/film/

>>138784641Panteon y las Visitadoras (Captain Pantoja and the Special Services)

>>138784664Filtered by based Ophuls. Stuck the chink shit up your ass you weeb faggot >>138784508You too OP. Fucking anime weeb no life faggot

>>1387845081. 2001: A Space Oddessey 2. Jules and Jim 3. My Night At Mauds 4. The Umbrellas of Cherbourg 5. Psycho 6. Persona 7. Le Samourai 8. Vivre Sa Vie 9. The Apartment 10. The Innocents

Another webmless thread

>>138784785>Filtered by based Ophuls. Stuck the chink shit up your ass you weeb faggotOphüls** you fucking idiotAnd no, everybody knows what Madame de.. is. IDK what the point of removing Han Ye to add Madame de.. was, it's pathetic.

>>138784703Lowbrow american retard

>>138784508I can believe fags are crying because their meme Chinese movie was filter!!Fuck You

Hitchcock never made a good film

>>138784861Madame is great. Go back to plebbit >>138784905Watch more movies faggot

>>138784861Le meme heh so good so funny

>>138784905wrong

>>138784942>Watch more movies faggotwhat movies

>>138785010More Hitchcock films

>>138784717It’s good

>>138785044but that is to vague to say

>>138784809>The InnocentsHoly shit. I just realized I watched the wrong film. I watched an above average Spanish period drama about a guy who poops everywhere, when people told me to watch the 1961 film. Fuck me.

>>138784508>Someone posted a spooky suicide webmkek. What happened to 4chan that people get triggered by someone becoming an hero?

>>138784942>Madame is great. Go back to plebbit'Removes a film based on Upvotes.''Replaces it with a generic Ophüls film''Spells it Ophuls''Calls me Reddit'

Gallo

>>138785147Who is that movie “generic”?

>>138785226Madame de, which everybody has seen and knows about."Oh boy can't add generic film 101 don't want to forget Casablanca too.... and Rope, but no Wrong Man. Too fancy for me."

>>138785291Popular is not the same as generic.

>>138785357We're making a /film/ chart, and we remove a film voted upon to replace it with a film that is in literally every single best of the 1950s chart out there. IDK how you could be interested by it, the other user was correct you people are not knowledgable enough to do consensus charts. Another user was arguing TSPDT and Sight and Sound.

>>138784879Gonna cry?

>>138785291This.The list is basically a copy paste of Sight and Sound and whatever else list 19 year old NEETs refer to when they get tired of anime. It is utterly pointless.

>>138785291>less than 10000 votes on imdb>lol dude everybody has seen itStill better than Han Ye which nobody has seen. That would be an amazing canon, films which nobody has seen. You still didn't say what makes the film bland.>>138785419Yes those are consesus charts too you dumb fuck. Don't play patrician here after seeing one Brakhage and one Snow, it's really fucking pathetic.

>>138785523>Still better than Han Ye which nobody has seenHow would you know it's better if nobody has seen it? Wasn't in your Sight and Sound list? Weren't told to like it? I didn't say the film itself was bland, I said it was a bland choice. Learn to read.You're the retard who has said I've only seen 1 Brakhage and 1 Snow, which is completely ridiculous lol.10,000 votes on IMDB (which has Joker and Shawshank Redemption as 2 of the best films of all time) is your standard for obscure. You're literally retarded.

>"""""film""""" thread>it's all adults in their early 20s discussing talkies and their favorite "visionary" meme directors even though everything in cinema had already been done by the 1930s

Attached: city-girl-1200-1200-675-675-crop-000000.jpg (1200x675, 97.53K)

>>138785523>That would be an amazing canon, films which nobody has seen.Yes. There are already a dozen better canons that reflect the mainstream consensus. Why are you trying to recreate it? It serves nothing. Embrace the unique opinions of /film/ or you're wasting your time.

>>138785588>me i have seen one Brakhage, me a big boy nowReally projecting on me and the other user about having seen "one Brakhage." Do you even have a KG account?

