A Founding Father to Emulate

Thomas Jefferson is the American Hitler who is acceptable to praise and emulate.

Generic republicans with ethno-nationalist tendencies have a hard time biting down on the George Lincoln Rockwell pill. So I present a man who's views mirror exactly those of our esteemed Obergruppenführer Richard Walter Darre and Gottfried Feder (the architect of national socialism).

Jefferson's Beliefs
>Hated (((banks, usury, and financial institutions)))

Jefferson's Accomplishments

Attached: backtoafrica.PNG (720x369 105 KB, 35.04K)

Other urls found in this thread:

8ch.net/sudo/res/74326.html
sys.8ch.net/log.php?board=pol
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jefferson_Bible
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Paine
ezekiel38rapture.blogspot.com/2016/11/the-founding-fathers-bunch-of-satanists.html
youtube.com/watch?v=0npi_pqicKQ
avalonlibrary.net/ebooks/John Daniel - Scarlet and the Beast.pdf
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

Hitler did say they modeled it after the "early American Republic

And if 95% of people don't want to be agrarian farmers, then what?

Why wouldn't you want your own house in the countryside with a small patch of woods to hunt and tap for syrup and collect firewood, and a pond to fish and let your kids catch turtles in. An apiary for honey and wax, and a patch or barley for beer and some vines for wine and a garden for vegetables to eat and ferment for winter storage and a henhouse by the compost heap to get eggs from every morning and a horse to ride.

Don't you want a wife and kids and a gun and a house and a horse and land?

If not, you're 90% likely to be a useless faggot or a shitskin.

Attached: Thomas Jefferson - a blood-thirsty race.png (1034x706 367.77 KB, 896.67K)

Attached: honestwork.jpeg (540x540, 13.68K)

There are plenty of options

Attached: 6a7c32eda8379093d1a1702b9554aef5901f3b9f42bedb43ccdde5ac86877d3f.png (1240x1870, 3.48M)

All white people want lands and crops.

Whites are always the farmers. Why else wouldn't (((they))) make the chant for niggers in SA, "Kill the boer. Kill the farmer." It's so obligatory that even niggers get it.

My dream user, exactly my dream.

Attached: 91bd39a1ae546a25f0c14a006e995554f2f62e9209cb14c0dee89493f3ca0ba3.jpeg (540x810, 169.09K)

Attached: 20180310_224134.png (1920x1080 44.89 KB, 569.09K)

Attached: 760bd61c85d035283d5064fa122f4ce0.jpg (564x808 78.84 KB, 296.18K)

(((Their))) vision of america

Attached: blog1.jpg (740x1073 311.86 KB, 135.2K)

I already live that life for the most part except I'm completely isolated and the wildlife needs to be taught lessons ever so often.

Jefferson did NOTHING during the Revolutionary War. While Washington, Hamilton, and everybody else was out in the freezing cold and the mud, Jefferson was satisfying his jungle fever and being a general cuck. Extremely aristocratic (pro-kike) opposed to development, wanted everyone to live on plantations and live shit lives if you weren't a master, while the masters spent all day powdering up their wigs before impregnating a few nignogs.

mfw I'm leaving pic 3 very soon and hoping to be out of the smog shitholes in the following year

Attached: f896588ddaafd2107e694b000b9accd09ef29c0748e6bf3008c00ebc6dd2b172.png (330x389, 72.37K)

Attached: MEMANK.png (262x399, 74.32K)

Italians get out. You're kind is not most welcome here.

Attached: 2ed71a42835b91d287652b00377159ebfe99e3a369ef64cf2085dbec0eca460f.jpg (500x502, 30.95K)

Begone in the name of my ancestor Based Jefferson!

Attached: ItalyIsABoot.png (908x1071, 336.1K)

They can either get to work or starve.

This. I want this so badly

I have ancestors who fought both as loyalist and revolutionaries, and as freemen and plantation owners with hundreds of acres of land, what Jefferson said is what they fought for, not jew york or other cities. For the next 200 years after that war my family were all farmers, and only recently they stopped being such because they were sucked up in urban bullshit.

Cities should be gassed and demolished, and anyone who thinks of even creating a town past 10k people should be killed.

Then we would lose to molochs like China, South Korea or Japan. Highly urbanized, and populous nations with huge industrial output. Whether you like it or not, cities generate wealth, are a hub of industry, commerce and centers of administration. Your agrarian idyll is just like that, an utopia. It would leave us defenseless and at mercy of our rivals. Bigger nations would quickly partition US soil between themselves. That's what you want for America? What our cities need is a widespread purge of undesirables and an effective planning to combat urban sprawl.

You're lucky you even got this out of me with such post that is intrinsically false, and only uses strawmen to attack an idea you can't even comprehend.

All urbanites get the rope on the holy day if it ever happens.

Attached: 1469265266953.png (382x268, 107.03K)

Are we going to get any serious replies here on some viable agrarian society of the future?

Right in the feels.

Attached: b9d1270b795577904ad066b0c3994d2fe6f8c5b32632507bbef7bf14233c816d.jpg (680x451, 62.97K)

sauce?

Mein Kampf you nigger. wtf are you doing here?

debt grows exponentially and the kikes eat like effendi while the goyim slave away.

what is this "wealth" you speak of?

the dumbest fucking creatures in existence

The commies did the same thing and then they all starved to death.

