ITT otherwise fun games cucked beyond repair:

ITT otherwise fun games cucked beyond repair:

Also, Far Cry thread I guess.

Holla Forums has shit taste in vidya

I don't know how it was on release but survival mode on expert is pretty enjoyable. Top shelf stealth archery for one.

Remove yourself

What did you expect after the Bethesda is redpilled meme?

I just want to play a game similar to FC2 but you play as a fledgling warlord building troops and fighting against muslim/communist/government factions.

Was there ever any doubt? They prioritize narrative themes over gameplay.

I mean I don't even disagree with a lot of what they say but them nigs really need to get some taste beyond surface level story shit.

That's uncalled for and you know it.


But there really isn't any other level then the surface shit one.

fitting

(You) forgot shitposting.

Regardless of skin tone, it's a fucking fucked fuck game for fucko fuckers.

Also the skin tones are one of the few things they likely got right. The neanderthals lived in the colder northern climate thus would've developed the whiter skin tone sooner, and the people who live in the normal climate have haven't evolved the white pigment yet but have adopted white facial features include blue eyes. It's… accurate enough to early Europeans and Neanderthals to have been possible.

The one thing they got wrong with the races is that Neanderthals should have had red hair be prominent, and their voices should've been higher pitched.

There's also the little detail that Neanderthals had been extinct for tens of thousands of years by the time the game takes place and absolutely none of the clothes, tools and customs portrayed in this game make any fucking sense whatsoever.

Have you even played the game or are you too busy shouting fuck on mongolian weaving sites?

Granted, but I don't believe they ever cohabited with humans proper. ib4 some pyramids in Bosnia and shieldmaidens tier revisionist bullshit

And yet the evil enemy tribe of Izila is mainly Caucasian and often with blonde hair. Except from the stronk poc wymin in charge, of course.

About 30,000 years out, but given that mammoths only went extinct 1600 BC (though in the mainland 10,000 BC-ish) and the game is set 10,000 BC (and I thought mammoths died out a fuck ton sooner) I can suspend disbelief for a small tribe that's fleeing the frozen north (where the last Mammoths died out).


No they're not. What was that you said about not playing the game?

I'm going to assume you've mistaken the wicker hats they occasionally wear as blond/e hair. I don't recall a single bit of blonde hair in the game. If there is then it must be so rare that I never encountered it, which would also make you wrong for saying the tribe was white and blonde except one.

Also iirc the Izila are fleeing volcanic eruption, and they've migrated to the east side of the map, the game taking place in central Europe, which means they migrated from the colder eastern portion of Europe which would expedite the evolutionary process a little faster which would justify them being whiter/lighter/righter skin toned.

Todd was the only one at E3 who didn't wear the fag ribbon

/ourgoy/

Right, people are going to bitch about animus at you instead of actually explaining why you're a fag again this time, OP. So I guess I have to do it for them.

First of all: and are correct. Holla Forums has absolute shit taste in videogames because they prioritize superficial stuff over the gameplay.
That's why Warhammer is massively popular there, because despite the terrible gameplay almost all of their games have, including tabletop, their aesthetics and lore is pretty cool.

So this is your first problem. You went to play a Far Cry game, caring more about the history and skintone of the characters you meet when the crafting, shooting, exploration and survival elements of the game should have been the primary thing to talk about. Basically, you're the faggot that can't get it up to a porno because the girl didn't tipped the pizza delivery boy 15% of the price.

Secondly, the game is shit. It's as linear as a straight line can be in it's progression which is retarded after Farcry 2 and 3.
Your tribe is reduced to companions only, there's never a "tribe" involved in the gameplay that you have to manage or protect.
Weapons are utter shit because we're talking about Advanced Cave Technology here. There's only so many clubs and bows you can make…

The game always progresses in the same way: Come up to an area you can explore for supplies, a few side activities to unlock some more supplies and enemies, then move on to a long corridor full of cinematic moments until you move to a new larger area.
Even the first Farcry or Crysis did it's linear game better.

So basically, you have a tedious, very simple, very basic game with meaningless content and full of cinematic moments.
Worst of all, it does the Detective Vision thing like every other shitty game that does the same thing, because the game fully expects that anyone playing it is retarded. And what do you know? It's true.

Maybe you should stop being a filthy secondary and actually learn about dem vydiogames, develop some taste and care about them for far more than just the superficial stuff? Being racist is stupid not because you're supposed to care about all races the same but because pinning problems on races when there's several other more dire problems that will end up overlooked by you is a short road to Shitville.

Only Far Cry 2 is good because it isnt a piss easy 'press X tp win' game.
Blood Dragon is fun because it is a game that doesnt take anything seriously and just goes balls out with it.

Wicker my ass, that's clay on their warriors. And it still doesn't explain why their npcs are predominately white even if they do foster some ex-wenja.
Also nice work cherrypicking what I wrote and dismissing what doesn't suit your narrative.

But yeah, related was more realistic and that's saying something being a frog comedy and all.

They push hard the 'white men are just neanderthal monsters' shit, even if neanderthals were pretty rad and were as intelligent as modern humans.

...

Wasn't many of the theories about their extintion related to their contact with modern humans? being anhiquilated by them, genetically assimilated, being infected by diseases they had no defenses for or even being pushed from the hunting grounds by the modern humans and their dogs.

lol its the sperg from /tg/ who posts tl;dr shit over and over

Guys.

If I want to be a Neanderthal…

…Does that makes me a furry?

I've played the game, and it's certainly not fun.
It's Far Cry 4 reskinned, and FC4 is FC3 reskinned.
It's a generic Ubisoft game with the exact same mechanics all their other games have that somehow feels as liner as HL2 while also being open world, it has absolutely nothing original other than setting.

When will games be uncucked?

Go the fuck back to Twitter if you can't read anything longer than a paragraph.

Also

lol it's the sperg from reddit who posts twitter shit over and over

The game takes place 12,000 years ago, actually. Probably not much of a difference in terms of technology, but still.

wew

Can you blame them? They've been taught their whole lives that niggers, spics, chinks, and the like are human like white people

Their hat is not made of clay user. It's wicker.

I'm going to assume when you say clay on their warriors you're referring to her hairline. Let me address this more than I should.

Her skintone on her face and arms are the same. If she was clayed on her arms then you wouldn't be able to see her scars (assuming it was wet clay), and if her skintone on her face is the same as her arms, and her arms are the same skintone as the other random NPC's that I've posted, then it's abundantly clear they're that she's the same colour as her people and her people are the same colour as her.

Further more, if she was clayed up,and her people were, then why do none of her people have that same shitty low-res hairline that I can only assume you think is clay on their hairline? That bald guy doesn't have any and if he clayed all the way then his hair wouldn't even be visible.

Further further more, if she and her people are clayed up then there would be cracks in the area around there mouths as it would've tried up and the movement of their lips would've messed it up, due to them being in the sun and wet clay would've dried up very quickly. There would also be cracks and areas where it would've fallen off in their armpits and elbows due to movement.

They don't though. Not only have I supplied screenshots to that effect, you've yet to even try to prove that.

REGARDLESS

Even if there are white toned people amongst them, I have already explained that they evolved in a colder climate which would've explained why they might have some lighter toned people to outright whites in amongst them as they were fleeing from the east to central Europe.

I'm sorry, what did I not answer? The only thing I didn't address was:
And that is bullshit. Where you expecting me to address how that was bullshit, because if we both know it's bullshit then I don't think that's necessary.

Unless you missed that I replied to:
Because I did answer that in the upper part of the post along with someone else, where I do concede that they didn't live together, but that given how early the mammoths died out I can suspend disbelief for a single group that's not only the last but also dying out (which they are in the game).


They are a different species, so yes.


Incorrect user. Mammoths went extinct 1600s BC user. Isolated group, but the mainland mammoths went out 10,000 BC - where the game is set.

This turned out to be big bullshit. I thought because the Wenja had be massacred before you arrive and their people scattered around they had just lost their non-vital things like sculptures and shit. I was expecting them to upgrade and start doing that shit mid to late game as you made a stable environment but they never did. At least they had some level of clay pottery around.

Oh except invent gunpowder. Fuck you Ubishit.

Only if you're non-white, otherwise it's just getting in touch with your ancestors.

holy shit what are you talking about?
hell there were remnant island populations surviving up to more or less when the pyramids were being built

Well fug, I must be thinking of a different species.
The completely misrepresentation of how primitive humans were at that time still stands

Top tier post user. You must have really hit home with your points considering how the replies were nothing but shitposts of no value.

lel

You're right about OP being a faggot though

They went extinct in North Africa a very long time ago, I think. You may have been thinking of that.
Actually depicting humans as they would have been 12000 years ago would have been very, very boring, they wouldn't have looked very different from us and they would have had decent weapons. The average normalfag would have complained about it being "UNREALISTIC" or some shit.

