Sessions is cooked

I don't care about Trump you pathetic piece of shit. The point is that Democrats are not changing tactics and doing the very thing that made them lose in the first place. Blaming Russia for your lose means that you can continue on with your shitty corporate agenda instead of making changes. We need them to adapt Bernie's populist platform instead of their shitty corporate Democrat agenda but they won't. This is bad for them.

You're neocon scum. Which means you're slightly worse than Trump. Kill yourself.

Didn't Trump compare the IC with Nazi Germany once on twitter? The man is dead before 2017 is over. Pence is then a good boy and is Reagan's Ghost.

Putin is on a level of anti-imperialism that shouldn't be possible tbh

1. russia is most definitely an enemy. putin is a belligerent autocrat. kills journalists, dissidents, and has enacted very far right social policies that even republicans would oppose. the level of russia apologism on the far left never ceases to amaze me.
2. lifting sanctions is a terrible idea. it jeopardizes the autonomy of former eastern block countries, specifically the ukraine which putin has been looking to annex for some time and has already sent forces to. lifitng sanctions/abandoning nato is the reason putin wanted trump as president.

you're so clueless it hurts. a country with a huge military (including the most nuclear weapons) and an aggressive foreign policy is not "irrelevant."

As an actual Russian: shut the fuck up. You have not even the slightest idea of what is actually going on.

Jefferson Beauregard Sessions is living proof that reconstruction never should have ended

none of that is america's problem. unless you plan on going to war with russia you're not going to fix any of those problems. and even then, we would still fuck it up.

Putin is an anti-imperialist hero, you fucking idiot. You can't expect everyone to be perfect on social policies. Anyone who opposes the US is good.

Here's how a former Reagan administration insider puts the IC situation with Trump. You're absolutely right, he's done.

paulcraigroberts.org/2017/02/16/trump-presidency-rip/

No. Shut the fuck up and fuck off traitor. Bet you're an ISIS shill too.

ISIS is a US-run force, like almost every Jihadi group.

Putin is still a porky, lets not forget that. However, the greater threat is the U.S, and supporting them now is a good thing for the long run.

When the US implodes, then we support whoever opposes the EU or China, whichever one is more powerful.

Does controlling Chechnya with a puppet dictator and ex-jihadist not count as imperialism now.

Then why would they be fighting Al-CIAda?

Kill yourself, Democrat. All of you Democrats should kill yourselves. All of you are worthless corporate shits who have absolutely nothing the people ever want.

And this is another reason you should kill yourself: your insufferable belief in corporate unity.

Fuck Putin. He's propping up an authoritarian oligarchy that only keeps Russia in that shithole situation. There's a path for the left not because of him, but in spite of him.

No, because only the US can be imperialist, as it is the only superpower and the center of global capitalism.

The US is on levels of deception that shouldn't be possible.

because the US is funding so many different militant groups at the same time they can't even keep track of them all

I should kill myself because I think ISIL is more likely to be a satellite force of a third party? Chill with your sperging for a bit would you.

Daily reminder for those similarly disposed

This is your brain on Tankieism

When Russia becomes the center of global capitalism, then you support (whoever) against Russian imperialism. This is unlikely to happen because an American collapse would collapse global capitalism and bring about Communism.

Yeah, who said I was using the NYT? How else would you describe Putin's Russia? Let me guess, you actually believe he's a neo-Soviet.

Russia clearly wants to be the center of global capitalism, why wait to oppose them

Because the defeat of the US brings about a revolutionary opportunity in the resulting power vacuum and crisis.

Why haven't you killed yourself yet? Your porky slave "conservative movement" is a corpse that even normal Republican voters can't stand. They roundly rejected you idiots in favor of Trump. Trump is more popular than your "conservative movement" and he's more popular than the Democratic party which also a corpse. You might as well just join the Democrats in your endless autistic screeching about the election you lost.

revolutions don't just spawn out of nowhere, If America collapses other capitalist countries will just try to fill the vacuum.

Thinking more into it, it seems that the populations of both sides would be against the war. It is a critical time to get the masses riled up to overthrow both military states and institute socialism.

The goal isn't to actually have a war here. Whatever Russia's plan is to undermine and break the US, is a good thing that should be supported by Communists because it will bring about a revolutionary moment. It seems more likely that the plan is to break the US through getting it to defeat itself with infighting.

...

I get that, but Russia needs to be liberated as well. After all Putin is a product of neoliberals.

I saw Jeff Sessions with the Devil!

Checked as that may be, it's actually pure liberal ideology, the exact same stuff that says Blacks can't be racist, or women can't be sexist. It's rhetorical manipulation.

You might want to look up the Monroe Doctrine and the concept of "spheres of influence."