Agrarian nations living on almost pre-industrial level are plagued by debt and misery too. Your point is? It's just Jews being Jewy as usual. By wealth I meant things like heavy industry requiring thousands of people to properly operate. Self-sufficient communities living off the land are great when you have no enemies, but we do have enemies, don't we? Even in the perfect scenario where Whites are the only race on earth, the nation which would industrialize first would likely dominate the globe. We don't have that luxury. We are at war whether you like it or not. Voluntary militias are great for defense but for securing lebensraum nothing beats a good tank, To manufacture that tank you need an efficient and well-organised industry. At the end of the day battles are won by soldiers, but wars are won by logistics, manpower reserves and industrial output.

In all honesty as western civilisation dies and we all seek out role models and heroes for answers and actions I would rather learn from the ancients, even your founding fathers did.

I love him so much I even did my kitchen and bathroom cabinets and all moulding and trim and some fixed beams out of hickory

Then you're a lazy nigger, or a shekel-grubbing kike, and you get the rope.

Good luck!

Did you cut down a cherry tree in his honor?

Not yet , seriously though I'm planting two of them on my property this spring , hopefully in two weeks. I don't have the lot size that farmeranon has but dammit the bit that I do own is mine!!
Two cherry trees two apple trees two weeping willows (for the kids so I can build them a badass tree-hut) and one stand of quaking aspen. 7 trees on my little slice of the pie

godspeed user!

I've always wanted my own property, to tend to the land, and build a family upon that land. I seek this because I am European, cro-magnon, this yearning is part of my genetic lineage. If you lack this, then you are either a mongrel, or something even worse.

There is such a thing as technocratic agrarian model capable of incredible military might and mobilization. Have you heard of the Third Reich?

Which was defeated due to insufficient industrial output in comparison to Allied nations. The same thing happened 20 years earlier during the First World War too. For comparison, the state of California alone constructed more warships in one month than whole Third Reich during the whole 12 years of NatSoc leadership. The disparity between the Axis Powers and the Allies was enormous and it was only a matter of time before Germany loses the war due to severe lack of manpower, industrial capabilities and raw resources. The biggest blow to production was conscription, which deprived many of the smallholdings of their only full-time worker, the male head of the family. It's doesn't really matter how brave your soldiers are and how brilliant your leadership is when the enemy can simply send another wave. The British with their colonial empire had almost unlimited natural resources at their disposal. Combine that with American enormous industrial output and Soviet virtually limitless manpower, and the outcome was quite predictable.

We don't have to go back that far to find a noble leader.

Attached: kim laughs at jew.png (727x500, 460.95K)

bump

More like it was defeated because Germany is geographically between Russia and Britain.

You've got it backwards, self sufficient smallholdings are good when we do have enemies. Cooperation on a large scale is only possible when a culture is already homogenous, united and strong. What you're looking at now is a great whale carcass being feasted on by worms, and proclaiming how productive those worms are.

Germany lost WW1 because it was starved out, and had too much population for the ground it occupied, hence why it wanted lebensraum for the next go-round. You're complaining that one country the size of Texas can't out-produce more than the rest of Europe and North America combined. That's not a failure of their economic model.

The other thing is, we live in an age of nukes, massive tank battles are likely not the way. We're in an age of 4GW now, and most weapons used in that are homemade.

8ch.net/sudo/res/74326.html
HALP
All old mods got the shoah!
sys.8ch.net/log.php?board=pol

All I see is Heil. What's the issue?

That's not really an equal point, considering the US had resources from all over the US sent to California. Also Germany had abandoned building up a navy pretty early on instead focusing on subs and trade raiding. The US needed a navy to fight Japan and move troops securely.

Wow, you started arguing like a kike FAST.

Keeps dropping truth bombs.

The Germans would have won WWI if that kike-puppet hadn't dragged the US into it. The British did fuckall in WWII. Russia won Europe with a little American help, and America won the Pacific on their own. America had more deaths than Britain, even though Britain was subject to heavy bombing and was in the war longer. Might have poisoned FDR because he was going to break up the Rothschild "British" Empire.

Are you fucking serious? You're kiking for Malthusian carrying capacity, so the goyim heard can be thinned by the "elite" of society? Germany knocked multiple significant power out of the war and would have won if the strongest military on earth hadn't intervened at the last minute.


This is such a stupid statement I am almost convinced you are a shill on the basis of this one sentence alone. You're anti-industrial, pro-Malthus, arguing that "homemade" weapons are going to win modern wars? Sounds like British intelligence.

DAILY REMINDER THAT UNITED STATES ARE WHORE OF BABYLON

SO CALLED FOUNDING FATHERS WERE SATANISTS AND BURN IN HELL AS WE SPEAK

WHORE OF BABYLON DESERVES DESTRUCTION AND DUTY OF ALL GOD FEARING MEN LIVING THERE IS TO DESTROY IT

JEFFERSON WAS A BLASPHEMER WHO MUTILATED GOD'S WORD

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jefferson_Bible
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Paine

ezekiel38rapture.blogspot.com/2016/11/the-founding-fathers-bunch-of-satanists.html

Attached: 1520281545529.jpg (850x400 311.28 KB, 68.65K)

Jefferson was a traitor. The actual founding fathers were almost all Christians, especially the leaders. Washington, Hamilton, Adams, all Christians. Franklin is the only exception.

The whore of Babylon is almost certainly Freemasonry/the British Empire/the British Royal Family/Rothschild axis.

youtube.com/watch?v=0npi_pqicKQ

avalonlibrary.net/ebooks/John Daniel - Scarlet and the Beast.pdf