>>138784508fuck off demo

>>138785139lmao

>>1387845081. Juliet dans Paris2. Marketa Lazarová3. Daisies4. The Color of Pomegranates4. The Exterminating Angel5. Persona6. Pierrot le Fou7. Mouchette8. Kwaidan9. Funeral Parade of Roses10. Gate of Flesh

>>138784573How the the fuck is Han Ye on the TSPDT 1001-2000 list?

>>138786043Asian Critics/Directors like it.He only provides the voting breakdown for top 1000 films, so you can't see, but I've been intrigued as well. That's how I found out about it.

How about you guys who don't like the chart to become a copy of sight and sound, TSPDT etc. make a new poll and say that you will exclude all films featured already in those lists. Include links to them so that people can easily check.

>>138786142Because I'm not familar with either list enough to say what is and is not in them.Also, that's just contrarianism for the sake of contrarianism.I'm opposed to a list to begin with.

Is Platoon good? I have it recorded. I heard its good. But I dont really want to watch it for some reason.

>>138785660Nobody said it's obscure but not everybody has seen it you absolute retard.Yes you have seen 4 Brakhage based on my quick count, 1 Snow and several Kubelka's and got filtered by Peter Tscherkassky. Not sure why are you acting all high and mighty when you logged under 1000 films you fucking cunt. Might i add, not Earrings of Madame de...>>138785755Wait are you the private tracker fag who thought Gremillon and Hanak are post 2000s filmmakers?

>>138786188Oh, then keep on doing nothing constructive while complaining endlessly

>>138786200It's okay, probably worth seeing desu.

>>138786188>I'm opposed to a list to begin withGood, then don't participate. Watch films instead of endlessly posting here.

>>138786200Worth watching as far as war films go, FMJ and Apocalypse now are both better though

>>138786214I made the account a few months ago, I've seen many films that have not been logged. My ratings are mostly inaccurate as well. I also haven't logged the Costa films I've seen yet, and Mauvais Sang I saw a few weeks ago, but logged most recently. Nice try.

>>138786214>Wait are you the private tracker fag who thought Gremillon and Hanak are post 2000s filmmakers?No. Do you have a KG account?

>>138786402Sure thing. You said you started watching films around during quarantine. I doubt you have watched Snow's filmography before.>>138786412No. Brakhage and Snow is on public trackers.

>>138786402>>138786214If you want a more accurate representation it's in my excel

>>138786534>Sure thing. You said you started watching films around during quarantine. I doubt you have watched Snow's filmography before.I started watching films when I was 17, but yes I watched less than 50 films in 2019, but close to 400 in 2018 and 400 in 2017 as well.

>>138786313already reported you to the FBI

>>138786565Sure.

To counter the pretend Sophian in the thread before previous, I must say that Film isn’t art. It has art IN it. Film is not theater. It has theatricality IN it. Film is not music. Is has music IN it. Film is not literature. It has literarility IN it. Film is a mechanized pulley system of chutes and ladders, two way mirrors, upside down incline plane, false bookshelves, phony floor compartments, paper mache puppets moved with elaborate rope set ups. It is a machine of interchangeable image tiles. A mechanized interchangeable machine of information science

Attached: 246C9093-A348-438D-9B03-80EA5399F8EA.png (2480x2174, 325.34K)

>>138786872Shut up Serpent

>>138786534>No.You should stop posting here until you learn more about film then.

>>138787082>KG is needed to learn about filmOkay so you are peak retard. Back to KG forums and discuss socialism

>>138787082Is a KG account synonymous with film knowledge now?

>>138787216No, but where else are you going to watch those films with all the theaters shut down now?

>>138786670I don't even have Avatar or Dumont logged on there. It's not an accurate representaiton. Plus there's several one minute Brakhage films on Youtube I do not even know the name of. I've probably seen 1500-2000 films.

>>138786200I thought it was pretty shit

>>138787247Public trackers and other ddl sites have almost everything you could ever want. Private trackers just make it easier.