Well… Neanderthals lived in my country, but you guys say that I'm not white because of my country.

Spanish.

Anyway, in which part of the world was the game set? I didn't play the game nor I plan to, yet if it was set in the iberian peninsula they could have used wooly rhinos or other kind of large primitive beasts from the ice age.

...

You have shit taste in video games and all you can do is spout buzzwords and non arguments in return when called out on your shit taste.

Oh unless you're referring to the blue eyes part, because none of them had those - it's all brown eyes.


Dinosaurs?

I can't think of anything you might've gotten them mixed up with other than the Woolly Rhinoceros, but humans also hunted them and they died out as little as 8,000 BC (possibly). Same with Mastodons who you might've gotten mixed up with, they died out like 12,000 years ago.

lol go back to crying about nazis liking 40k nigger

And just who called me out for liking what exactly?

>>>/cuckchan/


see and

Also maybe Giant Cave Bears and Ground Sloths but again, they're surprisingly late survivors and live side-by-side with humans.

Can you not see IDs or something? Neither of those are directed at me. I'm not OP. Learn to read, liberal faggot.

lol your sperging is easily recognizable /tg/ sperg

Obviously, and crossboarders like yourself make it so obvious much you aren't from here. You and OP are both being directed at by those posts. Do you really not realize how much you stand out?

Showing how ancient humans made stuff would have been really cool, though.

Slumming /a/utist detected. I thought you guys were too good for Holla Forumseddit these days.

Except I'm not the one who thinks Far Cry Primal is fun. That's OP.
Has something changed that not appreciating leftycuck posts is considered standing out now?


It wouldn't make for a very compelling addition to a game. Even something simple like animations for crafting shit would get old after the novelty wears off.

Epic.

It was a simple question. Meidos would not approve of you rubbing shoulders with us dirty shitposters. You might forget to capitalize or put a semicolon in the wrong place hanging with us. Big no no, instant ban.

But weren't they like 30% actually? You need new statistics
Let's start worshiping elephants and whales then, faggot.

And no, most of the world problems aren't due to race. They are do to people wanting easy and simple solutions to common problems that we all have.
A CEO wants cheap productive workers. He could invest in the local population or he can import indians. He doesn't do it because of the race of anyone, he does it because it's cheaper.
Poor people could try to get a job instead of commiting crimes, but when even middle class struggles to get a job with their education, what odds do lower class people have?
People wanting entertainment could make informed decisions about what movies and TV shows to see so they don't support badly done crap. But they don't have the time or autism to research that, they just want to see a movie with their girlfriend and romcoms will do fine.

There's far more dire problems with the world that have nothing to do with race. The need for safety, security and stability drives a lot of people towards lazy simple solutions that don't work well in long terms but who cares, right? Arguing about race does nothing but distract from that and even reinforces that there's nothing wrong with those problems because what we all must worry about is the racist people online.

You faggots are so easy to trigger…

Everywhere south of Iceland is non-white. What people who believe this don't know is that Iceland is populated by Celtic rape babies.

It wouldn't. That's one of those things were the genius behind it is impressive, but the process itself is boring, simple and repetitive.
It's the kind of thing that would be amazing to see NPCs doing in the background when you visit your village, but not really gameplay for the player to use.

Sounds pretty fucking lefty to me. Even your "rebuttal" totally disregards that those greedy fucks who outsource jobs are globalist jews, poor people committing crimes instead of working are niggers and spics, and people wanting lowest common denominator entertainment are degenerates because of the jewish owned media.

I had to look this up


Jesus Christ that's a lot of nordic on celtic rape.

And no, you don't get to weasel out by shitting on the gameplay, it being trash is a given.

Fuck off to whatever shithole you crawled out of.

Oh, so every rightwinged and centrist person is a racist, is that what you are saying?
It is stupid because in the end you don't hate them because of their race but because of what they do. You hate a black person for killing people, not because he's black, but you'd hate a white person too for the same crime. Race isn't an actual factor in how much you hate them, what they do is.

Broad generalizations is all you can do, pretending they are arguments. If anything, this is the curse you must endure for visiting Holla Forums so often, your complete loss of ability to actually argue with anyone that has a different point of view.
Queue in the infographics and the e-celebs videos, your attempt at saving face by having someone else do the explaining for you.

All "neutrals" are leftists in disguise. We keep calling you a Marxist cocksucker because you are one.

I just said the game is utter shit. It's terrible and clearly an experiment with their crafting and progression systems for something else they want to try for other games, not even a serious game itself.
But I did so talking about the gameplay, the number one thing that matters for videogames. If you care more about the story or the characters, you're a filthy secondary that doesn't even play videogames and gets the scoop out of youtube videos. You go back to whatever shithole you came from, although it's pretty clear it's Holla Forums, where the only thing that matters are identity politics.

Kindergarten-tier right there…

Their race determines what they do. That's why jews cheat and swindle and niggers steal and rape. It's in their genes. They can't fight it and we're right to hate them for it.
So majority of crime being attributed to those races and something like 97% of banks and media owned by jews is just generalizing? Sure, whatever helps you turn a blind eye to reality.

Race is the reason they behave that way.

Strawman. No, not every CEO is a kike, but kike are overrepresented in leading positions in business, entertainment, academia, etc.

Most of them are. 97% of gun crimes in New York are committed by niggers and spics. Also, crime has little to do with poverty. Compare crime stats for poor white or Asian communities with spic, nigger and mudshit ones.

No one said that. Stop strawmanning, it's embarrassing.

What you call "broad generalizations" smart people call statistics. It's a fact that 50% of murders in the US are committed by niggers, and 80% of rapes are done by spics, coons and mudshits.

Now crawl back to Holla Forums and learn that's the only place you're allowed to be you cockroach.

All I know is that I have lived in a lot of lower class neighborhoods in my life and everytime it got so bad that I had to find another shithole to move to is when the eses and brothas came in numbers. I don't think Holla Forums is right about everything but my every experience has taught me that non whites are more dangerous than their equivalent white counterparts.

The last refuge of the leftist cuckold trying desperately to defend Marxists trying to use games as propaganda.

No, gameplay is not the only thing that matters, otherwise so much effort wouldn't be put into presentation, music and narrative. Otherwise people wouldn't get excited about stories in games and care about the characters.

You lack any sort of argument to justify the pozz so you pretend the MUH GAMEPLAY demographic is the arbiter of what games should and shouldn't be.

You're a clown and we're all laughing at you.

...

How do you know whales aren't hyper geniuses but they just can't accomplish anything with flippers?


The CEO imports pajeets because he's a kike out to destroy the white race, implement globalism, and save a few shekels.


Poor white areas have significantly lower crime than poor nigger areas. It's a monkey thing.


Nope.

And then you complain when you're compared to SJWs, you WHITE MALE.

They also give 10% of all they earn to charity (that only helps other jews) and thats why you never see a poor jew.
The NBA and Morgan Freeman want to have a word with you, your broad generalizations are hitting very silly levels.


That's why you're racist? Because you're white?

So white people need more representation, uh?

That's pretty much what it means, that's what he said.

No, what dumb people call statistics, smart people call generalizations, it's the other way around.
You can use statistics to determine the odds of a black person being a criminal but even if the odds are 99%, you can't say this or that particular black person is a criminal because you simply don't know if he is or isn't. Only that he LIKELY is.
There's a difference there that apaprently only smart people notice.

Smart people also understand statistics are like symptoms. They are the manifestation of something happening in the background. You see black crime and immdiatly jump to "oh, they are criminals, they are black, they need to hung" and stay there.
Actual smart people see those statistics and wonder "why?" and go look into things like their culture, education, economic status, etc and find actual solutions like the broken windows case.

No, user, niggers commit 40% of rapes and are overrepresented in arson cases because they are poor. See, when they rape (mostly white women) it's a sexual emergency due to poverty, and when they set shit on fire it's because they are poor and want to warm themselves up.

It has absolutely nothing to do with their racial predisposition towards violence, poor impulse control and lack of ability to plan ahead!

It's them fucking rich people that make niggers behave like niggers. If only we got rid of the rich people and redistributed the assets everything would be fine and we'd achieve the communist utopia!

Iceland was uninhabited except for monks but you can't make butt babies before the Vikings showed up, so they took Celtic women they took as sex slaves with them and made babbies.

Please don't do that to yourself. I have no love for niggers, spics, gypsies and other leeches on society but don't let bad experiences cloud your judgement. I didn't had good experiences with black people when I was young too but met a few in University that were actually cool people.


