Two games, mostly the same devs and subject matter. Only one can be the cheeki breeki king

Two games, mostly the same devs and subject matter. Only one can be the cheeki breeki king

or

Which does hopeless russian nukecore best?

modded stalker > all

cuckchan thread

...

Thats the point. metro 2033 was made by half the team that left because they felt the original idea of 'oblivion lost' required direction after stalker got delayed and almost rebuild from the ground up because it was too open and the ai for story important npcs would kill themselves by wandering around long before the marked one reached them. Its about which works best. The ethos of the stalker devs that made metro or the ones that made clear sky and survivarium instead.

Nigger is this even a fucking question? Metro is linear shit.

Good fucking riddance, they made a pretty linear game that has less player urgency than the one they left.

I like how you transition from talking about just these 2 games, to the failures of the remaining stalker in an attempt to bias ones opinion to Metro. And you pretty much proved that Stalker does the "hopeless russian nukecore" better since the zone is so dangerous and organic that they had trouble keeping certain NPCs alive. Only to treat this as if taking the safe story driven corridor shooter route is better.

Pic related is better than both.

Fuck off Todd. Never bought your game never will.

I see people are shitting on metro lately, is this winter faggotrism or some migration of sorts?

Metro is pretty good, it has gameplay, it doesn't need to be open world as shit to be fun
example
but they are different games and don't need to be compared in the same light
one has a open world, really great AI that makes for some interesting plays,
the other is more immersive and story driven,
either way, both of them feature great atmosphere and unique experience that isn't brought on by any other game