>>138786670Anyway I just deleted it, and will make a new one with my imported excel data and share it with you :).

>>138787247Most of the recent releases I have on my hard drive aren't on KG lol

Yes the pretend Sophian is another one of my derivatives, misinterpreting the inherent Greek content shown in Contempt, Lang being Eumaeus and Piccoli Odysseus. The return home and killing the men trying to have sex with your wife as apex of the story. This is long pre-Darwin mind you. But the Greek awakening of consciousness in the journey of having to go around and learn and jump through the hoops of multiple different encyclopedic roles and personality manifestation in primitive society. Lang’s films showing a fundamental repeated Darwinian motif of conflict OVER women as baseline awakening of consciousness, not the subject itself being the prize of women, as the pretend Sophian imagined. Even in other more directly Sophian works of the adaptations of Frederick Tristan. Rosa is first described as a troubadour that has ‘played in all the high courts of Europe’, euphemism for ‘she gets around’. Wisdom gets around all right. But again he interprets the subject as the point in itself, his being overwhelmed by awakening of consciousness and trying to turn it off through worshipping the subject. He is like Apuleius after being turned from the Golden Ass, only to become a bald legalistic inhuman freak worshipping the feet of Isis.

>>138787278Ha, no chance. You may think you're getting the same on public trackers but it's not. Way more is on private trackers and the quality is often way better.

>>138778156Have you perused the Polish canon of film posters?Albumimgur.com/account/favorites/jdzxGMarketplacehttps://polishposter.com/film-posters/

Attached: unchienandalouposter.jpg (500x729, 90.35K)

>>138786642kek, why would the FBI care?

>>138787330Well yeah, films without artistic merit are not allowed to be uploaded to KG.

>>138787254Frankly who cares if you don't have some Dumont films logged that you would rate 5/5 anyways.>>138787308Absolute coward. Holy shit.

>>138786872Film is an image based manipulation of emotions between two intervals of time, the content mostly does not matter, as there is an invisible cinematic law that must always be followed by definition and function of the medium. Personal attachment to cinema is generally indicative of an infantile mind, even Jean Luc Godard said (paraphrasing) 'film is nothing compared to a good woman.'So, transgressive directors, successful ones, such as Dumont, Pasolini, Ruggero, Hooper, Reygadas, etc. have been able to resurface different sentiments through their content, to dismiss them is to dismiss yourself as a retard.The Safdies fail as their is correlation between content and manipulation, the Safdies are children who think things are 'cool,' which is common in a certain type of semite.Women are art, women are the basis of cinema, to celebrate beauty, to celebrate women, there is nothing as artistically stimulating as seeing a beautiful woman. From Homer to Tolstoy to Nabokov to Dumont, women have been the basis of man's conquest, manifesting in battle or art. Even, celibate Pessoa recognized this, as the desire does not need to be purely sexual and in fact should transcend the sexual, so coomers will never realize this.To venerate a hoe like Julia Fox in Uncut Gems or Heaven Knows What recognizes the infantile slavishness inherent in those feeble inartistic minds. They will never make anything worthwhile. To appease, anti-Gallofags, he never will either for similar reasons. To him, woman are a vessel for his catharsis, not a trophy of conquest.Now you may say, Melville or Malick? The earth is womanly in both their works, the feminine nature of God, the feminine nature of poetry, of conquest. Hitler was the greatest poet since WW1 in a sense.

>>138787467>Frankly who cares if you don't have some Dumont films logged that you would rate 5/5 anyways.No, I wouldn't give any a 5/5. Even Twentynine Palms and Dune aren't 5/5s, my ratings were messed up.>Absolute coward. Holy shitNo, I would like to re-do my ratings and films seen anyway, I'll post it here when I'm done.

>>138787553Sure sure

>watch Yojimbo>had already seen A Fistful of Dollars>it's literally the same filmIt kinda ruined both for me.

>>138787637Why are you shitting your pants?What's your letterboxd.