Good thing I didn't said it was the only thing that matters, rather the one that matters the most.
Boy wouldn't it be embarassing if I was misinterpreting someone else's post just to have an oportunity to shove my own political propaganda there? How else would I inject my CF memes or argue my shit taste in vydia otherwise?

I find it interesting that you choose to only engage obvious hardcore Holla Forumsacks but ignore a post explaining why a normal person who is in the same socioeconomic bracket as the black and hispanic you defend wants nothing to do with them. Have you ever lived and rubbed shoulders with poor whites and poor blacks/hispanics? Because there is a difference my friend. No matter how much you deny it.

Sorry just saw your post but my point stands.

I wonder if most people there even know?

How would you lessen the black crime rate in the USA?

I'm racist because niggers are niggers. I'm racist for the same reason I stay away from poisonous snakes and wild bears.

Sure they do. When 70% of the population is white then a similar number should be present in leading positions. Are you saying 2% of the population holding so many positions of power is a perfectly natural outcome?

That has nothing do to with your claim that people in this thread said whites don't commit crimes. No one said that, but you're free to quote someone and prove Holla Forums isn't always full of shit. I'm waiting.

And why should that matter to me? If there's a 99% chance that nigger is gonna assault me why should I not avoid him? Why should I not want him and his race gone?

Yes, race.

No one in this thread said anything like that. Again, give me a direct quote of someone advocating killing all the niggers.

Your ilk has been trying to find an excuse that isn't about race for the past 60 years, you've repeatedly failed and have punished anyone that tried to look into race as a factor.

Seems to me you know full well what the cause is but can't admit it because it's in the way of your ideological goals.

#MakeTheOceanGreatAgain

Tell me how obesity is not a problem or how it's due to race.
Tell me the same about diabetis or cancer.
Tell me how global warming, the overdependence on fossiel fuel (that's nearing it's end) or the myriad of similar problems is related to race.
Tell me how several companies in america (not owned by jews) severely buttfuck everyone they want with no oposition, from insurance companies to ISP ones.
Tell me with a straight fucking face that you're more worried about black people than any of these things.

How does poverty explain spics and niggers raping so much?

And like that other user said, if poverty is the biggest factor, how come poor white and Asian communities do not show the tendency towards crime?

You sound butthurt, which is understandable, leftists usually reach that stage pretty fast when outside their echo chamber.

Could we maybe just go back to shitting on Fry Cry Primal instead of shitposters shitposting shitposters who're shitposting shiposters?

He'd do what leftists always do, throw gibs at niggers and blame white people for it.

Brain size doesn't matter, what matters are neurons and synapses (connections between neurons).
Elephants have more neurons than humans, in fact they're the only animal with more neurons than humans, but they lack the number of synapses we have.

It's basically Call of Duty: Caveman Edition. Any complaint people have made to FC3 applies to Primal as well.

Making fun of the triggered leftycuck is more fun though.

No, you're both just retards in a screaming fit. Go to Holla Forums or Holla Forums if you want to pretend they're any more triggered than you are that the other exists. Filtered.

By your point, you mean your question?
I live in a small town in a country where minorities are actually minorities so my encounters with them have been sparse.
Here, the gypsies are what concerns people the most and rightly so. You think niggers are bad, you should meet these guys.

I have a friend that lives in a larger city who I visit from time to time and I get to see the drags of society and hear from him too. It's mostly white people that are too poor and uneducated to know how uneducated they are. They behave a lot like wannabe gangsters, only have courage in large numbers and violence seen as the default way to solve things.
I've seen and heard everything commonly atributed to black people in white people as well, the only thing in common being the conditions they lived in.

The only conclusion I took from that is that apartheids, state projects and ostracization breed crime as a solution to their condition.
It's not a race thing, it's an economic thing with race maybe feeding into it secondarily.


Cut down free gibs to every nigger of adult age.
Give gibs to kids going to schools, removed or reduced when they miss class or based on their grades.
This would get education off the ground, which is a good start.
The current nigger population isn't interested in working honestly, the best you can do is save the next generation.
Next, legalize light drugs so they lose the market for those.

People were comparing human brain size, not general brain size of all lifeforms on Earth. And even then, sizes and development of certain parts of the brain were compared.

I can actually do that, native Americans of the Pima tribe have a much greater risk of diabetes type 2 than any other ethnicity on Earth. Of course it's their diets that get them diabetes it doesn't appear just out of thin air, but their genetic makeup is the reason why they have the highest risk of any other ethnicity on Earth to get diabetes type 2.

No one saw this one coming. No one.

Leftists once again displaying their stupidity for the world to see. South Africa sure became a post racial utopia free of hate once Apartheid was dismantled. Them fucking whitey holding black people down.

Yes, just look at Rhodesia or South Africa.

Even more "us vs them"? How long are you gonna keep doing this? When are you going to understand there's no sides here, only different priorities?

"Your ilk" has been promoting race as the problem and contributing to it instead of solving it, making you part of the problem as well. Segregation, like every racist faggot wants, does nothing but strengthen the niggers pack mentality and reinforces their thuggish habits.

What about that 1%? What about the black dudes that become doctors and engineers? Should they leave the country or be hung or handled the same way as everyone else?
They are black too after all…

It's funny that you argue like that while making generalizations about niggers.
You said it yourself, faggot.

you have to go back

>>>/4chan/

WOW, a living, breathing cuck from my neck of the woods, who would've thunk it. When you actually spend some time in a place where niggers or Arabs reign supreme, like I had to do when I was working in Paris, then come back. Before that you can take your ivory tower ideas and ivory tower solutions and stick them up your ass.
Basically, you know how our countries have gypsies right? Now imagine that EVERYWHERE YOU GO there's fucking gypsies everywhere.

So you haven't lived with them and base your viewpoints off of seconhand knowledge and brief observations while you live in a safe little town whose only real problem is a nonwhite group that occasionally makes things uncomfortable. I understand not taking anecdotal evidence as gospel but relying entirely on theory is just as bad. You are basically doing the same thing as the polacks with their info graphics and statistics if you do. One anecdotal experience is one thing but an unbroken stream of them is quite another especially when you live it. Poor whites can be scum but most of them still value life to a point. The others do not. It means nothing to them. A methhead will kill you for money or because he has been up for a week and thinks you are a demon. The bangers will kill you just because you are there or to show strength to the young bloods coming up. There is a difference no matter how much you don't want to believe it.

Before you can use that argument, I'd like to see the statistics because I don't know them either and it's pointless to argue without them.

Funny.


Why, though? The game is shit, nobody actually played it to talk more than that about it. What do you expect anyone to say about it?


Uhuh, you're the one laughing either. Sure, champ.


And black people have inherent resistance to skin cancer and malaria. What now, untermench?


Sheer ignorance in that post.
Rhodesia was strictly economical in how it was handled for instance.
Lots of property was owned by white people that did not even lived there. They used the land and the resources available to get rich and barely contributed to the local economy, people that weren't even native from there.
They were "evicted" strictly for that, because niggers wanted their freedoms too.
It was a bad move on their part (can't expect more from niggers) but in the end it was either slave away for foreign boss or starve alone but free.

You'd think that the faggots always complaining about muslims invading their country or globalist jews owning everything would understand Rhodesia better than normalfaggots.
When even niggers understand this better than you, that's truly embarassing.

How does that have anything to do with what I said, catamite?

I have family in Paris too, I've visited them, saw the streets and I hear my uncle complaining about them all the time as well.
They are a problem indeed but simply staying at that level doesn't do anything. Focusing strictly on their race solves nothing.

Why are they there, who invited or created conditions for them to show up? German needs workers and America needs cheap labor, that's what actually contributed to their respective "invasions". What about France? That's what you should focus instead.


They're the biggest drug dealers around, they constantly rob and steal from anyone else and pretty much all gun crime is related to them. Maybe that's just "unconfortable" for americans.

I guess I should've added trigger warning: fun in the OP, then? I got a fondness for sneaking around and peppering (cave)men with arrows, and the way this game handles that is rather fun. Now I happen to agree completely on the detective vision bullshit, and one of the things I liked in survivor is how you can get rid of all that prompt/ui shit. Navigate with pets, eyes and ears only. One more time: fun.

The whole Holla Forums thing though? Nice strawman. I'd imagine it's even worthy of actual Holla Forums.


Going by the recent trend I doubt I'd see much of a difference even if I did.

It's always about cheaper workforce, but almost all end up on government handouts instead when they figure out that it makes more sense to be on the dole than to work (doesn't take that much time).

Don't even pretend we are on the same side.

Funny how the problem of fatherless niglets didn't start until after the Civil Rights movement.

