>aliens don’t existIs this plausible?

>>136708514space is fucking huge so realistically we'll never meet/find any

If aliens existed we would have found each other by now.

>>136708514aliens as intelligent as us, maybe, but bacteria still counts as aliens and probably exists everywhere

>>136708514>reposting the same thread multiple days in a row Is this plausible?

Aliens exists, but not as the mainstream narrative called hollywood would like you to think. They are an ancient race living on this Earth in dimensions we can barely perceive; demons, elves, call them as you want. When you have an official report of greys or other bullshit that were born in advance through media manipulation is just the "system" that is trying to deceive you. Read Jacques Vallée

>>136709179based and true

>>136709297>The universe is so buttfuckingly huge

Attached: you.png (473x536, 397.55K)

>>136709542This is the most reddit thread on the board right now. You're a redditor, I'm a redditor, OP is a redditor. Now calm down and drink your soi and I'll drink mine.

>>136709368t.dummy

>>136708514The film says that the existence of intelligent life outside Earth doesn't matter, because we will (probably) never come into contact with them anyway.

>>136709599>you're a redditorI've unironically never been on reddit in my entire life, don't try to lump me in with your faggotry

>>136709724>I've unironically never been on reddit in my entire life,You are on it right now.

>>136709297they couldnt even prove black holes existed until 2 fucking years ago. All that science is essentially make believe you fucking retard

>>136709892low IQ post

Imagine if 2 planets in our solar system had evolved intelligent life and we shared information, watching each others tv and porn would be wild but we would get bored after a while

>>136709892>american education

>>136709389>aliens as intelligent as usYou really think youre quite the smart one, huh? Think again dumbo

>>136709472Based schizo

>>136709930Atleast I believe in god and the Bible exists, the statement "the universe is buttfuckingly huge" is the most low iq tripe ever uttered, the other user is right your pseudoscience is just make believe wish fulfilment crap.

>>136710099It's the only example we have so far, so yeah

>>136708514It wasn't that they didn't exist only that the experiment didn't pick anything up. Kinda lucky if you'd pick something up anyway given the scope

>>136710173Nice math, nee geh ro.

>>136708514>Is this plausible?Not very. There must be considering all the different types of life we have on our own planet. There is probably animal life on other planets or moons in our own solar system. Then there is intelligent life on the level of our own consciousness. They're most likely out there as well. They're just too far away for us to meet them...at least not yet. His fathers problem was he gave up. He went out the farthest anyone had ever gone in our own solar system and he didn't find anything. So he deemed it an impossibility. That's like walking to the farthest room of your house and saying there are no people out beyond your front door.

Attached: ayyy.jpg (560x416, 19.52K)

>>136710099>>aliens as intelligent as us>You really think youre quite the smart one, huh?

Attached: 1575300654106.png (680x709, 243.33K)

>>136709368LOL u dumb idiot. You don't realize how immense the Universe is. You can't even comprehend how BIG it is. Shit. For all we know they are at the moment are playing god and we are some experimental antfarm to theme.

>>136708514Aliens = GodFather lost his faith

>>136710173you better be fucking black if you finna roll up on me with the n word homeboi

Attached: tenor.gif (220x213, 11.78K)

i am alienama

>>136710421you are so fucking basic my man

>>136708514>Let me go, Roy.

Attached: 1542256275291.jpg (962x539, 31.39K)

>>136708514Aliens would have the same scientific limits that we have when it comes to space travel, so they may as well not exist. We'd never meet them anyways.

>>136710464I gave him the n word passit's ok

>>136710421There is no evidence that the "universe" is as "big" as you claim, it's all just theoretical nonsense.

>>136710638>american education

Lets just say our tech will go nowhere in a thousand years IF we don't mine other planets and discover new resources.

>>136710638Sure. And the Universe is 2000 yrs old.

>>136709368By sitting here on Earth and going to the moon 4 times?

>>136710638Ever look at the sky at night?

