Even for the Bolsheviks, the notion of collective ownership has its limits. Trousers, shirt...

Hitler just wasn't a very smart guy, was he?

he was legitimately just a retarded LARPing failed artist who never had a real job, machiavelli'd his way to the top of the first political party he got into, then had several lucky victories in a row & thought that made him a god-emperor

Fucking nazis always obsessed with rekting and BTFOing

Classy.

more like … classist :^)

who does this remind you of

Why is this so funny?

Truly nothing has changed in the respective quality of our arguments.

He had autism don't bully him.

Because that comments is more worthy of a Youtuber than of Evil guy #1

...

Absolutely none of the Bolsheviks.

...

Did you see the Der Untermensch scan Holla Forums did the other day? Literally an incredibly long version of your average two pictures of different places under different systems out of context shitpost jpg material, like Cuban slum v Hong Kong downtown.

I've read that this is a symptom of aspergers

their fuhrer was a junkie faggot

I thought he had syphilis

...

He's like a tween trying to sound badass to his friends

The media's obsession with him being Evil guy #1 should have been a dead give away that he's not actually Evil guy #1. Same can be said for Stalin.

Well, of course. How are you supposed to share a handkerchief. Or clothes. I mean, you can share it communally, but that's for the ideologically consistent. Allow those who wish to be bankrupt and inconsistent to establish arbitrary lines in the sand for what is and is not "theirs", even though their entire platform is centred around not having things in the possession of the individual. Either it all is for the community, or none of it is (i.e. resorting to making cases for special pleading; or, illustrating intellectual inconsistency).

Reactionary politics are inherently irrational and aesthetic, compared to the rationalist basis of both liberalism and the radical left.
A nazi doesn't care about the quality of their argument, only that they "win" in some sense of the word.

Nope. Go away.

...

As far as I'm concerned, "liberalism" is LITERALLY just COINTELPRO against real leftists and that's why they're so keen to subvert this board.

This man could have at any point in the war administered deadlier dose of heroin to hitler`s "medical" cocktails.

Why did he not do it?

...

So recognising the common roots of socialism and liberalism in the French revolution is COINTELPRO? Discussion about political ideologies and the theory behind them is COINTELPRO? I'm not sure I follow.

No, advocating, arguing for, or evangelizing liberalism is COINTELPRO. Liberalism is bourgeois, therefore right-wing, and therefore not welcome here.

I have done nothing of the sort.

yes
in the modern context, yes
except for all the Holla Forumsyps shitting up the board advocating nazism etc.

Good thing he didn't do that. Stop being so retarded you little Reddit shit.

The shills are evolving.

So a disabled black woman who is 80 years old, Jewish, can't have kids, ugly as hell, doesn't have a cent to her name, and identifies as muffin-gender would be the ultimate deity the "workers" fight under. Got it.

...

mfw these poor women in the 1920s had to deal with the same kind of snivelling MAGA hat wearing manchildren we're still arguing with today.