which is coincidentally the moment Capitalism started to replace Feudalism as the dominant system.

Again, you seem to believe that "conservatism" is universal. I have never seen a Rabbi advocate for healthy Christian European families or a European ethnostate. It would obviously be stupid for Rabbis to do so, as Europeans are not their people.

Perhaps you ought to define what you mean by capitalism and how it can be fought.

Court Jews have always existed.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Court_Jew

Humans have not even existed that long, and none of them had left Africa until about 60,000 BP. Where are you getting your figures?

Define.

Capitalism is an economic mode of production featuring private ownership of the means of production, production of commodities for exchange, and waged labor. It can be fought by collectivization, organization of the waged laborers upon whom it relies, and the production of goods for use.

I bet on the democrat side you could atleast find a cute flat chested antifa girlfriend that volunteers at the community garden.

And so did merchants. But they weren't really that influential before Capitalism came to existence.

And a feminine penis too?

>organic
You're doing it wrong.

China and India are Northwestern Europe now?

I don't see how this will solve the problem of hostile foreign infiltrators destroying our civilization. In fact, hostile foreign infiltrators appear to be overrepresented among advocates for seizure of private property, while my people are overrepresented among holders of private property.

Literally everything boils down to humans vs orcs.

You do realise that there are less murders in madagascar than there are in Canada?

Less murders, unemployment and imprisonment in Botswana?

You're full of shit.

debunkingdenialism.com/2014/01/11/white-genocide-eurabia-and-other-white-supremacist-nonsense/

Is that murders, or murder rate?

WEW LAD

splcenter.org/fighting-hate/extremist-files/individual/richard-lynn fair.org/extra/racism-resurgent/

sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/01/100121155220.htm

ifitweremyhome.com/compare/BW/BR

ifitweremyhome.com/compare/AU/MG

Except it's not valid, because race doesn't exist you sperg.

Lee et al. 2008: "We caution against making the naive leap to a genetic explanation for group differences in complex traits, especially for human behavioral traits such as Autism Level scores"

AAA 1998: "For example, 'Evidence from the analysis of genetics (e.g., DNA) indicates that most physical variation, about 94%, lies within so-called racial groups. Conventional geographic 'racial' groupings differ from one another only in about 6% of their genes. This means that there is greater variation within 'racial' groups than between them.'

"Keita, S O Y; Kittles, Royal, Bonney, Furbert-Harris, Dunston, Rotimi; Royal, C D M; Bonney, G E; Furbert-Harris, P; Dunston, G M; Rotimi, C N (2004). "Conceptualizing human variation". Nature Genetics. 36 (11s): S17–S20. doi:10.1038/ng1455. PMID 15507998. Modern human biological variation is not structured into phylogenetic subspecies ('races'), nor are the taxa of the standard anthropological 'racial' classifications breeding populations. The 'racial taxa' do not meet the phylogenetic criteria. 'Race' denotes socially constructed units as a function of the incorrect usage of the term.

Keita, S O Y; Kittles, Royal, Bonney, Furbert-Harris, Dunston, Rotimi; Royal, C D M; Bonney, G E; Furbert-Harris, P; Dunston, G M; Rotimi, C N (2004). "Conceptualizing human variation". Nature Genetics. 36 (11s): S17–S20. doi:10.1038/ng1455. PMID 15507998. Modern human biological variation is not structured into phylogenetic subspecies ('races'), nor are the taxa of the standard anthropological 'racial' classifications breeding populations. The 'racial taxa' do not meet the phylogenetic criteria. 'Race' denotes socially constructed units as a function of the incorrect usage of the term.

Harrison, Guy (2010). Race and Reality. Amherst: Prometheus Books. Race is a poor empirical description of the patterns of difference that we encounter within our species. The billions of humans alive today simply do not fit into neat and tidy biological boxes called races. Science has proven this conclusively. The concept of race (…) is not scientific and goes against what is known about our ever-changing and complex biological diversity.

Roberts, Dorothy (2011). Fatal Invention. London, New York: The New Press. The genetic differences that exist among populations are characterized by gradual changes across geographic regions, not sharp, categorical distinctions. Groups of people across the globe have varying frequencies of polymorphic genes, which are genes with any of several differing nucleotide sequences. There is no such thing as a set of genes that belongs exclusively to one group and not to another. The clinal, gradually changing nature of geographic genetic difference is complicated further by the migration and mixing that human groups have engaged in since prehistory. Human beings do not fit the zoological definition of race. A mountain of evidence assembled by historians, anthropologists, and biologists proves that race is not and cannot be a natural division of human beings.