Affirmative Action.

They can be doctors and engineers in Africa. I seem to recall Africa needs plenty of those.

Oh, okay, so you admit you're strawmanning.

Gone, as in back to Africa.

So that is all you had to rebut with? "Well we get robbed and they shoot some people every once in a while. We aren't savages like you burgers with your exponentially higher amount of minorities." I envy you in a way that you can afford to think like this and be so smug about it. Enjoy your quiet french town. Hopefully you will never have to experience anything that might change your viewpoints on this. No sarcasm I really mean that.

Isn't this how capitalism has always worked? The British built railways in India to benefit themselves. The Indians build steel works in Britain to benefit themselves. Whenever I hear the line "they only did stuff in our country to generate riches for themselves" I'm always left wondering whether the end of colonialism has actually yielded much of a change.

Farcry 2 is underrated as fuck tbh.

I don't care about Holla Forums vs Holla Forums discussions, I just want to talk about cavemen, so here's a random question.

How far where the Neanderthals from learning the secrets of farming and domesticating animals?

Of course we cohabited with neanderthals, how else would all non-africans have neanderthal DNA?

"When our ancestors first migrated out of Africa around 60,000 years ago, they were not alone. At that time, at least two other species of hominid cousins walked the Eurasian landmass—Neanderthals and Denisovans. As our modern human ancestors migrated through Eurasia, they encountered the Neanderthals and interbred. Because of this, a small amount of Neanderthal DNA was introduced into the modern human gene pool.

Everyone living outside of Africa today has a small amount of Neanderthal in them, carried as a living relic of these ancient encounters. A team of scientists comparing the full genomes of the two species concluded that most Europeans and Asians have between 1 to 2 percent Neanderthal DNA. Indigenous sub-Saharan Africans have none, or very little Neanderthal DNA because their ancestors did not migrate through Eurasia."

Also, neanderthals were most likely neets, socially inept, autistic and more intelligent than homo sapiens. There is a direct correlation between the amount of neanderthal DNA you have, and your risk for developing autism. It also correlates to higher intelligence.

So basically the entire myth of strong dumb cavemen-neanderthals is completely backwards. They were weird cavenerds who the Chad-Sapiens wiped out.

Rhodesia was the breadbasket of Africa, it exported and fed all neighboring countries, but leftists like the cuck you're quoting couldn't tolerate such blatant racism and had to fuck it up and give the negro his "freedom". Now they're a starving shithole and another example of leftists being wrong about everything.

You'll note he bitches and moans about whites being in negro lands, but is fighting tooth and nail to justify niggers living in white lands. As always, the Marxist only cares to harm whites.

He's the stereotypical leftist cuck. Middle class family, not particularly religious but with a Christian identity, parents vaguely making an effort to virtue signal, raised in quite French town away from all the enrichment, swallow the Jewish semen he sees on TV whole and thinks them dumb white rednecks are a problem and whites in America are all inbred hillbillies going negro hunting on the weekend.

Any and every time a mudshit decides to enrich his generous hosts he'll shrug his shoulders, call it a (((coincidence))), an unrelated incident that has nothing to do with importing the whole of the third world into France and reinforce his contempt for his white peers, because he's obviously better than them, he knows the truth, all these niggers and mudshits are just poor and downtrodden by the white man, that's why they decided to shoot up a night club or run over white people with a truck.

It's white people, their colonialism and invisible, institutionalized racism to blame.

Different races genetically have different levels of susceptibility to diabetes, retard
Well only niggers like yourself believe in global warming or "overdependence" on fossile fuels and muh alternative energy
Well "several" is just about as vague as you can get. And nobody is claiming that there are no whites who do bad things. Whites who betrayed their own race will be right next to the kikes and niggers on the day of the rope.
Well, yeah, actually, I am more afraid of being killed, robbed, or assraped by a violent nigger, than I am about any of the non-issues and myths that you listed.

Are we not going to talk about cavemen?

We're talking about niggers, aren't we?

We were but the thread is lost to Holla Forums and Holla Forums fuckfaces now.

It's just frustrating to have someone tell you that your entire life experience is invalid because theoretical reasons.

All I know is that scientists believe they hadn't domesticated animals and that homo sapiens partnership with Wolves helped to out hunt them.

Black people aren't cavemen.

How you fucking dare insulting cavemen?

Sure, what do you want to know about cavemen, my man?
Here's a fun fact for starters: Generally, back in the days of hunter-gatherer societies, if you survived infancy you had a pretty high chance to live a relatively long life compared to when certain societies transitioned into agriculture.
Some reasons include lower nutritious value and low diversity of food consumed in agricultural societies, much higher chance of illness due to cohabitation with animals

Interesting. I just wanted to know for some unrelated stuff about cavemen surviving and expanding into the beginnings of the bronze age.


Weren't sapiens many more than Neanderthals? pushing them away from their hunt lands because they were outnumbered and the sapiens behaved like niggers.


Then let's talk about cavemen more.

It's just his feefees, he has fuckall to prove any of his claims. The best he's come up so far is "my gay trip to Paris" and "they're poor".

Hopefully the cockroach got the hint and fucked off.


So why did some tribes decide to stop being nomadic and settle down? Surely there must have been great advantages to justify such a drastic departure from their previous lifestyle.

One of the theories is that humanity in some parts of the world reached the cap in population where they were no longer able to sustain themselves off of hunting/gathering alone, so they had to start producing food themselves. This is even more amplified in some parts of the world, such as the Americas, where humans made many species of megafauna extinct. If you want to learn more, I suggest you look up the event known as the Neolithic Revolution.

Agriculture takes fewer people to feed the same amount of people. So instead of everyone hunting/gathering, some people were free to specialise, leading to artisans, merchants etc

This is more of a consequence of agriculture rather than the cause. What you described is the cause of why civilizations develop from agricultural societies.

I guess because you might or you might not find food in the woods, but you can at least have a decent source of food by farming?

no idea if it is legit but I read that a lot of early communities formed because it was easier to brew alcohol to get wasted on in large stationary groups

I remember watching a video by Lindybeige about horses, and the point he was making was basically who could have been crazy enough to figure out you could domesticate a horse and use it as a form of transportation.

I wonder the same for agriculture. Who figured out you could use seeds from plants, put them in a field and then grow them for food. Hell, it's even more outlandish when you take selective breeding into account.


But didn't our nomadic ancestors follow herds of animals around and hunt those?

Maybe they figured out it was much easier to just farm food than to chase it, also with much more success.

Farming and raising animals provides a consistent source of food, which is the reason for settling down. Early settlements were however a lot more "nomadic" in the sense that the village might move location every few years for better pasture or if a better place was found. Real permanent settlements, that eventually became cities, came later.

There's plenty of games that do exactly that but better. Dishonored scratches that itch very well, as do Thief games.
Previous Farcry games are still superior to this. You can have some fun with it, but it grows dull very, very fast.
Seriously, heavily modded Skyrim gives you mostly the same experience.

That's because it is. Holla Forums has a lot of crossposters that visit Holla Forums but their taste in videogames is alongside of "what's popular among people that hate popular things" and they spend more time talking and making memes about the franchises they love than actually playing or apreciating them.


That's not what I meant. Imigration is like growing plants, you need proper condition for the right type of plant including weeds.
Where did all the muslims came from and why? France isn't the paradise hub for good jobs that pay well for you to work on from 30 to 50 and then retire back to your country. Hasn't been so for a very long time. Then why did so many people took the time to travel and settle there? You need to find an actual explanation for this in order to begin solving the problem.


Partizanship.

Chaging the goalposts, we were talking about crime, not fatherless children.

That's no different than lynching because of skin color, it's just an action you take based on an arbitrary quality due to heavy generalizations.
What about we deport people that commit crimes and hire people that study and are qualified instead of saying it's as easy as deporting all black people instead?

Nationalism versus Patriotism, I guess.


Yes, it's one of the problems in Capitalism. That it allows for a fledgling industry to settle in a country but magically not really produce wealth there because the headquarters and the owners don't live or pay taxes there.
It's basically legal slavery because they still pay a salary but it's barely enough to get by and set by 3rd world standards. (that's why they settle there in the first place)


The leftist didn't do shit, niggers did.
And in case you never though about this for longer than 5 seconds, food doesn't simply flow one way without money coming the otherside. Rhodesia wasn't just freely distributing food around, it was selling it to every nearby country and pooling all the wealth it generated into the hands of foreigners that weren't even africans.

Wether they have the right to keep it or not, that's a very different discussion. But it's understandable that the niggers would get angry at the situation and would try to retake their land from them.
This is no different than you fags and your hatred for jewish-owned corporations but because you're not black suddendly it's a whole different business.