>>138787644Spoiler alert: Seven Samurai and The Magnificent Seven are also the same films. How do you not already know this?

>>138787676You are a coward you won't post shitHere bruh letterboxd.com/punq/

>>138787485Oh Apuleius, return to being the ass, so that you might amuse me and yourself. Remove yourself from the feet of Isis before I claw you away with masculine force. Women wear the face of men. Men have the soul of women. This is commonly known. Le matt. The fool. And has always been the case. Distracting yourself with the subject as if like a child told not to stare too long at some peculiar natural phenomena of rain or clouds. Don’t stare too long and don’t hold that face or it might be stuck like that. The piggish face as it is in the middle of orgasmic ecstasy. ‘Yes yes this is the subject, this is my Sophia’ (wrong she is formless). Dismiss petite names but do not dismiss direct awakening of consciousness in infatuation with the lowly parts of the subject. The 10 individual toes fill your mind and pop into your mouth like sucker candy in your imagination. Wisdom is disgusted by this piggish display and rejection of consciousness. Rejection of wisdom for mechanical stimuli. Turning it into something inhuman for the purpose of observation, thereby ultimately making the subject something controlled and not free with direct movement. That is the essence of satanism and that is why you live in hell with the absence of Sophia.

>>138787774You won't post shit, faggot

>>138787774Is that guy real lol. How can someone watch so many obscure movies a day.

>>138787901I never said i would. You said you would. Fucking coward. Only talk and talk. >>138787906Yes, he watches on one screen and searchers for new things to consume on another.

>>138787747How the fuck would i know? People always talk about Leone's trilogy and how great it is (it is indeed pretty good), they never say he basically stole Yojimbo's idea to start said trilogy

>>138787885Of man’s first disobedience, and the fruit Of that forbidden tree, whose mortal taste Brought death into the world, and all our woe, With loss of Eden, till one greater man [5] Restore us, and regain the blissful seat, Sing Heav’nly Muse, that on the secret top Of Oreb, or of Sinai, didst inspire That shepherd, who first taught the chosen seed, In the beginning how the heav’ns and earth [10] Rose out of Chaos: or if Sion hill Delight thee more, and Siloa’s brook that flowed Fast by the oracle of God; I thence Invoke thy aid to my advent’rous song, That with no middle flight intends to soar [15] Above th’ Aonian mount, while it pursues Things unattempted yet in prose or rhyme. And chiefly thou O Spirit, that dost prefer Before all temples th’ upright heart and pure,Instruct me, for thou know’st; thou from the first [20] Wast present, and with mighty wings outspread Dove-like sat’st brooding on the vast abyss And mad’st it pregnant: what in me is dark Illumine, what is low raise and support; That to the heighth of this great argument [25] I may assert Eternal Providence, And justify the ways of God to men.

>>138787774>>138787906i'd respect him if his taste wasn't so shit. he's trying so hard to try a certain aesthetic. his 5 stars are mostly bland classic movies from the silent era and a little beyond.>wizard of oz>birth of a nation>gone with the wind>snow white>ben hur

>>13878777427,635FilmsMental ilness

>>138788057He was sued for it

>>138787377Thanks user that site looks good. But idk about movie posters in a language other than the film's original language. seems ... tacky

>>138788138i saw it on imdb now. And deservedly so, it's the exact same movie, there isn't a single change to itWhat a fucking hack.

Is there a true separation between art and reality? Can you personally separate it in your mind, or do you let it destroy you repeatedly? It seems you have become an automaton of idols. Another stone tool of the gods made in replication of them. Made in THEIR image. Stone. Not God’s. Man free and moving. Women and men were once one creature combined into a super being, indestructible and fearful. This is the attempt of marriage. But to worship your other half as being the sole image. Is to worship the cold feet of immovable stone. Worshipping the image as reality. You will burn for this my friend, turn now and let me ride on your donkey back into oblivion. As friends. Not enemies. But be my enemy and thou shalt be destroyed like a casting of marble.