>>136710781No, by overlapping light spheres

>>136710638LOL idiot. This is just only our solar system alone.youtube.com/watch?v=Kj4524AAZdE

>>136709297The potential for a planet to support life is minuscule. The potential for that life to be created into something like an actual animal is equally minuscule. If science is right and mankind evolved out of apes that began to walk upright, then the fact that sentience and sapience are random and might not become real on any other planet is equally large. Then, even if all that happened, they'd have to create civilization, learn the sciences, get to the stars, and hopefully have all the resources to make such a thing possible. Also remember that not all planets that CAN potentially support life actually do, because Mars can theoretically support life but doesn't. Then, nothing bad has to happen to them at all. No meteors that wipe them off the face of their planet. No wars, famines, or plagues that kill them all off. Only now do they have the potential to even get off the planet, and they're probably so far away that we'll never meet them. Even if all that goes according to plan, their existence is irrelevant. We will never meet, or they will never exist.

>>136709129Fuck. That makes way too much sense.

>>136709892>>136710141>>136710638>American "education"

Attached: ZgpzS.png (1200x900, 155.84K)

>>136710099Edgy.

>>136709297I too watch rick and morty

>>136710825>observable universe

Nah its practically impossible. youtube.com/watch?v=W1_KEVaCyaA

>>136711420>>136710141everyone knows you're a retardno need to announce it

>>136708514Reminder thatFTL is not possible. Star Wars/Star Trek shit will never be possible. Humans cannot and will never be able to travel high distances in spaceAliens are not real. Even if they are real (they're not), they are so far away we will never reach out to them.Space traveling is essentially pointless and is just wasting resources.

space doesn't exist

>>136711584We live in The Matrix retard.

>>136712328>Space traveling is essentially pointless and is just wasting resourcesIdiot. It's like saying first explorers and pioneers are pointless.

>>136711584>on average it takes 1:10^164 attempts>this means it CANNOT ever happen in the first 10^58 attemptsretard

>>136712328Actually statistically you are incorrect. Considering the size and diversity of the known universe it's correct to say that life outside of Earth is both possible and plausible. While it's also correct to say that no life outside of Earth is possible, it is not plausible.

>>136712507except we can't travel faster than light, even if we could travel as fast as light, it's still too fucking slow

>>136708514Fuck no ayys, the voiceover in this film turned it from possible epic into shitty exposition (among other points, but this was the big one). We're now at the point where plebs can't read between the lines and interpret art.

>>136712328Reminder anons a faggot and space fantasies with galactic civilizations with multiple species are the most kino

>>136712328>So much unclaimed land and so many untouched resources>What a waste

aliens not existing is more scary then the fact that they might>humans are 100% alone in the universe>life on earth was a one in a quadrillion chance and coincidence, never happend anywhere else, the universe is completely empty and alone

Attached: 470f4f756de84034239b0437d8b732b4607d95dc.jpg (600x300, 35.31K)

>>136713529wtf 4chan, thats not the picture i posted

>>136713602Are you sure?

>>136712997>even if we could travel as fast as light, it's still too fucking slowSlow. LMFAO! If we can travel to Mars less than 10 mins that's not fucking slow. That's monumental! That's mean we can cover within our solar system with ease and mine resources and establish colony on other planets/moons.

>>136708514>Is this plausible?Not really. It's possible but not very likely.

>>13671352910 trillions Galaxies=1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 stars.There are freaking very highly likely are tons of Aliens out there. But IF we are talking about a highly advance intelligent then we are then that might be more rare. Even if there are a very high intelligent out there they might not even have the resources to get off the ground.

>Is this plausible?NoNow outta my way, human fucking shits

Attached: 1429472559173.jpg (1023x680, 103.06K)

>>136708514Not really considering the size of the universe,Human brain cant even comprehend the number of stars and planets in the sky, the abstract names we assign to such high numbers are all the same.

>>136714671>There are freaking very highly likely are tons of Aliens out there. But IF we are talking about a highly advance intelligent then we are then that might be more rare. Even if there are a very high intelligent out there they might not even have the resources to get off the ground.Its more the matter of contacting each other, due to cosmic distances being so big even inteligent races on opposite sides of a galaxy wont be able to constant each other until the get close. Species galaxies apart will need to reach a level where they need to control energy outputs of a star to send out signals that can be easily read in other galaxies.