Yes, food security is higher in agricultural societies, but paradoxically it's at the same time lower. You do have a much stabler food source in a plant or animals you grow yourself than an animal that runs around and may even become extinct if you hunt too many of them, but a bad harvest or a swarm of locusts could fuck up your whole food supply, leading to mass starvation.


I'm pretty sure humans knew that plants grow from seeds, just because their minds were more primitive doesn't mean that they were fucking retarded, they did have knowledge of how some things worked in nature. But yeah, I think that humanity's willingness to experiment is one of the reasons why a long time ago they thought "Hey, maybe we can somehow grow all this food ourselves if we just try to replicate what happens in nature, but with a degree of control".
Same with selective breeding, I think that they understood that for example if a tall man and tall woman bred, they had a substantially higher chance to have offspring which are tall, so they just took the same principle and used it for the breeding of animals.

Oh right, OP. About Cavemen.
There was a game that was canceled and never made called B.C. or something that looked really rad from the videos.
I'm sure some people will hate Primal because it doesn't live up to what that game could have been.

Shorter than that, the best I can recommend is Populous which is a neat game but it's Sapiens, not strictly cavemen and maybe Empire Earth.
The first ages in Empire Earth are actual cavemen with slingers, clubmen, javaliners for an army, berry pickers and hunters for gathering food and even shamans to release plagues and volcanos. It's a pretty fun game.

Could big beasts like woolen Rhinos be selectively bred to make domestic Rhino cows?

Theoretically yes, but for an animal to be domesticated the two most important factors to consider are the initial timidness of the animal towards humans when first encountered in the wild, and their willingness to breed in captivity. There are more factors, but if you don't have the mentioned two, then you sure as shit won't be fulfil the rest.

I've heard the theory that, in their constant travel, humans backtracked or re-visited a lot of places.
Then someone noticed that plants grew where they left seeds or at least remains of their food.

From that point, they then had the idea of planting things somewhere before moving on so they had food awaiting for them when they came back. They didn't planted seeds, they planted the whole fruit too.

It was only when they could produce enough food this way that the need to travel for more resources slowly eroded and they stayed in the same location because the initial harvest gave them too much to lug around but enough to last until the new harvest.
Possibly, if they only left when the food was critically low, then at some point the new harvest was ready before their previous stocks were consumed, so it wasn't necessarily a conscious decision, just a natural consequence from abundance of food.

There's also an RTS called Paraworld, I'm not much into RTSs myself, but my brother used to play it a whole lot, so it has to be at least fun. Here's one of the game's selling points - imagine your standard cavalry unit, now put them on dinosaurs.

isnt their a better version of this where civilization catches fire while the dindu is holding it and then he tells the white guy "this is your fault"

And leftardpol gets humiliated in another thread, who would have thought that?

Could these fucktards finally get out of Holla Forums and just stay in their whoremom's basement?

That's interesting. There were so many interesting and giantic primitive beasts that it coudl've been cool to see them tamed and farmed.

Didn't cows come from a huge protobull called Auroch?


There are so many things that you could do without any particular skill or knowledge…

If you guys had the chance to travel back in time to the prehistoric era with a database of all basic knowledges and tutorials about metalurgy and farming, would you do it and have a harem of cavewomen waifus?

Most likely not, biggest factor being how much those things have to eat. Herbivore animals can't really eat that much and stay in the same location for long, they roam to find newer sources of food.
Either you'd have a very large agricultural complex to feed the rhinos or they'd starve\stampede out.

That's logistics, then there's their ability to actually be tamed. Wild animals can't be tamed at all and even when handled as docile from their birth, it's still never 100% certain. Australia has a problem with faggots trying to keep dingos as pets for instance, and dead babies are the result quite often.


Oh that looks fun. Somewhat similar in graphics style to Spellforce, I wonder if it shares devs.
I saw someone recomending it on other threads, I'll have to check it out.

Oh, if you're big on spiritism, there's Dust. It's a puzzle sandbox game where you terraform the world to allow your tribe to progress. It doesn't have much to do with cavemen economis and warfare but the aesthetic is pretty cool.

So everybody should be allowed to live in white countries, causing harm to white people, so that they can "live in the right soil"? When a small group of white people move to a place with supposedly bad "soil", like for example, the Boers in South Africa, and they suddenly produce a massive food surplus and a much better society than the surrounding area, and blacks from all over the continent were migrating thousands of miles on foot to get to South Africa so that they could live as "second class citizens" in this "racist society", what does that say for your idiotic idea about "good soil" and "bad soil"? Furthermore, you act as though this "soil" aka culture/society, just falls out of the sky, created by a deity or something. In reality, a race of people in a certain area create their culture, society, and thus the vast majority of their envrionment, by behaving the way they're inclined to do. People's genetically-inclined behavior is obviously what causes them to create their culture/society/environment the way that they do, because the structure of the brain decides how any living creature does anything.

They came from a savage, violent, shitty society, which was created by muslims themselves. But I'm sure you have some idiotic idea that white people are somehow at fault for muslims being violent savages, and then you will proceed to demand that others disprove yet more of your baseless speculation on countless random environmental factors that couldn't possibly be magically forcing shitskins to act violently.
Well France is obviously a wealthier country than whatever shithole they came from. Ripe for the plunder. And they get directly handed tons of taxpayer money in welfare checks, government housing, and government subsidies.

What the fuck are you talking about, you illiterate fucking retard? The guy was saying that blacks only become doctors or engineers because of affirmative action hiring dumb niggers over far-more-qualified whites, to fill diversity quotas.

Both of those are the exact same thing, in practice.

Great work creating a containment thread. Now people can discuss video games without political and racial shitflinging.

But couldn't you selectively breed them? to make giant cowsheeps to ride on.

Found it. From the URL, it was on Reddit


That reminds me of Haven&Hearth where there were Aurochs roaming around that you could tame to turn into cows.

Christ no! If I wanted a harem of sweaty, hairy, ugly asses I'd start a /nerdboys/ or something.


You are making a lot of generalizations and miscrousnting what I said while assuming motive and intention on my part.
I didn't said everyone should be allowed anywhere, I never talked about soil, I never and will never excuse the muslim society and I merely asked what happened in France that made it atract them.

America had those passes, the HB1 or something and they had a demand for cheap skilled labour, that much I know.
France however, despite being nearby, I don't know what happened there. The immigration in Europe kinda ended (but is restarting) a long time ago, where it was mostly mediterranean countries sending people up north when it was economically vantageous to work there.
I'm not defending the rights of anyone or anything, I'm asking what the fuck happened that lead to a lot of muslims thinking "You know what's a good idea? Treck across desert of sea to that land of the funny frogs and cheese".

Plenty of richer and wealthier countries closer to them than France, and plety of even more richer and wealthier like Germany instead. Why France specifically? What did the French do that atracted them?

I'll stop arguing with you every other Holla Forumsfaggot because discussing partizan politics on Holla Forums is just plain wrong.
Plus, the OP actually wanted to discuss cavemen, so let's stick to that.

The first picture makes me so sad I would enslave a whole race and save them from themselves.

No, of course not, you think that everyone should be allowed in white countries, as all cucks like you do, whether you admit it or not.

The answer is very simple: Because only white countries will allow them in The governments of white nations open the borders up to these violent foreigners for many reasons. Not the least of them, is because non-whites are guaranteed votes for the leftist party to get into power. Then once these leftists politics are in place, that includes bringing in even more immigrants to vote for even more "take from whitey, give to me", and the politicians who support this now have an endless supply of voters to snuff out the angry white population. It's very self-fulfilling, you see.

"selective breeding" means sustaining several generations of unproductive animals, killing the ones that don't exhibit the traits you want and letting the others procreate.
It's not just RNG, it's something that takes a great investment over a long time and the more dangeroues and bigger the animal, the harder it is.

So you could in theory even domesticate a T-Rex. The question is, how many generations would it take and do you have enough b-list actors to sustain him?


Just to jungle the few neurons in your head a bit more… If black people aren't to be allowed in white countries, then why should white people be allowed in black countries? :^) Faggot…

I was expecting a socio-economic reason for France to open it's doors, something happening to it's demography after they kicked the gipsies or similar that actually provoked the "invasion". I'd even take the theory that it's revenge for all the weapons they sell there, staging a coup on France.

But if the only thing you're gonna post is regurgitate political propaganda someone threw up in your throat and parrot buzzwords left and right, then there's no point in keeping the discussion. It's disapointing to be honest.

Kill me fam

France imported a fuckton of Algerians after WWII because all their men died in the fighting, and Algeria was still French territory at the time.