>>138788208George Lucas should be sued too.

>>138787951>I never said i would.You already did though faggot.You saw about 1300 films, and only gave 9s as the highest.

>>138788329Sounds incredibly based

>>138788126She set her houses and pillars made of stone and celluloid, but did not include herself in the cast or reproduction. Worship the feet of celluloid and thou shall live in hell. But will thou love in hell? Evidently yes. It increases the torture all the more. The hope when the stone feels a tinge of warmth. But it is nothing. Art is nothing without wisdom yes. But to worship the subject of the form is death. By cutting off the tro͞oTH, one literally dies through cutting off potential of movement. The truth is real alright. And it is as hard as stone. Do not try to hide under it by creating fancies of the imagination (subjectivism) or you will be crushed by its weight when the wind makes it roll.

>>138788494Rabbi

>>138788329Lol what kind of galactic level of projection is this? I never posted my letterboxd here.

>>138788266why?

>>138788572Because you know you're a pleb.

>>138788624Post yours then. Oh wait, you deleted it.

>>138788572Why did you even have mine saved? Faggot

>>138788655i didn't.

>>138788653You had mine, minus a few hundred films, the dozen or so recents I didn't log, and skewed rankings, so nice work user you revealed me as a fraud.

>>138788733Mega cope. Now that you are redoing your ratings, you will post it right user? You aren't a hack fraud and you have actually seen double the amount of what you had logged.

>>138788553Judaism was invented in the pre modern enlightenment through numerous social reforms and pretend messiahs. But most importantly through jews becoming increasingly secular and mocking their most rural and childish superstitions in attempt to assimilate into the Europe of the enlightenment. Jews became atheistic to be more like Europeans. But I prefer the childish superstition and spooky nonsense of rural judaism and their old crag witch leaders. Maybe that sounds contradictory to what I said about truth. ‘Truth must be in my rationalism or pagan idolatry’. Nope wrong. Truth is in movement and both those are immovable. As is Judaism’s more central theological doctrine of wait and pretend for God to come pat you on the head and give you everything you’ve ever wanted by destroying your most bitter enemies. The Master moved up, down, in between, across the horizontal law of the earth and the vertical law of the firmament. In a shape sort of similar to a cross, one might say. Adonai Adonai burn the trees and topple the marble, it is marvel of the march of truth. And it cannot be stopped. No matter how much kicking and screaming comes from the forever child worshiping his mothers portrait.

Yes there were 930 films, but there's 1200 logged on Excel, nice job user. Very good detective skills... I've been revealed, not as the master you've all thought me to be, but a fraud. I saw 50 films in total all of last year, and about 225 so far this year.

>>138788057It's a common meme that kurosawa invented the western genre

>>138788826Sure why not, but I won't add my recents, and it'll effectively look the same, I don't like to log films I don't remember or haven't formed an opinion on yet. I actually removed 15 films, and There's about 20 I've seen I haven't added, and another 20 I saw this year, but don't remember the date.

>>138788850Cope. You literally deleted your whole letterboxd and i didn't even dox you. I wonder when will you post your new one. I bet you are not a hack fraud :)

>>138788956You could find it if you want

Attached: Screen Shot 2020-09-03 at 7.47.03 PM.png (394x194, 56.09K)

>>138788936>but I won't add my recentsletterboxd doesn't allow to log gay porn, i think

>>138789054>that name>the same ratingsWhy did you even delete it? Autism or what?

>>138789148

Attached: Screen Shot 2020-09-03 at 7.52.11 PM.png (1134x142, 36.57K)

this>prove your worthkinda juvenile faggotry needs to stop, or do you want people to just consume and consume art films? Who cares anyway, just talk about films you fucking toddlersmade this pic with a memegenerator btw, go fuck yourself

Attached: 4drxcq.jpg (500x577, 78.34K)

>>138789230My Dune analysis was questioned due to limited viewing. A fiesty user got ahold of my letterboxd account.