>>136708514i dont think that was the point at all. he said there were no aliens, sure, but how would he really know that? he didnt the point was not to waste your life looking to the heavens for salvation while neglecting your family and responsibilities on the earth.

>>136712328We aren't the only planet in this solar system faggot. Let africa starve if they can't get their shit together and use that money to reach for the... planets. Fuck, doesn't have the same ring to it.

Yes. Also >But the universe so BIG!Is not an argument. Nothing about the universe being large requires life to exist somewhere else.

>>136708514whitey on the moon

>>136710227This./thread

>>136715056He asked if it was plausible not possible. Life outside of Earth existing or not existing are both possible, and anyone who says otherwise is an actual moron. That being said life existing outside of Earth is more plausible than it not, because of the sheer size and diversity of the universe. It's all probability and it leans more towards one than the other.

>>136710173based

Is it plausible? Maybe. Maybe not.The vastness of the universe is literally beyond comprehension.>>136711235The potential for a planet to support life is minuscule. It's really not. This galaxy, alone, has 100 million stars, which means millions more chances of environments that can create life; let alone the thousands more galaxies with hundreds of millions more stars and planets -- ever-increasing those chances.> If science is right and mankind evolved out of apes that began to walk upright, then the fact that sentience and sapience are random and might not become real on any other planet is equally large.It arose from biological energy being funneled more to the brain -- largely due to the advent of cooking food to decrease energy spent on digestion -- than JUST walking upright; but, that's still not "random" since it clearly rose from a set of those events and not just happenstance.Eitherway, it's irrelevant since we've never met -- and likely will never meet -- other life in the universe just due to the vastness involved.

>>136708514The observable universe has something like 250 billion galaxies, the odds of their not being life elsewhere is vanishing small. Intelligent life? Intelligent tech-using life? The odds against it go up a bit but not too much.And thats just the observable universe. We think the minimum possible size of the observable+unobservable universe is about 250x the size of what we can see. The maximum? There are hints in the math that the complete universe is something like 10^10^10^120 megaparsecs. That number is so large that the unit could be nanometers or megaparsecs, it'd still roughly be the same monstrous number.They're out there. The closest one might be several galaxies over so we're never going to realistically talk to or even spot 'em, even for mega-constructions.

>>136708514The universe is vast and unknowable. Earth being the only planet to form and sustain diverse lifeforms in the entire history of the universe is just delusional.

>>136709297Nothing can be infinite, by its very nature it’s impossible.

>>136715056>Is not an argument. Nothing about the universe being large requires life to exist somewhere else.Big... the number of steps required to travel across the planet is big, the distance of from earth to the sun is big.... but the size of the visible universe?See, the argument isnt that its big, its practically infinite from a humans perspective, and thats just what we know about, the universe keeps going way outside that.There are those funny thought experiments about how much you would have to spend daily for your entire life just to spend Bezos fortune that show we just cant comprehend the magnitude of large numbers, and an estimated 1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 stars in visible universe alone isnt just big, its just beyond my scope.

>>136715503Ya but how many parsecs would it take to do the kessel run across the universe?

>>136715672Nothing about the universe being infinite requires life to exist somewhere else

>>136708514home.fnal.gov/~carrigan/infrared_astronomy/Fermilab_search.htmThe search focused on a temperature range of 100 to 600 K leaving about 6521 sources. No cut was made on proximity to other sources. By doing this partial Dyson spheres were not ruled out. As noted on the Dyson Sphere look-alike page there are several natural surrogates that are difficult to rule out. Several cuts were used on the LRS sample to focus in on a Dyson Sphere signature. These included temperature, classification, and visual scans in SIMBAD. This led to a sample of 17 weak and ambiguous candidates

>>136709256>extremely unlikelybased on what?extremely unlikely across the entire universe?