Who's the one making assumptions about the other now? I never said that the blacks in South Africa had no right to ban whites. Excluding the fact that, when the Boers settled there, it was pretty much an empty expanse of free land, aside from a relatively small number of tribes that the Boers purchased land from, and continued to cooperate and trade with. If blacks want to ban whites from all of Africa, and stop white farmers from creating a huge food surplus that prevents tons of starvation, then more power to them. I do think it's pretty fucked up that the niggers went around mass-murdering and raping innocent white farmers, though. Despite what jokes I might have made about the "day of the rope", or what many other Holla Forumsacks might believe, I personally think mass deporation and/or quarantined shitskin zones are the real answer to race problems in white countries, not mass murder. But blacks always instantly resort to murder and rape the moment they get the chance, so I wouldn't personally cry too many crocodile tears if things DID come to exterminating the blacks/muslims/etc.

Because you need some overly-complex, round-about, nonsensical explanation/==justification== for why leftists (which are composed mainly of non-whites, primarily jews, and a minority of self-hating whites who have white guilt complexes and desperately wish they were brown trans-women), would want to "diversify" white nations. Leftists openly talk about how they hate white people, and love diversity, and want more immigration. And obviously the immigrants aren't going to turn down an offer to go to a nice, white country, ripe for the plunder.

France opened its doors for the same reason every white country opens its doors to immigrants. You're moronic for thinking that every single white country had some individually specific, good reasoning for bringing in a bunch of immigrants. The reality is this: Non-whites obviously vote for immigration because they hate whites, and self-hating whites obviously support immigration because.. they hate whites. YOU support immigration because you hate whites, and because you're a simple-minded cuck.

It's funny. Because Trump wants to build a wall along Mexico and everyone calls him the next Hitler. MEANWHILE IN ZIMBABWE THIS HAPPENS AND NO ONE SAYS SHIT.

Oy vey, how dare you stop vibrant Hispanics from illegally coming over the border to steal jobs, drive wages to shit and rape white women!

Racist! Bigot! Hitler!

skyrim could have been good
but they just somehow did everything wrong
animations are good, but the combat is so bland with hardly any mechanics to it
there's only a bit of snow to the north/northeast, everywhere else it's just a lot of grey-green. and there's no variety to the wildlife at all - deer/wolf/mammoth/skeever/bear/fox/sabertooth cat thing . with mods you can at least add more
dragons are only a thread for the first 5 levels or so, after that you can just kite them and shoot them down, or even go in melee and it wouldn't matter, they hardly do any damage to be a threat.
no to mention that they would have been better as actual dragons instead of wyrms

Every time I see this picture, I bask in the irony.

Get Terrafirmacraft for Minecraft. It's an overhaul mod that gives you something very close to the Dark Ages and is autistically detailed. A pretty good mod.


Well there you go. That was what I was looking for.
So it's just a case of losing males and needing a quick replacement, then? America did that with women and got feminism, France did it with algerians and now they have muslims.
Well you can chalk that one up to Hitler then, I guess.


It wasn't a smart move on their part at all, but what can you expect from dumb revolutionaries? All they want is to "own the means of production", even if they have no fucking idea what they are gonna do with them afterwards.

There's a fundament to their initial stance, they didn't wanted someone else getting rich at their expense, even if they were winning a little bit with it. But they made a decision based on principles and ideology, not practical results and everyone there suffered from that.

Guess what would happen if all jews where kicked out of america…

Also, nobody says a damn thing because the white people that were evicted are not the underdogs. They are capitalist pigs that force the niggers to pick cotton and mine diamond for them, how could you root for them?
The wall is bad because it affects all these powerless people and you look a lot better defending those instead.


Hunterborn kinda fixes that. Kinda.

How horrible! They gave niggers jobs and fed them. What complete monsters!

Now niggers can starve and beg white people to get back, but the leftists are okay with it because they showed whitey who's boss once again.

jesus christ, gerard depardiou is still acting? i thought he'd have retired by now
he looked old back in the days, how the fuck does he still look the same

...

...

The Samson Option.

kek

You're no different than communists, always beliveing in your own utopia…


That's a more realistic scenario, but it wouldn't even take that.
From everyone else (especially every other jew) refusing to trade with America to the very large amount of unskilled people now running for the vacant offices and the ensuing confusion, America would doom itself very fast on it's own.

Perhaps the biggest change would be inner states that produce the food places like New York consume refusing to supply them or spiking prices, ruining the metropolitan lifestyle most people enjoy.
This isn't necessarily bad but it wouldn't be pacific at all…

...

Just like Nazi Germany's economy went to the crapper right after they kicked out all those pesky Jews which made Weimar Germany the richest land in all of Europe, right?

...

I'm too lazy to quote all the times you've said this nonsense in this thread. Immigrants are not filling any super-important roles in society that white people couldn't fill the shoes of, you imbecile. What exactly is it that you think shitskins are so skilled at that white people won't be able to do? Mow lawns? Play basketball? Deposit welfare checks?

...

Rape white women and kill white people. It's why he wants them in Western countries, leftists are far too bourgeois to dirty their own hands.

Holy Kek.

You do, and that's the problem. You don't want a Rhodesia in america, you first must not need them.


Jews did not held as much of the economy from Germany as they do in America, especially since England or France were better economies to seriously invest in at the time.
Apples to Oranges.


Assuming intent again. I never said I want them here.
What I want is figure out why some people want them here, solve that problem in a way that doesn't involve importing masses of culturaly incompatible barbarians and be done with the problem.
If the problem is lack of offspring or a disenfranchising with the education from the youth, than that's something that needs to be handled ASAP, but you don't handle it by stranglign jews or burning niggers and you certainly don't handle it by distrcting everyone with your crazy racist hijinks, reinforcing the idea that maybe it's not such a bad idea to take them in.

I was gunna give this braindefect shit a legit response, but I know we're on 8chn so it's bait for sure.

There is no way to tell a baiting troll and a genuine leftist apart.

South Africa: Whites providing massive food surplus, relatively VERY orderly and safe society compared to the rest of Africa. Blacks bite the hand that feeds them, massacre and rape many innocent white farmers, then run their farms into the ground

America: Jews provide what, exactly, to white people?

Now THAT'S an appropriate place to say "Apples to Oranges"


This is not, and makes no fucking sense. Getting rid of jews in Germany (predictably) was good for them. So if jews control and leech off of even more wealth in the US, then getting rid of jews would be even more of a benefit in the US than it was in Germany.

If you somehow find Far Cry Primal's gameplay fun, none of that shit should detract from your enjoyment of the game.

As a general rule, you shouldn't allow yourself to get into a position where the political beliefs of a creator influence your opinions on their work (again, unless the game has an overt focus on story and/or characters), because you're going to be hardpressed to find games/films/books/etc you enjoy otherwise.

sage for double post

Further elaborating on my previous point: You say South Africa and the US are parallel: with South Africa it was blacks who needed whites, but now in the USA, apparently it's whites who need jews. I can only fathom that your idiotic reasoning for this is because "durr, whites were the wealthy upper-class in South Africa, and jews are the wealthy upper-class in the US! Therefore jews are just as necessary to the wellbeing of whites in the US, as whites were to the wellbeing of blacks in Africa, because they're a wealthy upper-class!" This is an obvious non-sequitur, but that comes as no surprise from cucks like you.

In reality, the reverse is much more true, that the jews are like the blacks in Africa, and just like every other non-white race that leeches off white countries. They're the ones taking refuge in white nations, not the other way around.

Something something, if you can't tell sarcasm from being serious, something something autism.
Coincidentally, SJW's don't understand jokes, humor, metaphors or sarcasm either.
But that can't possibly be true since the horseshoe theory is just a myth!


This. If polical stances of the creators bother people, than they never cared for their work to begin with, they enjoyed them as a form of virtue signaling.
It's the reason you can still play Dwarf Fortress despite Toady's overly liberal ideas and userbase.

If only said creators didn't shove their leftists politics in their work and didn't sperg out on twitter like petulant children each time someone opposed them.

But of course, it's our fault for not being tolerant enough and letting them wish for our deaths. What bigots we are.

Or maybe it's just that you can't properly speak the english language and you come across as an illiterate retard. It's seriously difficult to glean what meaning you're trying to convey with most of the mindless shit that you gibber out.

Stick to speaking your native language, Stinky. You're not any good at English.

...

Oy vey.

...

This annoys me too, yeah, but unless the story and/or characters are a big part of a game, it shouldn't factor into the game's quality.

Far Cry Primal is shit because its gameplay is derivative, shallow and does nothing new that hasn't been done better before even within the same series, not because of the things OP listed.