>>138786872>>138787342Linking these for archival purpose. This being the rebuttal of this post made in previous thread >>138787485 (the pretend Sophian reposted)>>138788220This was made in reply as well

>>138789224The account is the same. I expected some change of ratings. You just deleted it with no purpose. Pure autism.

Just watched Turin Horse. Liked it overall but felt underwhelmed. Anyone else?

>>138789364I'm changing the ratings now.

>>138789373Perfect culmination of Tarr's filmography. The film does what it sets out to do with great conviction.

Well it appears the pretend Sophian is out of gas. He didn’t have much in the tank to start with. These are all my posts >>138786872>>138787342>>138787885>>138788220>>138788494>>138788830Written in rapid fire succession. He couldn’t even muster one new original sentence. Remember this my friend, the next time you try to snipe me with your perverse apeing of James Cameron being a pedophile, all the derivative content you tried to snipe me with. Next time you try to snipe me remember these lashings I gave you and it will burn as if the flaying was fresh. I have committed a miracle. I have whipped stone. And made it cry.

Attached: 4DB6AAA0-1D01-4E71-B1C5-4374C4E2EC41.jpg (1776x1072, 205.73K)

>>138790117He is busy with changing his letterboxd ratings

I was talking about the feminine beauty of the world, not an actual physical manifesation of lust. IDK what Lang has to do with any of this. It would helped if you preferred to specific films. Lang seems to be about the helplesness of a Man Vs. a Mob. Perhaps he's referring to the lustfulness thrust after Evil Maria, an un-pure woman. That was my initial point, modern cinema venerates Evil Maria's (Julia Fox), rather than Good Maria's. Or Gloria Grahame in Fury, but I believe Serpent has seen: Indian's Tomb, Tiger of Eschnauper, Mabuse, Metropolis, M, You Only Live Once, Big Heat, Moonfleet?Contempt is a Godard film in-line with the emasuclation of modern European man that is shown throughout his early works. I saw your posts on how it fits Lang's aesthetic, but I think that's a part of early Godard's films, creating a cinematic world of his subconcious, like in Pierrot le Fou how they lived through books and movies. A style that Carax mastered.

>>138790117I never said James Cameron was a pedophile rather his aestheic evinced pedophilia. Your posts are clearly seperate from mine, and it is you responding to my content not the other way around my friend. Your 'fight' last night was not with me, but another one of MY admirers. >>138790179This too

>>138790117Do you like Wojciech Has?

Let me peruse the final 3 of this lad's posts.

>>138790400Do not ask him questions, he views that as me 'admiring' him, even though I've never asked him anything other than if he has seen Pasolini, which he never responded to and falsely telling him my now ex-GF was into him, after he was sperging at me and I told her.

Why?letterboxd.com/4chanfilm/

>>138787885Nope, my relatively simple posts were not understand, I was speaking of the feminine beauty of the world in regards to God and death, not an actual lust.>>138788220Nope, I was talking about man looking into his soul and unlocking his 'feminine' concious. I view woman as Earthly, like trees or nature. >>138788830Again, I do not worship women.

Someone new logged Han Ye yesterday.letterboxd.com/nito93/

>John Waters designed poster for 2020 New York Film Festdangerously based

Attached: johnwatersNYFF.jfif.jpg (1000x1324, 843.16K)

>>138790193Evil Maria is the whore of Babylon riding the 7 headed beast in the dream sequence. Yes it has to do with early modernism but all that stuff was established in the prior decade with the clashes between futurist, vorticists, surrealism was the dream of a dying man in an opium den. It is a science and it has been corrupted. But it’s scientific aim raises it above modernism and the rest. Lang’s filmography is centered on two men fighting over a woman in repetition of him and Klein Rogge fighting over Von Harbou. You see it constantly. Yes it’s German romantic social Darwinism and distinctly Greek through Lang being raised in that period of Greek imitation. That is why he is in Contempt as Eumaeus. Because of the conflict in having to kill the men trying to have sex with your wife. In Contempt you’re too focused on the emotional intensity. It is not emasculation because it is controlled, instead of being over whelmed by. Simply about the most direct way of dealing with awakening of consciousness through the objective lives and aims of others. Like Odysseus traveling around the continent and meeting the encyclopedic array of characters that exist in the world. >>138790290Yes yes reply once the ego mask is broken. But it doesn’t fit on a brain, only a face. It slips off in the back of your mind.... ‘ oh no, I have been defeated’ >>138790400Yes he’s very funny>>138790641So you worship subjective primitivism? Sounds like the same thing to me