>>136715740>>136708514

Attached: Screenshot_20200719_024526_com.android.chrome.jpg (1080x2312, 1.11M)

>>136709892how far we've fallen

>>136709179if god is from outer space doesnt that technically make him an alien?

>>136708514OMG SPACE MONKEYS

Attached: Ad.Astra.2019.1080p.UHD.BluRay.DD5.1.x264-PaHe 00_43_21.jpg (1920x804, 283.96K)

>>136708514I'll take one for the team, and seed my cum into Jupiter's moons' oceans

Attached: 1594204794470.jpg (1450x2369, 661.88K)

>>136710173damn user is fucking based

>>136710227I don’t think it was as much as giving up, but the isolation breaking him and causing him to go mad too

Anyone itt smart enough to understand infinity as a concept? In other words anyone smart enough to understand why time cannot go backwards or forwards infinitely? I doubt there is but just curious

Guys, should I watch this movie or just read the plot summary on Wikipedia I have open right now?

>>136712997We don't know enough about the universe to truly know what we can or can't get away with. You have physical constraints given our models of how we observe things, but our observations are incomplete and very easily we could make discoveries and build devices that fundamentally redefine what's possible. We're not going to make a diesel engine that goes 3x the speed of light, but it doesn't mean we won't be able to go beyond the speed of light functionally. With sufficient understanding and manipulation of matter (of all kinds) and forces, we could potentially change the "laws of the universe" as we experience them. You don't know the future and that is terrifying to you, so you hunker down and suck the present's dripping titty hoping it protects you from the possibilities of tomorrow.

>>136711235suck my interstelar empire cock, doomer

>>136716357based

>>136716357Your right in a sense but there’s 0 evidence that breaking those laws is at all possible, so the default position should be it’s not possible. There’s as much evidence ftl is possible as there is evidence for god.

>>136714939This show how fucking sad we are. It's been only 100 yrs since our very first radio broadcast and it's only travel 200 light yrs. This is the reason why is that no aliens exists but more to do how fucking vast the Universe it making it impossible to make contact. We need to live to a million yrs to be able to find another intelligent species or hope there are an intelligent out there who are a millions yrs in advance and aren't hostile.

Attached: 20130115_radio_broadcasts.jpg (2795x2795, 2.01M)

>>136716176I think I saw you in the thread the other day. I wouldn’t bother here man, most people can’t grasp something like infinity, it’s like god for athiests. If you can grasp it and think about it it’s apparent it can’t exist in real life, space cannot be infinite for instance. But there’s no way you’ll convince anyone here, their minds can’t grasp the concept at all.

>>136708514Bad script with great visuals and monke madness

>>136716357>galaxies move apart faster than light>nooo, you dont understand, space expansion dosnt count, you cant break my math, i dont want to start my work from 0I fucking hate scientists, every time something is wrong they just add an imaginary number to fix the problem.Light speed is broken? Oh just substrata this ever increasing number.Gravity dosnt work? Oh must be that pesky imaginary matter we cant see,Space expands for no reason? Oh just add some i dont know, random number, lets call it dark number, yey it adds up now.

>>136715729A sphere is infinite.

>>136717362What most people don’t realize is that when it comes to stuff like theoretical physics the experts have absolutely no clue what they are talking about most of the time. To say they are using educated guesses is giving them too much credit. They literally just make shit up out of their ass and try to make the math work, which it doesn’t most of the time. Then they try to add other shit out of their ass, and/or make up new math to try to make it all work, which again it really doesn’t still most of the time. These theories are constantly changing and they are in agreement about almost none of it. It’s just really smart people with advanced math skills playing pretend more or less. I’m not saying it’s not useful because every once in a while they stumble upon something that’s correct/true, or partially correct/ true. But you shouldn’t take any new/newish theories of theirs seriously at all. They only have a slightly better chance of being true then someone here pulling shit out of their ass.

>>136717532>a sphere is infinite No it’s really not, unless you stretch the definition. However this is the only way space can in any way be infinite, is if it wraps around itself like a sphere sort of thing. In fact it’s the only theory of the universe that doesn’t create all sorts of impossible issues. Obviously we can’t know if it’s the correct one, but it seems to make the most sense.