NYT has an editorial policy of consistently using sensationalized descriptors in conjunction with political enemies or friends of the US whose political and emotional valence they choose to manipulate. NYT has been adhering to the authoritarian line for years now, and why wouldn't the rest of the CIA-embedded US press who is now legally free to partner with the government in information control make shit up? Your reflexive combination labels you as a Democratic tool.
Any bourgeois fake news outlet is as useless as any other. Would you not describe bourgeois liberalism as an authoritarian ideology? Why or why not? Is there a contrast to be had, or is there nothing but classical conditioning to be found in the bourgeois press?
Do you not understand that who and what you speak for determines the value of the words spoken?
Anyway, Putin's Russia, treated without regard to the petulant and bourgeois interests of the United States and ONE of its political parties, is a nation that values their way of life too much to let evangelical US shitballs pollute it. The people know they could take him down in a few hours were it necessary. I do know that Crimeans voted over 90% to be Russian subjects than candy-ass Poroshenko's. I do know that liberals hate him. I do know that people in the US desecrate churches and do time in prison for it. Since my own opinion is that liberals are arrogant, imperialist fucks who should be exterminated or imprisoned and tortured until they stop thinking liberally, I can say that Putin did literally nothing wrong, and as long as he continues to delegitimize bourgeois liberalism, can do no wrong.

Kill yourself, liberal.

Why do you brand me a liberal user?

Sessions is a big player in the Trump administration. Deposing Sessions and having the administration locked up in an investigation by a special prosecutor for a long while is actually good, even if it's baseless bullshit.

Alright, he may not be a bourgeois liberal, but he sure as hell is employing economic liberalism.

Also,
Nigga, what part of imperialism don't you get. Spheres of influence can easily be repurposed for a further imperialist project; believing in Saint Putin will not make it non-imperialist.

...

t. liberal

that's exactly putin's goal

ameriburgers are so stupid

i'm not even that guy but wtf are you talking about? how is that a liberal thing to say? getting sessions out would be a great thing.

Not the user you quoted, but having more shit players in the administration accelerates things at a greater rate

Good

He's probably an edgy accelerationist that thinks having a guy like Sessions do whatever batshit crazy thing Trump wants is good.

Like this guy

...

because like a liberal you are only thinking in a small picture and are not realizing the deeper game that is being played by the powers beyond your own control.

it wouldn't be a good thing because it would mean conceding defeat to the establishment democrats and neocons and the deep state. it means democracy is officially dead and that we have officially entered the age where even the illusion of democracy doesn't exist anymore, it's complete totalitarian control that you are advocating for because you don't like sessions or trump. i'm not sure how that is better than trump. as bad as trump is, I would rather him and his admin to be in power than neocons and the CIA. you have to choose between two awfully bad choices but anyone who thinks the CIA is a better choice than a democratically elected leader is fucking psycho.

also these tactics will only come back to bite you in the back. If they can bring down trump a populist right winger what will happen to a left wing populist? it's basically over at this point.

the accelerationist thing would be to take down sessions and impeach trump based on this russian propaganda story you fucking psychotic piece of dirt. do you know what kind of chaos this would cause?

Also fuck you, you cultist fuck. Putin is a corrupt porky who has enriched himself and his friends through the labor of the Russian people. The only reason he has such a high approval rating is because he floods his media outlets with propaganda and involves himself in foreign battles to give the divert the people's attention away to nationalism.

Do I support him over USA, absolutely. It is clearly the greater evil and getting rid of the world hegemon would be a huge step forward for the communist movement. But I am under no illusions whatsover, unlike your cock sucking self. Putin was handpicked by Yeltsin, who in case you forgot, was shilled for by the U.S government. Putin IS a product of the U.S government and rules with a porky agenda. You are closer to a liberal than I am because you support a fucking oligarch. Please get your head out of your ass you edgy fuck.

At this point I think the liberal wet dream of impeaching Trump and destroying his admin should be fulfilled. Let them get a guy like McCain in power so they can finally get the war with Russia that they have been craving for. 2017 will be a complete shit show

Well if Trump is impeached, then Pence is next and will probably just be a standard neocon president.

i don't even disagree with what you're saying but at the moment, you have to deal with what's in front of you. the power that the deep state holds over the country is obviously scary but the damage that jeff sessions could do as AG is more immediate. there's no real good outcome.

Aren't you supposed to be killing yourself, Democratic shill?

Not much really. Sure, there'd be calls from some for a constitutional amendment which would allow for a "do over" election, but it won't happen. Pence was probably isolated from all this anyway. He'd just become president and then get voted out in 2020.

So are the pro-Putin cultists tankies, Duginist Nazbol weirdos or FSB operatives?

And you think Pence is better than Trump? In what way? Pence is a neocon and more hard right than Trump and will be Bush 2.0. Please enlighten us how this is supposed to be better.