>>138790896Looks like shit

>>138790485Spare me with your silly laughy taffy type way of typing. Like you have squishing gum drops as teeth and the words wash around in your mouth like listerine as your lips slide slyly into a contorted smirk. It disgusts me. All this smirking by my detractors disgusts me

Is the guy posting all this shit the fag on letterboxd who only rated 1/2 or 5 based on esoteric bullshit because he couldn't connect with films on an emotional level due to his many mental illnesses? The guy who finally found a connection in Joker and wrote as if it was a revelation to experience what everyone else experiences in the films he condemned. Or is it someone else?To be honest I wish I could write like that, or even understand 100% of it. In uni I was smarter than most when it came to problem solving, creating systems, analysis and other autistic shit, but I've always been terrible with words. I can never be an intellectual no matter how much I read or learn. I always use simple language when possible (which makes me go on too long, sorry about that) even to communicate very advanced ideas. Reading stuff like this makes me feel retarded. But I have also met plenty of people who have enchanted others with pretty words who ended up being completely braindead when I tried to work with them on anything that required actual intelligence, so I don't know what to think. Any recs (lit or otherwise) for getting into aesthetics?

>>138790800Based and Hanyepilled

Is this Serpents Egg fellow you guys keep referring to that mentally ill Griffith fag from like 2 years ago?letterboxd.com/hatercles/

>>138791473No wtf that was Griffith friend from the Letterboxd threads. Most people here probably don’t remember but Serpent and Griffith friend used to be like Naruto and Sasuke. That’s some ancient lore

>>138784905Based

>>138792068Ah okay I kept out of the drama, personalities and circlejerks. Only visited the threads to talk about movies so I don't know much about them.

>>138791981Griffithfag has a new profile?

>>138792068>Griffith friendIt's griffithfag retard

60s listLa dolce VitaLe MeprisAndrei RublevPlay TimeWeek EndMasculin FemininChronicle of Anna Magdelena BachYoung Girls of RochefortMy Night at MaudsThe Gospel According to Matthew

>>138792359Maybe I have the profile mixed up with another autist from 2018. Have the 'old' profile?

>>138791006It’s literally emasculation and cuckery in contempt. You’re not even mentioning the American producer he gives his wife to

>>138792531Last I heard his account got deleted for shitting on that letterboxd dude that an heroed. So he could have made a new account. I really don't know

>>138792651Eli Hayes

>>138792618No because they are killed in their transgression through self emulation, the ultimate form of emasculation. Piccoli walks away with the blessing of Eumaeus (the blessing of friendship). Friendship being the ultimate form of masculinity defeating the trickery and deceit of the feminity and mockery of Lilith or corrupted Eve.

>The year is 2143.>Everyone's brain is connected to the internet.>You only have to close your eyes to access it.>Movies play in your brain in UHD quality.What's the first film you're watching?

Attached: 1587855468905.jpg (1920x1200, 1.78M)

>>138792989They get killed because he's just a 'man' and not a 'God' like he thought. He lost his wife, and Lang did not respect him.