>>136717362Exactly. The same shit happens/happened in economics to name one thing off the top of my head. No one wants to go in and gut the shit out of the current paradigm, even as the evidence mounts that it's becoming increasingly detached from reality. First, because that's a nightmarish, almost impossible task. And second, the entire you do it, everyone making money off the current paradigm is going to be raining fire down on you.

>>136708514We have no evidence on whether they do or dont exist, therefor its a pointless argument to say either one is more correct. However, based on the estimated number of galaxies, and by proxy number of planets estimated in the universe, from a statistical standpoint I think there is a pretty good argument to be made about the probability of other lifeforms in the universe.

>>136708514>people travel across the solar system in days and not months of constant acceleration and then decellerationshit flick

>>136708514There's literally aliens in the ice of Mars, so no it's not plausible

>>136708514>sneeds dont seed and feedis this chuckley?

>>136718493It’s just storytelling bro, sometimes you gotta turn your brain off. The jump he did from 1 spaceship to another through that planets ring was so much more stupid. Pretty sure the chances of accurately making that jump are effectively 0

>>136708514Ask yourself this. Why would an alien want to visit/make contact? What can we offer them? Imagine it from their point of view. Why would you bother making contact with bacteria when there is nothing to gain?

>>136719083Tons of reasons mate. Unfortunately the most likely reasons all involve us or our planet having something they want. Whether it be resources, the planet itself to live on, slave labor, maybe there’s tons of alien milfs that need human boy cummies to live. Who knows. It’s unlikely they would ask nicely. Best case scenario they are like us and are just curious. But we would even take advantage of aliens if it turned out they were less advanced then us and had stuff we wanted/needed. It’s really unlikely an alien encounter would be a net positive for us.

>>136712328Interstellar travel, at least locally interstellar, should be possible with fusion-powered spacecraft or solar sails. Don't need impossible FTL sci fi tech, just a bit of patience because the trip might take 60 years or something. Even at just the slow pace of currently envisioned space travel, a civilization that manages some longevity should be able to traverse the entire galaxy in only a few hundred thousand years.Given that other technological civilizations out there could have emerged a looooong time ago, it is still a real mystery how we haven't met them yet

Attached: ayy lmao smoking pepe.jpg (499x499, 35.45K)

Aliens do exist, but intelligent aliens may not exist

>>136712328>FTL is not possible. Star Wars/Star Trek shit will never be possible. Humans cannot and will never be able to travel high distances in spaceWon't be possible with that attitude, user. We'll find a way to go fast

>>136720021Given the vastness of the universe there's something a little arrogant and anthropocentric about thinking we're the only ones, the only time a technological civilization has ever happened anywhere Like yes we're special but we can't be THAT special

>>136720276Here's at least one way to go fastPage 109nanowerk.com/nanotechnology/reports/reportpdf/report47.pdf

Attached: bleeding edge armor.gif (600x400, 1.85M)

>>136720328Even if there are many advanced intelligent do exist outside our galaxy. We will never know until we receive their signals with depend on our longevity. The next closes galaxy is 26,000 light years away. That's how fucking long it will take our signal to reach them or they to reach us. We better hope they(advance extraterrestrials) been around 100 thousands years or more before us that are capable of communication. Sure we can make a theoretical assumption they do exist but we won't know until we receive them.

>>136720823Not only that but hope they still are around. If we get a signal from a million years ago no telling they are still there, or will still be there by the time we can send one back. Talk about latency on a phone call lmao

>>136715783Based on the sheer number of planets there are in the known universe. It's extremely unlikely that Earth is the one special snowflake in a universe with something like 10^25 planets we know of so far.

>>136709129>The communication revolution is a great filter it explains the fermi paradoxwrong, great filter is niggers

>>136721409However, one thing that counters that is how rare intelligent life on earth is, when you think about it. As far as we can tell, humans are the only species on earth to have ever developed technology, after hundreds of millions of years of evolution and similarly vast numbers of other animal species coming and going (unless you count things like birds nests and beaver dams as technology)

Attached: scully fucked by alien.jpg (754x734, 58.37K)

>>136721593And of humans only 1 maybe 2 races of the dozen or so seems capable of civilization building on their own. Still, it happened once no reason to think it can’t again.

