Let's assume that communism is finally achieved and you get your classless society that you've been so eager for.
What would stop society from creating a new artificial class system based on say genetics or race? And the old problems of class struggle will come back in a new way?
The dialectics will never end
Communism is against classes in general though. If some people are fit for more skilled work then fine but that won't make them a higher class of person. It's from each according to his ability, to each according to his need, not the other way round. The more able are the ones with a larger burden to carry.
That doesn't answer the question. Also work won't exist in a communist society.
God you are so retarded. Just like your meme.
Nothing.
Communism isn't the end of history; and their is nothing stopping a dialectical contradiction resolving its self with negative outcomes for humans.
In all likelyhood it will be the means of production itself that revolts against the human master; but a genetic slave race being created / coming into contradiction isn't out of the question.
Thanks for answering my question. That's all I needed to know.
You can't create a class system based on anything but relations of production you simp. Unless people are working for you in productive units you control, you're not an "upper class". The point of communism is to deprive people from that, to say there will be a new class based on biological traits is to imply those with biological traits must be in control of some type of material power and productive force, otherwise there's nothing to enforce their class rule.
The experience of human beings over time stays with them, in general. The experience of going through the revolution to communism, over generations and worldwide, will remove a lot of the terrible ideas that are ingrained in people today.
I'm not saying racism etc. will never come about again, but it's not particularly useful to think of humans in communism as some kind of petry dish experiment. They will have learnt the lessons of history. Education will be better under communism, for one.
Would there be a point? No. There would be.
The world isn't some fucking fantasy novel, people do things that make sense and that they believe will benefit them. Randomly and spontaneously creating a whole new oppressive state system out of nothing for no reason, would not happen.
wouldn't.
Just woke up n shit
They will make one up, for the oppressor is a necessity, things won't make sense without one.
That anything is possible if you have magic technology that can do anything?
Did you really need anyone to tell you that?
Maybe to you classcuck but that's probably the stupidest, most baseless support for a state I've ever seen.
Your communism is stupid.
What would nazi's be without the Jews?
What would those who define themselves based on a non-tangible, all permeating enemy be without said enemy?
There will always be someone higher up on the totem pole from you. That is the perpetual oppressor and it matters not how he got there he must be overthrown again and again and again until there is no one left. It is the only way to end the cycles of oppression.
Social Democrats.
They wouldn't exist because that's a really fucking dumb thing to do. They'd be useful people like engineers, plumbers, doctors, or neets who at least mow their lawn.
Not always, no.
There will always be someone better of than someone else unless there is only one or less persons in existence. If you pursue victim/oppressor dichotomy to its logical conclusion this is the result.
NEIGHBORS GOAT TOO MUST DIE
they would just find another enemy to blame all world's problem over.
They'd just be fascists. Hating specifically Jews is not what makes fascism fascism.
Also kek fair point.
You should have said Greens.
They would exist because their existence is based on an ideological need.
Being better than someone else is not having authority and power over them, that's not hierarchy.
They wouldn't be fascists in communism, at least not after a couple generations, same reason there's no monarchists in the west now except like three edgy people with actual autism who exist only on the internet.
Ethics? I dunno, you'd have to be a pretty shitty person to deliberately create conflict within an imagined perfect society, sounds like something AnCaps and Nazis would do though.
Genetically engineered humans are likely to come before Capitalism falls anyway, and they might actually prove Marx wrong.
All western countries that have royal houses have majority support for them.
Not actual monarchism. It's pretty much a joke in Canada
Hierarchy among humans, real hierarchy of social standing within groups is not only determined by the material resources you have at your disposal. A lot of it is perception and biochemical reactions to how you do in competition over female attention or academic fame or whatever. You will never get rid of hierarchy, there will always be someone who everyone listens to instead of you and you will resent him and eventually plot a revolution.
Sorry no I'm not a vengeful autist.
Goddamnit, Holla Forums, go be /r9k/ somewhere else.
But someone will be because there always is someone who resents his position in the hierarchy.
Post modernist go back to the trash heap of history.
He'd get mental help for his mental illness.
Just like revolutionaries get today lol.