The most complex instrument and the most valuable resource in the known universe is the human mind. Human minds vary in complexity due to random mutation and divergent evolutionary pressures. Some populations and sub-populations have been subjected to exceptional selective pressures for greater cognitive complexity. Among these populations are northern farmers who were subjected to strong selection for restraint and planning ability, and various small mercantile and priestly castes, who were produced by direct selective breeding. Within every endogamous population, further selective breeding takes place wherein the fittest members of the community pair off to create elite sub-populations.

Being in possession of a mind which is especially capable provides great advantages and opportunities to an individual. Possessing in your reproductive organs the capacity to produce cognitively capable offspring constitutes a further advantage in accumulating intergenerational wealth and power. Individuals thusly bestowed can be said possess high "genetic capital".

Individuals who possess high genetic capital are in possession of the only true "means of production", as intelligence is the limiting factor in all human endeavors. This is why redistributing factories and raw materials from elite castes to the lower classes generally leads to chaos and entropy.

...

Hmmmm
asbmb.org/asbmbtoday/asbmbtoday_article.aspx?id=32437

char4u.com/content/contributions-ancient-china-to-world/

How is that a definition of anything? Define the concept, don't tell some abstract story.

I've seen a rebuttal pic posted on here before, does anyone have it?

Genetic capital = genes for for good brains.

And which genes are those?

Why do you assume that the elite castes act to benefit society as a whole, when both present and past societies clearly demonstrate that they're selfish bastards who deserve the guillotine?

define good

Depends, do I believe in their cause?

jews have a higher lQ, they must know what they were doing

*points to dilznick*

Individuals with high genetic capital have greatly hindered research into this topic under the guise of protecting populations with low genetic capital. It may be that the whole field of cognitive genomics will be banned by elites under a false pretext. If we knew all of the advantageous genes, then we would be able to effectively redistribute the means of production, which would not be in the interests of the ruling class, who prefer to discuss the redistribution of tractors and shovels.

Less entropy, more complexity.

How do you intend to produce commodities with a brain?

You do realize that 1/3 of all Nobel prize winners are Jewish, right?

begging the question there buddy, why is less entropy good?

Hmmm….

pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2017/02/22/6-facts-about-black-americans-for-black-history-month/

jstor.org/stable/40064475?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4603674/

It would appear that you're just spouting Holla Forumsyp lies and pseudo science while blaming jews.

Damn the DPRK has a high Autism Level

telequinesis obviously

Someone should invert the colours and add a lens flare to it.

So far, my 141 autisms-per-hour has done me no good in life whatsoever. In fact, it has been an immense, if not the factor, contributing to my continuous existential crisis, generalized alienation and depression.

Does this count as capital or are my braincells the cognitive equivalent of Zimbabwean dollars?

kek!

Never seen a democrat push for more support for co-ops and credit unions.

When an individual belongs to an endogamous elite caste, their bonds of loyalty to the general population can become very tenuous. I believe that a truly equal society will require the redistribution of genetic capital.

indeed.

Congo is rich in raw materials, but does not possess any significant level economic activity. Raw materials are a necessary but insufficient prerequisite for production. Japan is the world's leading exporter, yet they possess no raw materials. They specialize in importing raw materials and exporting the fruits of their high genetic capital.

Yes.

About four billion years ago on the planet earth, a series of self-replicating chemical reactions began to order simple molecules into increasingly complex molecules. As a product of this continuing chemical reaction, I have a strong bias in favor of complexity over entropy. There is no objective reason why life is better than death, why snails are better than stones, why honey is better than hydrochloric acid, these are just preferences which have been programmed into me by the dispassionate selective forces of the cosmos .

I'm in the same situation. I was born to dysfunctional retard parents. At least I am smart enough to have a chance to think my way out of this world of shit. Try not jerking off, it wrecks your dopamine receptors and makes you into a useless faggot. Try getting some modafinil to help restore your dopamine levels, and uridine + DHA to help regrow your dopamine receptors.

This is really stupid. Most studies supporting hereditary, racial intelligence differences hold that East Asians have higher I.Qs than whites and larger brains (~107 I.Q vs ~100), and Indians are only slightly less intelligent than Europeans, so the ones sharp enough to immigrate will generally be very capable.

You built your entire ideology around things that you do not even understand. Then you ignore actual experts on the subject who tell you that the basis for you theory is nonsense. Finally, you verify it by using a debunked standardized test that does not even measure what it purports to measure.

If there is no such thing as objectivism, why should we discrimnate people based on race or Autism Level?

Evolutionary theory really isn't that complicated.

