Why are conservative filmmakers, critics and posters so embarrassing?

Why are conservative filmmakers, critics and posters so embarrassing?

Other urls found in this thread:

thefiscaltimes.com/2014/10/17/Who-s-More-Generous-Liberals-or-Conservatives
alternet.org/story/149721/ayn_rand_railed_against_government_benefits,_but_grabbed_social_security_and_medicare_when_she_needed_them
dailykos.com/stories/2010/07/31/889245/-Ayn-Rand,-was-a-devout-drug-addled,-Atheist
adequacy.org/stories/2001.8.22.0219.37804.html
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

Conservatives are just slightly right on the judeo-liberal spectrum, famalam. Ayn Rand was a kike.

What did Ayn Rand even believe? I only know her from Bioshock.

Many people have unfairly maligned Ayn Rand, the greatest philosopher of the 20th century. This has always confounded me, for no other person has developed such a rational approach to living as she. I believe the underlying reason is that most of her works, like The Fountainhead and Atlas Shrugged, are simply too complex and involved for most people. Thankfully, a group of Canadian musicians took the time during the 80's to distill the complexity of Rand's philosophy into music that we can all understand.

Modern rock pioneers Rush not only produce some of the hardest rocking tunes ever recorded, they also are pioneers when it comes to infusing rock music with deep insight into the natures of human behavior. The band consists of guitarist Alex Lifeson, deeply crooning singer/bass & keyboard player Geddy Lee, and drummer/lyricist Neil Peart. Peart is mostly known for his wildly improvisational, jazz-inspired drumming technique, but he plays an even greater role as the person who has single handedly brought the power of Ayn Rand's Objectivism to a level that can be understood by even the most stereotypically ignorant, drug-addled teen.

Ayn Rand's highly influential Objectivism is a deep topic, and her purely philosophical writings on it are quite dense. Realizing this, she took on the task of translating her thoughts into the realm of fiction in order to make it more accessible to the general public. Unfortunately, the task still proved formidable, and two of her resulting books totaled over 1,000 pages each. The complex nature of what she advocates even dictated that she spend the final 50 some-odd pages of Atlas Shrugged reiterating everything she had spent the previous 1,000 pages explaining. Thankfully, Neil Pert was up to the task of reinterpreting her work for her in layman's language.

Live for yourself, there's no one else
More worth living for
Begging hands and bleeding hearts will
Only cry out for more
Rush - Anthem

Rush is trash

With that one verse Peart has reached deep into the very core of what is important in Objectivism. Utilizing the power and reach of rock music, he and his bandmates have taught us much of what being an Objectivist is really all about. But how is it that a humble drummer was capable of such a feat? Quite simply, it was due to his environment. You see, Rush is a Canadian band, and as such they know first hand how the forces of socialism can destroy all that is important in man. Why this skill developed solely in Peart and not Lifeson or Lee is due to Peart's journey to England when he was eighteen. It was there that he first came to truly understand how important Objectivism is, utilizing the excessive governmental involvement in daily life prevalent in England as a catalyst for his enlightenment.

There is unrest in the forest,
There is trouble with the trees,
For the maples want more sunlight
And the oaks ignore their pleas.

The trouble with the maples,
(And they're quite convinced they're right)
They say the oaks are just too lofty
And they grab up all the light.
But the oaks can't help their feelings
If they like the way they're made.
And they wonder why the maples
Can't be happy in their shade?

There is trouble in the Forest
And the creatures all have fled
As the Maples scream 'Oppression!'
And the Oaks, just shake their heads

So the maples formed a union
And demanded equal rights.
These oaks are just too greedy;
We will make them give us light.'
Now there's no more oak oppression,
For they passed a noble law,
And the trees are all kept equal
By hatchet,
Ax,
And saw.
Rush - The Trees


Brainlets never learn.

Still trying to keep that Ayn Rand cult alive I see.

Indeed, we are kept down with hatchet, ax and saw. This parable clearly underscores how the small people continue to force those graced with power and influence to bend to the will of those who are not worthy, resorting to violence rather than reason to have their way. The music of Rush asks: Which are you? A noble oak, rising towards the sun, or a weak maple, whining about the unfairness of it all rather than bettering yourself through improved photosynthesis and nutrient gathering? The implied inferiority of the maple, national tree of Canada, is clearly intentional and represents Peart's dissatisfaction his socialist homeland.

