Founding Father predicts race war

"Deep rooted prejudices entertained by the whites; ten thousand recollections, by the blacks, of the injuries they have sustained; new provocations; the real distinctions which nature has made … will divide us into parties, and produce convulsions which will probably never end but in the extermination of the one or the other race" Thomas Jefferson from "Notes on the State of Virginia"

Attached: tj.jpg (373x170, 6.65K)

Other urls found in this thread:

oll.libertyfund.org/titles/jefferson-the-works-vol-3-notes-on-virginia-i-correspondence-1780-1782
oll.libertyfund.org/titles/jefferson-the-works-vol-4-notes-on-virginia-ii-correspondence-1782-1786
charles-darwin.classic-literature.co.uk/the-descent-of-man/ebook-page-105.asp

Post the rest, there's a lot of good stuff in Jefferson's personal writings.

Even though this really doesn't deserve its own thread, I took the liberty pun intended of locating it.

oll.libertyfund.org/titles/jefferson-the-works-vol-3-notes-on-virginia-i-correspondence-1780-1782
oll.libertyfund.org/titles/jefferson-the-works-vol-4-notes-on-virginia-ii-correspondence-1782-1786

Thanks a lot.

If it makes you feel better, his generation and around it tried to solve the OTHER problem of the nation. But posterity didn't finish the job… They never do.

Attached: Dakota-Sioux-Raid_American-Indian-Pictures.jpg (896x648, 446.49K)

Regarding USA history, can anyone explain really fast why:

1. they did not kill all indians, it's not like they could be recorded by cameras while doing it. just shoot them and let the animals eat them.

2. they did not send the niggers back to africa

3. they accepted jewish immigrants

Which is why its important to remember your ancestors, but to never artificially raise them to some unhuman level of idol worship. They may have been wise but had cataclysmic flaws simultaneously like most of us do. Having the wisdom to see the inevitable, years, decades, or centuries ahead of time doesn't matter if nobody has the will to take action on the wisdom itself.

Tried, reduced the race to a shadow of itself.
No will for it after the Civil War just ended, also logistically difficult.
Because they were shortsighted retards.

They killed 90% of the Indians.
Some of the founders were funded by (((bankers))) or were part of the (((masons))).

See point 2.

Attached: ClipboardImage.png (378x479, 150.36K)

jews have a habit of pretending to be white in order to infiltrate nations. Which is made easier by the fact that many whites cannot tell the difference by sight alone.

So … people have been saying "race war's a'comin'" since the nation's founding and it STILL hasn't happened?

Hilarious.

1. Select American leader
2. Search "was X a freemason" on google
4. Repeat the process with another leader
3. Remember that Freemasonry's plan for the New World (which it knew about in advance of Columbus' voyage due to their access to esoteric knowledge from previous eras, see Piri Reis map etc.) was the establishment of a capitol for the New World Order of Zionism
Now you have your answer

Jews are also good at external assimilation - adopting the dress, hairstyles, languages, and sometimes even the names of the locals. I say external assimilation, because no matter how much they're able to look like us and sound like us, deep down inside, they think of themselves as Jews, and only Jews, and their interests will never coalesce with ours.

Alternatively you can say it wasn't happening because whites still controlled the state but that they saw a time when white rule would be diminished and a race war would become inevitable. The term "race war" is kind of a silly word when taking the word "war" from its logical understanding as an event that's supposed to happen and then history moves on. Putting it in its continual form where live is a never-ending race war makes the term accurate as it is inaccurate depending on the phrasing. Same word games when struggling to point out genocide. People have an artificial perception of what is classified as genocide ever since WW2 and if they don't see that through the right lens like in South Africa they can easily dismiss it entirely despite the phrasing being correct. Both accurate and inaccurate depending on the context and peoples perceptions of the Age in question.

The race war truly began after the Civil War when the North imposed black rule on the South to degrade the whites in the region. Once you gave the non-whites that sip of power they've focused on our position in the greater scheme of things far better than we have, which is why you had blacks in the 1910's, 20's, and 30's talking about in the future blacks will rule over whites here in America. They saw things far more clearly than your white intellectual did who was too busy mentally masturbating his ideas while he was dominant unable to see his eventually decline. We're paying for it ever since.

When we compare the High Culture and Primitives to one another each forget the power of the other because they aren't in-tune with what they currently are not. The primitive never forgets natures instincts or the struggle like the high culture types often do. Like wise the high culture depends on their intellectual assets to constantly "save the day" so to speak when they run into very dire problems. The high culture usually wins but destroys itself in the process and has to start all over. Is this going to be a non-stop circular cycle or are we flirting with fate playing Russian roulette? How many times can we play this before finally realizing what needs to be done or getting wiped out?

