FEATHERCUCKS BTFO

Except the fur would deteriorate super fast.

As opposite of "scary" giant iguanas?

Holla Forums will believe in dinosaurs but not global warming?

Why does OP talk to himself so much?

Nice dodge of:

Do you faggots know how fossilization works? What you are showing isn't t-rex skin, it's a rock imprited with what scientists believe was t-rex skin. Keyword: believe. And even if they are right, this is only one part of the body. You don't argue that ostriches have no feathers because their feet are covered with scales.

This is an actual preserved part of a theropod:

REAL part. No rock, no imprint. Can be studied using microscopies. And more recent than your gay rock.

The feathercuck is afraid.

I don't see Reptile like scaleage maety

Explain this scalecuck. Oh wait you can't, because it's the definitive proof that theropods had feathers.

read it and weep, featherfaggot, better rope yourself now, because it's a scientific fact that the T-Rex had scales

That looks like tail hair
Maybe Dinosaurs liked like horses
I wonder what a t-rex benis or vagine looks like

see

and:

and shut up, feather queer

You cut the part where they said they didn't study all of his body and feathers were possible on his back.

Also:

LULZ. Dinosaurs' feathers were found in ambar in 2016. How it feels to be outdated?

T-Rex has no feathers on its tail, they have the fossils that prove it only had scales there:

T-Rex was a scale covered dinosaur, period.

EVIDENCE
V
I
D
E
N
C
E

Nice, lie, feather faggot.

sciencemag.org/news/2017/06/world-s-only-fossils-t-rex-skin-suggest-it-was-covered-scales-not-feathers

Oh wait, scalecucks BTFO. They can't even show proper evidence.

Meanwhile ambar proved them wrong.

Feathercuck = soy tbh

...

Dinosaurs were archosaurs, and so are modern crocodiles, which aren't very fluffy, are they. Featherfucks are gullible fools that probably believe in the out of apefrica theory too.

How would scalecucks be BTFO by you posting evidence that the T-Rex had scales, you turbo-autist? Did you just copy paste that without reading it? Are you in special ed?

you mean featherqueers, that's what they are

Holla Forums - Television and Movies

Reported for ban evasion
If you don't know that this age old debate has to do with the depiction of dinosaurs in Jurassic Park THEN YOU ARE CLEARLY NOT ONE OF US.

...

Arguing with a feathercuck is like grasping at slime. They truly are more despicable than even Jews.

Threadly reminder that fossils of ancient birds are not dinosaurs. If it has feathers, it's something other than a saur.

No it doesn't, because rule 6M states that jewish productions are not to be discussed.

I can't believe you're not all burnt out from the last scalefaggot vs feathercuck thread.

There’s at least two people doing this, you assmad feathercuck.

DELETE THIS

...