Irrelevant in regards to a game's quality, though if they're the type to do that sort of thing then it's doubtful that they're capable of making a good game anyway, sure.

Let's just wait a few days after this thread is gone and start again without Holla Forumsposting in the OP and thus not attracting the Holla Forums and Holla Forums cancer that's killing the board but is stupid enough to think it's saving it reducing threads into arguments that aren't videogames because them egos. Because let's face it when the spastics start screaming the only relief is to let the shortbus crash.

Thread filtered because I'm not a garbageman and thus don't belong around such trash that makes up most of this thread now.

But it should. It's their decision to politicize their work that forces people like me to then comment on it. We didn't start this shit, they did, and they have no wish to stop and will only get bolder as time goes on. Silence is consent.

Why does it have to be one or the other? It's obvious enough that games have evolved to have an important narrative component integral to the product. People certainly view a game's story as an important aspect that can impact the quality of the overall experience, so it's only fair to comment on it as well.

If I can dislike a movie like Birth of a Nation for the nigger cocksucking going on I can just as well dislike Primal for shoveling it's anti-white narrative in my face.

You're obviously barking up the wrong tree. We didn't create the problem, we didn't drag politics into games, we aren't the ones telling the majority demographic to just die, so why should we be the ones to shut up and take it in the ass like good little goyim?

It's relevant when they make it fucking difficult to ignore their opinions because they're screaming and throwing shit all over the place. As an example, Avellone is a leftist cuckold, but he's not out there screeching about it at every opportunity.

Your pic reminded me of this that might please OP and anyone looking for something similar.

Nobody forced you to come online and sperg out about it triggers you. You chose to do so.

You don't understand capitalism. Silence with your wallet is not consent.

No one here is lefty though.

Its really amazing how Holla Forums has just brought so many newfaggots here and it shows in post quality.

This board originates from 4chaim, where hate nigger threads on Holla Forums happened daily, Holla Forums would scream NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER whenever a black character was shown, where rape and beating women was joked about daily.

Somehow in your newfaggot mind, this is a prime breeding ground for liberals, despite the board having culture and history STEEPED in everything a liberal hates, somehow there are fucking liberals under the floorboards, in the attic and behind every post you dislike.

Fucking Holla Forumsacks are dead, stormfag has replaced them and their cancer fucking kills everything.

To top it off you guys are like 4chaim cucks, you have a moderator who does it for free, admits he doesn't care about the board, admits that he bans people for shits and gigs, and you guys just bend over to take the fat moderator dick, to new to know why we left 4chaim for the exact same reason.

I don't recall us making countries for vermin.

STILL GOING

Also to top it off, you have done fucking literally nothing, 4chaim Holla Forums managed to fuck over Buzzfeed and CNN.

Meanwhile you niggers made a video which was taken down because you didn't get the pertuburators permission to use his music, then you nigged out when he didn't allow you use his music.

And yet, if you would actually read the thread, there are multiple triggered cucks who are scrambling to excuse/justify inserting liberal propaganda into videogames, and mass immigration into white countries. Oh but everyone on Holla Forums are the edgiest guys from 4chan, who say "nigger" sometimes, so there certainly couldn't be a single cuck here.

It's partizans, user. It's what they do. They need an oposition to fight otherwise they have no purpose in life. And when there's no oposition, they'll find one.
It's no wonder the great majority of them are Americans or that witchhunts are arguments to them.
They can't even compromise with centrists because they aren't mental carbon copies of rightwing, despite both agreeing on multiple points.

They'll go to whatever extent to rationalize and assume whatever they want to justify, including "knowing" what the oposition thinks.
Just consider that in this thread I never said I agree with the muslim migration and in fact I'm actually against it, but multiple posters will assume the oposite and actually use it as an argument. Because of course, if I don't agree with them 100% then I must disagree 100% and want everything they don't want.
Again, this is how partizans work and think and the one reason they should be banned from everywhere but their containment board.

Ouch, that's gonna touch a nerve.


I don't recall you ever MAKING a country. Maybe fucked off from your previous one and stole one that was lying around.

it should be vaustism

No there are people who actually understand history who are discussing things with people who would rather scream
LEFTY CUCK
Then actually make an argument as why they are wrong.

This is why Holla Forums should of never happened, people need opposition in Holla Forums now it has become hugboxes on both sides.

Holla Forums isn't even a hugbox anymore, it's Trump flavored Holla Forums
posting quality there imploded over the last year and a half, I really wouldn't be surprised if the board dies after Trump is revealed to be same old same old

That's literally how every country is made.

Why are you even still here after you got utterly humiliated and now won't even reply to the posts that BTFO'd you? Sad!

They do it every time.

Funny because your butt-buddy there that you're circle-jerking with, is the one who has had to be schooled many times throughout the thread on his wildly inaccurate bullshitting about history/immigration throughout the thread. He just pulls vague half-truths (or outright falsehoods) about historical events relating to race-relations/immigration out of his ass, and gets repeatedly proven wrong by people who actually know more about politics and history. But you'll invalidate someone's entire argument just because they call you a cuck, because you're a cuck

Funny. I haven't claimed or said anything to put me on either end of the spectrum other than point out your hypocrisy.

They're not. Have you tried living as a white person in Africa or the Middle East? They will not welcome you.

Horseshoe theory is just the left's attempt to engage in false equivalence. The only recourse left to them these days is to masquerade as is to attempt and drag the opposition to their level by claiming they're equally bad. It's pathetic.

I don't think I've seen many examples of people calling "reverse SJW" on others, that reached harder than this.


Next these cucks will be saying that the only way to avoid being a reverse SJW is to stop breathing, because SJWs breathe.

You're on the spectrum alright…

Oh it definitely is ImKampfy is still there.
I highly doubt this, if he was they wouldn't of tried to block him so hard.

Sure thing bud.
I've seen Holla Forums stormfags claim to be against reporting and banning but then cry for someone to ban and report minutes later, and vice versa.

Yes, true, but the story's not an important part of Far Cry and never has been. Even when it got to 3&4 and the marketing seemed to make a big deal out of the villains, it's always been an excuse to shoot (or stab, in Primal's case) a bunch of mooks in an open environment that you can use to your advantage with some neat environmental technology in the background (the fancy water graphics in 1, the fire tech in 2, etc).

That's why I question letting the clearly slanted-to-the-left story of Primal ruining the game for anyone, because it should be a minor issue compared to how little the game has to offer when you compare it to every other barebones shooter with unnecessary crafting systems and open level "design" on the market right now.
Depends on what you mean by silence. Refusing to buy the game certainly isn't consent for them to keep pumping out shit like Primal and that's what I did.
And they shouldn't, because it's not.
I didn't insinuate any of this or that we should. All I've been saying is that it has no bearing on the most important part of a game, the gameplay, which is in the case of most vidya, and certainly an open world FPS like Far Cry, is the deciding factor in whether or not a it is good.

By all means complain about the story, by all means go directly to the writer's Twitter account and tell them how shit of a job they've done, but it's small potatoes compared to how bad the actual game part of the game is.


Agreed. Apart from when plastic paddies on Holla Forums glorify the IRA, which boils my blood both because I'm Irish and because a board of fascists praising a bunch of communist terrorists because they call themselves 'nationalists' is fucking ridiculousness of the highest order I haven't posted there in months. Pre and post-election Holla Forums are very different places.

You're 31 posts into having a Holla Forums vs Holla Forums debate on fucking Holla Forums. Where people just want to talk about how shit Farcry is now.

Where did this meme come from? I've never heard of it. Please refrain from pulling shit out your ass.

For that to happen someone would actually have to defend Holla Forums
Its just Holla Forums being upset someone disagrees with them, engaging in debate, losing said debate then shitposting in rage, while accusing everyone under the sun as Holla Forums

THEY ARE HUGBOXES WHY DO THEY BAN ME IF I DINDU NUFFIN

Can someone explain to me the point of /meta/ anything seems regardless of how much documented evidence is brought against a moderator ImKampfy is still mod.

Also none of those things are true, you can go on Holla Forums and see several people breaking rules and no one gets banned except that guy who says something against the board approved narrative.

Oh right your retarded shouldn't expected much.

..what in the fuck does that have to do with anything that I said? Is your argument that I must be a double-thinking retard because I go on Holla Forums? I seriously don't get it. You seem to share your butt-buddy's inability to communicate properly

Nothing, I just enjoy shitting on Holla Forums stormfags.
You're basically the 4cucks of this board.

You got moderators who do it for free, and you just bend over and take it, or better yet defend them.

So your argument then is that Holla Forums has shit taste because they don't like being fed leftist propaganda? That's pretty much all of Holla Forums, buddy. Go tell niggergate to play a game where you kill all white males just because the controls are well made.