You can choose a ready guide in some celestial voice.
If you choose not to decide, you still haven't made a choice.
You can choose from phantom fears and kindness that can kill;
I will choose a path that's clear-
I will choose Free Will.
Rush - Free Will

Lyrics such as these are the basic essance of Objectivism. Free will. The power to change your destiny should you so choose. Total rejection of the idea that some people are born into situations from which they cannot rise out of without help. Another line from the above song goes, "Blame is better to give than receive". No greater sarcastic truism has ever been uttered. The simple truth of the world is that absolutely each and every person who finds themselves in difficult circumstances is there as a result of their own actions. This is what Objectivism teaches us, that those who have problems deserve no help because it is all their fault anyway.

Of course those who are the little people among us are not content taking responsibility for their own failings, choosing instead to blame their problems on "phantom fears" like international banking, subversion of law, and the inherent corruption of capitalism due to its rewarding of greed above all else. This would be fine if there weren't so many of them, but that is not the case. Those who are accepting of their inherent inferiority outnumber us in such great numbers that they actually are able to influence world events. As a result, our politicians are forced to enact destructive socialist programs like school lunch programs, public sidewalks, and health care for the indigent.

However, we now have hope. In addition to Ayn Rand's scholarly and deeply thoughtful writings, we also have a means of making the truth understood to the masses. The music of Rush can be a highly effective tool for spreading the word of Rand. By combining high level philosophy with the power of primitive rhythm and repetitious melody, we finally have an effective tool for convincing the less perceptive among us that our cause is right and that getting in our way is extremely counterproductive. By further simplifying our message we will finally succeed in teaching the meek that the earth is not theirs to inherit, but should either be seized with force or surrendered to those who are stronger.


Randlet Paulberg is a cuckservative chump. His father less so, but even he never truly embraced Objectivism like Neil Peart.

to be fair listening to rush does approximate the pain of trying to read rand's shit text

Nothing really, she's just glorified by liberals who follow the money instead of the feels. There's nothing about loyalty or blood in her ideology, hence why it's still pushed onto the forefront of mainstream culture, because she's a kike and thus will always be subversive because it's in their nature as the parasite living off of the host while not wanting the host to find them out.

wtf is marx actually based? He was a life long NEET philosopher as far as I know, and he's a dude unlike that female (((she's))) suggesting.

because they are paper cutout controlled opposition with no real ideology.
Nationalism on the other hand is natural popular and powerful hence why people are manipulated instead to fight over political parties and personalities rather than caring about their own interests as a people and that of the country.

The only ideology of conservatives is to pay daddy Israel while agreeing with liberals on every domestic issue out there.

Um, sweetie, no.. just no.. okay?~

They are both the sides of the same schekel.

This tbh.

Sorry sweetums.

So you need to pick from

Really makes you think.

Liberals should have realized by now that national socialism is the logic end of their ideology. Its all about eating the (((rich))). Have you asked yourself the Jewish Question and realized the 1% is Jewish? Have you realized that for Palestine to be free, the Holocaust must run its course?

My real problem with this forest-as-society metaphor is the sentiment underlying it: The natural state of things is that the rich are rich because they deserve it. If they consume more than others, or if their progress makes life hard on the poor, then so be it. The principle fear of the rich is that if the selfish poor complain enough, then the rich, who are their betters, will be restrained by government from achieving their (natural) greatness and majesty. Quit complaining, poor people!

Fuck that right in the eye. All efforts to elevate the poor are done in the interest of allieviating suffering, and anyone incapable of seeing that for what it is (or worse, misrepresenting it as an effort to stunt the progress of the rich, by "hatchet, axe and saw"), is a selfish cock.

It also betrays the real agenda of those opposed to any form of charity or welfare. What matters most to them is not their achievement (the "height" of these goddamn trees), but their status – that they are the tallest trees and have other trees to look down upon.

No one sugests that the poor are better off if we just take money from the rich or hinder the rich in some hatchet/axe/saw way. Equalization in this manner would benefit no one. The point is not to make these cocksucking oak trees shorter, and presenting it in this light is duplicitous, deceptive and typical of right-wing assholes.

Fuck Rush and their right-wing agenda straight in the eye.

...

damn fag.

Replace Rand with Evola and you have a deal.

You want to know how I know you suck cock?

This.

Rand was so strong in her beliefs that when she lost all her money and needed help paying for medical treatment she turned down government assistance… oh wait she had no problem with that or welfare.