>>136709297This is a overwhelmingly simple argument. For every possibility to exist, the universe would have to be infinite in size. There’s no evidence to suggest it actually is, so I can’t see myself believing that there’s a planet exactly like ours where I am exactly the same but more of a fan of citrus fruits. It’s just a silly idea.

>>136721593"Intelligent" life is too subjective to mean anything in this context though. You're literally defining it based on how humans stack up against other terran lifeforms. Half the problem of knowing whether or not there is other life out there and to letting other life know that you're out there is having the technology to discover/communicate that fact, and humans don't in any meaningful. We have basically zero access to the universe at large. For all we know, millions of alien species are casually sending messages and visiting other planets in a whole intergalactic community we are unaware of because we're the retarded ginger step children of the "intelligent" life forms of the universe.Our comparative level of intelligence on earth doesn't mean shit in the scope of the universe.

>>136721793Also the universe cannot be infinite in size, and there especially can’t be an infinite number of planets. Only a total brainlet would even entertain the idea.

>>136714028The nearest solar system is 4 light years away and it has jack shit for possible habitable planets. We would unironically need a propulsion system like the warp drive (that moves space around us and not the ship itself) in Star Trek to have any fucking hope of exploring the universe.

>>136710173

Attached: FB147114-0D2B-44B6-AA12-ABFF319C8F95.jpg (1024x681, 93.82K)

>>136721841True, because an infinite universe structured like ours would be mostly empty space, so for infinite planets it would have to be so exponentially huge that it’s not even worth considering.

>>136721921Well not precisely. There’s many reasons why infinite well, anything pretty much can’t work. Infinite planets would mean every square inch of space would be filled with planets. Infinite space would mean you can’t actually occupy any set point in space. It’s just by its very definition impossible. I said it earlier in the thread but time cannot go backwards to infinity and it cannot go forwards into infinity.

>>136722136Oh yeah, that actually does make sense doesn’t it. I was thinking of scale, but any square inch that isn’t a planet means there could be more planets. Gotcha user.

do we even know for a fact how life began?

>>136722221Wasn't some magical sky wizard if thats what you're getting at.

>>136708514Where can I find this movie for streaming?

>>136708514In all seriousness only brainlets believe in aliens

>>136722295Based

>>136722170Holy shit man someone on 4chan gets it. You give me hope for this place user thanks. Been running into an unusual amount of idiots here lately and it’s been bumming me out.

>>136722221From what I understand they have a pretty good idea how it likely happened, but obviously there’s no way to know for sure. For all we know aliums came by to seed life on our planet to terraform it and will be back later to collect. If you have the time that’s actually a really good way to do it.

>>136714671I always find it hard to take the opinions of people who can't into English seriously, even when I want to agree with them.

Highly intelligent extraterrestrial don't mean shit if they don't have the resources with the proper elements and building block to help advance their technology. Imagine having a freaking large brain but no proper arms and fingers to build anything. Us human are just lucky. Hopefully we don't end up killing yourselves or a meteorites end us just like the dinosaurs.

>>136712328maybe FTL is possible tho

>>136721801Then remove the word intelligent and think of it in terms of whether or not a species develops the technology to attempt to travel and communicate across space. Humans might not have the tech to access the universe yet but we at least have the goal in mind and are working on getting there, while chimps and dolphins are not The main point being that this has happened only once on earth. If evolution took just a slightly different path it's conceivable that earth could have maintained a rich biodiversity for billions more years but without anything ever developing technology or thinking about what the fuck space is On an intuitive level, the same could easily be true for other planets with life out there, that diverse life forms are common but them developing intelligence and technology is an insanely rare, near-impossible fluke

Attached: interstellar_matt_wonder_dirt.jpg (1280x720, 76.23K)

>>136722901>hard to take the opinions of people who can't into English seriouslyLOL. Retard.