>>138793278a video tutorial on how to kill myself and escape that nightmare

>>138793303Bardot is a male suitor of Odysseus’ wife. That’s why (s)he dies in the end with Parlance. Because they are engaged in a homosexual relationship. Piccoli kills these suitors and goes to be with his true wife (Sophia). The one Parlance and Bardot are trying to suit or find through their struggled attempts to understand truth or wisdom. While Piccoli throughout the whole film is almost unrestless, content, Bardot and Parlance are ultra restless. And Lang exudes nothing but calmness. Because he is Eumaeus greeting his disguised friend at the gate

>>138793457I've only read The Iliad and not The Odyssey, so sorry for my inability to understand the references, same with the biblical references. I'm working through the 'epics' now and Melville's bibilography, any other reccomendations Serpent?

>>138793278Hopefully a newly restored and subtitled version of Han Ye

>>138793584Apuleius’ Metamorphoses for following the development of comedy. Meditations on the Tarot, somewhat silly but very rewarding systemic approach to understanding a lot of contemporary esotericism or hermeticism, which I dislike but the book does a good job of distancing itself from nonsense. Right now I’m reading Wyndham Lewis’ Tarr. Satire on the futurists and vitalists and examination of art world in France pre WW1. Might finally watch Moonfleet later.

>>138793968Moonfleet is good, but much like a lot of films I saw it in high school and remember very little other than I liked it. Thanks for the recs, I'm reading Book of Disquiet and Ulysses.

How do you rate movies that are just "alright" throughout but then have an actually great ending? Thinking about something like First Reformed.

Just finished editing my ratings :)

>>138794508Depends on if it recontextualizes the entire film or is simply a great finish to an okay film. In the latter case I might bump it up a bit from just "alright".

>>138794508So like Das Boot?6 or 7

>>138794508>>138794639haven't seen First Reformed yet btw, so can't answer for that film in particular

>>138794508I gave First Reformed a 7, could be a 6 though

Attached: Screen Shot 2020-09-03 at 10.18.19 PM.png (2352x640, 1.53M)

Attached: Screen Shot 2020-09-03 at 10.19.32 PM.png (2100x618, 850.18K)

This film legit made me feel unnerved, any other haunted films?

Attached: The-Boxers-Omen-1983.jpg (2880x2400, 1.37M)

>>138794560How many ratings did you have to go through? I need to edit my ratings, but I can't be bothered to go through all 3061 things I've rated

>>138795095Only 920, and I still am not finished.

who's the caravaggio of movies? a master of light

Attached: aw.jpg (1920x1080, 526.1K)

>>138794508why eveb bother giving a "physical" rating? ever? isn't a coherent opinion on the film enough?

>>138795090Marebito has to be the most unnerving movie I've ever watched. It's one of the most interesting of the late 90's/early 00's J-Horror films. Similar in some ways to Inland Empire with its early digital cinematography and utterly creepy depiction of urban environments.

>>138784508QA with Herzog next Tuesday 8 ET. He’s going to talk about his last documentary Nomad. youtu.be/PCXNHgJvt3o

>>138797149Imagine reaching perfection so early in life that the only thing to keep you going in old age is traveling to the remote corners of the earth to shoot documentaries

Does anyone ever do those letterboxd challenge lists? I've made a good amount of them, but I never finish them

>>138798026Link me some, sounds cool.

Watched Vertigo today.That film is a bit bizarre and very self-indulgent, take some cool camera movements and the stunning visuals ( a product of it's time ) and there's nothing left.Maybe Orson Welles was not completely wrong.

>>138798088This is the one I just saw that made me think of themboxd.it/7phpm

Watched A Gentle Woman. Meh. The actress was really pretty, the man unpleasant.

>>138798184I used to find it interesting psychologically but I cant remember why specifically.

What's your favorite Ferrara movie?

Attached: EY_ATHpXgAEmOZj.jpg (800x1200, 210.65K)

>>138786200I thought it was terrible, but I’m in the minority and you may like it. Born on the 4th of July is much better.

Tarkovsky shallow and pedantic

>>138784573Is Han Ye that meme fillm that is only available to view at an HK library or film archive or something?

>>138798184>guys I just watched an acclaimed movie and I didn’t like itWhy do people make posts like this?

What are some Brechtian /film/‘s to checkout?