-Liberals don't get 70% of our West Coast

-Liberals don't get 70% of our West Coast
-Removes smallest state which is disproportional to other states
-Promotes greater uniformity
-US remains with 50 beautiful states

Why has this not happened yet?

Attached: Lincoln Plan.jpg (1310x796, 480.01K)

Are you intentionally playing dumb? Democrats would never allow this because merging CT+RI would remove consistent Democrat senate seats, while splitting California would probably create a new red state. It'd be great if someone were ruling by fiat or the Democrats were otherwise incapacitated, but it's not politically feasible at this time.

I say split up north Carolina and south Carolina make west Carolina and east carolina. Would be awesome.

...

Muh 13 colonies and Dems don't want to write off power.

Sage and report.

Call it fucking Jefferson you faggots

This.
Why bother with the name Lincoln?
More virtue signaling?
Or, are they trying to soft-slide the Overton window towards eventually naming it MLK?

Polite sage for QTDDTOT

Does anyone else want to reunite West Virginia with Virginia, or would that ruin the aesthetic and story telling of our map?

This jefferson is ourguy

Let me add another idea, merge Maryland and Virginia's eastern shores with Delaware. If you cut it off at Hartford county you would have an easy red state of I think like 6 delegates, right smack in the Mid-Atlantic. It would be a massive improvement for Delmarva since most of them hate being in the same state as (((Baltimore))) and the suburbs of (((DC))), and not only that, but libtards in Delaware would have to play ball with being outnumbered by conservatives in their own state.

...

Look at the counties I'm talking about before you talk out of your ass, everything in Maryland east of Baltimore is red as fuck and the only thing making Delaware blue is one county.

Libs would shit their pants more than usual if this were proposed on the federal level

Fuck off. t. RI

You know what else we could do? Give JEFFERSON statehood and give the rest of California independence. Still 50 states if it bothers you so much. Lincoln is eastern Washington, you fucking moron.

Attached: LINCOLN.png (1024x600, 719.82K)

All that would do is make it worse for them, unless you want to make everything on the border with Austin as an exclave. Splitting up Texas just creates more red states and get more delegates per population because each state gets 2 by default.

Is this what you mean, then?

NO, KIKE.

Attached: C1BCDE1F-4273-43F4-91A6-24102EDE7DE0.jpeg (1869x1657, 379.6K)

3 electoral college votes, 1 representative, and 2 senators. Those are the minimum.

Oh, and if you move Fairfax, Alexandria, and Arlington to Maryland as a “compromise” for this: then Virginia goes red.

Attached: F2F7D916-053F-4209-8E8D-55607B2020F9.jpeg (2200x1549, 322.23K)

We are not merging or splitting anything. We are deporting shitskins and sending niggers back to where they will genuinely be kangz. We are not giving up one square inch. Is that clear, you Boomercucks? This generation is through running away from the problem.

You're implying liberals know how the electoral system works

Yeah, let's not name it this.


So, ship the niggers down to Mexico? We could arm them and air drop them in.

Merging CT and RI would be politically more feasible.

That's exactly what I'm talking about. Literally one blue county in the entire state and there's already been people who have been saying for years that Delmarva should just be its own state.

Right, I was thinking that since they would be sizeable states you wouldn't be able to stack up more representatives, but senators would increase so you would probably add another 2 delegates per extra state.

It's not really getting rid of Delaware it's more like merging the rest of it with Delaware and turning it into a swing state with no sales tax.

Why do you people always get so rustled about this? Giving California independence would not be "giving it up" because it could easily be reconquered when it would be advantageous to do so. You think a majority spic socialist shithole with no water would be able to defend itself from fucking anything? Removing California would reduce the amount of non-whites and leftists from the country by an absolutely enormous amount, like upwards of 25 million. Not to mention that more would move to California after the secession and those whites in California worth a damn would leave for the USA. Calexit, while it (and everything else mentioned in this thread) is total LARPINg and would never happen, would be a miracle.

No, it would not. Nothing in this thread is remotely politically feasible- even the most sensible one by far, Jefferson- because any form of state or electoral vote division that would hurt the Democrats would be struck down by courts for "gerrymandering". There is no precedent for it.

I am from Rhode Island. People here are proud of our state and would wholeheartedly oppose any form of state merging. We already voted against renaming the state to "The State of Rhode Island" from of "The State of Rhode Island and Providence Plantations" because muh the word plantations is wacist.

he was also a jew named springstein. He took his stepfather's last name Lincoln so he could get into politics.

Fuck you.

Attached: 4StateSolution.png (1333x1069, 502.76K)

...

While likely not possible, I like these

bump

...

Where the fuck do you think you are.