FOUND THE NIGGER

Attached: IMG_2981.JPG (1000x666, 427.65K)

Amen.

here's another good one

Attached: charles-darwin-425219.jpg (640x948, 142.06K)

Lincoln advocated for this but he was assassinated shortly after the civil war.

Wow what a great quote! I'm taking a class where we recreate the constitutional convention of 1787 and I'm in charge of the slave debate. What would you guys so or do to convince the southern states to give up their slaves? I had ideas in mind that revolved around financial compensation.
pic related, I'm Roger Sherman, 3/5ths Compromise guy

Attached: 228064399_96a968a1e7.jpg (350x500, 107.83K)

Bring up the various slave revolts especially the Abaco slave revolt which started in 1787, the 1733 slave insurrection on St. John, and Tacky's rebellion in 1760. While you can't use Haiti's revolt as an example, you can look at the violence occurring between the blacks and whites on the island.

Slavery delays automation which creates wealth. It also drives down wages of honest white men.

So did Charles Darwin

At some future period, not very distant as measured by centuries, the civilised races of man will almost certainly exterminate, and replace, the savage races throughout the world. At the same time the anthropomorphous apes, as Professor Schaaffhausen has remarked (18. 'Anthropological Review,' April 1867, p. 236.), will no doubt be exterminated. The break between man and his nearest allies will then be wider, for it will intervene between man in a more civilised state, as we may hope, even than the Caucasian, and some ape as low as a baboon, instead of as now between the negro or Australian and the gorilla.
charles-darwin.classic-literature.co.uk/the-descent-of-man/ebook-page-105.asp

Many great men have because it's so fucking obvious.

The Founders were redpilled on race. By today's standards they'd be called Nazis

Attached: 1517091700768.jpg (1240x1870 3.95 MB, 3.48M)

There's a reason why Hitler admired the early republic of America. Read MK and you'll see for yourself.

Because they never really had a grudge against indians as a race, just as peoples with competing interests. Despite the conversations we handy about here every day, genocide tends to leave a bad taste in the mouth for most people and so it was easier on the conscience to just put them on reservations.

There was never an official, centralized effort to either deport blacks or put them on a reservation like indians, mostly because of Christian blubbering.

A lack of an immune response, ironically enough.

I think modern pagan-christian thought is nothing like the thoughts of the early Americans who lived in a time when Alchemy was considered a real thing. They had no idea about the truth of "satan" etc.

Nowadays we just think of satan in a more "church technique" sort of way.
In the 1700's, satan was real and was devouring the righteous. While some may have known about the connections to the old pagan god "saturn" and why the church concocted satan to curb pagan beliefs, they were few in number.
Nothing like Hitler's time when many were far more sympathetic to pagan beliefs, in fact it's more pantheistic.

So that may explain the weird pentagram shape of Washington.

brilliant, thank you!

Got one for you “Slavery discourages arts and manufactures. The poor despise labor when performed by slaves. They prevent the emigration of whites, who really enrich and strengthen a country” (Madison 1787).

All three have the same answer: christcuckery. When Europeans came to North America there were about two million Indians living there. On the entire North American landmass. They lived in dingy tents, died from common colds and ate each-other. A single, light natural disaster would have wiped them out forever. Indians have grown to a level of population today they would never have been able to on their own. Like everywhere Europeans went in those days, after killing off the initial troublemakers who wanted to continue living in mud huts and eating each-other, we set to work to make sure their peoples would survive, prosper and grow by giving them medicine, technology, teaching them to stop eating each-other and so on. While our infinite kindness and benefaction to every other people on this planet speaks volumes for us, it has been mostly on our own expense and the whole idea was rooted in the judaeo-christian charity and guilt complexes.

The cultural marxists of colonial times might have swapped their black robes for purple hair and soy-glasses today, but the message is the same as ever. "The white man's burden."

Attached: foot_fetish.jpg (940x545, 466.04K)

So Darwin predicts and hopes for replacement of whites by a superior future race?

Lincoln actually changed his mind on it and in his last speech advocated "voting rights" for niggers, which is what John Wilkes Booth quoted as his motivation for taking matters into his own hands. Lincoln was the biggest cuck we ever had.

Why is this bumplocked?

Because mods are faggots.

The mods are neocucks alt-liters who are too pussified and high up in ivory towers to realize the necessity of a final solution. They're the kind of retards who think we can just move all of our problems elsewhere and everything will be okay again forever

Educate yourself on Monrovia, Liberia. They sent blacks back to Africa. Blacks made their own city called Chocolate City. Enjoy your homework.