Nazbol avant garde

The nazbol circles are the only ones where you can see a weird combination of post leftists avant garde and extreme right Wing nationalism. What leftypol thinks is the reason for this weird post modernist combination of extreme traditionalism and post left movement?

Other urls found in this thread:

niekischtranslationproject.wordpress.com
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

nazbol is a meme

Isn't Nazbol more a representation of how powerless Russians felt after the USSR was dissolved against their will, throwing their lives into chaos, only later for it to be attempted to be reformed into a serious organization?

The only authentic thing produced today is something produced from extreme isolation from the rest of the world with the ability to put aside any and all scrupules about morality but obeying a sense of it out of the reason for it.

The more learned you are in music are chances are the more creative there tends to be. In this case anyone who matures past this into even knowing how often twelve tone technique gets used is probably a step above the rest. For something that simple.

Nobody willing to delve deep into mental illness and come out can really call themselves avant or insightful at all.

The movement is prety right But at the same time prety post modernist its creator was banned from the USSR for showing Public homosexuality and even writed a book about his sexual experiences in the US.

Post modernism and traditionalism

The nazbols dont call themselfs "avant" directly But there is a conotation from themselfs that they are the " best of communism" since they are allways talking how the new socialist generation are a bunch of liberals.

NazBol isn't really extreme right nationalism. it's just aware of the JQ

Wut

What are Nazbols domestic and foreign policies? Or do they not have much agreement on that?

lmao

it's derriere garde if anything

all socialist states develop some form of socialist morality in order to have a standard to which they can measure their progress and from which they can extrapolate objectives. this usually ends up taking the form of productivism (stakhanovism, Fidel's sweet tooth etc).

capitalism removes this sort of moral anxiety (and induces much worse ones…) by freeing us from having to worry about discerning a meaning in life. the logic of capital decides where we will go, so why worry about where we should go?

pomo is not about changing the world, its about recognising your role as a signifier in a web of power relations and performing it with an ironic detachment or combining it with a contradictory role which allows you transcend the shit show of society or smt (what they hope to achieve with this is beyond me)

so you get devious little "ideologies" like nazbol, which in combining two contradictory ideologies (although of course they both fall on the same side of the good/bad binary) seek to co-opt their spectacular power while also negating any criticism.

"At the technological level, when images chosen and constructed by someone else have everywhere become the individual's principal connection to the world he formerly observed for himself, it has certainly not been forgotten that these images can tolerate anything and everything; because within the same image all things can be juxtaposed without contradiction." - Debord, Comments on the society of the spectacle

Thanks, this was the answer i was looking for in this thread.

Why not ask the founders?
niekischtranslationproject.wordpress.com

...

Rightwingers are constantly apeing leftwing theories and aesthetics because they usually don't have much by way of a dedicated academic pole to their movements.

National-Anarchists, those nazi drongos from the UK that post on full/pol/ alot ect. rip off anarchist black bloc shit.

Neo-Reactionaries steal from Deleuze and french academia and cyberpunk dystopian aesthetics.

A lot of lolberts will half incorporate leftwing anti-state tracts without the anti-capitalism, the writers at zerohedge for instance LOVES Debord.

Even the standard neo-con normie unironically read Alinsky thinking it is the 'rule book of the left' and try to turn it against it, there are about a dozen different rightwing rewrites for rules for radicals.

Not to mention the current aut-right is literally the negative reflection of the IDpol liberal left and uses the same sort of argumentation and 'muh rights' language.

This, actually.

We live in a memetic society. To refuse to acknowledge this is to allow yourself to be swept along by the tides of memesis.

...

Heh

gibberish