Line Item Veto Fake News

Nathaniel Wood
Nathaniel Wood

You're going to be hearing a lot of kikenews bullshit like

HURR DURR TRUMP IZ SOOOOO DUM LINE ITEM VETOZ IZ UNCONSTPATUTANUL DURR DURR DUMMY DRUMPF DURR DURR

While a normie is stupid enough to believe this, and a boomer might pass this off as laziness, the jews are once again pissing themselves trying to meme away Trump's growing power.
H.R.4890 - Legislative Line Item Veto Act of 2006

This act is way to give the President a line veto that follows Constitutional guidelines:
the proposed Act would give the President the ability to single out "wasteful" spending and to put such spending on hold. While the spending line-item is on hold, the President can send legislation to Congress to withdraw the particular line-item. The proposal would then be considered in both houses within ten days on an up or down basis, and could be passed by a simple majority. Additionally, such proposals could not be filibustered.
When asked how this proposed legislation was different from the 1996 Line-Item Veto Act that the United States Supreme Court had declared illegal, Bolten said that whereas the former act granted unilateral authority to the Executive to disallow specific spending line items, the new proposal would seek Congressional approval of such line-item vetoes. Thus, for the President to successfully withdraw previously enacted spending, a simple majority of Congress is required to agree to specific legislation to that effect.

Something similar could easily be implemented for Trump, so tell the kikeshills to gobble cock somewhere else.

Attached: lineitemlies.png (119.72 KB, 627x709)
Attached: lliva2006.png (69.84 KB, 1168x664)

Jaxson Sullivan
Jaxson Sullivan

Bill Clinton was fond of this, but didn't the supreme court rule against its use?

Aaron Hall
Aaron Hall

They ruled against the non-legislative line item veto in the 90's. This is a completely acceptable alternative.

Colton Torres
Colton Torres

Intredasting. So he could use this act to put individual line items up for congressional vote, allowing him to challenge any part of the (((omnibus))) he doesn't like. This kind of goes along with something Mnuchin said.

Attached: almond-status-activated.jpeg (79.75 KB, 772x236)

Samuel Richardson
Samuel Richardson

If he knew this the entire time he wouldn't have wasted seconds (before - will veto!, during - I hate this bill, I'll never sign another, fuckin kikes need protection! and after - it starts on Monday!, mil will built it) trying to downplay how terrible the bill is.
- Muh kike protection funding
-"No there really is 1.6B in funding for a down payment"
- Muh tranny ban
- Muh army will build it.
Its obvious hes trying to memory hole this disaster and cant wait until people move on to the next disaster. Like having guns regulated out of existence.
What (((they))) really want is for people to become tribal and justify anything Trump does. Any war, any funding, whatever the kikes want. Instead americans should be up the politicians ass 24/7 and examine everything these scumbags sign onto regardless of party. Had these lazy ass boomers and their offspring taken this approach years ago americans wouldn't be in this mess.

Nathaniel Diaz
Nathaniel Diaz

What are the odds this nigger is (1) and done?

Justin Lewis
Justin Lewis

Call me when Trump actually does something, not just says he is.

John Sullivan
John Sullivan

Go gobble cock somewhere else.

Austin Flores
Austin Flores

Trump probably didn't do his due diligence with the bill, which just makes him look bad all around at best. It's clear that if he goes the way of invoking his line-item veto power, it's as damage control, not part of his original plan of pitching the bill to the American public or his secondary plan of raging against it and making empty threats.

Nathaniel Howard
Nathaniel Howard

T. Hooknosed short sighted schlomo

Michael Torres
Michael Torres

Great comeback.

Nathan Davis
Nathan Davis

media claims something is unconstitutional
even though they were defending Obama when he did it a couple years back
Trump does things anyway, challenge issued and dismissed by court
media's reputation as liars and propagandists is spread further
All according to keikaku.

Zachary Wright
Zachary Wright

Not just omnibus. The President could cancel specific provisions of any bill and force them back down to Congress. Attacking riders and pork isn't only important for today. If Trump is serious about setting America back on a path of greatness, the patriotic leaders who come after him will need this tool as well.

Attached: bill.jpg (38.22 KB, 565x407)

Luke Martin
Luke Martin

100% - another D&C yid

Benjamin Taylor
Benjamin Taylor

Good for Trump. Bad for the Republic. Obama abused the shit out of this too, so it is just comeuppance. But you'd want to shut this down so a future King Nigger couldn't do the same.

William Wood
William Wood

Well it's certainty a move forward. I wish the Faggots at Kikebart knew about this, or even better had everything turned against them.

William Phillips
William Phillips

The 2006 Act wasn't actually passed. OP is saying it could be implemented for Trump. It requires congress to approve a veto decision so it's incredibly weak anyway, and if you stacked Congress could prevent another Obongo from using it.

Angel Wood
Angel Wood

Trump probably didn't do his due diligence with the bill
He explicitly stated he didn't read the bill - though in fairness absolutely no one read the entire thing - but then he decided to sign it anyway. So retard congress passes black box bill and retard president knowing that, and having not read the bill himself, decides to sign it. Long story short the government is an absolute clusterfuck and they should all be dragged out into the street and shot.

Julian Powell
Julian Powell

Trump passes a "bad deal" in exchange for more military money and starting the wall
line item vetos every concession he gave the dems after the fact
gets to keep all of his wins and everything they dems wanted gets voted against with simply 51 votes, while it would take 60 votes to get rid of Trump's stuff
Trump gets a bunch of stuff he wanted with absolutely no concessions

I would kek so hard if this happened. He must have such brilliant advisers and lawyers if they're able to come up with this.

Elijah Bailey
Elijah Bailey

Considering Holla Forums doesn't support democracy it's not a big deal. If there ever is a future King Nigger then that's already a failure. The best case scenario in the event of a future King Nigger is one that is extremely corrupt and radical, so that people hate him a lot more. It's basically accelerationism and a plan B.

Joseph Stewart
Joseph Stewart

This is called a "Expedited Rescission" and it has been kicked around since the 1990s
When King Nigger got into power, everyone stopped talking about it immediately. I would be tempted to say that 50% of the media is too stupid to know about it, and the other 50% is crafty jews trying to hide it.

Attached: CNN2.jpg (11.03 KB, 300x220)

Julian Sanders
Julian Sanders

Lol'ing at fags who think this is a shill

You are right on the money dont let these clowns intimidate you

Jackson Reed
Jackson Reed

(1)

Disable AdBlock to view this page

Disable AdBlock to view this page

Confirm your age

This website may contain content of an adult nature. If you are under the age of 18, if such content offends you or if it is illegal to view such content in your community, please EXIT.

Enter Exit

About Privacy

We use cookies to personalize content and ads, to provide social media features and to analyze our traffic. We also share information about your use of our site with our advertising and analytics partners.

Accept Exit