Who is pro-Putin here? What the fuck are you talking about you reddit shill?

In all your posts you tell a whole bunch of people to kill themselves. Sounds like a lot of projection, are you OK user? I'm sure there are good therapists near your area, its a good idea to visit them.

By this standard wasn't nixon's ousting already a coup by the deep state? What huge phenomena is a transfer of power from one neocon to another with a better thesaurus really going to be?

i don't think he said pence is better than trump. he just said pence has less of a chance of getting re-elected, which is definitely true.

though the dems could definitely find a way to fuck that up too.

I never implied that. I just mean that any sort of investigation that would lead to a Trump impeachment would likely not effect Pence, as chances are he was isolated from whatever may or may not have been going on between Trump and Russia. He'd be president for like 2 years and then get voted out in 2020. The only ones experiencing "chaos" would be the republican party. But they survived Bush. I'm sure they'll somehow survive Trump too.

something to remember with all this deep state shit is that flynn and sessions both lied. this isn't the CIA just making shit up, they both got caught in a lie. even if those lying were mostly innocuous bullshit. if they just told the truth, this "deep state coup" or whatever wouldn't be happening.

if this is true, why would it matter? why care about elections in the first place if a manufactured propaganda campaign can bring down any president? the illusion of democracy will completely be over. maybe it will be a good thing and lead to revolution or it will lead to totalitarian control. it most likely will lead to the latter.

I can find /suicide/ if I need it. Don't worry your pretty little head about me, redditor. I continue to maintain that liberalism and recalcitrant liberals need to be seen and never again heard. You're not making a good case against.

Tankie sympathizer here. Anything that topples liberals and liberalism is good. They're frankly subhumans fantasizing that their judgment isn't fucking laughable. I've heard enough of their self-important shit, and gulag will be just the thing to break them of their specialness.

Why shouldn't liberalism be crushed just as Nazism was after the war? Why is that defective ideology of dependence still around?

I knew it. Kindly off yourself, my man

the illusion of democracy might be over if trump stays in power too, judging by the way he wants to gut voter laws.

sessions and flynn both fucked up. the threat of this russia shit is definitely manufactured but the lies aren't. they got caught.

what did the mean liberals do to you :c

Flynn might have lied but Sessions didn't if you look at the actual context. He met with several ambassadors from different countries as part of his normal everyday job, whereas the question that the Democrat asked Sessions was speaking Russian ambassadors in relation to the Trump campaign. It's a false equivalency that is being done.

Dude, as a progressive, I totally agree with the democratic party is right now mosrtly filled with worthless corporate shits who only represent their big donors. But…
a. who do you think those corporate shits got that idea of helping big companies and not "we the people" from? That system is both right and left sides, especially the republicans (can't be proved otherwise).
b. If this system of legalized corruption is in place throughout the entire government (with few exceptions), how could "we the people" prevent this oligarchy to prolong?

The WH put out a statement that contradicts that. Also, his exact words were "I did not have communications with the Russians", not "I did not have communications with the Russians about the election."

It…wouldn't? What are you even talking about? You said Trump being impeached would cause chaos. All I said was that Pence would become president and then would get voted out in 2020. In other words, not chaos.

Are you daft?

That's correct, I really don't see both the right and the left together in this.

The question that the Al Franken asked Sessions was in regards to the election itself, you propagandist.

Just listen to the question that Al Franken asked Sessions:

youtube.com/watch?time_continue=22&v=Q_-BEMIgdxQ

It was with regards to the election campaign and Trump. He met with Russian ambassadors as part of his daily job not related to the campaign itself – he met with other ambassadors as well. It's completely normal.

Is there a way to combat oligarchy in the US?

Financial collapse leading to world war which will lead to mass civil unrest. If a revolutionary force can liberate the minds of the population then it is possible to seize the state. Once state is seized then the oligarchs will have to hung in order to set an example of the consequences of succumbing to greed.

Pence is definitely not like Bush. Bush is worse. The GOP corporation agenda was in full control of Bush (he's a bigger idiot than Pence).

Then he would say "I had communication with Russia but not concerning the election", not "I had no communication with Russia." He lied.

Nope. He didn't because the question was in regard to the election and not his daily job. His meetings with ambassadors are completely irrelevant to the question that was asked. Sorry. Try again.

Do you not agree that by getting "money out of politics" would heal this middle-working-class-killing system that we already have in place?

Absolutely not. Problems come from the profit incentive not from money in politics. The only reason corporations pour money into politics is because it helps them improve their profit margins. Also it is impossible to have politicians that aren't bought out by politicians. Offering jobs, increased media coverage, backdoor stock options, etc. There are many ways to circumvent laws. The problem is with the capitalist system itself and reform will never fix it.

*politicians bought out by corporations