Amazing how fast a persons beliefs shift when they lose all their money.

the right wing contributes more to charity, all forms of it especially the christcucks, and even to welfare through their taxes you buzzword spewing leftist moron. in your eyes all of the muh right winguhs are the 1% which legit makes you sound like a totally hypocritical ivory tower faggot. and why are you implying that government officials - that you seem to fucking worship - aren't rich people themselves? not to mention the porkies who almost universally are jews or connected to jews. there's a reason why some of Holla Forums legit dislike drumpf and not just because of muh shareblue. your ass confirmed for having zero understanding of the how world works.

wtf I hate conservatives now

An MIT study debunked that conservatives give more to charity, which was brought up in a book called "Who Really Cares: The Surprising Truth About Compassionate Conservatism" So no bias there.

it's as if your IQ is sub 125 making you quasi-retarded smh

not really an action like that doesn't necessarily disprove a belief in capitalism especially in context

She had PAID for that service, as in taxes.

Egoism is the only honest and useful ideology. Only suckers avoid being hypocrites.

Ayn Rand's college degree was in the field of social pedagogy, she majored in history, and she knows jack shit about writing and even less about economics.

...

Totally unbaised, goyim.

Charities are a racket. You should give back to your community, not hand out money to some palm rubbers, promising it will eventually make it to Africa.

Your talking points are a little outdated. Other studies have come out since the MIT one supporting that conservatives give more:
thefiscaltimes.com/2014/10/17/Who-s-More-Generous-Liberals-or-Conservatives

They mention the MIT study here.

Agreed.

not an argument

Wanna know how I know you need to go back to cuckchan?

Pleb as fuck.

Nigger you reddit posted a commiefaggot tryhard response to fifteen year old copypasta.

THIS!
ALL HAIL REVIEWBRAH!

The similarity is eerie tbh.

Communism, Socialism, and Marxism are all Jews, user.

I always thought he was more like a young Goebbels tbh

I wish I could find my very own führer tbh, I'd make Europe great again.

The ' tryhard response' was copypasta you dipshit!

Ayn Rand was a welfare queen who took up both social security and medicare when she was dying of cancer and the monies from her books sales couldn't cover her surgical costs. THAT'S RIGHT, this welfare queen made society pay for the cancer surgery/other medical treatments she "needed" BECAUSE OF HER OWN FUCKING STUPID DECISION TO SMOKE. SHE MADE SOCIETY PAY FOR HER FUCK UPS!
alternet.org/story/149721/ayn_rand_railed_against_government_benefits,_but_grabbed_social_security_and_medicare_when_she_needed_them

Jews don't really care about not being hypocritical.

Reviewbrah is uncomfortable to look at.

Your ears don't work, Rush is literal garbage

That's what that means. Back to cuckchan, both of you.

No kidding.

Trump yesterday: "I like taking the guns early, like in this crazy man's case that just took place in Florida … to go to court would have taken a long time … Take the guns first, go through due process second"

Trump 3 weeks ago: "Peoples lives are being shattered and destroyed by a mere allegation. There is no recovery for someone falsely accused — life and career are gone. Is there no such thing any longer as Due Process?"

tbh I don't see the hypocrisy. A poor nigger demanding more welfare is just as much an objectivist as a wealthy kike demanding less taxes, it's just a matter of what your self-interests currently are.

this

RATHER THAN BEING PROUD OF HER TAKING BACK WHAT BELONGED TO HER, SHE ACCEPTED HER DELICIOUS WELFARE HANDOUTS UNDER THE NAME "ANN O'CONNER" (Frank O'Conner was her husband) TO HIDE PEOPLE BRINGING UP THAT THE COST OF HER ULTRA LAVISH CANCER TREATMENT WAS WAAAAAYYYYYYY MORE THAN WHAT SHE PAID IN.

Bump

Conservative donations are to churches primarily. And that is to keep them in gods graces. When very little of the churches donations go to anyone but the church itself.

Liberals donate money to places that matter, and being mostly atheists / agnostic. They do it out of the kindness of their heart, not for fear of god and hell.


Depends on the charity. Some are shit of course, but others are more open about where the money goes and you'll find that 100% of the donations go to who they say they go to. Places like Goodwill though, yeah that's a racket.

Ayn Rand was a meth head too.
dailykos.com/stories/2010/07/31/889245/-Ayn-Rand,-was-a-devout-drug-addled,-Atheist
Of course this should have been obvious by her 10,000 + page books and cunty attitude.

Objectivism. Not even once.

...

yup the only allowed ideologies are ones invented by jews, everything else is ebil nazi stuff.

okay

adequacy.org/stories/2001.8.22.0219.37804.html

Liberals donate money to places that matter, and being mostly atheists / agnostic. They do it out of the kindness of their heart, not for fear of god and hell.

this is your mind on soy

whoops, those are worldwide states

also religious people give to charities for the same reason as liberals, to feel good. The difference is churchs try to help people versus kikes trying to destroy the west by getting nogs off for any crime imaginable or pushing the idea that the mentally ill should be allowed to do whatever they want