This doesn't mean they don't play any other games or would refuse to play a game that has "good gameplay" while still not full of cuckold porn. Also, a nice aesthetic and lore can very well make a game worth playing. It doesn't have to have whatever your vague definition of "good gameplay" is. How well movement and guns are handled is not all that matters in a videogame, despite what your autism is telling you.

Also just because someone cares about one aspect doesn't mean they don't care about any others.

Your post reminds me a lot of that blacked copy pasta where the guy defends the videos because of the lighting and production quality.

And here is the saging angry faggot mad others have hot opinions he can't agree with.
You scream leftist propaganda even when none exists.
You remind of my Uncle who can't watch satire making fun of leftists because he thinks its actual leftist propaganda.

Yes its all one big conspiracy to subvert the mind of 2000 people here.

Oh, you. Is this the new famposting?

Any proof for your claims? Thought so. I'm saging because this is a shit thread and the OP is retarded.

So you believe no games have leftist propaganda? That's a good one.

How did you even get that out of my post? I'm saying your reasoning is similar.

confirmed for not knowing what sage does
He's generally referring to guys being pissed off about leftist propaganda in videogames. Are you saying there is no leftist propaganda in videogames?

No, you autistic retard. You confirm with every fucking post that you have the reading comprehension of a nigger. You seem to think that he's saying that the other guy was secretly promoting race-mixing or something of that nature. But he's making the comparison to the guy who defends blacked videos because they have "good production quality", in the same way you cucks will defend videogames full of anti-white, anti-male, leftist propaganda because "hurrdurr it has good mechanics"

user, even Hitler was to the left of you.

I just want to point out how retarded this comment is.
Its also incredibly typical of the newfriend stormfag.
There is plenty of evidence. Which I will post and you will of course accuse of shitposting despite nothing in the post being shitposts but a debate with someone on Holla Forums

Where did I say that, qoute me.

Because of things already listed Holla Forums thinks everyone who disagrees with them is the boogeyman of the month.


Not bumping threads? What do you think it does?
No just that not everything is leftist propaganda, which is what I said but apparently not what you read.

Saying the guy who claimed I was denying the existence of all leftist propaganda despite me never saying that?
Wew lad.

Pic related, also bonus pic of Holla Forums defending shitty games.

Why are you getting so mad about saging, then, unless you think it's a reddit upboat?

Again I have to explain why it's actually your illiteracy and inability to clearly convey things that is at fault here, not PEOPLE MAKING BASELESS ASSUMPTIONS ABOUT YOUR ARGUMENT!!

The user you replied to said:

So he's clearly referring to leftist propaganda in videogames in general, however much (or little) there may be.

So you replied, saying:
Which strongly implies that you think there is no leftist propaganda in videogames, and that he's seeing leftist propaganda where there is none. So, if you admit that there IS leftist propaganda in videogames, then how is he seeing leftist propaganda that isn't there, you fucking moron?

He's just triggered by Holla Forums and butthurt he got banned, he has no arguments besides a stick up his butt

AND HE WILL NEVER STOP

Don't they have a phone app in Iceland that tells you if you're related to someone, so you don't end up fucking a close relative?

Except you know the screencap of a moderator banning someone for no reason.
You sound identical to the 4cucks that defended hotpocketers.

No it means that you scream lefty propaganda when none exists.
No one is denying gone homo is lefty propaganda, but far cry having some semblance of historical accuracy you can't argue against is hilarious.

Are you the same nigger that was arguing as if we didn't have neanderthal DNA?

...

Why do leftists have such an obsession with bringing nonwhites into white countries? Why can't they just leave us alone?

Because whites are too privileged and are not allowed to experience life without shitskins raping and killing people. Also race doesn't exist, bigot

...

Why isn't this thread bumplocked? It's not about video games, it's about politics.

bump

5 star post. Hit the nail one he fucking head. Obviously triggered the fuck out of 4/pol/fags since anyone that was originally in our Holla Forums has long since ditched the shithole.

top fucking kek. You realize that these are fictional races/tribes, right? And that this doesn't have even a "semblance" of historical accuracy.
You really think there was any era in history where the whites were doing more savagery (and in particular, cannibalism, since niggers have a particular love of that)? I'd like to think that you have to be willfully obtuse and dishonest to say something like that, but I'm sure you're retarded enough to really believe that
No, but I'll argue with your dumb faggotry anyway. Autists like you always think that you're arguing with the same person.
Also, I have no idea what fucking relevance this neanderthal comment has to what I said, you just pulled that out of nowhere. Not only did I never claim that whites had no neanderthal admixture, but I never mentioned anything about that at all. Again you continue to gibber nonsense that is completely out of left-field and has nothing to do with the argument at hand. Retards like you often do have trouble conveying anything clearly, having reading comprehension issues, etc.
Now, on this subject of whites having neanderthal admixture.. so what? Not only were neanderthals not particularly dumb for their time, but actually it's the reverse, they were above-averagely advanced for their time.
Anti-white faggots like you often like to bring up that whites have neanderthal admixture, as though white-skinned neanderthals were once the great savages while, at that era in time, there were advanced niggers who were smarter than them. This is just anti-white bullshit, and anyone who believes this is laughably incompetent. Considering that you randomly bring up that whites have neanderthal DNA, and say right after that Far Cry has historical accuracy, I'm guessing you also believe this bullshit about neanderthals. But I can't be quite sure because you're an autist who gibbers nonsense that never makes any sense. And you'll most likely use this vagueness in your claims to backpedal and act like you weren't saying that, like intellectually dishonest cucks do.
Also, asians have more neanderthal admixture than whites do. So why do cucks always proudly proclaim that whites, in particular, have neanderthal admixture, as though that's a bad thing? because they're anti-white faggots

This is such bullshit. You cucks who constantly defend libshit developers for their propaganda always say "oh don't judge a game on its politics, judge it on the merits of its gameplay!"
Devs inserting leftist propaganda into their games is a sure sign that it's a shit game. Why do people have to disregard the leftist propaganda? All that I need, to know that a game will be shit, is that it has libtard bullshit in it.
Also, reading this thread again, I just have to point out how hilarious it is that this faggot cuck who spent the whole thread defending immigration, denying race, defending leftist propaganda in games, etc. also believes that global warming not only exists, but that it's a more pressing issue than mass immigration of violent shitskins into white countries, where they commit widespread murder, rape, and other crime.

When has your supposed global warming killed anyone?

Comes as no surprise to me that he's a Minecraft fag, too


So you're only alright with people silently not paying for games, but when they try to spread awareness and criticism of shitty libtard dev bullshit, you then think they should be silent?

You cucks sure do like to endlessly talk about what people should and shouldn't care about. We shouldn't care about story/setting development in games, we shouldn't care about anti-white male propaganda being constantly pushed in our face. But no matter what bullshit you say, people will continue to care about it, faggots.
On topic of the thread, I've been wanting to bring up Killing Floor 2, which was recently released. I liked the original Killing Floor, particularly playing on the crazy, heavily-modded servers. When KF2 was in its early days, one of the first warning signs was that they were filling the game with disgusting dyed-hair, half-head-shaved, tattoed dykes as many of the characters (when the original KF spent most of its lifespan with no female characters at all, with all the male characters sharing the same voice). Then, in an incident that went down in infamy: Some fans of KF2 actually thought the disgusting tumblr dyke characters were attractive, and said on the KF forums that they were going to make nude/bikini models of them and mod it in for their server. Then, a staff member of Tripwire Interactive posted on the forums saying that they would ban anyone who did this and remove their server, and that they wouldn't tolerate this sexism on their game.
I'm sure cucks like the ones I've replied to above would be the ones saying "Oh, don't judge the game based on your political bias! Judge it by its merits when it comes out! Stop caring about all of that!"
But people did, and that was the main driving factor that made many people, including me, avoid supporting Tripwire any further and I later heard about what they did to the Red Orchestra 2 players. And I knew by these warning signs that KF2 would be garbage. also because they were using mocap. Incidentally, KF2 is shit.
Faggots like yourselves will defend what these libshit devs do, and say we "shouldn't care" about these things. More and more people continue to care about this leftist propaganda being dickwaved in their face at every turn, and are making a stance against it. And that triggers you cucks that white men are standing up against insults against them.

Are you guys mentally defective?
Holla Forums please, take your pills, you're sperging out hardcore.

...

Not even worth a pirate. And I say that from the perspective of not even having played it.

The wewuz and anti-white shit they force in every game now is so rage inducing that even if you were to mod the games to remove it, just knowing that these smug fucks developed it with for shekels ruins the whole thing.