The "experts" are elite caste high-IQ academics who have a vested interest in downplaying the role of heredity in their elite status. Elites take I.Q. tests in order to enter elite academic institutions, where they proceed to breed with other elites and create an inbred high I.Q. ruling caste. Elites then tell everyone that we are all equal, and if Joe the plumber failed to achieve elite status, then this was due to his own moral failings, and if Tyrone failed to achieve elite status, that this was due to oppression by Joe the plumber. The denial of hereditary intelligence is not meant to protect mentally feeble brown people, but to justify the rule of inbred genetic elites.

Yes, which is why Harvard has abandoned the extensive I.Q. testing of applicants and now draws students by random lots.

In order to minimize entropy. A global European utopia is the lowest entropy state which I can imagine.

If flooding Europe with mudslims will end eurocentrists retards like these then I am a neoliberal now

Europoors lived in fucking mudhuts while Incans in Latin America had actual socialism

The other side. I've had enough of capitalism, human face or not.

Congratulations.

Why not just go find a tribe in South America or Africa and ask to join so you can become a primitive Communist?

“There has been a lot of speculation about the growth of the Muslim population around the world, and many of those who speculate don’t have good data,” said Brian Grim, a senior researcher at the Pew Forum.

For example, the report undermines the notion that Europe is heading toward having any country with a Muslim majority. The continent will be about 8 percent Muslim in 2030, it projects.

“The data that we have isn’t pointing in the direction of ‘Eurabia’ at all,” Grim said.

“The Muslim population is growing and slowing. Instead of a runaway train, it’s trending with the general global population,” he said.

Cooperman [another Pew researcher – E. K. note] hopes that information will help make for more intelligent discussions, he said: “In the midst of heated debate and speculation, we think that solid, reliable, empirical estimates are valuable.”

debunkingdenialism.com/2012/08/11/the-widespread-abuse-of-heritability/

debunkingdenialism.com/2013/12/27/abusing-heritability-libertarian-realist-edition/

I'm sure there are some die hard Thomas Sankara fan boys there.

religion.blogs.cnn.com/2011/01/27/world-muslim-population-doubling-report-projects/

Probably not a wise idea to use an article before the EU started resettling one million almost-entirely-Muslim young refugees

I would walk into traffic

thats its where do I sign for Soros workforce?

telegraph.co.uk/news/religion/11406700/Number-of-Muslim-children-in-Britain-doubles-in-a-decade.html

Keeping in mind that the article linked is using British census data from 2011, not 2015.

These studies also never seem to incorporate things like age pyramids. Obviously a younger (overall) population is going to have a greater demographic effect than a comparable native population that's greying as rapidly as Britain's native white population is.

And then there's the fact that "Europe" includes eastern European countries with a minimal Islamic presence, which will obviously offset any so-called "Islamification" of Western European countries

market socialism vs capitalism actually

Jump in the fucking river…

You know, I have been thinking of self-medicating for depression. Microdosing LSD and certain dissociatives seem very promising. Now that I looked into it, they all do seem to affect dopamine levels. I'll look into your suggestions, thanks.

I'm an agorist. I live on the right side selling things that have been needlessly banned.

Nice, you said everything I thought of.

Nice

You say as you link to a historical event where the ruling class had just gotten millions of "their people" killed for no reason except their own greed. So much for the deep bond of caring and solidarity created by being born on the same plot of land.

But why

On the DPRK you maniac.

O-ok

DPRK are brain stronk

J.H. Blair dindu nuffin

Considering that first of all the right hand side will be mostly Europeans while the left hand side will be mostly Hispanics, i choose the right hand side. Because i can't stand Latin American culture and because i generally dislike Mexican cuisine. All jokes aside. This is a ridiculous false dichotomy and projection of liberal wet dreams. The states that bleed Blue are not green, progressive paradises. They're overcrowded, corrupt, in debt and highly inefficient states. My state is Blue as they come and our roads are trash, our weed system is ridiculously rigged in favor of mega corps taking it over, our prisons are overflowing with drug offenders, our LEO agencies are totally underfunded and bloated with DHS/FBI level nonsense spending, our governor is a corporate ass licking Frat fag and our cities are dirty and plagued with heroin and meth problems.

Not an American, so I might be wrong, but it seems to me that Washington, Maine or Oregon are much better places to live in than Alabama or Virginia.

both are shit. wtf i'm a turd positionist now

the cognitive development of someone is mainly within childhood, and can be stifled by extreme trauma, i.e. everything that happens in the developing world, a lot of which has to do with capitalist exploitation.

the way children are taught also has an effect, with children who learn to group things systematically scoring higher than those who group thematically

livescience.com/36143-iq-change-time.html

nihrecord.nih.gov/newsletters/2012/06_22_2012/story4.htm

pic related

Where're the welfare lines and rampant criminal shitskins on the left side?