>>136709297The only thing buttfuckingly huge is my shock at how dumb you are.>There are estimated 6x10^9 earth like planets that could give rise to life in our galaxy>there are an estimated 2x10^11 galaxies in the universe>we'll be overwhelming generous and just say there are 2x10^20 galaxies in the universe>using the milky way as an average, we can assume there are 1.2x10^30 earth like planets across the entire universe that could have given rise to life>the chance of dna-based life rising on a planet in the narrow time window of the exactly right conditions requires so many coinciding coincidences in a row that it is less than 1x10^50, making Earth a fluke beyond flukes>There are over 2.43x10^47 possible nucleotide combinations of human-length DNA. Even more variations when when you consider supporting molecules inside the nucleus>to say there are more than 1x10^999 possible combinations of atoms in just a human is still a gross UNDERESTIMATE (or whatever (7x10^27)^118 is)>yet there are only estimated 1x10^86 atoms in the entire universeYou are so fucking dumb I bothered to type this out.

>>136708514very likely actually, based on calculations, that are actually somewhat realistic, there might be around 1-2 active space faring civilizations at once in milky way,

>>136723001And maybe magic sky fairies exist too.

>>136723171whatever...

>>136723045>estimated 1x10^86 atoms in the entire universeSomething I'm curious about, how exactly does one go about estimating the total size of the non-observable universe?

Attached: cat_cringe.jpg (294x287, 9.64K)

>>136723171>>136712328It's thought that after the big bang, space expanded at a rate faster than lightShouldn't that put at least one small crack in your certainty about that?

>>136723205We can estimate the origin (common point) and outer limits (rate of expansion and time) of the universe. We can compare what we can see of the universe in volume to the volume of our estimate. Then apply.

>>136723032Newfag

>>136716203Jesus Christ, I just spent my entire night watching this shit movie. Why didn't you fucks warn me?

Uh, of course it is? Do we have evidence they exist? No? So then it is plausible that they don't exist. Honestly any argument for aliens existing has to assume way too much is true already.

>>136723171this but unironically, there are more logical arguments for the existence of god than there ever have been for aliens.

>>136723612Existance alone makes a better case for God than for Aliens.

>>136723555>has to assume way too much is trueAn argument that abiogenesis has only ever happened exactly once, on earth, and that therefore no life whatsoever exists anywhere else in the universe, has to assume even more.

Attached: 1429391643115.jpg (234x250, 11.61K)

>>136709297

Attached: so true.png (302x349, 73.89K)

>>136723473I would have told you to watch it. It’s not the best movie ever but I liked it.

>>136723709Your assumptions aren't by any means flawed, but you're still relying on previous assumptions without any evidence.

>>136709368Unless the MiB or someone is keeping them secret.

>>136709179Alien means not from earth, so all the angels and demons and shit would technically be aliens.

>claims to FUCKING LOVE SCIENCE>acting like vehemently defending the position of the existence of aliens as if it was a hard science, despite there being zero observable empirical categorization to suggest its existence isn't borderline new age crap

>>136715178bbc in his wife's womb

>>136723045In English, doc?

>>136717084Suck my infinitely long dick bitch lol

>>136708514We literally just had the US Government leak a UFO sighting.Aliens are real and they have already visited us. They are waiting for us to mature enough before they invite us to join them.

>>136724255well user are we maturing or rotting?

>>136724255>unidentified flying object appears on camera>"OMG ALIENS!!!"

>>136724255The Government are deceiving us with the Aliens angle when it's actually they are testing new tech toys.

>>136724255Sure user, the government just "casually" leaked something so absurdly shocking and groundbreaking to the populace.

>>136724255I wouldn't be surprised some underground scientists are doing this shit behind the government back.

it’s not only plausible, it’s likely >from what we know, abiogenesis is ex extremely rare phenomena >the likelihood of complex life arising is even more unlikely

Attached: 3E9D8741-B914-4575-83FB-7DD796676F74.jpg (680x1136, 93.57K)

>>136723205Retard here.> What is the point of the 1 in that equation> this is a genuine question