*blocks your childhood*

*blocks your childhood*

Other urls found in this thread:

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tyrannosaurus
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Archaeopteryx
theguardian.com/science/2015/jun/03/most-dinosaurs-had-scales-not-feathers-fossil-analysis-concludes
smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/t-rex-skin-was-not-covered-feathers-study-says-180963603/
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

SCALECUCKS BTFO

...

featherfags in absolute denial

OH NO NO NO NO

Feathercucks will be the first to hang on the DOTR, remember that

...

FAKE NEWS

...

They look like big chickens.

Not my childhood!

Dinosaurs went extinct because caveniggers fried and ate them all.

what if they just had normal skin?

this tbpfh

Now that's a proper dino.

But none of you even care about whether gigantopithecus was a giant gorilla or a giant orangutan.

That's a big birdie.

Daily reminder that fossils of ancient birds are not dinosaurs.

Its clearly a lythronax.

would dinosaur taste good?

Battlechickens doesn't real feathercuck.

...

"It was the last known member of the tyrannosaurids, and among the last non-avian dinosaurs to exist before the Cretaceous–Paleogene extinction."
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tyrannosaurus
T-rex didn't have feathers but it was more like a fur and not every type of tryannosaur had them, if at all, we don't really know.

Animals like the Archaeopteryx did have actual feathers though.
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Archaeopteryx

TL;DR T-REX PROBABLY DIDN'T HAVE FEATHERS BUT MAYBE SOME SPECIES OF RAPTOR DID UNTILL THE RAPTORS EVOLVED SMALLER AND SMALLER. T-REX IS AN EVOLUTIONARY DEAD END AND DID NOT SURVIVE.

Typical scalecuck oversimplifications. We don't know what T-Rex had apart from it's feet were feathered and a very small patch of bare skin. Even the major scalecucks concede the T-Rex probably had feathers all along it's back.

Reading scalecuck """""""opinion pieces"""""""" is like reading a childs tantrum, so petulant and angry that dinosaurs could bear resemblance to animals of the modern day and become familiar to us as the animals that they were and not hollywood monsters…

Would taste like chicken

...

Next thing you'll tell me is Pluto isn't a planet

There are no serious archaeologists who will still tell you that most dinosaurs, or even most therapods, had feathers. A few animals who served as evolutionary stepping stones from dinosaurs to birds likely did, but the shit people actually care about like T-rex and Triceratops did not. This debate has been settled already. 50 years from now being a featherfag will be like being a pyramid power fag today.

theguardian.com/science/2015/jun/03/most-dinosaurs-had-scales-not-feathers-fossil-analysis-concludes
smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/t-rex-skin-was-not-covered-feathers-study-says-180963603/

"Planet" is an incredibly arbitrary definition.

Pluto is a dwarf planet that exists as a trans neptunian object with other large objects that arent planets and is inside of a belt where it doesn't have enough mass to effect its surroundings